Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bagdonas, Ąžuolas 2015. Turkey as a Great Power? Back to Reality. Turkish Studies, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 310.

    Brooks, Stephen G. Ikenberry, G. John and Wohlforth, William C. 2013. Don't Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment. International Security, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 7.

    Onea, Tudor A. 2013. US Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era.

    Onea, Tudor A. 2013. US Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era.

    EUN, YONG-SOO 2012. Why and how should we go for a multicausal analysis in the study of foreign policy? (Meta-)theoretical rationales and methodological rules. Review of International Studies, Vol. 38, Issue. 04, p. 763.

    Ferguson, Chaka 2012. The Strategic Use of Soft Balancing: The Normative Dimensions of the Chinese–Russian ‘Strategic Partnership’. Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 197.

    Miller, Benjamin 2012. Regional threats and global management of conflicts in regions: The case of the US in the Middle East. International Politics, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 346.

    Murray, Robert W. 2012. Arctic politics in the emerging multipolar system: challenges and consequences. The Polar Journal, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 7.

    Brooks, Stephen G and Wohlforth, William C 2011. Assessing the balance. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 201.

    Prys, Miriam and Robel, Stefan 2011. Hegemony, not empire. Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 14, Issue. S2, p. 247.


America’s Middle East grand strategy after Iraq: the moment for offshore balancing has arrived


In this paper, I argue that there is an emerging consensus among realists that the US should abandon its hegemonic strategy and adopt an offshore balancing strategy. Here, Iraq and the so called war on terrorism (or ‘long war’, or ‘global counter-insurgency’, as some American officials sometimes refer to it) have been the catalysts. Increasingly, it is recognised that US aims in the Persian Gulf/Middle East – and the American military presence in the region – have fuelled terrorism, and caused Iran to self-defensively seek to acquire a nuclear weapons capability. A number of leading realists now argue that the best strategy for the US is to extricate itself from Iraq, reduce its regional footprint, and adopt an offshore balancing strategy.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *