Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Passive revolution: a universal concept with geographical seats

  • Chris Hesketh (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

In this article, I argue that Antonio Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution makes a foundational contribution to International Relations (IR), yet has been relatively under appreciated by the broader discipline. Within the Historical Sociology of International Relations, uneven and combined development has recently been postulated as a key trans-historical law that provides a social theory of the ‘international’. Drawing from, but moving beyond these debates, I will argue that passive revolution is a key conditioning factor of capitalist modernity. I will demonstrate how the concept of passive revolution is the element that explains the connection between the universal process of uneven development and the manner in which specific combinations occur within the capitalist era as geopolitical pressures, in tandem with domestic social forces become internalised into geographically specific state forms. It therefore offers a corrective to the frequently aspatial view that is found in much of the literature in IR regarding uneven and combined development. Additionally, passive revolution provides a more politicised understanding of the present as well as an important theoretical lesson in relation to what needs to be done to affect alternative trajectories of development.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Correspondence to: Chris Hesketh, Oxford Brookes University, Department of Social Sciences, 422a Gibbs Building, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP. Author’s email: chesketh@brookes.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Peter Ives and Nicola Short , ‘On Gramsci and the international: a textual analysis’, Review of International Studies, 39:3 (2013), p. 638

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny , ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations theory and the new Gramscians’, Review of International Studies, 24:1 (1998), pp. 321

Robert Cox , ‘Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12:2 (1983), pp. 162175

Adam D. Morton , ‘The continuum of passive revolution’, Capital & Class, 34:3 (2010), p. 321

John Hobson , ‘What is at stake in the neo-Trostkyist debate? Towards a non-Eurocentric historical sociology of uneven and combined development’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40:1 (2011), p. 141

Michael Burawoy , ‘Two methods in search of science’, Theory and Society, 18:6 (1989), p. 793

Ellen Meiksins Wood , ‘Modernity, postmodernity or capitalism?’, Review of International Political Economy, 4:3 (2007), pp. 539560

Kamran Matin , ‘Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:2 (2013), pp. 353377

Justin Rosenberg , ‘Kenneth Waltz and Leon Trotsky: Anarchy in the mirror of uneven and combined development’, International Politics, 50:2 (2013a), p. 194

Robbie Shilliam , ‘The Atlantic as a vector of uneven and combined development’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:1 (2009), pp. 6988

Phillip McMichael , ‘Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: an alternative comparative method’, American Sociological Review, 55:3 (1990), pp. 385397

Justin Rosenberg Why is there no international historical sociology?’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:3 (2006), pp. 307340

Alex Callinicos , ‘Does capitalism need the state system?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20:4 (2007), pp. 533549

Ray Kielym , ‘Spatial hierarchy and/or contemporary geopolitics: What can and can’t uneven and combined development explain?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25:2 (2013), pp. 231248

Alexander Anievas , ‘1914 in world historical perspective: the “uneven” and “combined” origins of World War I’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:4 (2013), pp. 721746

Jeremy Green , ‘Uneven and combined development and the Anglo-German prelude to World War I’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:2 (2012), pp. 345368

Andreas Bieler , ‘The EU, global Europe and processes of uneven and combined development: the problem of transnational labour solidarity’, Review of International Studies, 39:1 (2013), pp. 161183

Benno Teschke , ‘Advances and impasses in Fred Halliday’s international historical sociology: a critical appraisal’, International Affairs, 87:5 (2011), pp. 10871106

Alex Callinicos and Justin Rosenberg , ‘Uneven and combined development: the social-relational substratum of “the international”? An exchange of letters’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21:1 (2008), p. 85

Sébastien Rioux , ‘Mind the (theoretical) gap: On the poverty of International Relations theorising of uneven and combined development’, Global Society, 29:4 (2015), p. 485

Jamie Allinson and Alexander Anievas , ‘The uses and misuses of uneven and combined development: an anatomy of a concept’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:1 (2009), pp. 4767

Neil Davidson , ‘Putting the nation back into “the international”’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:1 (2009), pp. 928

Ian Bruff , ‘European varieties of capitalism and the international’, European Journal of International Relations, 16:4 (2010), pp. 615638

Chris Hesketh and Adam D. Morton , ‘Spaces of uneven development and class struggle in Bolivia: Transformation or trasformismo?’, Antipode, 46:1 (2014), pp. 149169

Chris Hesketh , ‘From passive revolution to silent revolution: Class forces and the production of state, space and scale in modern Mexico’, Capital & Class, 34:3 (2010), pp. 383407

Ian Bruff , ‘Germany’s Agenda 2010 reforms: Passive revolution at the crossroads’, Capital & Class, 34:3 (2010), p. 411

Christopher Chase-Dunn , ‘Globalization: a world-systems perspective’, Journal of World-Systems Research, 5:2 (1999), p. 204

Adam D. Morton , ‘Structural change and neoliberalism in Mexico: “passive revolution” in the global political economy’, Third World Quarterly, 24:4 (2003), pp. 631653

Phillip Roberts , ‘Passive revolution in Brazil: Struggles over hegemony, religion and development 1964–2007’, Third World Quarterly, 36:9 (2015), pp. 16631681

Sara Motta , ‘The Chilean Socialist Party (PSCh): Constructing consent and disarticulating dissent to neo-liberal hegemony in Chile’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10:2 (2008), pp. 303327

Dorothee Bohle , ‘Neoliberal hegemony, transnational capital and the terms of the EU’s eastward expansion’, Capital & Class, 30:1 (2006), pp. 5786

Stuart Shields , ‘Historicizing transition: the Polish political economy in a period of global structural change – Eastern Central Europe’s passive revolution?’, International Politics, 43:4 (2006), pp. 474499

Rick Simon , ‘Passive revolution, perestroika, and the emergence of the new Russia’, Capital & Class, 34:3 (2010), pp. 429448

Jamie Allinson and Alexander Anievas , ‘The uneven and combined development of the Meiji Restoration: a passive revolutionary road to capitalist modernity’, Capital & Class, 34:3 (2010), pp. 469490

Kevin Gray , ‘Labour and the state in China’s passive revolution’, Capital & Class, 34:3 (2010), pp. 449467

Rita Abrahamsen , ‘The victory of popular forces or passive revolution? A neo-Gramscian perspective on democratisation’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 35:1 (1997), pp. 129152

Fiona Nash , ‘Participation and passive revolution: the reproduction of neoliberal water governance mechanisms in Durban, South Africa’, Antipode, 45:1 (2015), pp. 101120

Andrew Brooks and Alex Loftus , ‘Africa’s passive revolution: crisis in Malawi’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41:3 (2016), pp. 258272

Ian Bruff , ‘The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism’, Rethinking Marxism, 26:1 (2014), pp. 113129

Chris Hesketh , ‘Producing state space in Chiapas: Passive revolution and everyday life’, Critical Sociology, 42:2 (2016), pp. 211228

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 55 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 858 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th March 2017 - 26th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.