Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ms7nj Total loading time: 0.273 Render date: 2022-08-09T22:32:28.113Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Nutritional and quality characteristics expressed in 31 perennial wheat breeding lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2009

Kevin M. Murphy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420, USA. Northwest Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Mount Vernon, WA 98273, USA.
Lori A. Hoagland
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420, USA.
Philip G. Reeves
Affiliation:
Deceased, formerly with USDA-ARS, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, ND 58203, USA.
Byung-Kee Baik
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420, USA.
Stephen S. Jones
Affiliation:
Northwest Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Mount Vernon, WA 98273, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: kmurphy2@wsu.edu

Abstract

Soil erosion due to annual cropping on highly erodible farmland is a major ecological concern in the wheat growing regions of Washington State. In response to requests from farmers, the winter wheat breeding program at Washington State University has been developing perennial wheat selected from crosses between wild wheatgrass species and commonly grown annual wheat cultivars. In 2005/06, we conducted field trials of the most promising perennial wheat breeding lines derived from interspecific crosses between tall wheatgrass (Thinopyrum elongatum) and bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Thirty-one perennial breeding lines and two annual winter wheat cultivars were evaluated for nutritional value in the form of grain mineral concentration, multiple baking and milling quality traits, and ease of grain threshability. The objective of this study was to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these post-harvest traits in the perennial wheat lines derived from these interspecific crosses. Mineral nutrient concentrations in the perennial lines were 44, 40, 24, 23, 32, 30 and 33% higher than the annual control cultivars for calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus and zinc, respectively. The annual cultivars had a higher grain mineral content per unit area of land than the perennial lines, due primarily to the higher grain yields of the annual cultivars. Compared to the annual wheat cultivars, the perennial lines produced grain with smaller seed size, lower test weight and reduced flour yield, mix time and loaf volume. Protein content was 3.5–4.5% higher in the perennial lines than in the annual cultivars. The threshability index (TI) ranged from 0.63 to 0.89 in the perennials (μ=0.75); significantly lower than the mean TI of the annual cultivars (μ=0.97). The significant genotype×location interaction found for TI suggests that the variation in annual precipitation positively influenced some perennial lines to express greater threshability. In addition to transferring traits important to the perennial growth habit in wheat, the wild wheatgrass species also introduced beneficial characteristics (i.e. increased protein and mineral concentration) and deleterious traits (poor threshing grain and inferior baking qualities). This research gives researchers a platform from which to direct further research and selection in the development of perennial wheat.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Borlaug, N. 2007. Feeding a hungry world. Science 318:359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A., Naylor, R., and Polasky, S. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Diaz, R. and Rosenburg, R. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Reganold, J.P., Elliott, L.F., and Unger, Y.L. 1987. Long-term effects of organic and conventional farming on soil erosion. Nature 330:370372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Cox, T.S., Glover, J.D., Van Tassel, D.L., Cox, C.M., and DeHaan, L.R. 2006. Prospects for developing perennial grain crops. BioScience 56:649659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bell, L., Byrne, F., Ewing, M., and Wade, L. 2008. A preliminary whole-farm economic analysis of perennial wheat in an Australian dryland farming system. Agricultural Systems 96:166174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Jordan, N., Boody, G., Broussard, W., Glover, J.D., Keeney, D., McCown, B.H., McIsaac, G., Muller, M., Murray, H., Neal, J., Pansing, C., Turner, R.E., Warner, K., and Wyse, D. 2007. Environment – sustainable development of the agricultural bio-economy. Science 316:15701571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Welch, R.M. and Graham, R.D. 2002. Breeding crops for enhanced micronutrient content. Plant and Soil 245:205214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Welch, R.M. 2002. The impact of mineral nutrients in food crops on global human health. Plant and Soil 247:8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Slafer, G.A. and Peltonen-Sainio, P. 2001. Yield trends of temperate cereals in high latitude countries from 1940 to 1998. Agricultural Food Science of Finland 10:121131.Google Scholar
11Borlaug, N.E. 1983. Contributions of conventional plant breeding to food production. Science 219:689693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Abeledo, L.G., Calderini, D.F., and Slafer, G.A. 2003. Genetic improvement of barley yield potential and its physiological determinants in Argentina (1944–1998). Euphytica 130:325334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Branca, F. and Ferrari, M. 2002. Impact of micronutrient deficiencies on growth: the stunting syndrome. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 46:8–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Grantham-McGregor, S.M. and Ani, C.C. 1999. The role of micronutrients in psychomotor and cognitive development. British Medical Bulletin 55:511527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Ramakrishnan, U., Manjrekar, R., Rivera, J., Gonzales-Cossio, T., and Martorell, R. 1999. Micronutrients and pregnancy outcome: a review of the literature. Nutrition Research 19:103159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Sanchez, P.A. and Swaminathan, M.S. 2005. Cutting world hunger in half. Science 307:357359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Stoltzfus, R.J. 2001. Defining iron-deficiency anemia in public health terms: a time for reflection. Journal of Nutrition 131:565S567S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Murphy, K.M., Reeves, P.R., and Jones, S.S. 2008. Relationship between yield and mineral nutrient concentration in historical and modern spring wheat cultivars. Euphytica 163:381390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Monasterio, J. and Graham, R. 2000. Breeding for trace minerals in wheat. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21:393396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Uauy, C., Distelfeld, A., Fahima, T., Blechl, A., and Dubcovsky, J. 2006. A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science 314:12981301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Calderini, D.F. and Ortiz-Monasterio, I. 2003. Are synthetic hexaploids a means of increasing grain element concentrations in wheat? Euphytica 134:169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Chhuneja, P., Dhaliwal, H., Bains, N., and Singh, K. 2006. Aegilops kotschyi and Aegilops tauschii as sources for higher levels of grain iron and zinc. Plant Breeding 125:529531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Murphy, K., Carter, A., Zemetra, R., and Jones, S. 2007. Karyotype and ideogram analyses of four wheatgrass cultivars for use in perennial wheat breeding. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 31:137149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24AACC. 2000. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 10th edition. Method 08-03, 10-52, 44-15A, 46-30, 54-40A, 55-10, 55-31, 56-11 and 56-63. AACC, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
25Lammer, D., Cai, X.W., Arterburn, M., Chatelain, J., Murray, T., and Jones, S. 2004. A single chromosome addition from Thinopyrum elongatum confers a polycarpic, perennial habit to annual wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:17151720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Murphy, K., Lyon, S., Balow, K., and Jones, S. 2009. Post-sexual cycle regrowth and grain yield in Thinopyrum elongatum×Triticum aestivum amphiploids. Plant Breeding in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Graham, R.D., Welch, R.M., and Bouis, H.E. 2001. Addressing micronutrient malnutrition through enhancing the nutritional quality of staple foods: principles, perspectives and knowledge gaps. Advances in Agronomy 70:77142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Glover, J.D. 2005. The necessity and possibility of perennial grain production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Wei, X.R., Hao, M.D., Shao, M.G., and Gale, W.J. 2006. Changes in soil properties and the availability of soil micronutrients after 18 years of cropping and fertilization. Soil and Tillage Research 91:120130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C., and Clark, R.B. 2002. Micronutrients in crop production. Advances in Agronomy 77:185268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Sims, J. 1986. Soil pH effects on the distribution and plant availability of manganese, copper and zinc. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50:367373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Fageria, N. and Zimmermann, F. 1998. Influence of pH on growth and nutrient uptake by crop species in an oxisol. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29:26752682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Samorah, N., Mullen, R., and Cianzio, S. 2004. Size distribution and mineral nutrients of soybean seeds in response to drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 27:815835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Dubcovsky, J. and Dvorak, J. 2007. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316:18621866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Jantasuriyarat, C., Vales, M.I., Watson, C.J.W., and Riera-Lizarazu, O. 2004. Identification and mapping of genetic loci affecting the free-threshing habit and spike compactness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108:261273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Tanno, K. and Willcox, G. 2006. How fast was wild wheat domesticated? Science 311:1886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Murphy, K., Lammer, D., Lyon, S., Carter, B., and Jones, S.S. 2005. Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: an evolutionary–participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:4855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Suneson, C.A. 1956. An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agronomy Journal 48:188191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Nalam, V., Vales, M., Watson, C.J.W., and Riera-Lizarazu, O. 2006. Map-based analysis of genes affecting the brittle rachis character in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112:373381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Li, C., Zhou, A. and Sang, T. 2006. Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science 311:19361939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Kislev, M., Weiss, E., and Hartmann, A. 2004. Impetus for sowing and the beginning of agriculture: ground collecting of wild cereals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:26922695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Cox, C.M., Garrett, K.A., Cox, T.S., Bockus, W.W., and Peters, T. 2005. Reactions of perennial grain accessions to four major cereal pathogens of the Great Plains. Plant Disease 89:12351240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Cox, C.M., Murray, T.D., and Jones, S.S. 2002. Perennial wheat germplasm lines resistant to eyespot, Cephalosporium stripe, and wheat streak mosaic. Plant Disease 86:10431048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44DeHaan, L.R., Van Tassel, D.L., and Cox, T.S. 2005. Perennial grain crops: a synthesis of ecology and plant breeding. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Nutritional and quality characteristics expressed in 31 perennial wheat breeding lines
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Nutritional and quality characteristics expressed in 31 perennial wheat breeding lines
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Nutritional and quality characteristics expressed in 31 perennial wheat breeding lines
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *