Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Kinematic topology and constraints of multi-loop linkages

  • Andreas Müller (a1)
Summary

Modeling the instantaneous kinematics of lower pair linkages using joint screws and the finite kinematics with Lie group concepts is well established on a solid theoretical foundation. This allows for modeling the forward kinematics of mechanisms as well the loop closure constraints of kinematic loops. Yet there is no established approach to the modeling of complex mechanisms possessing multiple kinematic loops. For such mechanisms, it is crucial to incorporate the kinematic topology within the modeling in a consistent and systematic way. To this end, in this paper a kinematic model graph is introduced that gives rise to an ordering of the joints within a mechanism and thus allows to systematically apply established kinematics formulations. It naturally gives rise to topologically independent loops and thus to loop closure constraints. Geometric constraints as well as velocity and acceleration constraints are formulated in terms of joint screws. An extension to higher order loop constraints is presented. It is briefly discussed how the topology representation can be used to amend structural mobility criteria.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail: a.mueller@jku.at
References
Hide All
1. Alizade, R., Bayram, C. and Gezgin, E., “Structural synthesis of serial platform manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 42, 580599 (2007).
2. Basu, D. and Ghosal, A., “Singularity analysis of platform-type multi-loop spatial mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 32 (3), 375389 (1997).
3. Brockett, R. W., “Robotic Manipulators and the Product of Exponentials Formula,” Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 58, pp 120129 (1984).
4. de Bustos, I. F., et al., “Second order mobility analysis of mechanisms using closure equations,” In: Meccanica 47 (7), 16951704 (Springer, The Netherlands, 2012).
5. Chen, C., “The order of local mobility of mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 46, 12511264 (2011).
6. Davidson, J. K. and Hunt, K. H., Robots and Screw Theory: Applications of Kinematics and Statics to Robotics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
7. Davis, T. H., “Mechanical networks – I,II,III,” Mech. Mach. Theory 18 (2), 95112 (1983).
8. Davies, T. H., “Kirchhoff's circulation law applied to multi-loop kinematic chains,” Mech. Mach. Theory 16 (3), 171183 (1981).
9. Davis, T. H., “A network approach to mechanisms and machines: Some lessons learned,” Mech. Mach. Theory 89, 1427 (2015).
10. Ding, H., Zhao, J. and Huang, Z., “Unified structural synthesis of planar simple and multiple joint kinematic chains,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45 (4), 555568 (2012).
11. Featherstone, R. Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms (Springer Science and Business Media, New York, 2008).
12. Gogu, G., “Mobility of mechanism: A critical review,” Mech. Mach. Theory 40, 10681097 (2005).
13. Gogu, G., Structural Synthesis of Parallel Robots – Part 1: Methodology (Springer, The Netherlands, 2008).
14. Jain, A., “Graph theoretic foundations of multibody dynamics, Part I: Structural properties,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26, 307333 (2011).
15. Hervé, J. M., “Analyse structurelle des mécanismes par groupe des déplacements,” Mech. Mach. Theory 13, 437450 (1978).
16. Hervé, J. M., “Intrinsic formulation of problems of geometry and kinematics of mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 17 (3), 179184 (1982).
17. Kieffer, J., “Differential analysis of bifurcations and isolated singularities of robots and mechanisms,” IEEE T. Rob. Automat. 10 (1), 110 (1994).
18. Laman, G., “On graphs and the rigidity of plane skeletal structures,” J. Eng. Math. 4, 331340 (1970).
19. Lee, A. and Streinu, I., “Pebble Game Algorithms and (k, l)-Sparse Graphs,” Proceedings of the European Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Applications (EuroComb '05) (2005).
20. Lee, A. and Streinu, I., “Pebble game algorithms and sparse graphs,” Discrete Math. 308 (8), 14251437 (1425).
21. Lerbet, J., “Analytic geometry and singularities of mechanisms,” ZAMM, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 78 (10b), 687694 (1999).
22. Merlet, J.-P., Optimal design of robots, Robotics: Science and Systems (Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005).
23. Müller, A., “On the terminology and geometric aspects of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators,” Robotica 31 (1), 137147 (2013).
24. Müller, A., “Higher derivatives of the kinematic mapping and some applications,” Mech. Mach. Theory 76, 7085 (2014).
25. Müller, A., “Representation of the kinematic topology of mechanisms for kinematic analysis,” Mech. Sci. 6, 110, (2015).
26. Müller, A., “Local kinematic analysis of closed-loop linkages -mobility, Singularities, and Shakiness,” ASME J. Mech. Rob. 8, 041013–1 (2016).
27. Müller, A., “Recursive higher-order constraints for linkages with lower kinematic pairs,” Mech. Mach. Theory 100, 3343 (2016).
28. Müller, A., “Coordinate mappings for rigid body motions,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 12 (2), (2016).
29. Müller, A. and Shai, O., “Constraint graphs for combinatorial mobility determination,” Mech. Mach. Theory 108, 260275 (2017).
30. Murray, R. M., Li, Z. and Sastry, S. S., A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994).
31. Park, F. C. and Lynch, K. M., Modern Robotics: Mechanics, Planning and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017).
32. Ploen, S. R. and Park, F. C., “Coordinate-invariant algorithms for robot dynamics,” IEEE Tran. Rob. Automat. Soc. 15 (6), 11301135 (1999).
33. Rico, J. M., Gallardo, J. and Duffy, J., “Screw theory and higher order kinematic analysis of open serial and closed chains,” Mech. Mach. Theory 34 (4), 559586 (1999).
34. Rico, J. M., Gallargo, J. and Ravani, B., “Lie algebra and the mobility of kinematic chains,” J. Robot. Syst. 20 (8), 477499 (2003).
35. Rico, J. M. and Ravani, B., “On mobility analysis of linkages using group theory,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 125, 7080 (2003).
36. Rico, J. M., Aguilera, L. D., Gallardo, J., Rodriguez, R., Orozco, H. and Barrera, J. M., “A more general mobility criterion for parallel platforms,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 128, 207219 (2004).
37. Rojas, N. and Thomas, F., Forward Kinematics of the General Triple-Arm Robot Using a Distance-Based Formulation, In: Proc. Computational Kinematics (Zeghloul, Said, Romdhane, Lotfi and Larib, Med Amine, eds.) (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2017) pp. 257–26.
38. Pozhbelko, V., “A unified structure theory of multibody open-, closed-, and mixed-loop mechanical systems with simple and multiple joint kinematic chains,” Mech. Mach. Theory 100, 116 (2016).
39. Schulze, B., Sljoka, A. and Whiteley, W., “How does symmetry impact the flexibility of proteins,” Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 372, (2014).
40. Selig, J., Geometric Fundamentals of Robotics (Monographs in Computer Science Series) (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005).
41. Sljoka, A., Algorithms in Rigidity Theory with Applications to Protein Flexibility and Mechanical Linkages (York University, Toronto, 2012).
42. Sljoka, A., Shai, O. and Whiteley, W., “Checking Mobility and Decomposition of Linkages Via Pebble Game Algorithm,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC), August 28–31 (2011) Washington, USA.
43. Shai, O., Sljoka, A. and Whiteley, W., “Directed graphs,” Decompositions, Spatial Rigidity, Discrete Appl. Math. 161, 30283047 (2013).
44. Sugimoto, K., “Kinematic analysis and derivation of equations of motion for mechanisms with loops of different motion spaces (theoretical analysis),” JSME Int. J. Series C Mech. Syst., Mach. Elements Manuf. 44 (3), 610617 (2001).
45. Talabă, D., “Mechanical models and the mobility of robots and mechanisms,” Robotica 33 (1), 181193 (2015).
46. Uicker, J. J., Ravani, B. and Sheth, P. N. Matrix Methods in the Design Analysis of Mechanisms and Multibody Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013).
47. Wei, G., Dai, S., Wang, S. and Luo, H., “Kinematic analysis and prototype of a metamorphic anthropomorphic hand with a reconfigurable palm,” Int. J. Human. Robot. 08 (3), 459479 (2011).
48. White, N. and Whiteley, W., “The algebraic geometry of motions of bar-and-body frameworks,” SIAM J. Algebr. Discrete Meth. 8 (1), 132 (1987).
49. Whiteley, W., “Counting out to the flexibility of molecules,” Phys. Biol. 2, S116S126 (2005).
50. Whiteley, W., “Rigidity and Scene Analysis,” In: Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, 2nd ed. (Goodman, J. E. and O'Rourke, J., eds.) (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2004).
51. Wittenburg, J., Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart (1977).
52. Wittenburg, J., Dynamics of Multibody Systems 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008).
53. Wohlhart, K., “Screw Spaces and Connectivities in Multiloop Linkages,” In: On Advances in Robot Kinematics (Lenarčič, J. and Galletti, C., eds.) (Springer, Dordrecht, 2004) pp. 97104.
54. Yan, H.-S., Creative Design of Mechanical Devices (Springer, 1998).
55. Zlatanov, D., Bonev, I. A. and Gosselin, C. M., “Constraint Singularities as C-Space Singularities,” In: Advances in Robot Kinematics, Theory And Application (Lenarčič, J. and Thomas, F., eds.) (Springer, Dordrecht, 2002) 183192.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Robotica
  • ISSN: 0263-5747
  • EISSN: 1469-8668
  • URL: /core/journals/robotica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd August 2018 - 14th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.