We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2010
D. S. L. Jarvis has led a spirited and well-considered polemic against post-structuralist and post-modernist theories of International Relations, arguing that they still leave much to be desired if they are to succeed in establishing a viable alternative to the traditional theoretical approaches of the field. While Jarvis and his cohorts have clearly delivered a great many important criticisms to this end, the question nonetheless remains as to how adroitly the foundational literature of post-structuralist and post-modernist thought has been deployed by the dissident school of International Relations theory. As this article argues, a return to the foundations of anti-foundationalist thought thus becomes a vital necessity if the footing of the ‘third debate’ is to be secured with some greater degree of perspicuity and, indeed, in a manner more fruitful for the study of International Relations. In so doing, it concludes that the ‘power-knowledge’ problématique has been poorly construed and must be revisited with much greater care and attention to some clear object of study if the post-structuralist and post-modernist ventures are ultimately to be fulfilled.
1 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Human, All Too Human (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 390.Google Scholar
2 See, for example, Spegele, Roger, ‘Richard Ashley's Discourse for International Relations’, in Jarvis, Daryl S. (ed.), International Relations and the ‘Third Debate’ (Westport: Praeger, 2002), p. 93.Google Scholar
3 See, for example, Abdelal, Rawi, National Purpose in the World Economy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001)Google Scholar , Capital Rules (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007), and ‘IMF and the Capital Account’, in Truman, Edwin (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century (Washington, D.C: Institute for International Economics, 2006)Google Scholar ; Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 2006)Google Scholar ; Andrews, David M. (ed.), Orderly Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008)Google Scholar ; Blyth, Mark, Great Transformations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Bukovansky, Mlada, Legitimacy and Power (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar ; Chwieroth, Jeffrey, ‘Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets’, International Organization, 61: 2 (2007), pp. 443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and Capital Ideas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google ScholarPubMed ; Dobbin, Frank, Forging Industrial Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , ‘The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, 60 (2006), pp. 781–810Google Scholar , and The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar ; Epstein, Rachel A., ‘NATO Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy’, in Security Studies, 14: 1 (2005), pp. 63–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar , ‘When Legacies Meet’, East European Politics and Societies, 20: 2 (2006), pp. 254–285Google Scholar ; ‘Cultivating Consensus and Creating Conflict’, Comparative Political Studies, 39: 8 (2006), pp. 1019–1042Google Scholar , ‘Divided Continent’, in Kirschner, Jonathan D. (ed.), Globalization and National Security (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 231–257Google Scholar , and In Pursuit of Liberalism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2008)Google Scholar ; Fierke, Karin M. and Jørgensen, Knud Erik (eds), Constructing International Relations (New York, M.E. Sharpe, 2001)Google Scholar ; Guzzini, Stefano and Leander, Anna (eds), Constructivism and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Huysmans, Jef, Dobson, Andrew and Prokhovnik, Raia (eds), The Politics of Protection (London: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar ; Johnson, Juliet, A Fistful of Rubles (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar ; Karagiannis, Nathalie and Wagner, Peter (eds), Varieties of World-Making (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Kirschner, Jonathan (ed.), Globalization and National Security (London: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar ; Mitchell, Timothy, Rule of Experts (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar ; Mitchell, Timothy (ed.), Questions of Modernity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000)Google Scholar ; Newman, Edward, Thakur, Ramesh and Tirman, John (eds), Multiculturalism Under Challenge? (Tokyo: UN University, 2006)Google Scholar ; Onuf, Nicholas G., World of Our Making (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989)Google Scholar ; Parsons, Craig, A Certain Idea of Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar ; Ruggie, John Gerard, Constructing the World Polity (London: Routledge, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Schimmelfennig, Frank and Sedelmeier, Ulrich (eds), The Europeanization of Central Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar ; Spruyt, Hendrik, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar , and Ending Empire (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar ; Truman, Edwin (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century (Washington, D.C: Institute for International Economics, 2006)Google Scholar ; Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Zehfuss, Maja, Constructivism in International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar See also Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix, What Is Philosophy? (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
4 For a clear and concise statement on the nature of the ‘transversal’ see Foucault, Michel, ‘The Subject and Power’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), p. 129.Google Scholar
5 Foucault, Michel, ‘The Subject and Power’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), p. 129.Google Scholar
6 See, for example, Spegele, Roger, ‘Richard Ashley's Discourse for International Relations’, in Jarvis, Daryl S. (ed.), International Relations and the ‘Third Debate’ (Westport: Praeger, 2002), pp. 91–123.Google Scholar
7 Jarvis, Daryl S., International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2000), p. 55.Google Scholar
8 Ibid., p. 29.
9 See, for example, Thucydides, , The Peloponnesian War (London: Penguin, 1972), pp. 72–87 and pp. 400–408.Google ScholarPubMed
10 See, for example, Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Prince (London: Penguin, 2003), pp. 32–35 and pp. 77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 See, for example, Marx, Karl, Grundrisse (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993), pp. 83–88Google Scholar , and Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, ‘The German Ideology’ and ‘The Communist Manifesto’, in Marx, Karl, Selected Writings, 2nd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 192, p. 249, and p. 260.Google Scholar
12 Jarvis, Daryl S., International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2000), p. 55.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., pp. 202–3.
14 Spegele, Roger, ‘Richard Ashley's Discourse for International Relations’, in Jarvis, Daryl S. (ed.), International Relations and the ‘Third Debate’ (Westport: Praeger, 2002), p. 93.Google Scholar
15 See, for example, Halliday, Fred, Nation and Religion in the Middle East (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2000), pp. 15–30Google Scholar , and The World at 2000 (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 110–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 O'Callaghan, Terry, ‘Jim George and the Repudiation of Realism’, in Jarvis, Daryl S. (ed.), International Relations and the ‘Third Debate’ (Westport: Praeger, 2002), p. 78.Google Scholar
17 Ibid., p. 79.
18 Halliday, Fred, The World at 2000 (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 See, for example, Halliday, Fred, Nation and Religion in the Middle East (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2000), pp. 15–30Google Scholar , and The World at 2000 (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 110–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 See also, for example, Jarvis, Daryl S., International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
21 Daryl S. Jarvis, International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism, p. 55.
22 See, for example, Machiavelli, Niccolò, Discourses on Livy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), pp. 47–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 See footnote 3, above.
24 Ashley, Richard K. and Walker, R. B. J., ‘Speaking the Language of Exile’, International Studies Quarterly, 34: 3 (1990), pp. 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977), p. 27.Google Scholar
26 Foucault, Michel, ‘The Juridical Apparatus’, in Connolly, William (ed.), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York University Press, 1984), p. 202.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., p. 202.
28 Ibid.
29 Ibid.
30 See, for example, Waltz, Kenneth N., Man, the State, and War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
31 See, for example, Krasner, Stephen D., Defending the National Interest (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
32 See, for example, Friedrich Hegel, Georg Wilhelm, The Philosophy of History (New York: Dover, 1956), pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
33 See, for example, Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, ‘The German Ideology’, in Marx, Karl, Selected Writings, 2nd Edition (Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press, 2002), pp. 176–184.Google Scholar
34 See, for example, Rostow, W. W., The Stages of Economic Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960), pp. 4–16.Google Scholar
35 Foucault, Michel, ‘The Juridical Apparatus’, in Connolly, William (ed.), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York University Press, 1984), p. 202.Google Scholar
36 Ibid.
37 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977), p. 27.Google Scholar
38 Foucault, Michel, ‘The Juridical Apparatus’, in Connolly, William (ed), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York UP, 1984), p. 220.Google Scholar
39 Ibid.
40 Foucault, Michel, ‘Governmentality’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), p. 231.Google Scholar
41 See, for example, Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time (New York: Harper and Row, 1962), p. 31, pp. 38–39, pp. 41–49, and pp. 424–455Google Scholar , and Negri, Antonio, ‘On Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, ‘A Thousand Plateaus’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 18: 1 (1995), pp. 93–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar – see also Fynsk, Christopher, Heidegger (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
42 See Nietzsche, Friedrich, Beyond Good and Evil, Basic Writings of Nietzsche (New York: Modern Library, 2000), p. 279.Google Scholar
43 Deleuze, Gilles, ‘How Do We Recognize Structuralism’, Desert Islands and Other Texts (Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2004), p. 178.Google Scholar
44 Harvey, David, The Condition of Postmodernity (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
45 For general introductions to structuralist thought, see Richard, and DeGeorge, Fernande (eds), The Structuralists: From Marx to Lévi-Strauss (Garden City: Anchor, 1972)Google Scholar ; Kurzweil, Edith, The Age of Structuralism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980)Google Scholar ; and Sturrock, John (ed.), Structuralism and Since (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
46 See, for example, de Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966)Google Scholar – see also Barthes, Roland, Elements of Semiology (New York: Hill and Wang, 1967)Google Scholar ; and Culler, Jonathan, Ferdinand Saussure: Rev. Ed. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
47 See, for example, Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Totemism (Boston: Beacon, 1963)Google Scholar , The Savage Mind (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1966)Google ScholarPubMed , The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Boston: Beacon, 1969)Google Scholar , Tristes Tropiques (New York: Atheneum, 1978)Google Scholar , and Myth and Meaning (New York: Schocken, 1979)Google ScholarPubMed – see also Sperber, Dan, ‘Claude Lévi-Strauss’, in Sturrock, John (ed.), Structuralism and Since (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 19–51.Google Scholar
48 Sim, Stuart (ed.), The Routledge Critical Dictionary of Postmodern Thought (New York: Routledge, 1999), p. 365.Google Scholar
49 See, for example, Barthes, Roland, Mythologies (New York: Hill and Wang, 1972).Google Scholar
50 See, for example, Lacan, Jacques, Écrits (New York: W. W. Norton, 1977)Google Scholar and The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis (New York: W. W. Norton, 1981).Google Scholar
51 Althusser, Louis, For Marx (New York: Vintage, 1996), p. 111.Google Scholar
52 Richard, and DeGeorge, Fernande (eds), The Structuralists (Garden City: Anchor, 1972), p. xii.Google Scholar
53 See Deleuze, Gilles, Nietzsche and Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006), pp. 156–159.Google Scholar
54 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things (London: Tavistock, 1989), pp. xxi–xxii.Google Scholar
55 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, Foucault Live (New York: Semiotext(e), 1989), p. 326.Google Scholar
56 Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things, p. xxiii.Google Scholar
57 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon, 1984), pp. 83–86.Google Scholar
58 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things, pp. xv–xxiv.Google Scholar
59 Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time (New York: Harper and Row, 1962), pp. 486–488Google Scholar – see also, for example, Heidegger, Martin, Nietzsche, Volumes III–IV (San Francisco: Harper, 1991), pp. 84–89.Google Scholar
60 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things, pp. xxi–xxii.Google Scholar
61 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, ‘What Is Enlightenment?’, The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon, 1984), pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
62 Deleuze, Gilles, ‘Humans: A Dubious Existence’, Desert Islands and Other Texts (Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2004), p. 93.Google Scholar
63 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Beyond Good and Evil, Basic Writings of Nietzsche (New York: Modern Library, 2000), p. 417.Google Scholar
64 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, The Portable Nietzsche (New York: Modern Library, 1982), p. 243.Google Scholar
65 See, for example, Deleuze, Gilles, The Logic of Sense (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), pp. 148–153Google Scholar , Negotiations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 170–171Google ScholarPubMed , and Nietzsche and Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006), p. 4.Google ScholarPubMed
66 See also, for example, Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965), pp. 21–58 and pp. 141–281Google Scholar ; Lampert, Laurence, Nietzsche and Modern Times (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), p. 2Google Scholar ; and Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), pp. vii–ix.Google Scholar
67 See Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, pp. 225–228.Google Scholar
68 Foucault, Michel, ‘Questions of Method’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 76–78.Google Scholar
69 Freud, Sigmund, Civilization and Its Discontents (New York: W. W. Norton, 1961b), p. 37.Google Scholar
70 Weber, Max, ‘Science as a Vocation’, From Max Weber (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 139.Google Scholar
71 Ibid.
72 Weber, Max, ‘The Meaning of Discipline’, From Max Weber (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), pp. 253–264Google Scholar ; and Freud, Sigmund, Civilization and Its Discontents (New York: W. W. Norton, 1961), pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
73 Max Weber, ‘Science as a Vocation’, p. 139.
74 See, for example, Freud, Sigmund, Civilization and Its Discontents, pp. 64–74.Google Scholar
75 Max Weber, ‘The Meaning of Discipline’, p. 262.
76 Foucault, Michel, ‘Governmentality’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), p. 235.Google Scholar
77 Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Representation, Volume I (New York: Dover, 1969), p. xxiii.Google Scholar
78 See Kant, Immanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1950)Google Scholar , and Critique of Pure Reason (New York: St. Martin's, 1965).Google ScholarPubMed
79 See Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956)Google Scholar , Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What Is Enlightenment? (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1959)Google Scholar , and The Metaphysical Elements of Justice (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965).Google Scholar
80 See Kant, Immanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What Is Enlightenment? and On History (New York: Macmillan, 1963).Google Scholar
81 See Kant, Immanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Religion within the Limits of Pure Reason Alone (New York: Harper, 1960)Google Scholar , and Critique of Pure Reason.
82 For a brief layman's account of Kantian philosophy, see Durant, Will, ‘Immanuel Kant and German Idealism’, The Story of Philosophy (New York: Touchstone, 1961), pp. 192–220.Google Scholar
83 Kant, Immanuel, ‘What Is Enlightenment?’, On History (New York: Macmillan, 1963), p. 8Google Scholar – see also Foucault, Michel, ‘What Is Enlightenment?’, The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon, 1984), pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
84 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Human, All Too Human (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 5.Google Scholar
85 Vattimo, Gianni, The End of Modernity (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), p. 11.Google Scholar
86 Ibid., pp. 11–12.
87 Ibid., pp. 10–11.
88 Ibid., p. 11.
89 The question of relativism poses all manner of interesting problems in this context – problems that must be parceled out with great care between empirical and normative realms if much mischief is to be avoided. For present purposes, however, I am interested exclusively in the empirical realm, which, given that both postmodernism and realism are morally and ethically relativistic, seems hardly an ill-guided approach. For a superb discussion of their comparative relativisms, see Halliday, Fred, Nation and Religion in the Middle East (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2000) pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
90 See, for example, Halliday, Fred, The World at 2001 (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 75–89.Google Scholar
91 See, for example, Nietzsche, Friedrich, Human, All Too Human (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 12–30.Google Scholar
92 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, ‘What Is Enlightenment?’ and ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon, 1984), pp. 32–50 and pp. 76–100Google Scholar , The Order of Things (London: Tavistock, 1989), pp. xxi–xxiiGoogle Scholar , and ‘Politics and the Study of Discourse’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
93 Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things (London: Tavistock, 1989b), p. xxiii.Google Scholar
94 Ibid., p. xxii.
95 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1 (New York: Vintage, 1978), pp. 138–145Google Scholar , The Order of Things, pp. xxi–xxiv, and ‘Politics and the Study of Discourse’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977), pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
97 Foucault, Michel, ‘What Is Enlightenment?’, The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon, 1984), p. 46.Google Scholar
98 Heidegger, Martin, ‘Being and Time’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), p. 47.Google Scholar
99 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power (New York: Vintage, 1967), p. 323.Google Scholar
100 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power, p. 299Google Scholar – see also Emerson, Ralph Waldo, ‘History’, Emerson's Essays (New York: Perennial, 1951), pp. 26–27Google Scholar ; and Nietzsche, Friedrich, Writings from the Late Notebooks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
101 Heidegger, Martin, Nietzsche, Volumes III–IV (San Francisco: Harper, 1991), p. 96.Google Scholar
102 Ibid., p. 95 – see also McKirahan, Richard D., Philosophy Before Socrates (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994), p. 122Google Scholar ; and Nietzsche, Friedrich, ‘On Truth and Falsity in Their Extramoral Sense’, Philosophical Writings (New York: Continuum, 1997), pp. 87–99.Google Scholar
103 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power (New York: Vintage, 1967), p. 330.Google Scholar
104 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power (New York: Vintage, 1967), p. 278Google Scholar – see also pp. 278–9.
105 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Gay Science (New York: Vintage, 1974), p. 121.Google Scholar
106 See, for example, McKirahan, Richard D., Philosophy Before Socrates (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994), pp. 116–150.Google Scholar
107 Deleuze, Gilles, The Logic of Sense (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), p. 23.Google Scholar
108 See Heidegger, Martin, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), pp. 324–326.Google Scholar
109 See, for example, Deleuze, Gilles, The Logic of Sense, pp. 23–27Google Scholar ; and Foucault, Michel, ‘Theatrum Philosophicum’, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), pp. 165–196.Google Scholar
110 See, for example, Sloterdijk, Peter, Critique of Cynical Reason (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
111 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, p. 28.Google Scholar
112 See, for example, Sloterdijk, Peter, Critique of Cynical Reason (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), p. 17 and pp. 22–75Google Scholar ; and Spegele, Roger, ‘Richard Ashley's Discourse for International Relations’, in Jarvis, Daryl S. (ed.), International Relations and the “Third Debate” (Westport: Praeger, 2002), p. 93.Google Scholar
113 Der Derian, James, ‘The (S)pace of International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly, 34: 3 (1990), p. 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
114 Deleuze, Gilles, ‘On Gilbert Simondon’, Desert Islands and Other Texts (Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2004), p. 87.Google Scholar
115 Foucault, Michel, ‘Discourse on Power’, Remarks on Marx (New York: Semiotext(e), 1991), pp. 165–168.Google Scholar
116 Bacon, Francis, New Organon and Related Writings (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1981), p. 39.Google Scholar
117 See Michel Foucault, ‘What Is Enlightenment?’, pp. 47–9.
118 See Foucault, Michel, ‘Omnes et Singulatim’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), pp. 180–201)Google Scholar ; and Burchell, Graham, ‘Governmental Rationality’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
119 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
120 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume 2 (New York: Pantheon, 1985), pp. 25–32Google Scholar ; Deleuze, Gilles, Negotiations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 97–99, pp. 113–114, and pp. 175–176Google Scholar ; Guattari, Félix, ‘So What’, Chaosophy (New York: Semiotext(e), 1995), pp. 19–25Google Scholar ; and Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix, Anti-Oedipus (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983), pp. 321–322.Google Scholar
121 Emerson, Ralph Waldo, ‘History’, Emerson's Essays (New York: Perennial, 1951), p. 3.Google Scholar
122 Michel Foucault, ‘Governmentality’, pp. 244–5.
123 Heidegger, Martin, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), p. 326.Google Scholar
124 Michel Foucault, ‘Governmentality’, pp. 244–5 – see also, for example, Oestreich, Gerhard, Geist and Gestalt des frühmodernen Staates (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1969)Google Scholar and Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google ScholarPubMed
125 Deleuze, Gilles, Nietzsche and Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006), p. xGoogle Scholar – see also pp. 6–8.
126 See, for example, Aristotle, , Introduction to Aristotle, 2nd Ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973), p. 318.Google Scholar
127 Aristotle, Introduction to Aristotle, p. 318 – see also, for example, Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power (New York: Vintage, 1967), pp. 268–269, pp. 285–303, p. 303, and pp. 338–9Google Scholar ; and Palan, Ronen P. and Blair, Brook M., ‘On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 19:4 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
128 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, The Foucault Reader, pp. 47–49.Google Scholar
129 Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986), p. 227.Google Scholar
130 Miller, Peter and Rose, Nikolas, ‘Governing Economic Life’, in Gane, Mike and Johnson, Terry (eds), Foucault's New Domains (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 78–81.Google Scholar
131 Ibid., pp. 81–85.
132 See Marx, Karl, Grundrisse (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993)Google Scholar and Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google ScholarPubMed
133 See Burckhardt, Jacob, The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990).Google Scholar
134 See Mumford, Lewis, The Culture of Cities (London: Secker and Warburg, 1946)Google Scholar , The Transformation of Man (New York: Harper and Row, 1956)Google Scholar , Technics and Human Development (New York: Harvest, 1967)Google Scholar , and The Pentagon of Power (San Diego: Harvest, 1970).Google Scholar
135 See Negri, Antonio, Time for Revolution (London: Continuum, 2005).Google Scholar
136 See Oestreich, Gerhard, Geist and Gestalt des frühmodernen Staates (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1969)Google Scholar and Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google ScholarPubMed
137 Hsia, R. Po-Chia, Social Discipline in the Reformation (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
138 See van Creveld, Martin, The Rise and Decline of the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
139 For each of these three essays, see Heidegger, Martin, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993).Google Scholar
140 See Foucault, Michel, ‘The Subject and Power’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), pp. 126–127.Google Scholar
141 Heidegger, Martin, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), pp. 321–322.Google Scholar
142 Heidegger, Martin, ‘Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), pp. 283–284Google Scholar – see also in relation to Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977), pp. 135–139.Google Scholar
143 Martin Heidegger, ‘Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics’, p. 287.
144 Heidegger, Martin, ‘Letter on Humanism’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), pp. 225–226.Google Scholar
145 Heidegger, Martin, ‘Letter on Humanism’, Basic Writings, p. 226.Google Scholar
146 Ibid., pp. 226–7.
147 See Foucault, Michel, ‘Governmentality’ and ‘Questions of Method’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), pp. 229–258Google Scholar – see also Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and Gane, Mike and Johnson, Terry (eds), Foucault's New Domains (London: Routledge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
148 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
149 See, for example, Marx, Karl, Capital, Volume One (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990), pp. 439–454.Google Scholar
150 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, p. 220.Google Scholar
151 Ibid.
152 Ibid., p. 221.
153 Ibid., pp. 26–7, and Foucalt, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1 (New York: Vintage, 1978), pp. 135–137.Google Scholar
154 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, p. 222.Google Scholar
155 Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, ‘The German Ideology’Google Scholar , in Marx, Karl, Selected Writings, 2nd Ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 177.Google Scholar
156 See, for example, Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations (London: Everyman's, 1991), p. 400.Google Scholar
157 See, for example, Ricardo, David, The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (London: Dent, 1973), p. 81.Google Scholar
158 See Braudel, Fernand, The Perspective of the World (New York: Harper and Row, 1984), p. 48.Google Scholar
159 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, p. 146.Google Scholar
160 Ibid., pp. 168–9 – see also ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, The Essential Foucault (New York: New Press, 2003), p. 358.Google ScholarPubMed
161 See Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1 (New York: Vintage, 1978), pp. 133–159Google Scholar ; and ‘The Juridical Apparatus’, in Connolly, William (ed.), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York University Press, 1984), pp. 201–221Google Scholar – see also Deleuze, Gilles, ‘On the Death of Man and Superman’, Foucault (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), pp. 124–132.Google Scholar
162 See Foucault, Michel, Discipline and PunishCrossRefGoogle Scholar – see also Deleuze, Gilles, ‘On the Death of Man and Superman’, Foucault (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), pp. 124–132.Google Scholar
163 See Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, pp. 3–6, pp. 168–9, and pp. 220–1Google Scholar , The History of Sexuality, Volume 1, pp. 133–159Google ScholarPubMed , and ‘The Birth of Biopolitics’, The Essential Foucault, pp. 202–207Google ScholarPubMed – see also Gilles Deleuze, ‘On the Death of Man and Superman’, pp. 124–32.
164 Deleuze, Gilles, ‘Postscript on Control Societies’, Negotiations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 177–182Google Scholar – see also Gilles Deleuze, ‘On the Death of Man and Superman’, pp. 124–32.
165 See, for example, Freud, Sigmund, Civilization, Society and Religion (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991)Google Scholar , and The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud (New York: Modern Library, 1995).Google Scholar
166 See, for example, Nietzsche, Friedrich, Human, All Too Human (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 12–13 and p. 35.Google Scholar
167 See Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, p. 26.Google Scholar
168 Ibid., p. 222.
169 Foucault, Michel, ‘The Juridical Apparatus’, in Connolly, William (ed.), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York University Press, 1984), p. 220.Google Scholar
170 Ibid.
171 See, for example, Abdelal, Rawi, National Purpose in the World Economy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001)Google Scholar , Capital Rules (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007)Google ScholarPubMed , and ‘IMF and the Capital Account’, in Truman, Edwin (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century (Washington, D.C: Institute for International Economics, 2006).Google Scholar
172 See, for example, Blyth, Mark, Great Transformations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
173 See, for example, Chwieroth, Jeffrey, ‘Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas’, International Studies Quarterly, 51:1 (2007), pp. 5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar , ‘Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets’, International Organization, 61: 2 (2007), pp. 443–463Google Scholar , ‘International Liquidity Provision’, in Andrews, David (ed.), Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008), pp. 73–116Google Scholar , and Capital Ideas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010).Google ScholarPubMed
174 See, for example, Dobbin, Frank, Forging Industrial Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , ‘The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, 60 (2006), pp. 781–810Google Scholar , and The Global Diffusions of Markets and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
175 See, for example, Epstein, Rachel A., ‘NATO Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy’, in Security Studies, 14: 1 (2005), pp. 63–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar , ‘When Legacies Meet’, East European Politics and Societies, 20: 2 (2006), pp. 254–285Google Scholar , ‘Cultivating Consensus and Creating Conflict’, Comparative Political Studies, 39: 8 (2006), pp. 1019–1042Google Scholar , ‘Divided Continent’, in Kirschner, Jonathan D., Globalization and National Security (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 231–257Google Scholar , and In Pursuit of Liberalism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
176 See, for example, Gheciu, Alexander, ‘“Civilizing” the Balkans, Protecting Europe’, in Huysmans, Jef, Dobson, Andrew, and Prokhovnik, Raia (eds), The Politics of Protection (London: Routledge 2006), pp. 101–121.Google Scholar
177 See, for example, Johnson, Juliet, A Fistful of Rubles (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
178 See, for example, Mitchell, Timothy, Rule of Experts (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar , and Mitchell, Timothy (ed.), Questions of Modernity (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2000).Google Scholar
179 See, for example, Parsons, Craig, A Certain Idea of Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
180 See, for example, Spruyt, Hendrik, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar and Ending Empire (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
181 Meuret, Denis, ‘A Political Genealogy of Political Economy’, in Gane, Mike and Johnson, Terry (eds), Foucault's New Domains (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 68–72Google Scholar – see also Oestreich, Gerhard, Geist and Gestalt des frühmodernen Staates (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1969)Google Scholar and Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google ScholarPubMed , and Weber, Max, ‘The Meaning of Discipline’, From Max Weber (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), pp. 253–264.Google Scholar
182 See, for example, Machiavelli, Niccolò, Discourses on Livy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), pp. 16–28 and pp. 44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Madison, James, nos. 10 and 51, in Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James and Jay, John, The Federalist Or, The New Constitution (London: J. M. Dent, 1992), pp. 265–269.Google Scholar
183 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977), pp. 135–139Google Scholar ; and Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power (New York: Vintage, 1967), p. 410.Google Scholar
184 See, for example, Jünger, Ernst, The Glass Bees (New York: Noonday, 1960)Google Scholar ; Heidegger, Martin, ‘Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics’ and ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), pp. 283–284 and 321–2Google Scholar ; Mumford, Lewis, Technics and Human Development (New York: Harvest, 1967)Google Scholar , and The Pentagon of Power (San Diego: Harvest, 1970)Google Scholar ; Stiegler, Bernard, Technics and Time, 1 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar ; and Zimmerman, Michael, Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
185 See, for example, Foucault, Michel, ‘The Juridical Apparatus’, in Connolly, William (ed.), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York University Press, 1984), pp. 201–221.Google Scholar
186 See, for example, Giddens, Anthony, Central Problems in Social Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979), pp. 49–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
187 See, for example, Abdelal, Rawi, National Purpose in the World Economy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001)Google Scholar , ‘IMF and the Capital Account’, in Truman, Edwin (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century (Washington, D.C: Institute for International Economics, 2006)Google Scholar , and Capital Rules (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007)Google ScholarPubMed ; Chwieroth, Jeffrey, ‘Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets’, International Organization, 61: 2 (2007), pp. 443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar , ‘International Liquidity Provision’, in Andrews, David M. (ed.), Orderly Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008)Google Scholar , and Capital Ideas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google ScholarPubMed ; Dobbin, Frank, Forging Industrial Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , ‘The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, 60 (2006), pp. 781–810Google Scholar , and The Global Diffusions of Markets and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar ; Epstein, Rachel A., ‘Divided Continent’, in Kirschner, Jonathan D. (ed.), Globalization and National Security (London: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar ; Gray, John, False Dawn (New York: New Press, 1998)Google Scholar ; Johnson, Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar ; Johnson, Juliet, A Fistful of Rubles (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar ; Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Theatrum Politicum’, and Giovanni Procacci, ‘Social Economy and the Government of Poverty’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 105–118 and pp. 151–68Google Scholar ; and Strange, Susan, States and Markets (London: Pinter, 1988)Google Scholar – see also, of course, Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon, 1957).Google Scholar
188 See, for example, van Creveld, Martin, The Rise and Decline of the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Donzelot, Jacques, ‘The Mobilization of Society’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 169–179Google Scholar ; Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977)Google Scholar ; and Hsia, R. Po-Chia, Social Discipline in the Reformation (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
189 See, for example, Burchell, Graham, ‘Peculiar Interests’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 119–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Dobbin, Frank, ‘The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, 60 (2006), pp. 781–810Google Scholar , and The Global Diffusions of Markets and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar ; and Epstein, Rachel A., In Pursuit of Liberalism (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
190 See, for example, Epstein, Rachel A., ‘NATO Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy’, in Security Studies, 14: 1 (2005), pp. 63–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Gheciu, Alexandra, ‘“Civilizing” the Balkans, Protecting Europe’, in Huysmans, Jef, Dobson, Andrew and Prokhovnik, Raia (eds), The Politics of Protection (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 101–121Google Scholar ; Paret, Peter, Clausewitz and the State (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985)Google Scholar ; and Wampler, Richard L., Training Lessons Learned and Confirmed from Military Training Research (Arlington: U.S. Army Research for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
191 See, for example, Mitchell, Timothy, Rule of Experts (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar ; and Oestreich, Gerhard, Geist and Gestalt des frühmodernen Staates (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1969)Google Scholar and Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google ScholarPubMed
192 See, for example, Strange, Susan, The Retreat of the State (London: Pinter, 1997), pp. 161–179.Google Scholar
193 Ibid., pp. 100–9.
194 See, for example, Defert, Daniel, ‘“Popular Life” and Insurance Technology’, and François Ewald, ‘Insurance and Risk’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 211–233 and pp. 197–210Google Scholar ; and Strange, Susan, The Retreat of the State, pp. 122–134.Google Scholar
195 See, for example, Strange, Susan, The Retreat of the State (London: Pinter, 1997), pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
196 Ibid., pp. 147–60.
197 Ibid., pp. 110–21.
198 See, for example, Claude, Richard and Weston, Burns H. (eds), Human Rights in the World Community (Philadelphia: University of Penn Press, 2006).Google Scholar
199 See, for example, James, Helen, Governance and Civil Society in Myanmar (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
200 See, for example, Germain, Randall D. and Kenny, Michael (eds), The Idea of Global Civil Society (London: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar , and Juergensmeyer, Mark (ed.), Religion in Global Civil Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
201 See, for example, Guattari, Félix, ‘So What’, Chaosophy (New York: Semiotext(e), 1995), p. 19Google Scholar ; Jünger, Ernst, The Glass Bees (New York: Noonday, 1960)Google Scholar ; Heidegger, Martin, ‘Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics’ and ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, Basic Writings, Rev. Ed. (San Francisco: Harper, 1993), pp. 283–284 and 321–2Google Scholar ; Mitchell, Timothy, Rule of Experts (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar ; Mumford, Lewis, Technics and Human Development (New York: Harvest, 1967)Google Scholar and The Pentagon of Power (San Diego: Harvest, 1970)Google Scholar ; Stiegler, Bernard, Technics and Time, 1 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar ; and Zimmerman, Michael, Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
202 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Writings from the Late Notebooks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 21.Google Scholar
203 Bergson, Henri, Creative Evolution (New York: Modern Library, 1944), p. 11.Google Scholar
204 Whitehead, Alfred North, Adventures of Ideas (New York: Free Press, 1967), pp. 274–275.Google Scholar
205 Deleuze, Gilles, Spinoza (San Francisco: City Lights, 1988), pp. 92–93Google Scholar , and Difference and Repetition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), pp. 35–142Google ScholarPubMed – see also Colebrook, Claire, ‘Univocal’, in Parr, Adrian (ed.), The Deleuze Dictionary (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005), pp. 291–293Google Scholar ; and Nietzsche, FriedrichGood, Beyond and Evil, , Basic Writings of Nietzsche (New York: Modern Library, 2000), p. 238Google Scholar , and The Gay Science (New York: Vintage, 1974), p. 121.Google ScholarPubMed
206 See, for example, Rescher, Nicholas, Process Philosophy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and Robinson, Keith (ed.), Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
