Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Climate change and agriculture in New York and Pennsylvania: risk perceptions, vulnerability and adaptation among farmers

  • David Lane (a1), Allison Chatrchyan (a1), Daniel Tobin (a2), Kaila Thorn (a3), Shorna Allred (a4) and Rama Radhakrishna (a3)...
Abstract

Climate change impacts on agriculture have been intensifying in the Northeastern United States. In order to encourage the adoption of climate change adaptation and mitigation practices by farmers, it is critical to understand their perspectives on the risks they face and actions they are taking. However, very few empirical studies have considered how farmers are interpreting and responding to climate impacts, risks and opportunities in the Northeast. This study investigates farmer views and decisions related to climate change using data from six farmer focus groups conducted across New York and Pennsylvania. The study examined how farmers perceived climate impacts on their farms, the practices they are willing to adopt, and how perceived risks and vulnerability affect farmers’ decision-making related to adaptation and mitigation strategies. Although farmers articulated concern regarding climate impacts, they also made clear that other business pressures, such as profitability, market conditions, labor availability or government regulations were often more critical issues that affected their decision-making. Decisions about adopting climate change adaptation and mitigation practices vary widely, and personal experience with extreme weather and changing seasons affected decision-making. The findings from this study provide improved understanding of farmers’ needs and priorities, which can help guide land-grant researchers, extension and policymakers in their efforts to develop and coordinate a comprehensive strategy to address climate change impacts on agriculture in the Northeast.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author for correspondence: David Lane, E-mail: del97@cornell.edu
References
Hide All
Adger, WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16, 268281.
Arbuckle, JG, Prokopy, LS, Haigh, T, Hobbs, J, Knoot, T, Knutson, C, Loy, A, Mase, AS, McGuire, J, Morton, LW and Tyndall, J (2013) Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States. Climatic Change 117(4), 943950.
Bartels, W, Furman, CA, Diehl, DC, Royce, FS, Dourte, DR, Ortiz, BV, Zierden, DF, Irani, TA, Fraisse, CW and Jones, JW (2013) Warming up to climate change: a participatory approach to engaging with agricultural stakeholders in the southeast US. Regional Environmental Change 13(S1), 4555.
Below, TB, Schmid, JC and Sieber, S (2015) Farmers’ knowledge and perception of climatic risks ad options for climate change adaptation: a case study from two Tanzanian villages. Regional Environmental Change 15(7), 11691180.
Brugger, J and Crimmins, M (2015) Designing institutions to support local-level climate change adaptation: insights from a case study of the U.S. Cooperative Extension System. Weather, Climate, and Society 7(1), 1838.
Chatrchyan, A, Erlebacher, R, Chaopricha, N, Chan, J, Tobin, D and Allred, S (2017) United States agricultural stakeholder views and decisions on climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change e467.
Corbin, J and Strauss, A (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1), 321.
Corbin, J and Strauss, A (2015) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, JW (2007) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approached. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, JW (2013) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friese, S (2014) Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Haden, VR, Niles, MT, Lubell, M, Perlman, J and Jackson, LE (2012) Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change? PLoS ONE 7, e52882.
Horton, R, Yohe, G, Easterling, W, Kates, R, Ruth, M, Sussman, E, Whelchel, A, Wolfe, D and Lipschultz, F (2014) Chapter 16: northeast. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment 371395.
Howe, PD, Mildenberger, M, Marlon, JR and Leiserowitz, A (2015) Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local levels in the USA. Nature Climate Change 5, 596603.
Jemison, JM Jr, Hall, DM, Welcomer, S and Haskell, J (2014) How to communicate with farmers about climate change: farmers’ perceptions and adaptations to increasingly variable weather patterns in Maine (USA). Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 4(4), 5770.
Kuehn, D, Chase, L, Sharkey, T and Powers, S (2016) Perceptions of maple producers towards climate change. Northeastern States Research Cooperative: SUNY-ESF. http://www.uvm.edu/tourismresearch/publications/maple%20producers%20report%20final.pdf
Kunkel, KE, Stevens, LE, Stevens, SE, Sun, L, Janssen, E, Wuebbles, D, Rennells, J, DeGaetano, A and Dobson, JG (2013) Regional climate trends and scenarios for the U.S. National Climate Assessment: Part 1. Climate of the Northeast U.S. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 142-1, 79 Retrieved from https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/asset/document/NOAA_NESDIS_Tech_Report_142-1-Climate_of_the_Northeast_US.pdf.
Liu, Z, Smith, W.J Jr and Safi, AS (2014) Rancher and farmer perceptions of climate change in Nevada, USA. Climatic Change 122(1–2), 313327.
Maddison, D (2007) The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa. Policy Research Working Paper 4308. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-4308.
Mase, AS, Gramig, BM and Prokopy, LS (2017) Climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation behavior among Midwestern U.S. Crop farmers. Climate Risk Manage 15, 817.
Mase, A and Prokopy, LS (2014) Unrealized potential: a review of perceptions and use of weather and climate information in agricultural decision making. Weather, Climate, and Society 6(1), 4761.
Meyrick, J (2006) What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. Journal of Health Psychology 11(5), 799808.
NASS [National Agricultural Statistics Service] (2014) 2012 Census of agriculture: United States summary and state data. USDA/NASS Rep 695. Retrieved from: https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_US_State_Level/usv1.pdf.
Niles, MT, Brown, M and Dynes, R (2016) Farmers intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change 135(2), 277295.
Patton, MQ (2001) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Prokopy, LS, Arbuckle, JG, Barnes, AP, Haden, VR, Hogan, A, Niles, M and Tyndall, J (2015) Farmers and climate change: a cross-national comparison of beliefs and risk perceptions in high-income countries. Environmental Management 56(2), 492504.
Schattman, RE, Conner, D and Méndez, VE (2016) Farmer perceptions of climate change risk and associated on-farm management strategies in Vermont, northeastern United States. Elementa Science of Anthropocene 4, 4131.
Sietz, D, Choque, SEM and Lüdeke, MK (2012) Typical patterns of smallholder vulnerability to weather extremes with regard to food security in the Peruvian Altiplano. Regional Environmental Change 12(3), 489505.
Smit, B and Wandel, J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16, 282292.
Tobin, D, Janowiak, M, Hollinger, D, Skinner, RH, Swanston, C, Steele, R, Radhakrishna, R, Chatrchyan, A, Hickman, D, Bochicchio, J, Hall, W, Cole, M, Hestvik, S, Gibson, D, Kleinman, P, Knight, L, Kochian, L, Rustad, L, Lane, E, Niedzielski, J and Hlubik, P (2015) In Anderson, T (ed.) Northeast and Northern Forests Regional Climate hub Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. United States: Department of Agriculture, p. 65. Retrieved from: http://climatehubs.oce.usda.gov/sites/default/files/Northeast%20Regional%20Hub%20Vulnerability%20Assessment%20Final.pdf.
Tobin, D, Radhakrishna, R, Chatrchyan, A and Allred, SB (2017) Addressing climate change impacts on agriculture and natural resources: barriers and priorities for land-grant universities in the northeastern United States. Weather, Climate and Society 9(3), 591606.
USDA (2016) Adaptation resources for agriculture: responding to climate variability and change in the midwest and northeast. Technical Bulletin 1944. In Janowiak, M, Dostie, D, Wilson, M, Kucera, M, Skinner, RH, Hatfield, J, Hollinger, D and Swanston, C (eds). October. Acessed at: https://www.climatehubs.oce.usda.gov/sites/default/files/adaptation_resources_workbook_ne_mw.pdf.
Walthall, C, Hatfield, J, Marshall, E, Lengnick, L, Backlund, P, Adkins, S, Ainsworth, E, Booker, F, Blumenthal, D and Bunce, J (2012) Climate change and agriculture: effects and adaptation. USDA Tech Bulletin 1935, 186.
Weiss, RS (1994) Learning From Strangers: The art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wolfe, DW, Comstock, J, Lakso, A, Chase, L, Fry, W, Petzoldt, C, Leichenko, R and Vancura, P (2011) Agriculture. In Rosenzweig, WSC, DeGaetano, A, O'Grady, M, Hassol, S and Grabhorn, P (eds). Responding to Climate Change in New York State: The ClimAID Integrated Assessment for Effective Climate Change Adaptation in New York State [Technical Report]. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYERSDA). Retrieved from: https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/climaid.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 202
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 317 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th January 2018 - 19th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.