Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:12:26.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of substituting anthropometric joints with revolute joints in humanoid robots and robotic hands: a case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2013

Mehdi Mousavi ,
Aurelio Somà  and
Francesco Pescarmona
Mehdi Mousavi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy Center for Space Human Robotics at PoliTo, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, C.so Trento 21, 10129 Torino, Italy
Aurelio Somà
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
Francesco Pescarmona
Affiliation:
Center for Space Human Robotics at PoliTo, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, C.so Trento 21, 10129 Torino, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mehdi.mousavi@polito.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the human body there are many joints whose functions are very similar to revolute joints. To avoid the complexity of these joints, they are usually substituted by revolute joints in many humanoid robots. Revolute joints have purely rotational motion along their fixed axis, while real joints in the human body have Instantaneous Rotational Axis (IRA) due to their configuration. Substitution of this kind of human joints with revolute (hinge) joints in robots changes the kinematics of joints. Knowing the exact characteristics of the moving axis of rotation in human joints is a prerequisite for the kinematic study of a joint. Here the main geometrical difference between these kinds of joints in humans and their simplified (hinge-like) models in robots is described. Then, as a case study, the mechanism of the three joints of the index finger are compared with their hinge-like model using a multi-body code to understand when revolute joints can be substituted for anthropometric joints in hand exoskeletons and robotic hands. Furthermore, the position of IRA and its distance from the center of the condyle of the joint are presented. The concept and the results can be extended for other fingers and all similar joints, and can be used in humanoid robots, hand exoskeletons and robotic hands.

Keywords

Humanoid robotsRobotic handsHand exoskeletonsHuman jointsFinger biomechanical modelFinger kinematics, Distal interphalangealProximal interphalangealMetacarpophalangeal
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 501 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Leijnse, J. N. A. L. and Spoor, C. W., “Reverse engineering finger extensor apparatus morphology from measured coupled interphalangeal joint angle trajectories – a generic 2D kinematic model,” J. Biomech. 45 (3), 569–578 (2012).Google Scholar
2.Cerveri, P., Momi, E. D., Lopomo, N., Baud-Bovy, G., Barros, R. M. L. and Ferrigno, G., “Finger kinematic modeling and real-time hand motion estimation,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35 (11), 1989–2002 (2007).Google Scholar
3.Fok, K. S. and Chou, S. M., “Development of a finger biomechanical model and its considerations,” J. Biomech. 43 (4), 701–713 (2010).Google Scholar
4.Zhao, D. and Zhang, W., “Topology and Analysis of Three-Phalanx COSA Finger Based on Linkages for Humanoid Robot Hands,” In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications (ICIRA10), Shanghai, China (2010) 465–476.Google Scholar
5.Wu, L. C., Carbone, G. and Ceccarelli, M., “Designing an underactuated mechanism for a 1 active DOF finger operation,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 44 (2), 336–348 (2009).Google Scholar
6.Figliolini, G. and Ceccarelli, M., “A novel articulated mechanism mimicking the motion of index fingers,” Robotica 20 (1), 13–22 (2002).Google Scholar
7.Lee, K. and Guo, J., “Kinematic and dynamic analysis of an anatomically based knee joint,” J. Biomech. 43 (7), 1231–1236 (2010).Google Scholar
8.Mihelj, M., “Human arm kinematics for robot-based rehabilitation,” Robotica 24 (03), 377–383 (2006).Google Scholar
9.Shih, K. S., Lin, S. C., Chao, C. K., Lee, W. S., Lu, T. W. and Hou, S. M., “Biomechanical influences of pin placement and elbow angle on hinge alignment and joint distraction of bridged elbow-pin-fixator construct,” J. Biomech. 43 (4), 757–763 (2010).Google Scholar
10.Che, D. and Zhang, W., “GCUA humanoid robotic hand with tendon mechanisms and its upper limb,” Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3 (4), 395–404 (2011).Google Scholar
11.Ceccarelli, M., Rodriguez, N. E. N. and Carbone, G., “Design and tests of a three finger hand with 1-DOF articulated fingers,” Robotica 24 (02), 183–196 (2006).Google Scholar
12.Bahari, M. S., Jaffar, A., Low, C. Y., Jaafar, R., Roese, K. and Yussof, H., “Design and development of a multifingered prosthetic hand,” Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4 (1)59–66 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Chu, J. U., Jeong, D. H., Youn, I., Choi, K. and Lee, Y. J., “Myoelectric hand prosthesis with novel adaptive grasping and self-locking,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12 (6), 1095–1103 (2011).Google Scholar
14.Yao, S., Ceccarelli, M., Carbone, G., Zhan, Q. and Lu, Z., “Analysis and optimal design of an underactuated finger mechanism for LARM hand,” Front. Mech. Eng. 6 (3), 332–343 (2011).Google Scholar
15.Zurn, J. B., Motai, Y. and Vento, S., “Self-reproduction for articulated behaviors with dual humanoid robots using on-line decision tree classification,” Robotica 30 (2), 315–332 (2012).Google Scholar
16.Choi, H. S., Na, W. and Kang, D., “A humanoid robot capable of carrying heavy objects,” Robotica 29 (05), 667–681 (2011).Google Scholar
17.Carbone, G., Grasping in Robotics, Part II, Mechanism Design (Springer, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2013, ISBN: 978-1-4471-4663-6), pp. 107–189. Available at: http://www.springer.com/engineering/robotics/book/978-1-4471-4663-6. Last accessed July 5, 2013.Google Scholar
18.Moorehead, J. D., Harvey, D. M. and Montgomery, S. C., “A surface-marker imaging system to measure a moving knee's rotational axis pathway in the sagittal plane,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 (3), 384–393 (2001).Google Scholar
19.Zhang, X., Lee, S. W. and Braido, P., “Determining finger segmental centers of rotation in flexion–extension based on surface marker measurement,” J. Biomech. 36 (8), 1097–1102 (2003).Google Scholar
20.Koo, S. and Andriacchi, T. P., “The knee joint center of rotation is predominantly on the lateral side during normal walking,” J. Biomech. 41 (6), 1269–1273 (2008).Google Scholar
21.Chang, L. Y. and Pollard, N. S., “Constrained least-squares optimization for robust estimation of center of rotation,” J. Biomech. 40 (6), 1392–1400 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Chang, L. Y. and Pollard, N. S., “Robust estimation of dominant axis of rotation,” J. Biomech. 40 (12), 2707–2715 (2007).Google Scholar
Gamage, S. S. H. U. and Lasenby, J., “New least squares solutions for estimating the average centre of rotation and the axis of rotation,” J. Biomech. 35 (1), 87–93 (2012).Google Scholar
24.Dumont, C., Albus, G., Kubein-Meesenburg, D., Fanghänel, J., Stürmer, K. M. and Nägerl, H., “Morphology of the interphalangeal joint surface and its functionaml relevance,” J. Hand Surg. 33 (1), 9–18 (2008).Google Scholar
25.Lawrence, T., Trail, I. A. and Noble, J., “Morphological measurements of the proximal interphalangeal joint,” J. Hand Surg. (British and European volume) 29 (3), 242–247 (2004).Google Scholar
26.Dumont, C., Burfeind, H., Kubein-Meesenburg, D., Hosten, N., Fanghanel, J., Gredes, T. and Nagerl, H., “Physiological functions of the human finger,” J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 59(Suppl 5), 69–74 (2008).Google Scholar
27.Leibovic, S. J. and Bowers, W. H., “Anatomy of the proximal interphalangeal joint,” Hand Clin. 10 (2), 169–178 (1994).Google Scholar
28.Ash, H. E. and Unsworth, A., “Proximal interphalangeal joint dimensions for the design of a surface replacement prosthesis,” J. Eng. Med. 210 (28), 95–108 (1996).Google Scholar
29.Amirouche, F., Fundamentals of Multibody Dynamics. Theory and Applications (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006).Google Scholar
30.Shabana, A. A., Dynamics of Multibody Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005).Google Scholar
31.Gibson, I., Advanced Manufacturing Technology for Medical Applications: Reverse Engineering, Software Conversion and Rapid Prototyping (John Wiley, New York, NY, 2005) pp. 123–162.Google Scholar
32.Buryanov, A. and Kotiuk, V., “Proportions of hand segments,” Int. J. Morphol. 28 (3), 755–758 (2010).Google Scholar
33.Schmidt, H. M. and Lanz, U., Surgical Anatomy of the Hand (Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, 2004) pp. 213–238.Google Scholar
34.Kenesi, C., “The interphalangeal joints of the fingers,” Anatomia Clinica 3, 41–48 (1981).Google Scholar
35.MSC Adams, MSC Adams/View Help (MSC Software Corporation, Santa Ana, CA, 2012).Google Scholar
36.Lindberg, D., “MSC Adams Modeling of Mechanical System in A400M Crew Entrance Door,” Master's Thesis (Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2012).Google Scholar
37.Engström, J., Richloow, E. and Wickström, A., “Modeling of Robotic Hand for Dynamic Simulation,” Bachelor's Thesis (KTH University, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010).Google Scholar
38.Giesbers, J., “Contact Mechanics in MSC ADAMS, a Technical Evaluation of the Contact Models in Multibody Dynamics Software MSC Adams,” Bachelor's Thesis (Faculty of Engineering Technology, Applied Mechanics, University of Twente, Netherlands, 2012).Google Scholar
39.MSC Adams, “Help document for Adams/solver,” Doc. ID: DOC10102, available at: http://simcompanion.mscsoftware.com/infocenter/index?page=content&id=DOC10102&cat=1VMO50&actp=LIST (2012), online. Last accessed July 2, 2013.Google Scholar
40.Uchiyama, S., Cooney, W. P., Linscheid, R. L., Niebur, G. and An, K. N., “Kinematics of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger after surface replacement”, J. Hand Surg. 25 (2), 305–312 (2000).Google Scholar