Skip to main content
×
Home

Testing a complete-diet model for estimating the land resource requirements of food consumption and agricultural carrying capacity: The New York State example

  • Christian J. Peters (a1), Jennifer L. Wilkins (a2) and Gary W. Fick (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Agriculture faces a multitude of challenges in the 21st century, and new tools are needed to help determine how it should respond. Among these challenges is a need to reconcile how human food consumption patterns should change to both improve human nutrition and reduce agriculture's environmental footprint. A complete-diet framework is needed for better understanding how diet influences demand for a fundamental agricultural resource, land. We tested such a model, measuring the impact of fat and meat consumption on the land requirements of food production in New York State (NYS). Analysis was confined to this geographic area to simplify the modeling procedure and to examine the state's ability to reduce environmental impact by supplying food locally. Per capita land resource requirements were calculated with a spreadsheet model for 42 diets ranging from 0 to 381 g d−1 (0 to 12 oz d−1) of meat and eggs and 20 to 45% total calories from fat. Many of these diets meet national dietary recommendations. The potential human carrying capacity of the NYS land base was then derived, based on recent estimates of available agricultural land. A nearly fivefold difference (0.18–0.86 ha) in per capita land requirements was observed across the diets. Increasing meat in the diet increased per capita land requirements, while increasing total dietary fat increased the land requirements of low meat diets but reduced the land needed for high meat diets. Higher meat diets used a larger share of the available cropland suited only to pasture and perennial crops. Thus, only a threefold difference was observed for the potential number of people fed from the NYS land base (2.0–6.2 million). In addition, some high-fat vegetarian diets supported fewer people than lower fat diets containing 63–127 g d−1 of meat (approximately one- to two-thirds of the national average per capita consumption in the US). These results support the assertion that diet should be considered in its entirety when assessing environmental impact. To more completely understand how diet influences land requirements and potential carrying capacity, this model should be applied across a larger geographic area that encompasses a wider variety of climates and soil resources. To better understand the ability of a local region to supply more of its own food, the model should be moved into a geospatial framework.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: cjp20@cornell.edu
References
Hide All
1 Peters C.J., Fick G.W., and Wilkins J.L. 2003. Cultivating better nutrition: can the food pyramid help translate dietary recommendations into agricultural goals? Agronomy Journal 95:14241431.
2 Delgado C., Rosegrant M., Steinfeld H., Ehui S., and Courbois C. 2001. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. Outlook on Agriculture 30(1):2729.
3 Delgado C., Rosegrant M., Steinfeld H., Ehui S., and Courbois C. 1999. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and Environment. Discussion Paper 28. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
4 Delgado C.L. 2003. Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution. Journal of Nutrition 133:3907S3910S.
5 Rosegrant M.W. and Ringler C. 1997. World food markets into the 21st century: environmental and resource constraints and policies. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 41(3):402428.
6 Alexandratos N. 1999. World food and agriculture: outlook for the medium and longer term. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59085914.
7 Johnson D.G. 1999. The growth of demand will limit output growth for food over the next quarter century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59155920.
8 Pinstrup-Andersen P., Pandya-Lorch R., and Rosegrant M.W. 2000. World food prospects. Agrarwirtschaft 49:311319.
9 Dyson T. 1999. World food trends and prospects to 2025. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59295936.
10 Tillman D., Cassman K.G., Matson P.A., Naylor R., and Polasky S. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671677.
11 Hall D.C., Ehui S., and Delgado C.L. 2004. The livestock revolution, food safety, and small-scale farmers: why they matter to us all. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17(4/5):425444.
12 Cassman K.G. 1999. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:59525959.
13 Heitschmidt R.K., Short R.E., and Grings E.E. 1996. Ecosystems, sustainability, and animal agriculture. Journal of Animal Science 74:13951405.
14 Pimentel D. and Pimentel M. 2003. Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 78(suppl.):660S663S.
15 Duncan R.C. and Youngquist W. 1999. Encircling the peak of world oil production. Natural Resources Research 8(3):219232.
16 Easterling W. and Apps M. 2005. Assessing the consequences of climate change for food and forest resources: a view from the IPCC. Climatic Change 70:165189.
17 Reid J.T. 1970. The future role of ruminants in animal production. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon Tyne. p. 122.
18 Oltjen J.W. and Beckett J.L. 1996. Role of ruminant livestock in sustainable agricultural systems. Journal of Animal Science 74:14061409.
19 Bradford G.E. 1999. Contributions of animal agriculture to meeting global human food demand. Livestock Production Science 59:95112.
20 Reijnders L. and Soret S. 2003. Quantification of the environmental impact of different protein choices. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 78:664S668S.
21 Bowman S.A., Lino M., Gerrior S.A., and Basiotis P.P. 1998. The healthy eating index, 1994–96. Family Economics and Nutrition Review 11(3):213.
22 US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 5th ed. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
23 US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs and US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 2000. Food Commodity Intake Database, Version 2.1 [CD-ROM computer file]. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.
24 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2005. Food consumption (per capita) data system: food pyramid servings. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/foodconsumption/FoodGuideIndex.htm (verified 27 November 2006).
25 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2004. Food consumption (per capita) data system: nutrient availability. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/foodconsumption/NutrientAvailIndex.htm (verified 27 November 2006).
26 US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 2004. US Department of Agriculture Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 17. Available at Web site: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp (verified 27 November 2006).
27 Peters C.J., Wilkins J.L., and Fick G.W. 2005. Input and Output Data in Studying the Impact of Meat and Fat on the Land Resource Requirements of the Human Diet and Potential Carrying Capacity: The New York State Example [R05-1]. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
28 Matthews R.H. and Garrison Y.J. 1975. Food yields: summarized by different stages of preparation. Agricultural Handbook No. 102. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.
29 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 1992. Weights, measures, and conversion factors for agricultural commodities and their products. Agricultural Handbook No. 697. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.
30 Kantor L.S. 1998. A Dietary Assessment of the U.S. Food Supply (AER-772). US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.
31 New York Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. New York Agricultural Statistics, 2003–04 Annual Bulletin. Available at Web site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/ny/Bulletin/2004/04-bulletin.htm (verified 23 November 2005).
32 US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2001. Crop Production 2000 Summary. Available at Web site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bban/ (verified 23 November 2005).
33 US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. Crop Production 2003 Summary. Available at Web site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bban/ (verified 23 November 2005).
34 Neter J., Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim C.J., and Wasserman W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
35 US Census Bureau. 2006. State and County QuickFacts. Available at Web site: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html (verified 4 August 2006).
36 Fraser D. 2001. The ‘New Perception’ of animal agriculture: legless cows, featherless chickens, and a need for genuine analysis. Journal of Animal Science 79:634641.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 38
Total number of PDF views: 234 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2161 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.