Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    de los Ríos, Ignacio Rivera, María and García, Carmen 2016. Redefining rural prosperity through social learning in the cooperative sector: 25 years of experience from organic agriculture in Spain. Land Use Policy, Vol. 54, p. 85.

    Kharel, Gehendra Zheng, Haochi and Kirilenko, Andrei 2016. Can land-use change mitigate long-term flood risks in the Prairie Pothole Region? The case of Devils Lake, North Dakota, USA. Regional Environmental Change,

    Picone, Gianfranco Trimigno, Alessia Tessarin, Paola Donnini, Silvia Rombolà, Adamo Domenico and Capozzi, Francesco 2016. 1H NMR foodomics reveals that the biodynamic and the organic cultivation managements produce different grape berries (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sangiovese). Food Chemistry, Vol. 213, p. 187.

    Parpinello, Giuseppina Paola Rombolà, Adamo Domenico Simoni, Marco and Versari, Andrea 2015. Chemical and sensory characterisation of Sangiovese red wines: Comparison between biodynamic and organic management. Food Chemistry, Vol. 167, p. 145.

    Kazimierczak, Renata Hallmann, Ewelina Lipowski, Janusz Drela, Nadzieja Kowalik, Anna Püssa, Tõnu Matt, Darja Luik, Anne Gozdowski, Dariusz and Rembiałkowska, Ewa 2014. Beetroot (Beta vulgarisL.) and naturally fermented beetroot juices from organic and conventional production: metabolomics, antioxidant levels and anticancer activity. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 94, Issue. 13, p. 2618.

    Kokornaczyk, Maria O. Parpinello, Giuseppina P. Versari, Andrea Rombolà, Adamo D. and Betti, Lucietta 2014. Qualitative discrimination between organic and biodynamic Sangiovese red wines for authenticity. Analytical Methods, Vol. 6, Issue. 18, p. 7484.

    Villanueva-Rey, Pedro Vázquez-Rowe, Ian Moreira, Maríaº Teresa and Feijoo, Gumersindo 2014. Comparative life cycle assessment in the wine sector: biodynamic vs. conventional viticulture activities in NW Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 65, p. 330.

    Jakopic, Jerneja Slatnar, Ana Mikulic-Petkovsek, Maja Veberic, Robert Stampar, Franci Bavec, Franci and Bavec, Martina 2013. Effect of Different Production Systems on Chemical Profiles of Dwarf French Bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL. cv. Top Crop) Pods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 61, Issue. 10, p. 2392.

    Sradnick, André Murugan, Rajasekaran Oltmanns, Meike Raupp, Joachim and Joergensen, Rainer Georg 2013. Changes in functional diversity of the soil microbial community in a heterogeneous sandy soil after long-term fertilization with cattle manure and mineral fertilizer. Applied Soil Ecology, Vol. 63, p. 23.

    Bavec, Martina Narodoslawsky, Michael Bavec, Franc and Turinek, Matjaž 2012. Ecological impact of wheat and spelt production under industrial and alternative farming systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 27, Issue. 03, p. 242.

    Heimler, Daniela Vignolini, Pamela Arfaioli, Paola Isolani, Laura and Romani, Annalisa 2012. Conventional, organic and biodynamic farming: differences in polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of Batavia lettuce. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 92, Issue. 3, p. 551.

    Heinze, Stefanie Oltmanns, Meike Joergensen, Rainer Georg and Raupp, Joachim 2011. Changes in microbial biomass indices after 10 years of farmyard manure and vegetal fertilizer application to a sandy soil under organic management. Plant and Soil, Vol. 343, Issue. 1-2, p. 221.

    Heitkamp, Felix Raupp, Joachim and Ludwig, Bernard 2011. Soil organic matter pools and crop yields as affected by the rate of farmyard manure and use of biodynamic preparations in a sandy soil. Organic Agriculture, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 111.

    Heinze, Stefanie Raupp, Joachim and Joergensen, Rainer Georg 2010. Effects of fertilizer and spatial heterogeneity in soil pH on microbial biomass indices in a long-term field trial of organic agriculture. Plant and Soil, Vol. 328, Issue. 1-2, p. 203.


Biodynamic agriculture research progress and priorities

  • M. Turinek (a1), S. Grobelnik-Mlakar (a1), M. Bavec (a1) and F. Bavec (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2009

Biodynamic (BD) agriculture became the subject of research efforts during the past decades, whereas a part of the scientific community looks at the BD method with skepticism and marks it as dogmatic. Nevertheless, as explored in this review, a fair share of the available peer-reviewed research results of controlled field experiments as well as case studies show effects of BD preparations on yield, soil quality and biodiversity. Moreover, BD preparations express a positive environmental impact in terms of energy use and efficiency. However, the underlying natural science mechanistic principle of BD preparations is still under investigation. In addition, quality determination methods, based on holistic approaches, are increasingly being investigated and recognized. BD farming strives, as manifested in several publications, to positively impact cultural landscape design as well. Summarized data showed that further research is needed and thus encouraged in the field of food quality comparison/determination, food safety, environmental performance (e.g., footprints), and on the effects of BD farming practices on farm animals.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

5L. Carpenter-Boggs , J.P. Reganold , and A.C. Kennedy 2000. Effects of biodynamic preparations on compost development. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 17:313328.

6L. Carpenter-Boggs , A.C. Kennedy , and J.P. Reganold 2000. Organic and biodynamic management: effects on soil biology. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:16511659.

8J.G. Zaller 2007. Seed germination of the weed Rumex obtusifolius after on-farm conventional, biodynamic and vermicomposting of cattle manure. Annals of Applied Biology 151:245249.

9J. Raupp and U.J. König 1996. Biodynamic preparations cause opposite yield effects depending upon yield levels. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 13:175188.

12O.P. Rupela , S. Gopalakrishnan , M. Krajewski , and M. Sriveni 2003. A novel method for the identification and enumeration of microorganisms with potential for suppressing fungal pathogens. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39:131134.

13P. Mäder , A. Fließbach , D. Dubois , L. Gunst , P. Fried , and U. Niggli 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:16941697.

14A. Fließbach , H.R. Oberholzer , L. Gunst , and P. Mäder 2007. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118:273284.

15F. Oehl , E. Frossard , A. Fließbach , D. Dubois , and A. Oberson 2004. Basal organic phosphorus mineralization in soils under different farming systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36:667675.

16J.G. Zaller and U. Köpke 2004. Effects of traditional and biodynamic farmyard manure amendment on yields, soil chemical, biochemical and biological properties in a long-term field experiment. Biology and Fertility of Soils 40:222229.

17S. Wada and K. Toyota 2007. Repeated applications of farmyard manure enhance resistance and resilience of soil biological functions against soil disinfection. Biology and Fertility of Soils 43:349356.

18E. Scheller and J. Raupp 2005. Amino acid and soil organic matter content of topsoil in a long term trial with farmyard manure and mineral fertilizers. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 22:379397.

19L. Pfiffner and P. Mäder 1997. Effects of biodynamic, organic and conventional production systems on earthworm populations. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 15:3–10.

20T.H. Anderson and K.H. Domsch 1993. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25:393395.

21H.H. Janzen 2004. Carbon cycling in earth systems – a soil science perspective. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104:399417.

23J.P. Reganold , A.S. Palmer , J.C. Lockhart , and A.N. MacGregor 1993. Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344349.

24P. Droogers and J. Bouma 1996. Biodynamic vs. conventional farming effects on soil structure expressed by simulated potential productivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60:15521558.

25H.H. Janzen 2006. Greenhouse gases as clues to permanence of farmlands. Conservation Biology 21:668674.

26D. Pimentel , P. Herperly , J. Hanson , D. Douds , and R. Seidel 2005. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55:573582.

27M. Ryan and J. Ash 1999. Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on growth of pasture plants and VAM fungi in SE Australian soils with contrasting fertiliser histories (conventional and biodynamic). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73:5162.

28M.H. Ryan , D.R. Small , and J.E. Ash 2000. Phosphorus controls the level of colonisation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in conventional and biodynamic irrigated daily pastures. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40:663670.

29P. Frey-Klett , J. Garbaye , and M. Tarkka 2007. The mycorrhiza helper bacteria revisited. New Phytologist 176:2236.

30L.L. Burkitt , D.R. Small , J.W. McDonald , W.J. Wales , and M.L. Jenkin 2007. Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 1. Soil and pasture properties. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47:479488.

32M.L. Nguyen and R.J. Haynes 1995. Energy and labour efficiency for three pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping (pasture-arable) farms in Canterbury, New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 52:163172.

33B. Probst , C. Schüler , and R.G. Joergensen 2008. Vineyard soils under organic and conventional management – microbial biomass and activity indices and their relation to soil chemical properties. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44:443450.

37J.O. Andersen , C.B. Henriksen , J. Laursen , and A.A. Nielsen 1998. Computerised image analysis of biocrystallograms originating from agricultural products. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 22:5169.

38J.F.H.M. Vereijken , T. van Gelder , and T. Baars 1997. Nature and landscape development on organic farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63:201220.

39M.W. Ho and R. Ulanowicz 2005. Sustainable systems as organisms? BioSystems 82:3951.

40M. Beismann 1997. Landscaping on a farm in northern Germany, a case study of conceptual and social fundaments for the development of an ecologically sound agro-landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63:173184.

41M. Colquhoun 1997. An exploration into the use of Goethean science as a methodology for landscape assessment: the Pishwanton Project. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63:145157.

42D.J. Greenwood , W.F. Whyte , and I. Harkavy 1993. Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Human Relations 46:175192.

43H. Helmfried , A. Haden , and M. Ljung 2008. The role of action research (AR) in environmental research: learning from a local organic food and farming research project. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21:105131.

50A. Berner , I. Hildermann , A. Fließbach , L. Pfiffner , U. Niggli , and P. Mäder 2008. Crop yield and soil fertility response to reduced tillage under organic management. Soil Tillage Research 101:8996.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *