Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary–participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains

  • Kevin Murphy (a1), Doug Lammer (a1), Steve Lyon (a1), Brady Carter (a1) and Stephen S. Jones (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

Organic and low-input farmers often plant seed varieties that have been selected under conventional practices, traditionally including high inputs of artificial fertilizers, crop protection chemicals and/or water. In addition, these crops are often selected in environments that may or may not represent the local environment of the farmer. An evolutionary participatory breeding (EPB) method emphasizes the utilization of natural selection in combination with site-specific farmer selection in early segregating generations of a heterogeneous crop population. EPB is a combination of two specific breeding methods, evolutionary breeding and participatory plant breeding. Evolutionary breeding has been shown to increase yield, disease resistance, genetic diversity and adaptability of a crop population over time. It is based on a mass selection technique used by farmers for over 10,000 years of crop improvement. Participatory plant breeding programs originated in developing countries to meet the needs of low-input, small-scale farmers in marginal environments who were often overlooked by conventional crop breeders. The EPB method is an efficient breeding system uniquely suited to improving crop varieties for the low-input and organic farmer. The EPB method utilizes the skills and knowledge of both breeders and farmers to develop heterogeneous landrace populations, and is an effective breeding method for both traditional and modern farmers throughout the world.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: joness@wsu.edu
References
Hide All
1Danquah E.Y., and Barrett J.A. 2002. Grain yield in composite cross five of barley: Effects of natural selection. Journal of Agricultural Science 138: 171176.
2Soliman K.M., and Allard R.W. 1991. Grain yield of composite cross populations of barley: Effects of natural selection. Crop Science 31: 705708.
3Ceccarelli S.S. 1996. Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. Euphytica 92: 203214.
4Lotter D.W. 2003. Organic agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 21: 4 59128.
5Pimbert M.P. 1994. The need for another research paradigm. Seedling 11: 2 2025.
6Perales H., Brush S.B., and Qualset C.O. 1998. Agronomic and economic competitiveness of maize landraces and in situ conservation in Mexico. In Smale M. (ed.). Farmers, Gene Banks, and Crop Breeding: Economic Analyses of Diversity in Wheat, Maize, and Rice. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Massachusetts.
7Haugerud A., and Collinson M.P. 1990. Plants, genes and people: Improving the relevance of plant breeding in Africa. Experimental Agriculture 26: 341362.
8Allard R.W. 1990. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources Sunderland, Massachusetts Sinauer Associates.
9Suneson C.A. 1956. An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agronomy Journal 48: 188191.
10Jain S.K. 1961. Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals: The composite cross bulk population method. Euphytica 10: 315324.
11Ceccarelli S., Grando S., Tutwiler R., Baha J., Martini A.M., Salahieh H., Goodchild A., and Michael M. 2000. A methodological study on participatory barley breeding I. Selection phase. Euphytica 111: 91104.
12Allard R.W. 1999. History of plant population genetics. Annual Review of Genetics 33: 127.
13Bhatt G.M. 1973. Comparison of various methods of selecting parents for hybridization in common bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 457464.
14Busch R.H., Janke J.C., and Frohberg R.C. 1974. Evaluation of crosses among high and low yielding parents of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and bulk prediction of line performance. Crop Science 14: 4750.
15Lupton F.G.H. 1961. Studies in the breeding of self-pollinating cereals. 3. Further studies in cross prediction. Euphytica 10: 209224.
16Utz H.F., Bohn M., and Melchinger A.E. 2001. Predicting progeny means and variances of winter wheat crosses from phenotypic values of their parents. Crop Science 41: 14701478.
17Schnell F.W. 1982. A synoptic study of the methods and categories of plant breeding. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzuechtung 89: 118.
18Degago Y., and Caviness C.E. 1987. Seed yield of soybean bulk populations grown for 10 to 18 years in two environments. Crop Science 27: 207210.
19Corte H.R., Ramalhol M.A.P., Goncalves F.M.A., and Abreu A.D.F.B. 2002. Natural selection for grain yield in dry bean populations bred by the bulk method. Euphytica 123: 387393.
20Wolfe M.S. 1992. Barley diseases: maintaining the value of our varieties. In Munck L.(ed.). Barley Genetics VI. Proceedings of the Sixth International Barley Genetics Symposium, Vol II. Munksgaard, Copenhagen. p. 10551067.
21Garrett K.A., and Mundt C.C. 1999. Epidemiology in mixed host populations. Phytopathology 89: 984990.
22Wolfe M.S. 1985. The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 23: 251273.
23Zhu Y., Chen H., Fan J., Wang Y., Li Y., Chen J., Fan J., Yang S., Hu L.,, Leung H., Mew T.W., Teng P.S., Wang Z., and Mundt C. 2000. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406: 718722.
24Allard R.W. 1990. The genetics of host–pathogen coevolution: Implications for genetic resource conservation. Journal of Heredity 81: 16.
25Jackson L.F., Webster R.K., Allard R.W., and Kahler A.L. 1982. Genetic analysis of changes in scald resistance in barley composite cross V. Phytopathology 72: 10691072.
26Maroof M.A.S., Webster R.K., and Allard R.W. 1983. Evolution of resistance to scald, powdery mildew, and net blotch in barley composite cross II populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 66: 279283.
27Muona O., and Allard R.W. 1982. Evolution of resistance to Rhynchosporium secalis (Oud.) Davis in barley composite cross II. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 61: 209214.
28Buzzell R.I., and Hass J.H. 1972. Natural and mass selection estimate of relative fitness for the soybean rps gene. Crop Science 12: 7576.
29Hartwig E.E., Kilen T.C., Young L.D., and Edwards C.J.J. 1982. Effects of natural selection in segregating soybean populations exposed to phytophthora rot or soybean cyst nematodes. Crop Science 22: 588590.
30Agrios G.N. 1997. Plant Pathology 4th ed London, UK Academic Press.
31Robinson R.A. 1996. Return to Resistance: Breeding Crops to Reduce Pesticide Dependence. AgAccess, Davis, CA.
32Simmonds N.W. 1983. A Plant Breeder's Perspective of Durable Resistance. American Phytopathological Society Ames, Iowa, USA.
33Bruckner P.L., and Finney P.L. 1992. Milling and baking quality attributes of soft red winter wheat bulk populations and derived lines. Crop Science 32: 11721179.
34Basset L.M., Allan R.E., and Rubenthaler G.L. 1989. Genotype×environment interactions on soft white winter wheat quality. Agronomy Journal 81: 955960.
35Kratochvil R.J., and Sammons D.J. 1990. A comparison of soft red winter wheat F2 populations, their F1 hybrids, and parents. Journal of Production Agriculture 3: 363367.
36Allard R.W. 1996. Genetic basis of the evolution of adaptedness in plants. Euphytica 92: 111.
37Enjalbert J., Goldringer I., Paillard S., and Brabant P. 1999. Molecular markers to study genetic drift and selection in wheat populations. Journal of Experimental Botany 50: 283290.
38Jain S.K., and Allard R.W. 1960. Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species, I. Evidence for heterozygote advantage in a closed population of barley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 46:13711377.
39Fisher R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40Cleveland D.A., Soleri D., and Smith S.E. 1999. Farmer plant breeding from a biological perspective: Implications for collaborative plant breeding. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper No. 10. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.
41Cromwell E., Wiggins S., and Wentzel S. 1993. Sowing Beyond the State. Overseas Development Institute, London.
42Canadian Seed Alliance. 2004. Report of the Seed Sector Advisory Committee. Canadian Seed Alliance, Ottowa, Canada. Available at Web site http://www.seedsectorreview.com (verified 1 June 2004).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 84 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 555 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.