Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-9lvz7 Total loading time: 0.244 Render date: 2021-09-28T03:55:19.978Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Conflicts of power, landscape and amenity in debates over the British Super Grid in the 1950s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2019

Katrina Navickas*
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire

Abstract

The ‘Super Grid’ network of high-voltage power lines transformed the landscapes of England and southern Scotland in the 1950s. This article examines debates over the siting of pylons, with a focus on the public inquiries into the proposed lines across the Pennines in Lancashire. It brings together archives on electrification from the newly nationalised British Electricity Authority, preservationist groups and local government to reveal deeper insights into processes of local and national decision-making about and popular attitudes to the rural landscape. It uncovers how the public inquiries exposed tensions and differences about the definition of amenity, not just between the electricity industry and preservationists, but also between interests representing urban industrial districts and the National Parks, northern and southern England, and within the preservationist movement. The conflicts over pylons and amenity shows how narratives of landscape preservation were contested and riven with class, region and economic differences in the postwar period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hansard Parliamentary Debates, ‘Debate in the House of Commons on the Electricity Bill’, vol. 432, cols 1404–531 (3rd February 1947), <https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1947/feb/03/electricity-bill> [6th September 2018].

2 Hannah, Leslie, Engineers, Managers and Politicians: The First Fifteen Years of Nationalised Electricity Supply in Britain (Basingstoke, 1982), pp. 7, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hannah, Leslie, Electricity Before Nationalisation: A Study of the Development of the Electricity Supply Industry in Britain to 1948 (London, 1982)Google Scholar.

3 Nottingham Journal, 24th July 1950, 16th July 1953.

4 The National Archives, Kew (hereafter TNA) POWE 14, British Electricity Authority and Central Electricity Authority records, Ministry of Power and Fuel, 1947–60; TNA COU 1/33, National Parks Commission, Electricity subcommittee records, 1950–5; Museum of English Rural Life Special Collections, University of Reading (hereafter MERL) C/1, archive of the Campaign for the Preservation of Rural England, 1950–60.

5 TNA POWE 14/1015, 1017, minutes of public inquiry into the 275 kV line between Blackstone Edge and Carrington/Pennington, 2nd November 1954; TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, 2nd November 1954; MERL C/1/62/90, Stalybridge-Penwortham/Monk Fryston 275 kV line, public inquiry, Oldham, 22nd September 1959.

6 Sheail, John, ‘Power to the People: Power Stations and the National Grid’, in Brassley, Paul, Burchardt, Jeremy and Sayer, Karen, eds, Transforming the Countryside: the Electrification of Rural Britain (Abingdon, 2017), p. 39Google Scholar.

7 Weightman, G., Children of Light: How Electricity Changed Britain Forever (London, 2011)Google Scholar; Hughes, Thomas, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930 (Baltimore, 1988)Google Scholar; Byatt, I. C. R., The British Electrical Industry, 1875–1914: The Economic Returns to a New Technology (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar; Self, H. and Watson, E. M., Electricity Supply in Great Britain: its Development and Organisation (London, 1952)Google Scholar; Baker, John Leon, ‘Planning the Future of the Electricity Supply Industry, 1935–1948’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, 1991)Google Scholar; Moore-Colyer, R. J., ‘Lighting the landscape: rural electrification in Wales’, Welsh History Review, 23:4 (2007), 7292Google Scholar.

8 Hannah, Engineers, Managers and Politicians; Hill, C. N., An Atomic Empire: A Technical History of the Rise and Fall of the UK Atomic Energy Programme (London, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zoe Gardner, ‘Landscapes of Power: the Cultural and Historical Geographies of Renewable Energy in Britain since the 1870s’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, 2008).

9 Luckin, Bill, Questions of Power: Electricity and Environment in Interwar Britain (Manchester, 1990), p. 4Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., p. 179; Field, Gregory, book review, Business History Review, 65:3 (1991), 699701CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nye, David, book review, British Journal for the History of Science, 25:2 (1992), 378–9Google Scholar.

11 Evans, David, A History of Nature Conservation in Britain, 2nd edn (London, 1997), pp. 53–7Google Scholar.

12 Hannah, Engineers, Managers and Politicians, pp. 2, 7.

13 Matless, David, Landscape and Englishness, 2nd edn (London, 2016), pp. 34–5Google Scholar, 71–2, 279.

14 Sheail, John, ‘The “amenity” clause: an insight into half a century of environmental protection in the United Kingdom’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 17:2 (1992), 152–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Howkins, Alun, The Death of Rural England: A Social History of the Countryside (London, 2003), p. 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Elson, Martin J., Green Belts: Conflict Mediation in the Urban Fringe (London, 1986)Google Scholar; Cherry, Gordon and Rogers, Alan, Rural Change and Planning (London, 1996)Google Scholar; Sturzaker, John and Mell, Ian, Green Belts: Past, Present, Future? (Abingdon, 2017)Google Scholar.

17 Brassley, Burchardt and Sayer, eds, Transforming the Countryside, p. 8.

18 Sheail, ‘Power to the People’, p. 47; Sheail, ‘The “amenity” clause’, 157; Sheail, J., Power in Trust: The Environmental History of the Central Electricity Generating Board (Oxford, 1991), p. 112Google Scholar. See also Shirley, Rosemary, ‘Cultures of Connectivity: Visual Representations of a Networked Countryside in the Early Twentieth Century’, in Bluemel, Kristen and McCluskey, Michael, eds, Rural Modernity: A Critical Intervention (Edinburgh, 2018)Google Scholar.

19 Hansard Parliamentary Debates, ‘Electricity Pylons in Beauty Spots’, House of Lords, vol. 198, cols 546–68 (2nd July 1956), <https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/1956-07-02/debates/e6397899-9d14-48e3-9973-73d5db7a5bef/ElectricityPylonsInBeautySpots> [24th August 2018].

20 Hansard Parliamentary Debates, ‘Electricity Bill’, House of Lords, vol. 204, cols 148–92 (30th May 1957), <https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1957/may/30/electricity-bill>, [24th August 2018].

21 Sheail, ‘The “amenity clause”’, 155; Sheail, Power in Trust, p. 112.

22 TNA POWE 14/1017, list of Bolton County Borough objections, 1953–4.

23 TNA POWE 14/1015, correspondence of district councils to the Ministry of Fuel and Power, June 1954.

24 TNA POWE 14/1015, Ministry of Fuel and Power, schedule, 12th November 1954.

25 TNA POWE 14/1021, minutes of the second inquiry, December 1955.

26 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, November 1954, Speech of Mr Thesiger, QC.

27 TNA POWE 14/1015, note EL 82/16/186.

28 Brimblecombe, Peter, ‘The Clean Air Act after fifty years’, Weather, 61:11 (2006), 312CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Evans, History of Nature Conservation, p. 105.

29 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 23.

30 Ibid., pp. 22–3.

31 TNA POWE 14/1017, minutes of the public inquiry, Bolton County Borough objections.

32 TNA POWE 14/1023, minutes of the public inquiry, Tyldesley and Whitworth objections.

33 Hannikainen, Matti, The Greening of London, 1920–2000 (Abingdon, 2016), p. 97Google Scholar.

34 An Advisory Plan, South Lancashire and North Cheshire Advisory Planning Committee, prepared by Nicholas, R. and Hellier, N. J. (Manchester, 1947), p. 70Google Scholar; Matless, Landscape and Englishness, pp. 34–5; Nairn, I., ed., ‘Outrage: special issue’, Architectural Review, 117:702 (1955)Google Scholar.

35 Howkins, Death of Rural England, p. 189.

36 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 30; POWE 14/1023, minutes of the public inquiry, pp. 23–4.

37 Hansard Parliamentary Debates, ‘Proposed New Super Grid’, House of Lords, vol. 199, cols 487–513 (31st July 1956), <https://hansard.parliamentuk/Lords/1956-07-31/debates/d1f760b5-ab8d-4b76-8f58-50a6cec294be/ProposedNewSuper-Grid> [24th August 2018].

38 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 41.

39 Dart, Reginald, The Town Plan for Turton (Turton, 1947)Google Scholar, in TNA POWE 14/1023, minutes of the public inquiry; Matless, Landscape and Englishness, pp. 82–3.

40 TNA POWE 14/1016, statements to the public enquiry, statement by P. A. Barnes.

41 Sheail, Power in Trust, p. 112.

42 TNA COU 1/33, BEA memorandum, ‘Development of electricity supply in National Park and rural areas’, October 1950; Rosemary Shirley, ‘The Women’s Institute Goes Electric’, in Brassley, Burchardt and Sayer, eds, Transforming the Countryside, p. 143.

43 TNA COU 1/33, Duff's memorandum on meeting with the BEA, 23rd November 1950.

44 TNA COU 1/33, amended version of ‘Development of electricity supply in National Parks and rural areas document’, 1950.

45 Cherry and Rogers, Rural Change and Planning, pp. 127–8.

46 TNA POWE 14/1015, R. Metcalfe to C. Murphy, 12th October 1954; POWE 14/1022, Report of the public inquiry, p. 15.

47 Ingold, Tim, The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (London, 2000), p. 198Google Scholar; for taskscapes in the Pennines, see Navickas, Katrina, ‘Luddism, incendiarism and the defence of rural taskscapes in 1812’, Northern History, 48:1 (2011), 5973CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 16.

49 TNA POWE 14/1015, H. G. Griffin to the Ministry of Fuel and Power, 27th September 1954.

50 TNA POWE 14/1023, minutes of the public inquiry.

51 TNA POWE 14/1016, statement by P. A. Barnes.

52 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, pp. 10–11.

53 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 30.

54 Climber and Rambler Magazine, vol. 4 (1965), p. 20; Hill, Howard, Freedom to Roam: the Struggle for Access to Britain’s Moors and Mountains (Ashbourne, 1980), pp. 35Google Scholar, 109; see Barnes, P. A., Trespassers Will Be Prosecuted (Sheffield, 1934)Google Scholar.

55 This was especially the case in the American context: Carr, Ethan, Wilderness by Design: Landscape Architecture and the National Park Service (Lincoln, NA, 1998)Google Scholar.

56 Gardner, ‘Landscapes of Power’, p. 6; see Dehaene, Michiel, ‘A conservative framework for regional development: Patrick Abercrombie’s interwar experiments in regional planning’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25:2 (2005), 133–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar, which suggests that Abercrombie’s interpretation of ‘wild country’ in regional plans was more elastic than the more codified definition in his Greater London Plan (London, 1945).

57 Lewis, Alan, ‘Planning through conflict: competing approaches in the preparation of Sheffield’s postwar reconstruction’, Planning Perspectives, 28:1 (2013), 2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 TNA POWE 14/1016, statement by P. A. Barnes.

59 Cherry and Rogers, Rural Change and Planning, p. 133; Merriman, Peter, Driving Spaces: A Cultural-Historical Geography of England’s M1 Motorway (Oxford, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 TNA POWE 14/1023, report of J. G. Birkett, November 1954.

61 TNA POWE 14/1016, statement by P. A. Barnes; Ingold, The Perception of the Environment, p. 195.

62 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 17.

63 Matless, Landscape and Englishness, p. 45.

64 TNA POWE 14/1016, statement by P. A. Barnes.

65 Lancashire Evening Post, 22nd January 1955.

66 Bolton Journal and Guardian, 5th November 1954; Bolton Evening News, 28th September, 2 and 3 November 1954; Bolton Standard; Rochdale Observer for this period do not contain any editorials or letters on the Super Grid plans.

67 TNA POWE 14/1023, minutes of the public inquiry; POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 25.

68 Matless, Landscape and Englishness, p. 55.

69 Carr, T. W., Electric Power Stations (London, 1955), p. 110Google Scholar.

70 TNA POWE 14/1016, statement of Lancashire County Council to the inquiry.

71 TNA POWE 14/1022, report of the public inquiry, p. 21.

72 Sheail, Power in Trust, pp. 141–3.

73 TNA POWE 14/884, public inquiry at Cheltenham, 27th and 28th January 1954.

74 For example, letter to the editor in Birmingham Daily Post, 22nd October 1956.

75 MERL C/1/62/90, minutes of proceedings at a public local inquiry, Town Hall Oldham, 22nd September 1959.

76 MERL C/1/62/90, minutes; Gardener, ‘Landscapes of Power’, p. 6; Crowe, Sylvia, The Landscape of Power (London, 1958)Google Scholar.

77 Howkins, Death of Rural England, pp. 189–90; Cherry and Rogers, Rural Change and Planning, pp. 130, 133; Kelly, Matthew, ‘The Nature State in Postwar Britain’, in von Hardenberg, Wilko Graf, Kelly, Matthew, Leal, Claudia and Wakild, Emily, eds, The Nature State: Rethinking the History of Conservation (Abingdon, 2017), pp. 116–17Google Scholar.

78 TNA COU 1/33, minutes of the NPC electricity subcommittee, 11th September 1950.

79 MERL C/1/62/90, Barnes to Griffin, 9th July 1959.

80 TNA POWE 14/1016, statement by P. A. Barnes.

81 Luckin, Questions of Power, p. 179.

82 MERL C/1/62/90, draft statement by P. A. Barnes at the public inquiry, Town Hall Oldham, 22nd September 1959.

83 Greenhalgh, James, Reconstructing Modernity: Space, Power and Governance in Mid Twentieth-Century British Cities (Manchester, 2018), p. 136Google Scholar.

84 Matless, Landscape and Englishness, p. 63.

85 Jay, Stephen, ‘The forces shaping local planning policy on high voltage electricity installations’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 6:3/4 (2004), 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

86 Cotton, Matthew and Devine-Wright, Patrick, ‘Putting pylons into place: a UK case study of public perspectives on the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56:8 (2013), 1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, Christopher R. and Eiser, Richard, ‘Understanding “local” opposition to wind development in the UK: how big is a backyard?’, Energy Policy, 38:6 (2010), 3108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

87 Woods, Michael, ‘Conflicting environmental visions of the rural: windfarm development in mid Wales’, Sociologia Ruralis, 43:3 (2003), 286CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Conflicts of power, landscape and amenity in debates over the British Super Grid in the 1950s
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Conflicts of power, landscape and amenity in debates over the British Super Grid in the 1950s
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Conflicts of power, landscape and amenity in debates over the British Super Grid in the 1950s
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *