Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Consumer willingness to pay for domestic ‘fair trade’: Evidence from the United States

  • P.H. Howard (a1) and P. Allen (a2)

The success of fair trade labels for food products imported from the Global South has attracted interest from producers and activists in the Global North. Efforts are under way to develop domestic versions of fair trade in regions that include the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Fair trade, which is based on price premiums to support agricultural producers and workers in the Global South, has enjoyed tremendous sales growth in the past decade. Will consumers also pay a price premium to improve the conditions of those engaged in agriculture closer to home? To address this question, consumer willingness to pay for food embodying a living wage and safe working conditions for farmworkers was assessed with a national survey in the United States. The question format was a discrete choice (yes/no) response to one of four randomly selected price premiums, as applied to a hypothetical example of a pint of strawberries. Multilevel regression models indicated that respondents were willing to pay a median of 68% more for these criteria, with frequent organic consumers and those who consider the environment when making purchases most willing to pay higher amounts. Although the results should be interpreted with caution, given the well-known gap between expressed attitudes and actual behaviors, we conclude that there is a strong potential market opportunity for domestic fair trade.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

4  P. De Pelsmacker , L. Driesen , and G. Rayp 2005. Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39(2):363385.

7  C.G. Magaña and J.D. Hovey 2003. Psychosocial stressors associated with Mexican migrant farmworkers in the Midwest United States. Journal of Immigrant Health 5(2):7586.

16  D. Jaffee , J.R. Kloppenburg , and M.B. Monroy 2004. Bringing the ‘moral charge’ home: fair trade within the North and within the South. Rural Sociology 69(2):169196.

21  W.H. Friedland 1998. Review of Strawberry Fields: Politics, Class, and Work in California Agriculture, by Miriam J. Wells. Agriculture and Human Values 15(2):185188.

24  T.A. Arcury , S.A. Quandt , D.B. Barr , J.A. Hoppin , L. McCauley , J.G. Grzywacz , and M.G. Robson 2006. Farmworker exposure to pesticides: methodologic issues for the collection of comparable data. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(6):923928.

29  W. Moon and S.K. Balasubramanian 2003. Willingness to pay for non-biotech foods in the U.S. and U.K. Journal of Consumer Affairs 37(2):317339.

30  J.L. Lusk and D. Hudson 2004. Willingness-to-pay estimates and their relevance to agribusiness decision making. Review of Agricultural Economics 26(2):152169.

31  I.H. Langford , I.J. Bateman , A.P. Jones , H.D. Langford , and S. Georgiou 1998. Improved estimation of willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Land Economics 74(1):6575.

40  I. Vermeier and W. Verbeke 2006. Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer ‘attitude–behavioral intention’ gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19(2):169194.

41  J.A. List and C.A. Gallet 2001. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environmental and Resource Economics 20(3):241254.

43  P. Allen and M. Kovach 2000. The capitalist composition of organic: the potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of sustainable agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 17(3):221232.

45  S. Lyon 2006. Evaluating fair trade consumption: politics, defetishization and producer participation. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30(5):452464.

48  L.T. Raynolds , D. Murray , and P.L. Taylor 2004. Fair trade coffee: building producer capacity via global networks. Journal of International Development 16(8):11091121.

49  C. Getz and A. Shreck 2006. What organic and Fair Trade labels do not tell us: towards a place-based understanding of certification. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30(5):490501.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 82 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 310 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.