Skip to main content Accessibility help

Evaluating scale and technical efficiency among farms and ranches with a local market orientation

  • Allison Bauman (a1), Dawn Thilmany (a2) and Becca B.R. Jablonski (a3)


In recent years, the growth in local food marketing channels has been significant. Most of the research in this field examining the economic implication of these trends has focused post-farmgate including supply chain analysis (e.g., Hardesty et al., 2014; King et al., 2010), regional economic impacts (e.g., Brown et al., 2014; Hughes et al., 2008; Jablonski et al., 2016) and consumer values and motivations that have driven demand (e.g., Costanigro, 2014; Lusk and Briggeman, 2009). To date, with the exception of a few case studies examining expenses and sales by channel assessment (LeRoux et al., 2010; Hardesty and Leff, 2010; Jablonski and Schmit, 2016) there has been little research that examines the impact on financial viability among farms selling through these markets. The goal of this paper is twofold: first, to identify the factors that have the greatest influence on the efficiency of farmers and ranchers that participate in local food systems, and second, to estimate the relationship between marketing strategy and farm financial efficiency, with a particular focus on variations across farm size. Our estimation of the stochastic production frontier suggests that scale, production enterprise specialty, market outlet choices, land ownership, and management of expenses have the greatest influence on producer financial efficiency. Our model suggests that scale has the largest impact on financial efficiency, providing evidence that, all else constant, the most important factor in the efficiency of direct market producers is scale. When profit is defined as operating profit, results indicate that marketing channel is not an important indicator of efficiency. But when profit is defined as return on assets, marketing channel is an important indicator of efficiency, albeit less than is scale. Results from this analysis indicate there are economies of scale associated with farms and ranches that sell through local and regional markets, and that scale rather than marketing channel has the largest influence on efficiency.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Allison Bauman, E-mail:


Hide All
Aigner, D, Lovell, CA Knox and Schmitt, P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6, 2137.
Barath, L and Ferto, I (2015) Heterogeneous technology, scale of land use and technical efficiency: the case of Hungarian crop farms. Land Use Policy 42, 141150.
Bauman, A, Thilmany, D and Jablonski, BBR (2017) The financial performance implications of differential marketing strategies: exploring farms that pursue local markets as a core competitive advantage. Submission to the Agricultural and Resources Economic Review.
Bokusheva, R, Hockmann, H and Kumbhakar, SC (2012) Dynamics of productivity and technical efficiency in Russian agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics 39(4), 611637.
Brown, JP, Goetz, SJ, Ahearn, MC and Liang, K (2014). Linkages between community-focused agriculture, farm sales, and regional growth. Economic Development Quarterly 28(1), 516.
Costanigro, M, Kroll, S, Thilmany, D and Bunning, M (2014) Is it love for local/organic or hate for conventional? Asymmetric effects of information and taste on label preferences in an experimental auction. Food Quality and Preference 31, 34105.
Detre, JD, Mark, TB, Mishra, AK and Adhikari, A (2011) Linkage between direct marketing and farm income: a double-hurdle approach. Agribusiness 27(1), 1933.
Dubman, RW (2000) Variance estimation with USDA's Farm Costs and Returns surveys and Agricultural Resource Management Study surveys. Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Staff Paper No. AGES 00-01.
Farm Credit Administration. (2016) Young, Beginning, and Small Farmer/Rancher Lending. Available at (Accessed 27 May 2017).
Fernandez-Cornejo, J, Mishra, A, Nehring, R, Hendricks, C, Southern, M and Gregory, A (2007) Off-farm income, technology adaptation, and farm economic performance. ERR-36, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Green, WH (2012) Econometric Analysis. Edinburgh Gate, Harlow Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Hardesty, S and Leff, P (2010) Determining marketing costs and returns in alternative marketing channels. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25(1), 2434.
Hardesty, S, Feenstra, G, Visher, D, Lerman, T, Thilmany McFadden, D, Bauman, A and Rainbolt, G (2014) Values-based supply chains: supporting regional food and farms. Economic Development Quarterly 28(1), 1727. doi: 10.1177/0891242413507103.
Hughes, D, Brown, C, Miller, S and McConnell, T (2008) Evaluating the economic impact of farmers’ markets using an opportunity cost framework. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(1), 253265.
Jablonski, BBR and Schmit, TM (2016) Differentiating ‘local’ producers’ expenditure profiles to evaluate impacts of policies supporting local food systems. Journal of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 31(2), 139147.
Jablonski, BBR, Schmit, TM and Kay, D (2016) The economic impacts of food hubs to regional economies: a framework including opportunity cost. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 45(1), 143172.
Ho, CKM, Newman, M, Dalley, DE, Little, S and Wales, WJ (2013) Performance, return and risk of different dairy systems in Australia and New Zealand. Animal Production Science 53, 894906.
Hoppe, RA (2014) Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: Family Farm Report, 2014 Edition, EIB-132, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Key, N and McBride, WD (2014) Sub-therapeutic antibiotics and the efficiency of U.S. hog farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 96(3), 831850.
King, RP, Hand, MS, DiGiacomo, G, Clancy, K, Gomez, MI, Hardesty, SD, Lev, L and McLaughlin, EW (2010) Comparing the Structure, Size, and Performance of Local and Mainstream Food Supply Chains, ERR-99, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
LeRoux, MN, Schmit, TM, Roth, M and Streeter, DH (2010) Evaluating marketing channel options for small-scale fruit and vegetable producers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25(1), 1623.
Low, SA and Vogel, S (2011) Direct and Intermediated Marketing of Local Foods in the United States, ERR-128, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Low, SA, Adalja, A, Beaulieu, E, Key, N, Martinez, S, Melton, A, Perez, A, Ralston, K, Stewart, H, Suttles, S, Vogel, S and Jablonski, BBR (2015) Trends in U.S. Local and Regional Food Systems, AP-068, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Lusk, JL and Briggeman, BC (2009) Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(1), 184196.
MacDonald, JM and McBride, WD (2009) The Transformation of U.S. Livestock Agriculture: Scale, Efficiency, and Risks, Economic Information Bulletin No. 43. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Maudos, J, Pastor, JM, Pérez, F and Quesada, J (2002) Cost and profit efficiency in European banks. Journal of International Financial Markets 12, 3358.
Mayen, CD, Balagatas, JV and Alexander, CE (2010) Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 92(1), 181195.
Meeusen, W and van den Broeck, J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 18(2), 435444.
Mishra, KA, El-Osta, HS, Morehart, MJ, Johnson, JD and Hopkins, JW (2002) Income, Wealth, and the Economic Well-Being of Farm Households, AER-812, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Morrison Paul, CJ and Nehring, R (2005) Product diversification, production systems, and economic performance in U.S. Agricultural production. Journal of Econometrics 126, 525548.
Onozaka, Y and Thilmany McFadden, D (2011) Does local labeling complement or compete with other sustainable labels? A conjoint analysis of direct and joint values for fresh produce claims. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(3), 689702.
Oppendahl, DB (2013) Understanding recent trends in Midwest farmland leasing. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Essays on Issues 308. Available at
Park, T, Mishra, AK and Wozniak, SJ (2014) Do farm operators benefit from direct to consumer marketing strategies? Agricultural Economics 45, 213224.
Park, TA (2015) Direct marketing and the structure of farm sales: an unconditional quantile regression approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 40(2), 266284.
Schmit, TM, Jablonski, BBR and Mansury, T (2016) Assessing the economic impacts of local food system producers by scale: a case study from New York. Economic Development Quarterly 30(4), 316328.
StataCorp. (2013) Stata: Release 13. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Thilmany McFadden, D, Bauman, AJablonski, BBR (2016 a) The Financial Performance Implications of Differential Marketing Strategies: Exploring Farms That Pursue Local Markets as A Core Competitive Advantage. Working paper, presented as an Organized Symposia at the 2016 AAEA Annual Meetings, Boston, MA.
Thilmany McFadden, D, Conner, D, Deller, S, Hughes, D, Meter, K, Morales, A, Schmit, T, Swenson, D, Bauman, A, Phillips Goldenberg, M, Hill, R, Jablonski, BBR and Tropp, D (2016 b) The Economics of Local Food Systems: A Toolkit to Guide Community Discussions, Assessments, and Choices. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. Available at
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Association (USDA RMA). (2017) Whole Farm Revenue Protection Pilot Program. Available at (Accessed 1 May 2017).
Wolf, CA, Stephenson, MW, Knoblauch, WA and Novakovic, AM (2016) Dairy farm financial performance: firm, year, and size effects. Agricultural Finance Review 76(4), 532543.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Evaluating scale and technical efficiency among farms and ranches with a local market orientation

  • Allison Bauman (a1), Dawn Thilmany (a2) and Becca B.R. Jablonski (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.