Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Birkhofer, Klaus Smith, Henrik G and Rundlöf, Maj 2016. eLS.

    Barthel, Stephan Crumley, Carole and Svedin, Uno 2013. Bio-cultural refugia—Safeguarding diversity of practices for food security and biodiversity. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 23, Issue. 5, p. 1142.

    Bavec, Martina Narodoslawsky, Michael Bavec, Franc and Turinek, Matjaž 2012. Ecological impact of wheat and spelt production under industrial and alternative farming systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 27, Issue. 03, p. 242.

    Birkhofer, Klaus Bezemer, T Hedlund, Katarina and Setälä, Heikki 2012. Microbial Ecology in Sustainable Agroecosystems.

    Chappell, Michael Jahi and LaValle, Liliana A. 2011. Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Doran, John Walsh 2011. Parting editorial: Renewing Earth and its people – translating science into practice. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 26, Issue. 04, p. 267.

    Phalan, Ben Balmford, Andrew Green, Rhys E. and Scharlemann, Jörn P.W. 2011. Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy, Vol. 36, p. S62.

  • Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Volume 22, Issue 4
  • December 2007, pp. 321-323

‘Organic abundance’ report: fatally flawed

  • Alex Avery (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 23 January 2008

Fatal flaws in the recent report from Badgley et al. claiming that organic agriculture ‘could produce enough food on a global per capita basis to sustain the current human population, and potentially an even larger population, without increasing the agricultural land base’. Among the serious problems identified: over 100 non-organic yield studies were claimed as organic; organic yields were misreported; false comparisons were made to unrepresentative low non-organic yields; high organic yields were counted 2, 3, even 5 times by citing different papers that referenced the same data; favorable and unverifiable ‘studies’ from biased sources were given equal weight to rigorous university studies. This report is being submitted to the Editor of the journal, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, for publication and response. It is only being released in the interest of public debate and discussion during the much-touted ‘organic fortnight’.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *