Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vh8gq Total loading time: 0.512 Render date: 2022-10-04T02:05:57.146Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Meeting the challenge of disease management in perennial grain cropping systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

C.M. Cox*
Affiliation:
The Land Institute, 2440 E Water Well Road, Salina, KS 67401, USA.
K.A. Garrett
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, 4024 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
W.W. Bockus
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, 4024 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: cmcox@landinstitute.org

Abstract

Perennial grain production will likely present unique challenges for managing diseases that affect the productivity and longevity of crops being considered. Typical cultural practices effective at reducing soil- and residue-borne pathogens, such as annual crop rotations, delayed fall planting, and tillage, are not feasible in perennial systems. Consequently, soil- and residue-borne pathogens, and pathogens such as root colonizers and viruses that survive in live tissue, may increase in importance in a perennial grain crop. Resistance genes will undeniably be important defenses against disease. However, it is seldom, if ever, possible to incorporate within a single cultivar resistance to all existing and future important diseases. Furthermore, genes vulnerable to ‘boom and bust’ cycles are generally short-lived when deployed in monocultures. For these reasons, the use of mixtures of crop cultivars or species that vary in resistance functions will likely be an important strategy for managing diseases and pests of perennial grains. Burning of plant residue, a natural phenomenon in native perennial grass systems, may also be an effective disease management strategy. The successful implementation of these management tools may reduce or eliminate the risk that perennial grain crops will become pathogen refugia that affect neighboring annual plantings and the productivity of perennial plants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1Tilman, D 1999. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 96: 59956000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Jackson, W., and Jackson, L.L. 1999. Developing high seed yielding perennial polycultures as a mimic of mid-grass prairie. In Lefroy, E.C., Hobbs, R.J., O'Connor, M.H., Pate, J.S. (eds). Agriculture as a Mimic of Natural Ecosystems. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
3Moffat, A.S 1996. Higher yielding perennials point the way to new crops. Science 274: 14691470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Pimm, S.L 1997. In search of perennial solutions. Nature 389: 126127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Cox, T.S., Bender, M., Picone, C., Van Tassel, D.L., Holland, J.B., Brummer, E.C., Zoeller, B.E., Paterson, A.H., and Jackson, W 2002. Breeding perennial grain crops. Critical Reviews in Crop Science 21: 5991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wilhelm, W.W., Mielke, L.N., and Fenster, C.R 1982. Root development of winter wheat as related to tillage in western Nebraska. Agronomy Journal 74: 8588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Buyanovsky, G.A., and Wagner, G.H. 1987. Carbon transfer in a winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) ecosystem. Biology and Fertility of Soils 5: 7682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Gordon-Werner, J., and Dorffling, K. 1988. Morphological and physiological studies concerning the drought tolerance of the Secale cereale × Secale montanum cross Permontra. Agronomy and Crop Science 160: 277285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Warembourg, F.R., and Estelrich, H.D 2001. Plant phenology and soil fertility effects on below-ground carbon allocation for an annual ( Bromus madritensis ) and a perennial ( Bromus erectus ) grass species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33: 12911303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Mathre, D.E., and Johnston, R.H. 1990. A crown barrier related to Cephalosporium stripe resistance in wheat relatives. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 15111514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Lindstrom, M.J., Schumacher, T.E., and Blecha, M.L. 1994. Management considerations for returning CRP lands to crop production. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49: 420425Google Scholar
12Gebhart, D.L., Johnson, H.B., Mayeux, H.S., and Polley, H.W. 1994. The CRP increases soil organic carbon. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49: 488492Google Scholar
13Huggins, D.R., Allen, D.L., Gardner, J.C., Karlen, D.L., Bezdicek, D.F., Rosek, M.J., Alms, M.J., Flock, M., Miller, B.S., and Staben, M.L. 1997. Enhancing carbon sequestration in CRP-managed land. In Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Follett, R.F. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil CRC, Boca Raton, FL p. 323334.Google Scholar
14Neher, D.A. 1995. Biological diversity in soils of agricultural and natural ecosystems. In Olson, R., Francis, C. and Kaffka, S. (eds) Exploring the Role of Diversity in Sustainable Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 5571Google Scholar
15Rovira, A.D., and Wildermuth, G.B. 1981. The nature and mechanisms of suppression. In Asher, M.J.C. and Shipton, P. (eds) Biology and Control of Take-all. London: UK Academic Press, 385415.Google Scholar
16Weller, D.M., Raaijmakers, J.M., McSpadden-Gardener, B.B., and Thomashow, L.S. 2002. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 309348CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17van Elsas, J.D., Garbeva, P., and Salles, J. 2002. Effects of agronomical measures on the microbial diversity of soils as related to the suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens. Biodegradation 13: 2940CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Clapperton, M.J., Lee, N.O., Binet, F., and Conner, R.L. 2001. Earthworms directly reduce the effects of take-all (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) on soft white spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Fielder). Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33: 15311538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19van Bruggen, A.H.C., and Semenov, A.M. 2000. In search of biological indicators for soil health and disease suppression. Applied Soil Ecology 15: 1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Sarniguet, A., and Lucas, P. 1992. Evaluation of populations of fluorescent pseudomonads related to decline of take-all patch on turfgrass. Plant and Soil 145: 1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Asher, M.J.C. and Shipton, P.J. (eds). 1981. Biology and Control of Take-all. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
22Bruehl, G.W., and Lai, P. 1968. The probable significance of saprophytic colonization of wheat straw in the field by Cephalosporium gramineum. Phytopathology 58: 464466Google Scholar
23Bruehl, G.W., Millar, R.L., and Cunfer, B. 1969. Significance of antibiotic production by Cephalosporium gramineum to its saprophytic survival. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 49: 235246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Bockus, W.W. 1987. Diseases of roots, crown, and lower stems. In Heyne, E.G. (ed.) Wheat and Wheat Improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI 510527Google Scholar
25Cook, R.J., Sitton, J.W., and Haglund, W.A. 1987. Influence of soil treatments on growth and yield of wheat and implications for control of Pythium root rot. Phytopathology 77: 11921198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Browning, J.A. 1974. Relevance of knowledge about natural ecosystems to development of pest management programs for agroecosystems. In Proceedings of the First International Wheat Genetics Symposium Manitoba, Canada p. 1227Google Scholar
27Wolfe, M.S. 1985. The current status and prospects of mutiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 64: 148155Google Scholar
28Browning, J.A. 1988. Current thinking on the use of diversity to buffer small grains against high epidemic and variable foliar pathogens: problems and future prospects. In Rajaram, N.W. and Rajaram, S. (eds). Breeding Strategies for Resistance to the Rusts of Wheat. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F. 7690Google Scholar
29McDonald, B.A., Allard, R.W., and Webster, R.K. 1988. Responses of two-, three-, and four-component barley mixtures to a variable pathogen population. Crop Science 28: 447452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Mahmood, T., Marshall, D., and McDaniel, M.E. 1991. Effect of winter wheat cultivar mixtures on leaf rust severity and grain yield. Phytopathology 81: 470474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Mundt, C.C. 2002. Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 381410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32McDonald, B.A., and Linde, C. 2002. Pathogen evolution genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 349379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Bockus, W.W., and Shroyer, J.P. 1998. The impact of reduced tillage on soilborne plant pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 38: 485500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Bockus, W.W., Appel, J.A., Bowden, R.L., Fritz, A.K., Gill, B.S., Martin, T.J., Sears, R.G., Seifers, D.L., Brown-Guedira, G.L., and Eversmeyer, M.G. 2001. Success stories: breeding for wheat disease resistance in Kansas. Plant Disease 85: 453461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Coley, P.D., Bryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S. III. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230: 895899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Bazzaz, F.A., Chiariello, N.R., Coley, P.D., and Pitelka, L.F. 1987. Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. Bioscience 37: 5867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Nault, L.R., Gordon, D.T., Damsteegt, V.D., and Iltis, H.H. 1982. Response of annual and perennial teosintes ( Zea ) to six maize viruses. Plant Disease 66: 6162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Hart, R. 1977. Why are biennials so few. The American Naturalist 111: 792799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Jones, S.S., Murray, T.D., and Allan, R.E. 1995. Use of alien genes for the development of disease resistance in wheat. Annual Review of Phytopathology 33: 429443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Friebe, B., Gill, K.S., Tuleen, N.A., and Gill, B.S. 1996. Transfer of wheat streak mosaic virus resistance from Agropyron intermedium into wheat. Crop Science 36: 857861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Juahar, P.P., and Peterson, T.S. 1996. Thinopyron and Lophopyrum as sources of genes for wheat improvement. Cereal Research Communications 24: 1521Google Scholar
42Cox, C.M., Murray, T.D., and Jones, S.S. 2002. Perennial wheat germplasm lines resistant to eyespot, Cephalosporium stripe, and wheat streak mosaic. Plant Disease 86: 10431048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Cox, C., Bockus, W., Garrett, K., Cox, T.S., and Peters, T. 2004. Reaction of selected perennial grass accessions to barley yellow dwarf, 2003. Biological and Cultural Tests for Control of Plant Diseases Vol. 19:. Published online at http://www.apsnet.org/online/BCtests/ (verified 18 January 2005).Google Scholar
44Burdon, J.J., and Thompson, J.N. 1995. Changed patterns of resistance in a population of Linum marginale attacked by the rust pathogen Melampspora lini. Journal of Ecology 83: 199206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Thrall, P.H., and Burdon, J.J. 2003. Evolution of virulence in a plant host–pathogen metapopulation. Science 299: 17351737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Armbrecht, I., Perfecto, I., and Vandermeer, J. 2004. Enigmatic biodiversity correlations: ant diversity responds to diverse resources. Science 304: 284286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Murdoch, M.W., Evans, F.C., and Peterson, C.H. 1972. Diversity and pattern in plants and insects. Ecology 53: 819829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Andow, D.A. 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annual Review of Entomology 36: 561586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Gilbert, G.S. 2002. Evolutionary ecology of plant diseases in natural ecosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 1343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Dinoor, A., and Eshed, N. 1984. The role and importance of pathogens in natural plant communities. Annual Review of Phytopathology 22: 443466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Bever, J.D. 1994. Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology 75: 19651977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Mills, K.E., and Bever, J.D. 1998. Maintenance of diversity within plant communities: soil pathogens as agents of negative feedback. Ecology 79: 15951601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Holah, J., and Alexander, H.M. 1999. Soil pathogenic fungi have the potential to affect the coexistence of two tallgrass prairie species. Journal of Ecology 87: 598608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Harper, J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London, Uk, Academic Press.Google Scholar
55Harper, J.L. 1990. Pests, pathogens, and plant communities: an introduction. In Burdon, J.J. and Leather, S.R., Leather, (eds). Pests, Pathogens, and Plant Communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK: p. 314Google Scholar
56Mitchell, C.E., Tilman, D., and Groth, J.V. 2002. Effects of grassland plant species diversity, abundance, and composition on foliar fungal disease. Ecology 83: 17131726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Garrett, K.A., and Mundt, C.C. 2000. Effects of planting density and cultivar mixture composition on stripe rust severity in wheat: an analysis accounting for limits to the replication of controls. Phytopathology 90: 13131321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Zhu, Y., Hairu, C., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, J., Fan, J., Yang, S., Hu, L., Leung, H., Mew, T.W., Teng, P.S., Wang, Z., and Mundt, C.C. 2000. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406: 718722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Cox, C.M., Garrett, K.A., Bowden, R.L., Fritz, A.K., Dendy, S.P., and Heer, W.F. 2004. Cultivar mixtures for the simultaneous management of multiple diseases: tan spot and leaf rust of wheat. Phytopathology 94: 961969CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Garrett, K.A., Dendy, S.P., Power, A.G., Blaisdell, G.K., Alexander, H.A., and McCarron, J.K. 2004. Barley yellow dwarf disease in natural populations of dominant tallgrass prairie species in Kansas. Plant Disease 88: 574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Power, A.G. 1999. Virus spread and vector dynamics in genetically diverse plant populations. Ecology 72: 232241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62Vilich-Meller, V. 1992. Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, Fusarum spp. and Rhizoctonia cerealis stem rot in pure stands and interspecific mixtures of cereals. Crop Protection 11: 4550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Mundt, C.C., Brophy, L.S., and Schmitt, M.S. 1995. Disease severity and yield of pure-line wheat cultivars and mixtures in the presence of eyespot, yellow rust, and their combination. Plant Pathology 44: 173182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Halloin, J.M., and Johnson, D.J. 2000. Reduction of sugarbeet losses from Rhizoctonia crown and root rot by use of mixtures of resistant and susceptible varieties. Phytopathology 90: S33 abstractGoogle Scholar
65Hariri, D., Fouchard, M., Prud'homme, H. 2001. Incidence of soil-borne wheat mosaic virus in mixtures of susceptible and resistant wheat cultivars. European Journal of Plant Pathology 107: 625631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Cowger, C., and Mundt, C.C. 2002. Effects of wheat cultivar mixtures on epidemic progression of Septoria tritici blotch and pathogenicity of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology 92: 617623CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67Garrett, K.A., and Mundt, C.C. 1999. Epidemiology in mixed host populations. Phytopathology 89: 984990CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68Mundt, C.C., and Browning, J.A. 1985. Development of crown rust epidemics in genetically diverse oat populations: effect of genotype unit area. Phytopathology 75: 607610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69Sone, J., Bockus, W.W., and Claassen, M.M. 1994. Gradients of tan spot of winter wheat from a small area source of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Plant Disease 78: 622627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70Knapp, A.K., Briggs, J.M., Hartnett, D.C. and Collins, S.L. 1998. Grassland Dynamics: Long-term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
71Hardison, J.R. 1976. Fire and flame for plant disease control. Annual Review of Phytopathology 14: 355380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72Hardison, J.R. 1963. Commercial control of Puccinia striiformis and other rusts in seed crops of Poa pratensis by nickel fungicides. Phytopathology 53: 209216Google Scholar
73Bockus, W.W., Webster, R.K., Wick, C.M., and Jackson, L.F. 1979. Rice residue disposal influences overwintering inoculum level of Sclerotium oryzae and stem rot severity. Phytopathology 69: 862865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74Bockus, W.W., O'Conner, J.P., and Raymond, P.J. 1983. Effect of residue management methods on incidence of Cephalosporium stripe under continuous winter wheat production. Plant Disease 67: 13231324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75Scheinhost, P.L., Lammer, D.L., Cai, X., Murray, T.D., and Jones, S.S. 2001. Perennial wheat: The development of a sustainable cropping system for the U.S. Pacific Northwest. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 16: 147151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Meeting the challenge of disease management in perennial grain cropping systems
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Meeting the challenge of disease management in perennial grain cropping systems
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Meeting the challenge of disease management in perennial grain cropping systems
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *