Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 32
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dolan, Thomas M. 2016. Go Big or Go Home? Positive Emotions and Responses to Wartime Success. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 230.

    Duncombe, Constance 2016. Cowardice: a brief history, by Chris Walsh, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2014, 304 pp., US$27.95 (hardback), ISBN 9780691138633. Also available as EBook ISBN 978140085203. Global Discourse, Vol. 6, Issue. 1-2, p. 258.

    Friedrichs, Jörg 2016. An intercultural theory of international relations: how self-worth underlies politics among nations. International Theory, Vol. 8, Issue. 01, p. 63.

    Head, Naomi 2016. Costly encounters of the empathic kind: a typology. International Theory, Vol. 8, Issue. 01, p. 171.

    Kotliar, Dan M. 2016. Emotional Oppositions: The Political Struggle over Citizens’ Emotions. Qualitative Sociology,

    Pears, Louise 2016. Ask the audience: television, security andHomeland. Critical Studies on Terrorism, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 76.

    Roach, Steven C 2016. Why moral commitments matter: mapping the ethics and politics of responsible and accountable global governance. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 309.

    Choi, Ji Young 2015. Rationality, norms and identity in international relations. International Politics, Vol. 52, Issue. 1, p. 110.

    Hagström, Linus and Gustafsson, Karl 2015. Japan and identity change: why it matters in International Relations. The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Holmes, Marcus 2015. Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly, p. n/a.

    Villegas, Paloma E. 2015. Moments of Humiliation, Intimidation and Implied ‘Illegality’: Encounters with Immigration Officials at the Border and the Performance of Sovereignty. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 41, Issue. 14, p. 2357.

    Clément, Maéva 2014. Al-Muhajiroun in the United Kingdom: the role of international non-recognition in heightened radicalization dynamics. Global Discourse, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, p. 428.

    COICAUD, JEAN-MARC 2014. Emotions and Passions in the Discipline of International Relations. Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 15, Issue. 03, p. 485.

    Dolan, Thomas M. 2014. Emotion and Strategic Learning in War. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a.

    Eznack, Lucile and Koschut, Simon 2014. Friendship and International Relations.

    Holland, Jack and Solomon, Ty 2014. Affect is what states make of it: articulating everyday experiences of 9/11. Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, p. 262.

    Hutchison, Emma and Bleiker, Roland 2014. Theorizing emotions in world politics. International Theory, Vol. 6, Issue. 03, p. 491.

    Hutchison, Emma 2014. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei 2014. Russia says no: Power, status, and emotions in foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 47, Issue. 3-4, p. 269.

    Lindemann, Thomas 2014. Interest, passion, (non)recognition, and wars: a conceptual essay. Global Discourse, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, p. 483.


You dissin me? Humiliation and post 9/11 global politics


Despite a growing awareness about the importance of emotions to global politics, the discipline of International Relations is still working towards adequate theorisations and investigations of their role. This is particularly noticeable in the fact that there has been little sustained, scholarly examination of the effects of various emotions on the shape and orientation of the US foreign policy reaction to 9/11. This essay seeks to begin to address both of these gaps by examining the role that dynamics of humiliation and counter-humiliation have played in contemporary global politics. In particular, it develops a theoretical understanding of humiliation and then applies this framework to explain how dynamics of humiliation have impacted post 9/11 American global policy. It concludes that we cannot fully understand the sources, and the effects, of post 9/11 contemporary politics (especially US global policy) without taking into account the dynamics of humiliation.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *