Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T12:37:05.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assisted passive snake-like robots: conception and dynamic modeling using Gibbs–Appell method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

Gholamreza Vossoughi ,
Hodjat Pendar ,
Zoya Heidari  and
Saman Mohammadi
Gholamreza Vossoughi*
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence in Design, Robotics and Automation (CEDRA), Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave. Tehran 11365-9567, Iran.
Hodjat Pendar
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence in Design, Robotics and Automation (CEDRA), Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave. Tehran 11365-9567, Iran.
Zoya Heidari
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence in Design, Robotics and Automation (CEDRA), Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave. Tehran 11365-9567, Iran.
Saman Mohammadi
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence in Design, Robotics and Automation (CEDRA), Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave. Tehran 11365-9567, Iran.
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: vossough@sharif.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper, we present a novel structure of a snake-like robot. This structure enables passive locomotion in snake-like robots. Dynamic equations are obtained for motion in a horizontal plane, using Gibbs–Appell method. Kinematic model of the robot include numerous nonholonomic constraints, which can be omitted at the beginning by choosing proper coordinates to describe the model in Gibbs–Appell framework. In such a case, dynamic equations will be significantly simplified, resulting in considerable reduction of simulation time. Simulation results show that, by proper selection of initial conditions, joint angles operate in a limit cycle and robot can locomote steadily on a passive trajectory. It can be seen that the passive trajectory is approximately a Serpenoid curve.

Keywords

Snake-like robotPassive motionDynamic modelingGibbs–Appell methodSerpenoid curve

Information

Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 267 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Gray, J., Animal Locomotion (Norton, New York, 1993) pp. 166–193.Google Scholar
2.Hirose, S., Biomechanical Engineering (Kougyou Tyousa Kai, Tokyo, Japan, 1987).Google Scholar
3.Hirose, S., Biologically Inspired Robots: Snake-like Locomotor and Manipulator (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
4.Takanashi, O., Aoki, K. and Yashima, S., “A Gait Control for the Hyper-Redundant Robot O-RO-CHI,” Proceedings of the ROBOMECÕ96, (Ube, Japan, 1996) pp. 78–80.Google Scholar
5.Worst, R. and Linnemann, R., “Construction and Operation of a Snake-Like robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Symposia on Intelligence and Systems, (Los Alamitos, CA, IEEE Press, 1996) pp. 164–169.Google Scholar
6.Mori, M. and Hirose, S., “Development of active cord mechanism ACM-R3 with agile 3D mobility,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (Outrigger Wailea Resort, Maui, Hawaii, USA, IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2001) pp. 1552–1557.Google Scholar
7.Prautsch, P. and Mita, , “Control and Analysis of the Gait of Snake Robots”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, (Hawaii, 1999) pp. 502–507.Google Scholar
8.Ute, J. and Ono, K., “Fast and Efficient Locomotion of a Snake Robot Based on Self-Excitation Principle,” IEEE Proceedings of AMC, (Maribor, Slovenia, 2002) pp. 532–539.Google Scholar
9.Chirikjian, G. S. “Hyper-Redundant Manipulators Dynamics—A Continuum Approximation,” Adv. Robot., 9 (3), 217–243 (1995).Google Scholar
10.Jones, B. A. and Walker, I. D., “Kinematics for multi-section continuum robots,” IEEE Trans Robot. 22 (1), 43–55 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Saito, M., Fukaya, M. and Iwasaki, T., “Serpentine Locomotion with Robotic Snakes,” IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag. 22 (1), 64–81 (2002).Google Scholar
12.McMahon, T. A., “The role of compliance in mammalian running gaits,” J. Exp. Biology 115 (11), 263–282 (1985).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Ahmadi, M., Stable Control of a One-Legged Robot Exploiting Passive Dynamics Ph.D. Thesis Mechanical Engineering Department, McGill University, 1998).Google Scholar
14.Seifert, H. S., “The lunar pogo stick,” J. Spacecraft, 4 (7), 914–943 (1967).Google Scholar
15.McGeer, T., “Passive dynamic walking” Int. J. Robot Res. 9 (2), 62–82 (1990).Google Scholar
16.Raibert, M. H. and Thompson, C. M., “Passive Dynamic Running,” In:Experimental Robotics I (Hayward, V. and Khatib, O., eds.) (Springer-Verlag NY, 1989) pp. 74–83.Google Scholar
17.Featherstone, R., Robot Dynamics Algorithms (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nor-Well, MA, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Ginsberg, J. H., Advanced Engineering Dynamics, (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 1998).Google Scholar
19.Kane, T. R. and Levinson, D. A., Dynamics: Theory and Applications (New York, McGraw-Hill 1985).Google Scholar
20., D. E. “Rosenthal, An Order n Formulation for Robotic Systems,” J. Astronaut. Sci. 38 (4)511–529 (1990).Google Scholar
21.Vukobratovi'c, M. K., Filaretov, V. F. and Korzun, A. I., “A Unified Approach to Mathematical Modeling of Robotic Manipulator Dynamics,” Robotica 12 (5), 411–420 (1994).Google Scholar
22.Jerkovsky, W., “The Structure of Multibody Dynamics Equations,” J. Guid. Cont., 1 (3)173–182 (1978).Google Scholar
23.Baraff, D., “Linear-time dynamics using Lagrange multipliers,” Proc. Annu. Conf. Comp. Graph. Interact. Techn. 30 137–146 (ACM Press, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
24.Anderson, K. S. and Critchley, J. H., “Improved ‘Order-N’ performance algorithm for the simulation of constrained multi-rigid-body dynamic systems,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 9 (2), pp. 185–212 (Springer 2003).Google Scholar
25.Desoyer, K. and Lugner, P., “Recursive formulation for the analytical or numerical application of the Gibbs–Appell method to the dynamics of robots,” Robotica 7 (4)343–347 (1989).Google Scholar
26.Rudas, I. and Toth, A., “Efficient recursive algorithm for inverse dynamics,” Mechatronics 3(2), 205–214 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Mata, V., Provenzano, S., Cuadrado, J. I. and Valero, F., “An O(n) Algorithm for Solving the Inverse Dynamic Problem in Robots by Using the Gibbs–Appell Formulation,” Proceedings of 10th World Congress on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Oulu, Finland (XXX, 1999) pp. 1208–1215.Google Scholar
28.Tavakoli Nia, H., Pishkenari, H. Nejat and Meghdari, A., “A Recursive Approach for Analysis of Snake Robots Using Kane's Equations,” Proceedings of IDETC/CIE (Long Beach, CA, 2005).Google Scholar
29.Naudet, J., Lefeber, D. and Terze, Z., “General Formulation of an Efficient Recursive Algorithm Based On Canonical Momenta for Forward Dynamics of Open-loop Multibody Systems,” IDMEC/IST, Lisbon, Portugal (Jul. 1–4, 2003).Google Scholar
30.de Jal'on, J. Garc'ıa and Bayo, E., Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge (Springer-Verlag), 1994.Google Scholar
31.Brenan, K. E., Campbell, S. L. and Petzold, L. R., “The Numerical Solution of Initial Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations,” (Elsevier Science Publishing New York, 1989).Google Scholar
32.Ma, S. and Tadokoro, N., “Analysis of Creeping Locomotion of a Snake-like Robot on a Slope,” J. Autonom. Robots 20 (1), 15–23 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Ma, S., “Analysis of creeping locomotion of a snake-like robot,” Advan. Robot. 15 (2), 205–224 (2001).Google Scholar