Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T18:16:13.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Dictionary without Definitions: Romanticist Science in the Production and Presentation of the Grimm Brothers’ German Dictionary, 1838–1863

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2014

Kelly Kistner
Kelly Kistner*
Affiliation:
University of Washington E-mail: kistner@u.washington.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Between 1838 and 1863 the Grimm brothers led a collaborative research project to create a new kind of dictionary documenting the history of the German language. They imagined the work would present a scientific account of linguistic cohesiveness and strengthen German unity. However, their dictionary volumes (most of which were arranged and written by Jacob Grimm) would be variously criticized for their idiosyncratic character and ultimately seen as a poor, and even prejudicial, piece of scholarship. This paper argues that such criticisms may reflect a misunderstanding of the dictionary. I claim it can be best understood as an artifact of romanticist science and its epistemological privileging of subjective perception coupled with a deeply-held faith in inter-subjective congruence. Thus situated, it is a rare and detailed case of Romantic ideas and ideals applied to the scientific study of social artifacts. Moreover, the dictionary's organization, reception, and legacy provide insights into the changing landscape of scientific practice in Germany, showcasing the difficulties of implementing a romanticist vision of science amidst widening gaps between the public and professionals, generalists and specialists.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 683 - 707
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aarsleff, Hans. [1967] 1979. The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Stephen G. 1999. Darwinism and the Linguistic Image : Language, Race, and Natural Theology in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrine, Frederick. 1998. “The Metamorphosis of the Scientist.” In Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature, edited by Seamon, David and Zajonic, Arthur, 33–54. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bahr, Joachim. 1991. “Periodik der Wörterbuchbearbeitung Veränderungen von Wörterbuchkonzepftion und - praxis.” In Studien zum Deutschen Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, Band I, edited by Kirkness, Alan, et al., 1–50. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph. 1971. The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Berlin Brandenburg Academy of Science. “Das DWB.” Last accessed July 30, 2011 (http://dwb.bbaw.de/dwb/dwbstart.html).Google Scholar
Bontempelli, Pier Carlo. [2001] 2004. Knowledge, Power, and Discipline: German Studies and National Identity. Translated by Poole, Gabriele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Christmann, Hans Helmut. 1994. “Linguistics and Modern Philology in Germany 1800–1840 as ‘Scientific’ Subjects and as University Disciplines.” In Romanticism in Science: Science in Europe, 1790–1840, edited by Poggi, Stefano and Bossi, Maurizio, 203–214. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Alan P. 1998. “The Resurrection of Thinking and the Redemption of Faust: Goethe's New Scientific Attitude.” In Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature, edited by Seamon, David and Zajonic, Arthur, 255–276. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Edward. 1987. The Mind of God and the Works of Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan A. 2000. Collecting and Historical Consciousness in Early Nineteenth-Century Germany. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, and Jardine, Nicholas. 1990. “Introduction: The Age of Reflection.” In Romanticism and the Sciences, edited by Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas, 1–9. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1884. Einleitung in das Sprachstudium: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte und Methodik der vergleichenden Sprachforschung. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.Google Scholar
Denecke, Ludwig. 1980. “Jacob Grimms Vorrede zum Dritten Bande des Deutschen Wörterbuchs.” In Geschichte des Deutschen Wörterbuchs 1838–1863: Dokumente zu den Lexikographen Grimm, edited by Kirkness, Alan, 267–78. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag.Google Scholar
Dettelbach, Michael. 1996. “Humboldtian Science.” In Cultures of Natural History, edited by Jardine, Nicholas, Secord, James A., and Spary, Emma, 287–304. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrar, W. V. 1976. “Science and the German University System.” In The Emergence of Science in Western Europe, edited by Crosland, Maurice, 179–192. New York: Neale Watson Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Ganz, Peter. 1973. Jacob Grimm's Conception of German Studies: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford, 18 May 1973. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grass, Günter. 2010. Grimms Wörter: eine Liebserklärung. Göttingen: Steidl.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1854. “Vorwort zu Band I.” In Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig: S. Hirzel Verlag.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. [1998] 2001. “What Is a People? The Frankfurt ‘Germanists’ Assembly’ of 1846 and the Self Understanding of the Humanities in the Vormärz.” In The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, edited and translated by Pensky, Max, 1–25. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Roger. 1971. The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. 2009. “Roots, Races, and the Return to Philology.” Representations 106 (1):34–62.Google Scholar
Henne, Helmut. 1990. “Jacob Grimm and Wilhelm Grimm at Work on Their Dictionary.” In The Grimm Brothers and the Germanic Past, edited by Antonsen, Elmer H., et al., 89–96. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Holmes, Richard. 2008. The Age of Wonder. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Holland, Jocelyn. 2009. German Romanticism and Science: The Procreative Poetics of Goethe, Novalis, and Ritter. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holly, Werner. 1991. “’Wilde pflanzen ohne nährende frucht’ – Die Behandlung des politisch-sozialen Wortschatzes im Deutschen Wörterbuch.” In Studien zum Deutschen Wörterbuch von Jacob Grim und Wilhelm Grimm, Band II, edited by Kirkness, Alan, et al., 347–405. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlitz, Bernd. 1991. “Deutsches Wörterbuch – Hausbuch der Nation? Probleme der Benutzung und Benutzungmöglichkeiten.” In Studien zum Deutschen Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, Band II, edited by Kirkness, Alan, et al., 407–434. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas. 1996. “Naturphilosophie and the Kingdoms of Nature.” In Cultures of Natural History, edited by Jardine, Nicholas, Secord, James A., and Spary, Emma, 230–245. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemble, John Mitchell. 1838. “The Hanoverian Coup d’Etat.” British and Foreign Review; or, European Quarterly Journal, 6 (11):269–338.Google Scholar
Kemble, John Mitchell. 1840. “The Political Opinions of the Germans.” British and Foreign Review; or, European Quarterly Journal 10 (19):25–49.Google Scholar
Kirkness, Alan. 1980. Geschichte des Deutschen Wörterbuchs 1838–1863: Dokumente zu den Lexikographen Grimm. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag.Google Scholar
Kistner, Kelly. 2013. “‘A Word Factory Was Wanted’: Organizational Objectivity in the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary.” Social Studies of Science 43 (6):801–828.Google Scholar
Knight, David M. 1976. “German Science in the Romantic Period.” In The Emergence of Science in Western Europe, edited by Crosland, Maurice, 161–178. New York: Neale Watson Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Knight, David. 1986. The Age of Science: The Scientific World-View in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Knight, David. 1990. “Romanticism and the Sciences.” In Romanticism and the Sciences, edited by Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas, 13–24. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad. 1990. “Jacob Grimm's Position in the Development of Linguistics as a Science.” In The Grimm Brothers and the Germanic Past, edited by Antonsen, Elmer H., et al., 7–23. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kraus, Hans-Christof. 2013. “Die Gelehrten und der cholerische König.” Damals 45 (5):40–41.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1961. “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science.” Isis 52 (2):161–193.Google Scholar
Kühn, Peter. 1991. “wir wollen kein Gesetzbuch machen. Die normativen Kommentare Jacob Grimms im Deutschen Wörterbuch.” In Studien zum Deutschen Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, Band I, edited by Kirkness, Alan, et al., 104–167. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles. 1980. State, Society, and University in Germany, 1700–1914. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1936. Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Edited by Moore, M. H.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Megill, Allan. 1994. “Introduction: Four Senses of Objectivity.” In Rethinking Objectivity, edited by Megill, Allan, 1–20. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mellor, Chauncey Jeffries. 1972. “Scholarly Purpose and National Purpose in Jacob Grimm's Work on the Deutsches Wörterbuch.” Ph. D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Metcalf, George. 1967. “Review: Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm. Neubearbeitung, Vol. I, Fascicle 1: A-Abenteuer.” Modern Philology 64 (4):386–389.Google Scholar
Miller, Douglas. 1995. “Preface.” In Scientific Studies, vol. 12 of Goethe: The Collected Works, edited and translated by Miller, Douglas. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, S.R. 1990. “Schelling and the Origins of his Naturphilosophie.” In Romanticism and the Sciences, edited by Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas, 25–37. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolson, Malcolm. 1987. “Alexander von Humboldt, Humboldtian Science and the Origins of the Study of Vegetation.” History of Science 25:167–194.Google Scholar
Osselton, Noel. 2000. “Murray and His European Counterparts.” In Lexicography and the OED, edited by Mugglestone, Lynda, 59–76. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2009. “Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World.” Critical Inquiry 35:931–961.Google Scholar
Püschel, Ulrich. 1991. “Zwischen Erörterung und Ergebnisdarstellung Zu Wörterbuchstilen im Deutschen Wörterbuch.” In Studien zum Deutschen Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, Band I, edited by Kirkness, Alan, et al., 51–103. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Reichman, Oskar. 1991. “Zum Urbegriff in den Bedeutungserläuterungen Jacob Grimms (auch im Unterscheid zur Bedeutungsdefinition bei Daniel Sanders).” In Studien zum Deutschen Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, Band I, edited by Kirkness, Alan, et al., 299–345. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Paul. 1974. “The Beginnings of Morphology: Linguistic Botanizing in the 18th Century. Historiographica Linguistica 1 (3):313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1990. “Genius in Romantic Natural Philosophy.” In Romanticism and the Sciences, edited by Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas, 82–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Elinor S. 1990. “Romantic Philosophy and the Organization of the Disciplines: The Founding of the Humboldt University of Berlin.” In Romanticism and the Sciences, edited by Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas, 38–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shippy, Tom. 2003a. The Road to Middle-Earth: How J.R.R. Tolkien Created a New Mythology. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Shippy, Tom. 2003b. “Grimm's Law: How One Man Revolutionized the Humanities.” Times Literary Supplement, November 7, 14–15.Google Scholar
Tresch, John. 2010. “Even the Tools Will Be Free: Humboldt's Romantic Technologies.” In The Heavens on Earth: Observatories and Astronomy in Nineteenth-Century Science and Culture, edited by Aubin, D., Bigg, C., and Sibum, H.O., 253–284. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tresch, John. 2012. The Romantic Machine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Steven. 1981. “The Prussian Professoriate and the Research Imperative 1790–1840.” In Epistemological and Social Problems of the Sciences in the Early Nineteenth Century, edited by Jahnke, H. N. and Otto, M, 109–121. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Turner, Steven. 1983. “Historicism, Kritik, and the Prussian Professoriate, 1790–1840.” In Philologie und Hermeneutik im 19. Jahrhundert II, edited by Bollack, Mayotte and Wismann, Heinz, 450–477. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1837. History of the Inductive Sciences from the Earliest to the Present Time. London: J.W. Parker.Google Scholar
Wiley, Raymond, trans. 1971. John Mitchell Kemble and Jakob Grimm: A Correspondence 1832–1852. Leiden: Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Wyss, Ulrich. 1979. Die wilde Philologie: Jacob Grimm und der Historismus. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Zajonic, Arthur. 1998. “Goethe and the Science of His Time: An Historical Introduction.” In Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature, edited by Seamon, David and Zajonic, Arthur, 15–32. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Zgusta, Ladislav. 1986. “Grimm, Littré, OED, and Richardson: A Comparison of Their Historicity.” Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America 8:74–93.Google Scholar
Zgusta, Ladislav. 1991. “Jacob Grimm's Deutsches Wörterbuch and Other Historical Dictionaries of the 19th Century.” In Studien zum Deutschen Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, Band II, edited by Kirkness, Alan, et al., 595–626. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar