Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T10:25:43.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rigor and Clarity: Foundations of Mathematics in France and England, 1800–1840

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Joan L. Richards
Joan L. Richards
Affiliation:
History DepartmentBrown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has long been apparent that in the nineteenth century, mathematics in France and England developed along different lines. The differences, which might well be labelled stylistic, are most easy to see on the foundational level. At first this may seem surprising because it is such a fundamental area, but, upon reflection, it is to be expected. Ultimately discussions about the foundations of mathematics turn on views about what mathematics is, and this is a question which is answered by a variety of different groups including mathematicians, students, curricular planners, parents, etc. Mathematical practice rests on some kind of mixture of the answers to this fundamental question which come from these diverse groups. Comparing the cultural matrices which supported mathematics in France and Britain in the first decades of the nineteenth century sheds light on the real though often subtle differences in the ways the subject was pursued in the two countries.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1991 , pp. 297 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, W. W. Rouse. 1889. A History of the Study of Mathematics at Cambridge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bellhoste, Bruno. 1985. Cauchy. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Bos, H. J. M. 1974. “Differentials, Higher Order Differentials and the Derivative in the Leibnizian Calculus.” Archive for History of Exact Science 14:1–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Carl. 1956. History of Analytic Geometry. New York: Scripta Mathematica.Google Scholar
Boyer, Carl. 1968. A History of Mathematics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cannon, Susan Faye. 1978. Science and Culture: The Early Victorian Period. New York: Dawson and Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Cauchy, Augustin-Louis. 1821. Cours d'analyse de l'Ecole royale polytechnique. Première partie: Analyse algébrique. Paris.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine J. 1986. “The Physicalist Tradition in Early Nineteenth-Century French Geometry.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. 3:269–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Morgan, Augustus. 1827. Ms Add. 3. University College Archives.Google Scholar
De Morgan, Augustus. 1842. The Differential and Integral Calculus. London.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre. 1981. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Dupin, Charles. 1819. Essai historique sur les services et les travaux scientifiques de Gaspard Monge. Paris.Google Scholar
Enros, Philip C. 1981. “Cambridge University and the Adoption of Analytics in Early Nineteenth-Century England.” In Social History of Nineteenth Century Mathematics, edited by Mehrtens, Herbert, Bos, Henk, and Schneider, Ivo, 135–48. Boston: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enros, Philip C. 1983. “The Analytical Society (1812–1813): Precursor of the Renewal of Cambridge Mathematics.” Historia Mathematica 10:24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Craig G. 1987. “Joseph Louis Lagrange's Algebraic Vision of the Calculus.” Historia Mathematica 14:38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabiner, Judith V. 1981. The Origins of Cauchy's Rigorous Calculus. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grabiner, Judith V. 1988. “The Centrality of Mathematics in the History of Western Thought.” Mathematics Magazine 61:220–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 1970. The Development of the Foundations of Mathematical Analysis from Euler to Riemann. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 1981. “Mathematical Physics in France, 1800–1835.” In Epistemological and Social Problems of the Sciences in the Early Nineteenth Century, edited by Jahnke, H. N. and Otte, M. 349–70. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 1984. “Work for the Workers: Advances in Engineering Mechanics and Instruction in France, 1800–1830.” Annals of Science 41:1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert. 1980. Philosophers at War: The Quarrel between Newton and Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, Luke. 1981. “Mathematics and Revolution from Lacroix to Cauchy.” In Social History of Nineteenth Century Mathematics, edited by Mehrtens, Herbert, Bos, Henk, and Schneider, Ivo, 50–74. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Lacroix, S. F. 1810. Traité du calcul différentiel et du calcul intégral, Vol. 1, Paris.Google Scholar
Lacroix, S. F. 1816a. An Elementary Treatise on the Differential and Integral Calculus, translated and with supplementary notes by Babbage, Charles and Herschel, William. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lacroix, S. F. 1816b. Essais sur l'enseignement en général et sur celui des mathématiques en particulier. Paris.Google Scholar
Lagrange, J. L. 1813. Théorie des fonctions analytiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Montucla, J. F. 1799. Histoire des mathématiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Papers, 1852–1853, Vol. 44 (Reports, vol. 5), Cmnd 1559. Report of her Majesty's Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the State, Discipline, Studies and Revenues of the University and Colleges of Cambridge: Together with the Evidence and an Appendix.Google Scholar
Richards, Joan L. 1980. “The Art and the Science of British Algebra: A Study in the Perception of Mathematical Truth.” Historia Mathematica 7:343–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Joan L. 1987. “Augustus De Morgan, the History of Mathematics, and the Foundations of Algebra.” Isis 78:7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Joan L. 1988. Mathematical Visions: The Pursuit of Geometry in Victorian England. Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rothblatt, Sheldon. 1976. Tradition and Change in English Liberal Education. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Schübring, Gert. 1987. “On the Methodology of Analysing Historical Textbooks: Lacroix as Textbook Author.” For the Learning of Mathematics 7:41–51.Google Scholar
Schweber, Silvan S. 1981. “John F. W. Herschel: A Prefatory Essay.” In Aspects of the Life and Thought of Sir John Frederick Herschel, edited by Schweber, S. S. 1–83. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Crosbie, and Wise, M. Norton. 1989. Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taton, René. 1959. “Condorcet et Sylvestre-François Lacroix.” Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 12:127–58.Google Scholar
Voltaire, [François-Marie Arouet]. 1910. “Letters on the English.” In French and English Philosophers: Descartes, Rousseau, Voltaire, Hobbes, edited by Eliot, Charles W.. New York: P. F. Collier and Son.Google Scholar
Weiss, John Hubbel. 1982. The Making of Technological Man. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard. 1980. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, L. Pearce. 1953. “Science, Education and the French Revolution.” Isis 44:311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. Pearce. 1956. “Science, Education and Napoleon I.– Isis 47:369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, Robert. 1803. The Principles of Analytical Calculation. Cambridge.Google Scholar