Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-22rqw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-26T09:02:16.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining marketing costs and returns in alternative marketing channels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Shermain D. Hardesty  and
Penny Leff
Shermain D. Hardesty*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Penny Leff
Affiliation:
Small Farm Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: shermain@primal.ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Direct marketing is a popular marketing practice among smaller producers in the United States. We conducted detailed case studies of three organic farming operations of different sizes and compared their marketing costs and profitability in alternative marketing channels. We classified marketing-related activities into three categories: packing and storage, transportation, and selling and administration. By measuring the costs for labor, purchased goods and services, and capital assets associated with these marketing activities, we determined that there are significant variations in marketing costs across marketing channels. For each of our three case-study farms, marketing costs per dollar of revenue were lowest in the wholesale channel and highest in the farmers' market channel. Significant labor costs for the selling activity and transportation expenses offset the higher prices and minimal packaging costs associated with farmers' markets. Profitability can also be significantly affected by marketing factors, such as packing and grading standards, and product that is used for sampling and consumer premiums. Our research demonstrates that the higher prices that producers earn from direct marketing rather than wholesaling are not pure profit; the price premiums are compensation for the costs they incur when direct marketing their produce. Direct marketing channels, such as farmers' markets and Community Supported Agriculture (CSAs), can enable smaller farmers to build financially viable operations, by gaining access to markets, growing their farming operations and reducing their marketing risk. However, to achieve this success, farmers must manage their marketing costs as well as their production costs.

Keywords

farmers' marketsCommunity Supported Agriculturefinancial managementsmall farms

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 25 , Special Issue 1: “Food for Life”: Looking Beyond the Horizon , March 2010 , pp. 24 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA, AMS). 2008. Farmers market growth: 1994–2008. Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateS&navID=WholesaleandFarmersMarkets&leftNav=WholesaleandFarmersMarkets&page=WFMFarmersMarketGrowth&description=Farmers%20Market%20Growth&acct=frmrdirmkt (accessed November 3, 2009).Google Scholar
2.US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA, NASS). 2009. Volume 1, Table 2. Available at Web site http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_US_State_Level/index.asp (accessed November 3, 2009).Google Scholar
3.Ness, C. 2007. Farmers burn out on markets. San Francisco Chronicle, September 19, 2007. Available at Web site http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/09/19/FDAHS186D.DTL (accessed November 3, 2009).Google Scholar
4.Parsons, R. 2007. A victim of its own success? Los Angeles Times, April 11. Available at Web site http://articles.latimes.com/2007/apr/11/food/fo-farmers11 (accessed November 3, 2009).Google Scholar
5.Thilmany, D. and Watson, P. 2004. The increasing role of direct marketing and farmers markets for western US producers. Western Economics Forum 3(2):19–25.Google Scholar
6.Stephenson, G. and Lev, L. 2004. Common support for local agriculture in two contrasting Oregon communities. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(4):210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Brown, C., Miller, S., Boone, D., Boone, H., Gartin, S., and McConnell, T. 2007. The importance of farmers' markets for West Virginia direct marketers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22(1):20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Park, T. and Lohr, L. 2006. Choices of marketing outlets by organic producers: accounting for selectivity effects. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 4(1):Article 4. Available at Web site http://www.bepress.com/jafio/vol4/iss1/art4 (accessed November 3, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kambara, K. and Shelley, C. 2002. The California Agricultural Direct Marketing Study. USDA-AMS and California Institute of Rural Studies, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
10.Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., Zurbriggen, M., and Hossain, F. 2003. Producer satisfaction with returns from farmers market related activity. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18(2):80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Fake, C., Klonsky, K.M., and DeMoura, R. 2008. Sample costs to establish a mandarin orchard and produce mandarins: Intermountain—Sierra Nevada foothills. University of California, Cooperative Extension Service, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
12.LeRoux, M.N., Schmit, T.M., Roth, M., and Street, D.H. 2009. Evaluation marketing channel options for small-scale fruit and vegetable producers: Case study evidence from central New York. EB 2009–03. Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
13.Perez, J., Allen, P., and Brown, M. 2003. Community supported agriculture on the Central Coast: The CSA member experience. Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems Center Research Brief No. 1, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
14.Oberholtzer, L. 2004. Community supported agriculture in the Mid-Atlantic Region: Results of a shareholder survey and Farmer interviews. Small Farm Success Project, Stevenville, MD.Google Scholar
15.Strochlic, R. and Shelley, C. 2004. Community Supported Agriculture in California, Oregon and Washington: Challenges and opportunities. California Institute for Rural Studies, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
16.Dmitri, C. and Lohr, L. 2007. The US consumer perspective on organic foods. In Canavari, M. and Olson, K. (eds). Organic Food: Consumers' Choices and Farmers' Opportunities. Springer, New York. p. 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Feenstra, G. and Lewis, C. 1999. Farmers' markets offer new business opportunities for farmers. California Agriculture 53(6):25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Gillespie, G., Hilchey, D., Hinrichs, C., and Feenstra, G. 2008. Farmers' markets as keystones in rebuilding local and regional food systems. In Hinrichs, C. and Lyson, T. (eds). Remaking the North American Food System: Strategies for Sustainability. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska. p. 65–83.Google Scholar