Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T16:30:13.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Science, Technology, Medicine – and the State: The Science-State Nexus in Scandinavia, 1850–1980

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Extract

One of the common characteristics of science, technology, and medicine is their ambition to epistemologically and organizationally move beyond the confines of nation states. In practice, however, they develop differently in countries or regions. Scientists, engineers, and physicians are constrained as well as enabled by national boundaries and specific cultures. The cultural status of such practices in reverse is influenced by a country's history, politics, and the view of the role of science, technology, and medicine in society. It is the relation between a specific region, Scandinavia, and the history of science, technology, and medicine within this region that this issue of Science in Context sets out to explore. But what is this “Scandinavia”? To many, Scandinavia besides being a specific geographical region of three countries (Denmark, Sweden, and Norway) with entwined histories and closely related languages is a way of denoting a specific style or movement. “Scandinavian design” is renowned for three interrelated features; minimalism or simplicity, functionalism, and “design to the people” i.e. functional products for the average citizen (Beer 1975; Glambek 1997; Fallan 2012).

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asdal, Kristin. 2004. Politikkens teknologier. Produksjoner av regjerlig natur [Technologies of politics: Producing governable nature]. Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
Asdal, Kristin. 2008a. “On Politics and the Little Tools of Democracy: A Down-to-Earth-Approach.” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16:1126.Google Scholar
Asdal, Kristin. 2008b. “Subjected to Parliament: The Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and the Animal Body.” Social Studies of Science 38:899917.Google Scholar
Beer, Eileene Harrison. 1975. Scandinavian Design: Objects of a Life Style. New York: American-Scandinavian Foundation.Google Scholar
Bjerknes, Gro, Ehn, Pelle, Kyng, Morten, and Nygaard, Kristen, eds. 1987. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C. 2005. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brimnes, Nils. 2007. “Vikings against Tuberculosis: The International Tuberculosis Campaign in India 1948–51.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 81:407430.Google Scholar
Byrkjeflot, Haldor. 2001. “The Nordic Model of Democracy and Management.” In The Democratic Challenge to Capitalism: Management and Democracy in the Nordic Countries, edited by Byrkjeflot, Halso, Myklebus, Sissel, Myrvang, Christine, and Sejersted, Francis, 1945. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Byrkjeflot, Haldor, Myklebus, Sissel, Myrvang, Christine, and Sejersted, Francis, eds. 2001. The Democratic Challenge to Capitalism: Management and Democracy in the Nordic Countries. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Niels Finn. 2006. The Nordic Model of Welfare: A Historical Reappraisal. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Collett, John Peter. 2011. Universitetet i Oslo 1811–2011. Vol. 1, Universitetet i Oslo 1811–1870. Universitetet i nasjonen [University of Oslo 1811–2011. Vol. 1, The University of Oslo 1811–1870. The University in the Nation]. Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. 2004. “‘The Linear Model’ Did not Exist: Reflections on the History and Historiography of Science and Research in Industry in the Twentieth Century.” In The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications: Nobel Symposium 123, edited by Grandin, Karl, Wormbs, Nina and Widmalm, Sven, 3157. Sagamore Beach MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Ehn, Pelle. 1989. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.Google Scholar
Fallan, Kjetil. 2012. Scandinavian Design: Alternative Histories. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gaudillière, Jean Paul, and Löwy, Ilana, eds. 1998. The Invisible Industrialist: Manufacturers and the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Houndsmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Glambek, Ingeborg. 1997. Det nordiske i arkitektur og design sett utenfra [Nordic Architecture and Design Seen from Outside]. København: Arkitektens Forlag.Google Scholar
Goossens, Herman, Ferech, Matus, Stichele, Robert Vander, and Elseviers, Monique. 2005. “Outpatient Antibiotic Use in Europe and Association with Resistance: A Cross-National Database Study.” Lancet 365 (9459):579587.Google Scholar
Gradmann, Christoph. 2013. “Sensitive Matters: The World Health Organization and Antibiotic Resistance Testing, 1945–1975.” Social History of Medicine 26:555574.Google Scholar
Hamran, Olav. 2010. Riktig medisin? En historie om apotekvesenet [The Right Medicine? A Story on the Apothecary System]. Oslo: Pax.Google Scholar
Hestmark, Geir. 1999. Vitenskap og nasjon: Waldemar Christopher Brøgger 1851–1905 [Science and the Nation: Waldemar Christopher Brøgger]. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Hvidtfelt Nielsen, Kristian, and Nielsen, Henry, eds. 2006. Viden uden grænser: 1920–1970 [Knowledge without Borders]. Vol. B. 4, Dansk naturvidenskabs historie [The History of Danish Natural Science]. Århus: Aarhus universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Imhof, Arthur E. 1994. Lebenserwartungen in Deutschland, Norwegen und Schweden im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jensen, Siri, Lindbæk, Morten, Gradmann, Christoph, and Lie, Anne Kveim. 2010. “Erindringer Om Antibiotikaresistensens Historie” [Memories on the History of Antibiotic Resistance]. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening [Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association] 24 (130):24942498.Google Scholar
Kjærgaard, Peter C., ed. 2006. Lys over landet: 1850–1920, Dansk naturvidenskabs historie [Light throughout the Country: 1850–1920. The History of Danish Natural Science]. Århus: Aarhus universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Krige, John. 2006. American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. [1984] 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Løvoll, Øistein, and Sandbu, Synne. 2002. “Measles and Measles Immunisation in Norway: Historical Review and Present Situation.” Eurosurveillance (12), http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=2099 (last accessed December 7, 2013).Google Scholar
Moene, Karl, and Wallerstein, Michael. 2006. “Social Democracy as a Development Strategy.” In Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution, edited by Wallerstein, Michael, Bardhan, Pranab K., and Bowles, Samuel, 148168. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Myklebust, Sissel, ed. 1997. Technology and Democracy: Obstacles to Democratization - Productivism and Technocracy, vol. 28 of TMV Skriftserie. Centre for Technology and Culture. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2004. “Physics and Chemistry of Life, Commentary.” In The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications: Nobel Symposium 123, edited by Karl Grandin, Nina Wormbs, and Sven Widmalm, 221–225. Sagamore Beach MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Sejersted, Francis. [1964] 1993. Demokratisk kapitalisme [Democratic Capitalism]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Sejersted, Francis. 2011. The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard, and Sørensen, Henrik Kragh, eds. 2006. Perspectives on Scandinavian Science in the Early Twentieth Century. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
Sivasundaram, Sujit. 2010. “Sciences and the Global: On Methods, Questions, and Theory.” Isis 101:146158.Google Scholar
Sogner, Knut. 1997. “The Double Meaning of Vitamins.” Scandinavian Journal of History 22 (3):187198.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy. 1988. “Designing with the User, a Review of Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge.” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 6 (2).Google Scholar
Svensson, Lennart G. 1987. Higher Education and the State in Swedish History. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Walsh, Vivien. 2004. “Paradigms in the Evolution of Life Sciences Research, and the Changing Structure of the Innovative Organization.” In The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications: Nobel Symposium 123, edited by Grandin, Karl, Wormbs, Nina, and Widmalm, Sven, 189219. Sagamore Beach MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Waterton, Claire. 2010. “Experimenting with the Archive: STS-ers As Analysts and Co-constructors of Databases and Other Archival Forms.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35:645676.Google Scholar
Widmalm, Sven. 1999. Vetenskapsbärarna: naturvetenskapen i det svenska samhället, 1880–1950 [Champions of Science: Natural Science and Swedish Society, 1880–1950]. Hedemora: Gidlund.Google Scholar
Witoszek, Nina. 1998. Norske naturmytologier: fra Edda til økofilosofi [Norwegian Mythologies of Nature: From the Edda to Eco-Philosophy]. Oslo: Pax.Google Scholar