Skip to main content
×
Home

Biodynamic agriculture research progress and priorities

  • M. Turinek (a1), S. Grobelnik-Mlakar (a1), M. Bavec (a1) and F. Bavec (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Biodynamic (BD) agriculture became the subject of research efforts during the past decades, whereas a part of the scientific community looks at the BD method with skepticism and marks it as dogmatic. Nevertheless, as explored in this review, a fair share of the available peer-reviewed research results of controlled field experiments as well as case studies show effects of BD preparations on yield, soil quality and biodiversity. Moreover, BD preparations express a positive environmental impact in terms of energy use and efficiency. However, the underlying natural science mechanistic principle of BD preparations is still under investigation. In addition, quality determination methods, based on holistic approaches, are increasingly being investigated and recognized. BD farming strives, as manifested in several publications, to positively impact cultural landscape design as well. Summarized data showed that further research is needed and thus encouraged in the field of food quality comparison/determination, food safety, environmental performance (e.g., footprints), and on the effects of BD farming practices on farm animals.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: franci.bavec@uni-mb.si
References
Hide All
1Steiner R. 1924. Geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagen zum Gedeihen der Landwirtschaft. Rudolf Steiner Verlag, Dornach.
2Reganold J.P. 1995. Soil quality and profitability of biodynamic and conventional farming systems: A review. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 10:3645.
3Demeter International e.V. 2008. Demeter International e.V. – A World-wide Network. http://www.demeter.net/ (verified 10 December 2008).
4Ryan M. and Ash J. 1999. Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on growth of pasture plants and VAM fungi in SE Australian soils with contrasting fertiliser histories (conventional and biodynamic). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73:5162.
5Carpenter-Boggs L., Reganold J.P., and Kennedy A.C. 2000. Effects of biodynamic preparations on compost development. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 17:313328.
6Carpenter-Boggs L., Kennedy A.C., and Reganold J.P. 2000. Organic and biodynamic management: effects on soil biology. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:16511659.
7Reeve J.R., Carpenter-Boggs L., Reganold J.P., York A.L., McGourty G., and McCloskey L.P. 2005. Soil and winegrape quality in biodynamically and organically managed vineyards. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 56:367376.
8Zaller J.G. 2007. Seed germination of the weed Rumex obtusifolius after on-farm conventional, biodynamic and vermicomposting of cattle manure. Annals of Applied Biology 151:245249.
9Raupp J. and König U.J. 1996. Biodynamic preparations cause opposite yield effects depending upon yield levels. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 13:175188.
10Zimdahl R. 1999. Fundamentals of Weed Science. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
11Goldstein W., Barber W., Carpenter-Boggs L., Daloren D., and Koopmans C. 2004. Comparisons of conventional, organic and biodynamic methods. Michael Fields Agricultural Institute. Available at Web site http://www.michaelfieldsaginst.org/education/comparison.pdf (verified 30 June 2008).
12Rupela O.P., Gopalakrishnan S., Krajewski M., and Sriveni M. 2003. A novel method for the identification and enumeration of microorganisms with potential for suppressing fungal pathogens. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39:131134.
13Mäder P., Fließbach A., Dubois D., Gunst L., Fried P., and Niggli U. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:16941697.
14Fließbach A., Oberholzer H.R., Gunst L., and Mäder P. 2007. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118:273284.
15Oehl F., Frossard E., Fließbach A., Dubois D., and Oberson A. 2004. Basal organic phosphorus mineralization in soils under different farming systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36:667675.
16Zaller J.G. and Köpke U. 2004. Effects of traditional and biodynamic farmyard manure amendment on yields, soil chemical, biochemical and biological properties in a long-term field experiment. Biology and Fertility of Soils 40:222229.
17Wada S. and Toyota K. 2007. Repeated applications of farmyard manure enhance resistance and resilience of soil biological functions against soil disinfection. Biology and Fertility of Soils 43:349356.
18Scheller E. and Raupp J. 2005. Amino acid and soil organic matter content of topsoil in a long term trial with farmyard manure and mineral fertilizers. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 22:379397.
19Pfiffner L. and Mäder P. 1997. Effects of biodynamic, organic and conventional production systems on earthworm populations. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 15:3–10.
20Anderson T.H. and Domsch K.H. 1993. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25:393395.
21Janzen H.H. 2004. Carbon cycling in earth systems – a soil science perspective. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104:399417.
22Raupp J. 2001. Forschungsthemen und Ergebnisse eines Langzeitdüngungsversuchs in zwei Jahrzehnten; ein Beitrag zur Bewertung von pflanzenbaulichen Langzeitversuchen. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 79:7193.
23Reganold J.P., Palmer A.S., Lockhart J.C., and MacGregor A.N. 1993. Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344349.
24Droogers P. and Bouma J. 1996. Biodynamic vs. conventional farming effects on soil structure expressed by simulated potential productivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60:15521558.
25Janzen H.H. 2006. Greenhouse gases as clues to permanence of farmlands. Conservation Biology 21:668674.
26Pimentel D., Herperly P., Hanson J., Douds D., and Seidel R. 2005. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55:573582.
27Ryan M. and Ash J. 1999. Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on growth of pasture plants and VAM fungi in SE Australian soils with contrasting fertiliser histories (conventional and biodynamic). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73:5162.
28Ryan M.H., Small D.R., and Ash J.E. 2000. Phosphorus controls the level of colonisation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in conventional and biodynamic irrigated daily pastures. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40:663670.
29Frey-Klett P., Garbaye J., and Tarkka M. 2007. The mycorrhiza helper bacteria revisited. New Phytologist 176:2236.
30Burkitt L.L., Small D.R., McDonald J.W., Wales W.J., and Jenkin M.L. 2007. Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 1. Soil and pasture properties. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47:479488.
31Burkitt L.L., Wales W.J., McDonald J.W., Small D.R., and Jenkin M.L. 2007. Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 2. Milk production and composition and animal health. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47:489494.
32Nguyen M.L. and Haynes R.J. 1995. Energy and labour efficiency for three pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping (pasture-arable) farms in Canterbury, New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 52:163172.
33Probst B., Schüler C., and Joergensen R.G. 2008. Vineyard soils under organic and conventional management – microbial biomass and activity indices and their relation to soil chemical properties. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44:443450.
34Kahl B.J. 2006. Entwicklung, in-house Validierung und Anwendung des ganzheitlichen Verfahrens Biokristallisation für die Unterscheidung von Weizen-, Möhren- und Apfelproben aus unterschiedlichem Anbau und Verarbeitungsschritten. Habilitationsschrift. University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany.
35Meelursarn A. 2006. Statistical evaluation of texture analysis from the biocrystallization method: Effect of image parameters to differentiate samples from different farming systems. PhD thesis. University of Kassel, Witzenhausen.
36Andersen J.O., Huber M., Kahl J., Busscher N., and Meier-Ploeger A. 2003. A concentration matrix procedure for determining optimal combinations of concentrations in biocrystallization. Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 79:97–114.
37Andersen J.O., Henriksen C.B., Laursen J., and Nielsen A.A. 1998. Computerised image analysis of biocrystallograms originating from agricultural products. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 22:5169.
38Vereijken J.F.H.M., van Gelder T., and Baars T. 1997. Nature and landscape development on organic farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63:201220.
39Ho M.W. and Ulanowicz R. 2005. Sustainable systems as organisms? BioSystems 82:3951.
40Beismann M. 1997. Landscaping on a farm in northern Germany, a case study of conceptual and social fundaments for the development of an ecologically sound agro-landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63:173184.
41Colquhoun M. 1997. An exploration into the use of Goethean science as a methodology for landscape assessment: the Pishwanton Project. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63:145157.
42Greenwood D.J., Whyte W.F., and Harkavy I. 1993. Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Human Relations 46:175192.
43Helmfried H., Haden A., and Ljung M. 2008. The role of action research (AR) in environmental research: learning from a local organic food and farming research project. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21:105131.
44Stevenson F.J. 1994. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. Wiley Interscience, New York.
45Turinek M., Grobelnik-Mlakar S., Bavec M., and Bavec F. 2008. Biodynamic agriculture from past to present. Agricultura 6:14.
46Koepf H., Schaumann W., and Haccius M. 1996. Biologisch-dynamische Landwirtschaft. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart.
47Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available at Web site http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/consleg/2002/R/02002R1774-20060401-en.pdf (verified 10 December 2008).
48Hurter M. (ed.)2007. Zur Vertiefung der biologisch-dynamischen Landwirtschaft. Verlag am Goetheanum, Dornach.
49Biodynamic-Research-Team. 2008. Biodynamic-Research.net – Information and Communication Network for Research on Biodynamic Agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.biodynamic-research.net/ (verified 10 December 2008).
50Berner A., Hildermann I., Fließbach A., Pfiffner L., Niggli U., and Mäder P. 2008. Crop yield and soil fertility response to reduced tillage under organic management. Soil Tillage Research 101:8996.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 201 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1488 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.