Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Testing a complete-diet model for estimating the land resource requirements of food consumption and agricultural carrying capacity: The New York State example

  • Christian J. Peters (a1), Jennifer L. Wilkins (a2) and Gary W. Fick (a3)

Agriculture faces a multitude of challenges in the 21st century, and new tools are needed to help determine how it should respond. Among these challenges is a need to reconcile how human food consumption patterns should change to both improve human nutrition and reduce agriculture's environmental footprint. A complete-diet framework is needed for better understanding how diet influences demand for a fundamental agricultural resource, land. We tested such a model, measuring the impact of fat and meat consumption on the land requirements of food production in New York State (NYS). Analysis was confined to this geographic area to simplify the modeling procedure and to examine the state's ability to reduce environmental impact by supplying food locally. Per capita land resource requirements were calculated with a spreadsheet model for 42 diets ranging from 0 to 381 g d−1 (0 to 12 oz d−1) of meat and eggs and 20 to 45% total calories from fat. Many of these diets meet national dietary recommendations. The potential human carrying capacity of the NYS land base was then derived, based on recent estimates of available agricultural land. A nearly fivefold difference (0.18–0.86 ha) in per capita land requirements was observed across the diets. Increasing meat in the diet increased per capita land requirements, while increasing total dietary fat increased the land requirements of low meat diets but reduced the land needed for high meat diets. Higher meat diets used a larger share of the available cropland suited only to pasture and perennial crops. Thus, only a threefold difference was observed for the potential number of people fed from the NYS land base (2.0–6.2 million). In addition, some high-fat vegetarian diets supported fewer people than lower fat diets containing 63–127 g d−1 of meat (approximately one- to two-thirds of the national average per capita consumption in the US). These results support the assertion that diet should be considered in its entirety when assessing environmental impact. To more completely understand how diet influences land requirements and potential carrying capacity, this model should be applied across a larger geographic area that encompasses a wider variety of climates and soil resources. To better understand the ability of a local region to supply more of its own food, the model should be moved into a geospatial framework.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author:
Hide All
1  C.J. Peters , G.W. Fick , and J.L. Wilkins 2003. Cultivating better nutrition: can the food pyramid help translate dietary recommendations into agricultural goals? Agronomy Journal 95:14241431.

2  C. Delgado , M. Rosegrant , H. Steinfeld , S. Ehui , and C. Courbois 2001. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. Outlook on Agriculture 30(1):2729.

5  M.W. Rosegrant and C. Ringler 1997. World food markets into the 21st century: environmental and resource constraints and policies. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 41(3):402428.

6  N. Alexandratos 1999. World food and agriculture: outlook for the medium and longer term. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59085914.

7  D.G. Johnson 1999. The growth of demand will limit output growth for food over the next quarter century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59155920.

9  T. Dyson 1999. World food trends and prospects to 2025. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59295936.

10  D. Tillman , K.G. Cassman , P.A. Matson , R. Naylor , and S. Polasky 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671677.

11  D.C. Hall , S. Ehui , and C.L. Delgado 2004. The livestock revolution, food safety, and small-scale farmers: why they matter to us all. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17(4/5):425444.

12  K.G. Cassman 1999. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59525959.

13  R.K. Heitschmidt , R.E. Short , and E.E. Grings 1996. Ecosystems, sustainability, and animal agriculture. Journal of Animal Science 74:13951405.

15  R.C. Duncan and W. Youngquist 1999. Encircling the peak of world oil production. Natural Resources Research 8(3):219232.

16  W. Easterling and M. Apps 2005. Assessing the consequences of climate change for food and forest resources: a view from the IPCC. Climatic Change 70:165189.

18  J.W. Oltjen and J.L. Beckett 1996. Role of ruminant livestock in sustainable agricultural systems. Journal of Animal Science 74:14061409.

19  G.E. Bradford 1999. Contributions of animal agriculture to meeting global human food demand. Livestock Production Science 59:95112.

36  D. Fraser 2001. The ‘New Perception’ of animal agriculture: legless cows, featherless chickens, and a need for genuine analysis. Journal of Animal Science 79:634641.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 34
Total number of PDF views: 217 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1951 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.