Skip to main content

Variable admittance control of the exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation based on a novel strength metric

  • Ali Taherifar (a1), Gholamreza Vossoughi (a1) and Ali Selk Ghafari (a2)

Assist-as-needed control is underlain by the aim of replacing skillful therapists with rehabilitation robots. The objective of this research was to introduce a smart assist-as-needed control system for the elderly or partially paralyzed individuals. The main function of the proposed system is to assist the patients just in the required sub phases of the motion. To ensure that a smart and compliant system is developed, the target admittance gains of the controller was adapted according to the concept of energy The admittance gains were modified so that an exoskeleton reduces interaction energy in cases wherein users have sufficient strength for task execution and maximizes the interaction energy in the required subphases. The results of simulations and an experimental investigation on a novel exoskeleton showed that the proposed adaptive admittance control improves performance to a level substantially higher than that achieved with constant impedance control.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail:
Hide All
1. Riener R., Lunenburger L., Jezernik S., Anderschitz M., Colombo G. and Dietz V., “Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13 (3), 380394 (2005).
2. Emken J. L., Bobrow J. E. and Reinkensmeyer D. J., “Robotic Movement Training as an Optimization Problem: Designing a Controller that Assists only as Needed,” Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. 9th International Conference on IEEE (2005) pp. 307–312.
3. Han Y., Zhu S., Zhou Z., Shi Y. and Hao D., “Research on a multimodal actuator-oriented power-assisted knee exoskeleton,” Robotica 35 (9), 19061922 (2016).
4. Cai L. L. et al., “Implications of assist-as-needed robotic step training after a complete spinal cord injury on intrinsic strategies of motor learning,” J. Neuroscience 26 (41), 1056410568 (2006).
5. Emken J. L., Harkema S. J., Beres-Jones J., Ferreira C. K. and Reinkensmeyer D. J., “Feasibility of manual teach-and-replay and continuous impedance shaping for robotic locomotor training following spinal cord injury,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55 (1), 322334 (2008).
6. Wolbrecht E. T., Chan V., Reinkensmeyer D. J. and Bobrow J. E., “Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16 (3), 286297 (2008).
7. Oboe R. and Pilastro D., “Non-linear Adaptive Impedance Controller for Rehabilitation Purposes,” Proceedings of the Advanced Motion Control (AMC), 2014 IEEE 13th International Workshop on IEEE, (2014) pp. 272–277.
8. Hussain S., Jamwal P. K., Ghayesh M. H. and Xie S. Q., “Assist-as-needed control of an intrinsically compliant robotic gait training orthosis,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64 (2), 16751685 (2017).
9. Burdet E., Ganesh G., Yang C. and Albu-Schäffer A., “Interaction Force, Impedance and Trajectory Adaptation: By Humans, for Robots,” In: Experimental Robotics (Khatib O., Kumar V. and Sukhatme G., eds.), Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 79, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014) pp. 331345.
10. Mehdi H. and Boubaker O., “Stiffness and impedance control using Lyapunov theory for robot-aided rehabilitation,” Int. J. Social Robot. 4 (1), 107119 (2012).
11. Li Y., Sam Ge S. and Yang C., “Learning impedance control for physical robot–environment interaction,” Int. J. Control 85 (2), 182193 (2012).
12. Chien M.-C. and Huang A.-C., “Adaptive impedance control of robot manipulators based on function approximation technique,” Robotica 22 (04), 395403 (2004).
13. Winter D. A., Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. (Wiley, 2009).
14. Hogan N., “Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part III applications,” J. Dynamic Syst., Meas. Control 107 (2), 17 (1985).
15. Oh S., Baek E., Song S.-k., Mohammed S., Jeon D. and Kong K., “A generalized control framework of assistive controllers and its application to lower limb exoskeletons,” Robot. Autonomous Syst. 73, 6877 (2014).
16. Karavas N., Ajoudani A., Tsagarakis N., Saglia J., Bicchi A. and Caldwell D., “Tele-impedance based assistive control for a compliant knee exoskeleton,” Robot. Autonomous Syst. 73, 7890 (2014).
17. Taherifar A., Vossoughi G. and Selk Ghafari A., “Optimal target impedance selection of the robot interacting with human,” Adv. Robot. 31 (8), 113 (2017).
18. Slotine J.-J. E. and Li W., Applied Nonlinear Control (No. 1). (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991).
19. Huang A.-C. and Chien M.-C., Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators: A Unified Regressor-free Approach. (World Scientific, 2010).
20. Sharifi M., Behzadipour S. and Vossoughi G., “Nonlinear model reference adaptive impedance control for human–robot interactions,” Control Eng. Practice 32, 927 (11//2014).
21. Tsuji T. and Tanaka Y., “Bio-mimetic impedance control of robotic manipulator for dynamic contact tasks,” Robot. Autonomous Syst. 56 (4), 306316 (2008).
22. Kai C.-Y. and Huang A.-C., “A regressor-free adaptive controller for robot manipulators without Slotine and Li's modification,” Robotica 31 (07), 10511058 (2013).
23. Desai R. and Geyer H., “Robust Swing Leg Placement under Large Disturbances,” Proceedings of the Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2012 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, (2012) pp. 265–270.
24. Desai R. and Geyer H., “Muscle-reflex Control of Robust Swing Leg Placement,” Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, (2013) pp. 2169–2174.
25. Song S., Desai R. and Geyer H., “Integration of an Adaptive Swing Control into a Neuromuscular Human Walking Model,” Proceedings of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, (2013) pp. 4915–4918.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0263-5747
  • EISSN: 1469-8668
  • URL: /core/journals/robotica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 17 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th November 2017 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.