Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:42:51.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dredging and Projecting the Depths of Personality: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Narratives of the Unconscious

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Jason Miller*
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles E-mail: 645537@gmail.com

Argument

The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) was a projective psychological test created by Harvard psychologist Henry A. Murray and his lover Christina Morgan in the 1930s. The test entered the nascent intelligence service of the United States (the OSS) during the Second World War due to its celebrated reputation for revealing the deepest aspects of an individual's unconscious. It subsequently spread as a scientifically objective research tool capable not only of dredging the unconscious depths, but also of determining the best candidate for a management position, the psychological complexes of human nature, and the unique characteristics of a culture. Two suppositions underlie the utility of the test. One is the power of narrative. The test entails a calculated abuse of the subjects tested, based on their inability to interpret their own narrative. The form of the test requires that a subject fail to decipher the coded, unconscious meaning their narrative reveals. Murray believed the interpretation of a subject's narrative and the projection contained therein depended exclusively on the psychologist. This view of interpretation stems from the seemingly more reasonable belief of nineteenth-century Romantic thinkers that a literary text serves as a proxy for an author's deepest self. The TAT also supposes that there is something beyond consciousness closely resembling a psychoanalytic unconscious, which also has clear precedents in nineteenth-century German thought. Murray's views on literary interpretation, his view of psychology as well as the continuing prevalence of the TAT, signals a nineteenth-century concept of self that insists “on relations of depth and surface, inner and outer life” (Galison 2007, 277). It is clear the hermeneutic practice of Freud's psychoanalysis, amplified in Jung, drew on literary conceptions of the unconscious wider than those of nineteenth-century psychology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amerikas, Karl. 2000. “Introduction: Interpreting German Idealism.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, edited by Amerikas, Karl, 118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, James. 1999. “Henry A. Murray and the Creation of the Thematic Apperception Test.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser, Lon and Stein, Morris I., 2339. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arac, Jonathan. 2000. “The Impact of Shakespeare.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 5, Romanticism, edited by Brown, Marshall, 272296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Joel. 2000a. “Scientific Models.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 5, Romanticism, edited by Brown, Marshall, 115138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Joel. 2000b. “Theory of the Novel.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 5, Romanticism, edited by Brown, Marshall, 250272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brittain, H. L. 1907. “A Study in Imagination.” Pedagogical Seminary 14:137207.Google Scholar
Capshew, James. 1999. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1983. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Lawrence. 1939. “Projective Methods for the Study of Personality.” Journal of Psychology 8:359413.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 2007. “Image of Self.” In Things That Talk, edited by Daston, Lorraine, 257294. Cambridge: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1879. “Psychometric Experiments.” Brain 2:149162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. 2003. “The Unconscious Mind.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945, edited by Baldwin, Thomas, 107119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gieser, Lon, and Stein, Morris I.. 1999. “A View of the Future.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser, Lon and Stein, Morris I., 215223. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödde, Gunter. 2010. “Freud and Nineteenth-Century Philosophical Sources on the Unconscious.” In Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought, edited by Nicholls, Angus and Liebscher, Martin, 261287. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Ellen. 1995. The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housden, Martyn. 2005. “An Early Example of Personality Profiling: Henry A. Murray's Study of Adolf Hitler Written for the OSS.” Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion 8:227250.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 2000. “Hölderlin and Novalis.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, edited by Amerikas, Karl, 141161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lashley, Karl. 1939. Letter to Robert M. Yerkes. November 23. UCLA Special Collections.Google Scholar
Lemov, Rebecca. 2009. “Towards a Data Base of Dreams: Assembling an Archive of Elusive Materials, c. 1947– 1961.” History Workshop Journal 67:4468.Google Scholar
Libby, Walter. 1908. “The Imagination of Adolescents.” American Journal of Psychology 50:249252.Google Scholar
Liebscher, Martin. 2010. “Friedrich Nietzsche's Perspectives on the Unconscious.” In Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought, edited by Nicholls, Angus and Liebscher, Martin, 241260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. 1987. “Goethe and Psychoanalysis.” In Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal, edited by Amrine, Fredrick, Zucker, Francis, and Wheeler, Harvey, 83100. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
McClelland, David. 1999. “How the Test Lives On: Extensions of the Thematic Apperception Test Approach.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser, Lon and Stein, Morris I., 163177. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Morgan, Wesley. 1999. “The 1943 Images: Their Origin and History.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser, Lon and Stein, Morris I., 6585. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Henry, with Morgan, Christiana D.. [1935] 1981. “A Method for Investigating Fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test.” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman, Edwin, 390408. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry, and Morgan, Christiana D.. [1936] 1981. “Techniques for a Systematic Investigation of Fantasy.” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman, Edwin, 366389. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry, et al. 1938. Explorations in Personality: A Clinical and Experimental Study of Fifty Men of College Age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry. [1940] 1981. “What Should Psychologists Do about Psychoanalysis?” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman, Edwin, 291311. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry. 1943. “Analysis of the Personality of Adolph Hitler: With Predictions of His Future Behavior and Suggestions for Dealing with Him Now and After Germany's Surrender.” OSS Confidential. A copy in PDF is available from the Cornell Law School library.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry, with Morgan, Christiana. 1943. Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge: Harvard University Printing Office.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry. 1949. “Introduction to Pierre.” In Pierre; or, the Ambiguities, by Melville, Herman, xiii. New York: Hendricks House.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry. 1951. “In Nomine Diaboli.” New England Quarterly 4:435452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Henry. 1960. “Introduction.” In Myth and Mythmaking, edited by Murray, Henry A., 919. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Murray, Henry. [1967] 1981. “The Case of Murr.” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman, Edwin, 5378. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Nicholls, Angus. 2010. “The Scientific Unconscious: Goethe's Post-Kantian Epistemology.” In Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought, edited by Nicholls, Angus and Liebscher, Martin, 87120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oberlin, Gerhard. 2007. Goethe, Schiller, und das Unbewusste: Eine literaturpsychologische Studie. Giessen: Psychosozial Verlag.Google Scholar
OSS Assessment Staff. 1948. Assessment of Men: Selection of Personnel for the Office of Strategic Services. New York: Rinehart & Company.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert. 2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Forrest. 1992. Love's Story Told: A Life of Henry A. Murray. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Louis. 1932. “Social Situation Pictures in the Psychiatric Interview.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2:124132.Google Scholar
Staff Writer. 1946. “A Good Man Is Hard to Find: The O.S.S. Learned How, with New Selection Methods that May Well Serve Industry.” Fortune 33:9295, 217–218, 220, 223.Google Scholar
Tallis, Frank. 2002. Hidden Minds: A History of the Unconscious. New York: Arcade Publishers.Google Scholar
Triplet, Rodney. 1992. “The Making of a Psychologist.” American Psychologist 47:299307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, David. 1998. “Toward a Science of Personality Psychology: David McClelland's Development of Empirically Derived TAT Measures.” History of Psychology 1:130152.Google Scholar