Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Comparison of crop management strategies involving crop genotype and weed management practices in conventional and more diverse cropping systems

  • Robin Gómez (a1), Matt Liebman (a2), David N. Sundberg (a2) and Craig A. Chase (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Cropping systems that include forage legumes and small grains in addition to corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can achieve similar or higher crop productivity and economic return than simpler corn–soybean rotations. We hypothesized that this rotation effect occurs regardless of the crop genotype planted and the herbicide and cultivation regime selected for weed management. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a 3-year experiment that compared three cropping systems: a conventional 2-year corn–soybean rotation, a 3-year corn–soybean–oat (Avena sativa L.)/red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) rotation, and a 4-year corn–soybean–oat/alfalfa–alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) rotation. Within each cropping system, two contrasting sets of management strategies were used: (i) genetically engineered corn with resistance to insect pests (Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner and Diabrotica spp.) plus the broadcast application of pre-emergence herbicides, followed in the rotation by a genetically engineered soybean variety with resistance to the herbicide glyphosate plus the post-emergence broadcast application of glyphosate; and (ii) non-genetically engineered corn plus the banded application of post-emergence herbicides, followed in the rotation by a non-genetically engineered soybean and banded application of several post-emergence herbicides. The two management strategies were identified as ‘GE’ and ‘non-GE.’ Corn yield was higher in the 3-year (12.51Mgha−1) and 4-year (12.79Mgha−1) rotations than in the conventional 2-year (12.16Mgha−1) rotation, and was also 2% higher with the GE strategy than with the non-GE strategy. Soybean yield was similar among rotation systems in 2008, but higher in the 3- and 4-year systems than the 2-year rotation in 2009 and 2010. Soybean yield was similar between management strategies in 2008, but higher in the GE strategy in 2009, and similar between strategies in the 3- and 4-year rotations in 2010. Increases in rotation length were accompanied by 88–91% reductions in synthetic N fertilizer application, and the use of the non-GE rather than the GE strategy was accompanied by a 93% reduction in herbicide active ingredients applied. Averaged over the period of 2008–2010, net returns to land and labor were highest for the 3-year rotation managed with either the GE ($928ha−1yr−1) or non-GE ($936ha−1yr−1) strategies, least in the 2-year rotation managed with the non-GE strategy ($738ha−1yr−1), and intermediate in the other rotation×management combinations. Our results indicate that more diverse crop rotation systems can be as profitable as conventional corn–soybean systems and can provide farmers with greater flexibility in crop management options.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Universidad de Costa Rica, Escuela de Agronomía, San José, Costa Rica. gomez.robin@gmail.com
References
Hide All
1Porter P.M., Huggins D.R., Perillo C.A., Quiring S.R., and Crookston R.K. 2003. Organic and other management strategies with two- and four-year crop rotations in Minnesota. Agronomy Journal 95:233244.
2Liebman M. and Ohno T. 1998. Crop rotation and legume residue effects on weed emergence and growth: Applications for weed management. In Hatfield J., Buhler D.D. and Stewart B. (eds). Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Sleeping Bear Press, Chelsea, MI. p. 181221.
3Brummer E.C. 1998. Diversity, stability, and sustainable American agriculture. Agronomy Journal 90:12.
4Cook R.J. 2006. Toward cropping systems that enhance productivity and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 103:1838918394.
5Hartwig N.L. and Ammon H.U. 2002. Cover crops and living mulches. Weed Science 50:688699.
6Barbash J.E., Thelin G.P., Kolpin D.W., and Gilliom R.J. 2001. Major herbicides in ground water. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:831845.
7Liu J., You L., Amini M., Obersteiner M., Herrero M., Zehnder A.J.B., and Yang H. 2010. A high-resolution assessment on global nitrogen flows in cropland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 107:80358040.
8ERS. 2011. Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S.: Extent of adoption. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/Adoption.htm (accessed April 22, 2012).
9EPA. 2011. Pesticides industry sales and usage: 2006 and 2007 market estimates. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/pestsales/ (accessed April 22, 2012).
10NRC. 2010. Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
11Francis C., Lieblein G., Gliessman S., Breland T.A., Creamer N., Harwood R., Salomonsson L., Helenius J., Rickerl D., Salvador R., Wiedenhoeft M., Simmons S., Allen P., Altieri M., Flora C., and Poincelot R. 2003. Agroecology: The Ecology of Food Systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22:99118.
12Liebman M. and Gallandt E.R. 1997. Many little hammers: Ecological management of crop-weed interactions. In Jackson L.E. (ed.). Ecology in Agriculture. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. p. 291343.
13Robertson G.P. and Swinton S.M. 2005. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:3846.
14Anderson R.L. 2007. Managing weeds with a dualistic approach of prevention and control. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 27:1318.
15Shennan C. 2008. Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge, and agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363:717739.
16Ronald P.C. 2011. Plant genetics, sustainable agriculture and global food security. Genetics 188:1120.
17Ronald P.C. and Adamchak R.W. 2008. Tomorrow's Table: Organic Farming, Genetics, and the Future of Food. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
18Mortensen D.A., Egan J.F., Maxwell B.D., Ryan M.R., and Smith R.G. 2012. Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. Bioscience 62:7584.
19Gassmann A.J., Petzold-Maxwell J.L., Keweshan R.S., and Dunbar M.W. 2011. Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22629. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022629.
20Altieri M.A. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74:1931.
21Liebman M. and Davis A. S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Research 40:2747.
22Raimbault B. and Vyn T. 1991. Crop rotation and tillage effects on corn growth and soil structural stability. Agronomy Journal 83:979985.
23Drinkwater L.E., Wagoner P., and Sarrantonio M. 1998. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262265.
24Dinnes D.L., Karlen D.L., Jaynes D.B., Kaspar T.C., Hatfield J.L., Colvin T.S., and Cambardella C.A. 2002. Nitrogen management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching in tile-drained midwestern soils. Agronomy Journal 94:153171.
25Campbell C. and Zentner R. 1993. Soil organic matter as influenced by crop rotations and fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57:10341040.
26Riedell W.E., Pikul J.L., Jaradat A.A., and Schumacher T.E. 2009. Crop rotation and nitrogen input effects on soil fertility, maize mineral nutrition, yield, and seed composition. Agronomy Journal 101:870879.
27Tilman D., Cassman K.G., Matson P.A., Naylor R., and Polasky S. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671677.
28Ghorbani R., Wilcockson S., Koocheki A., and Leifert C. 2008. Soil management for sustainable crop disease control: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 6:149.
29Dyck E. and Liebman M. 1994. Soil fertility management as a factor in weed control: The effect of crimson clover residue, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer and their interaction on emergence and early growth of lambs quarters and sweet corn. Plant and Soil 167:227237.
30Anderson R.L. 2005. A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations. Agronomy Journal 97:15791583.
31Bossio D.A., Scow K.M., Gunapala N., and Graham K.J. 1998. Determinants of soil microbial communities: Effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microbial Ecology 36:112.
32Deng S.P., Moore J.M., and Tabatabai M.A. 2000. Characterization of active nitrogen pools in soils under different cropping systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils 32:302309.
33Cruse M.J., Liebman M., Raman D.R., and Wiedenhoeft M.H. 2010. Fossil energy use in conventional and low-external-input cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 102:934941.
34Archer D.W., Jaradat A.A., Johnson J.M.F., Weyers S.L., Gesch R.W., Forcella F., and Kludze H.K. 2007. Crop productivity and economics during the transition to alternative cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 99:15381547.
35Chavas J.-P., Posner J.L., and Hedtcke J.L. 2009. Organic and conventional production systems in the Wisconsin integrated cropping systems trial: II. Economic and risk analysis 1993–2006. Agronomy Journal 101:288295.
36VanGessel M.J., Froney D.R., Conner M., Sankula S., and Scott B.A. 2004. A sustainable agriculture project at Chesapeake farms: A six-years summary of weed management aspects, yield, and economic return. Weed Science 52:886896.
37Liebman M., Gibson L.R., Sundberg D.N., Heggenstaller A.H., Westerman P.R., Chase C.A., Hartzler R.G., Menalled F.D., Davis A.S., and Dixon P.M. 2008. Agronomic and economic performance characteristics of conventional and low-external-input cropping systems in the central Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal 100:600610.
38Jaynes D.B., Dinnes D.L., Meek D.W., Karlen D.L., Cambardella C.A., and Colvin T.S. 2004. Using the late spring nitrate test to reduce nitrate loss within a watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:669677.
39Blackmer A., Voss R., and Mallarino A.P. 1997. Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn in Iowa. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA.
40Littell R.C., Stroup W.W., and Freund R.J. 2002. SAS for Linear Models. 4th ed.SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. p. 466.
41Hanna M. 2002. Estimating the field capacity of farm machines. PM 696. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA. Available at http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM696.pdf (verified November 23, 2010).
42Duffy M. 2008. Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa – 2008. FM 1712. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, Ames, IA. Available at http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/duffy/documents/Anns20agdm20FM1712_000.pdf (verified January 31, 2012).
43Duffy M. 2009. Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa – 2009. FM 1712. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, Ames, IA. Available at http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/duffy/documents/COP2009.pdf (verified January 31, 2012).
44Duffy M. 2010. Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa – 2010. FM 1712. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, Ames, IA. Available at http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/duffy/documents/COP2010.pdf (verified January 31, 2012).
45NASS. 2012. Crop values annual summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1050 (verified January 31, 2012).
46Leandro L.F., Robertson A., Mueller D.S., Liebman M., and Yang X.B. In review. Lessons from the 2010 outbreak of soybean sudden death syndrome in Iowa. Plant Disease Journal, in press.
47Rew L.J., Whelani B., and Mc Bratney A. 2000. Does kriging predict weed distributions accurately enough for site-specific weed control? Weed Research 41:245263.
48Weller D.M., Raaijmakers J.M., and Tomashow L.S. 2002. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40:309348.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 198 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.