Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:34:27.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adapted task configuration of a reconfigurable binary parallel robot with PRRRP structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2012

Daniel Schütz*
Affiliation:
Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
Annika Raatz
Affiliation:
Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
Jürgen Hesselbach
Affiliation:
Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: d.schuetz@tu-bs.de

Summary

Binary-actuated robots offer a discrete workspace with the advantage that no feedback control is needed, as their actuators have two mechanical end-positions. This contribution focuses on a planar parallel robot with a PRRRP structure and driven by rodless pneumatic cylinders. Thus, the robot's workspace only features four destination points, which can be reached quickly and with high repeatability. Because of the fact that there is no possibility to reach in discrete points, an adapted task configuration is essential. The objective of this work is to establish and validate a synthesis and calibration technique for binary parallel robots with a PRRRP structure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chirikjian, G. S., “A Binary Paradigm for Robotic Manipulators,” In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, USA (1994) pp. 30633069.Google Scholar
2.Chirikjian, G. S., “Kinematic synthesis of mechanisms and robotic manipulators with binary actuators,” J. Mech. Des. 117, 573580 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Suthakorn, J. and Chirikjian, G. S., “A new inverse kinematics algorithm for binary manipulators with many actuators,” Adv. Robot. 15 (2), 225244 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lee, D. S. and Chirikjian, G. S., “An Efficient Method for Computing the Forward Kinematics of Binary Manipulators,” In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, USA (1996) pp. 10121017.Google Scholar
5.Ebert-Uphoff, I. and Chirikjian, G. S., “Efficient workspace generation for binary manipulators with many actuators,” J. Robot. Syst. 12 (6), 383400 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Plante, J. S., Santer, M., Dubowsky, S. and Pellegrino, S., “Compliant Bistable Dielectric Elastomer Actuators for Binary Mechatronic Systems,” Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Mechanisms and Robotics (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Sujan, V. and Dubowsky, S., “Design of a lightweight hyper-redundant deployable binary manipulator,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 126 (1), 2939 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.SCHUNK, “GEMOTEC System: Systematic Assembly Automation,” available at: http://www.schunk.com/ (accessed March 2, 2011).Google Scholar
9.EPS-AUTOMATION, “Handling System,” available at: http://www.eps-automation.de/ (accessed March 2, 2011).Google Scholar
10.Takahashi, N., Higuchi, O., Miyakawa, S., Uno, M. and Sato, H., “Pick and Place Unit,” U.S. Patent, Patent Number: 4,595,335 (1986).Google Scholar
11.Schütz, D., Raatz, A. and Hesselbach, J., “The development of a reconfigurable parallel robot with binary actuators,” In: Advances in Robot Kinematics (Lenarčič, J. and Stanišić, M. M., eds.) (Springer+Business Media B.V., Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2010) pp. 225232.Google Scholar
12.Plante, J. S. and Dubowsky, S., “The calibration of a parallel manipulator with binary actuation,” In: Advances in Robot Kinematics (Lenarčič, J. and Wenger, P., eds.) (Springer+Business Media B.V, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2008) pp. 391398.Google Scholar
13.Dizioglu, B., Getriebelehre. Bd. 2: Maßsbestimmung (Vieweg, Berlin, Germany, 1967).Google Scholar
14.Bernhardt, R. and Albright, S. L., Robot Calibration, 1st ed. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1993).Google Scholar
15.Zhuang, H. and Roth, Z., “Method for kinematic calibration of Stewart platforms,” J. Robot. Syst. 10 (3), 391405 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Manipulating Industrial Robots – Performance Criteria and Related Test Methods, (CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 1998).Google Scholar