Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science

  • Robbie Duschinsky (a1)

Argument

This article explores historical sociology as a complementary source of knowledge for scientific research, considering barriers and facilitators to this work through reflections on one project. This project began as a study of the emergence and reception of the infant disorganized attachment classification, introduced in the 1980s by Ainsworth’s student Mary Main, working with Judith Solomon. Elsewhere I have reported on the findings of collaborative work with attachment researchers, without giving full details of how this came about. Here, I will offer personal reflections arising from the process, and my work in what Hasok Chang has called history as “complementary science.”

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Ainsworth, Mary, Blehar, Mary, Waters, Everett, and Wall, Sally. [1978] 2015. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Bristol: Psychology Press.
Albert, Mathieu, and Laberge, Suzanne. 2017. “Confined to a Tokenistic Status: Social Scientists in Leadership Roles in a National Health Research Funding Agency.” Social Science & Medicine 185:137146.
Andersen, Hanne. 2016. “Collaboration, Interdisciplinarity, and the Epistemology of Contemporary Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:110.
Anderson, Amanda. 2001. The Powers of Distance: Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Arpin, Isabelle, and Granjou, Céline. 2015. “The Right Time for the Job? Insights into Practices of Time in Contemporary Field Sciences.” Science in Context 28(2):237258.
Baert, Patrick, Weinberg, Darin, and Mottier, Véronique. 2011. “Social Constructionism, Postmodernism and Deconstructionism.” The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by Ian, C. Jarvie and Zamora-Bonilla, Jesus, 475486. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Balmer, Andrew, Calvert, Jane, Marris, Claire, Molyneux-Hodgson, Susan, Frow, Emma, Kearnes, Matthew, Bulpin, Kate, Schyfter, Pablo, Mackenzie, Adrian, and Martin, Paul. 2016. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3(1):7380.
Bernard, Kristin, Dozier, Mary, Bick, Johanna, Lewis-Morrarty, Erin, Lindhiem, Oliver, and Carlson, Elizabeth. 2012. “Enhancing Attachment Organization among Maltreated Children.” Child Development 83(2):623636.
Bernini, Marco, and Woods, Angela. 2014. “Interdisciplinarity as Cognitive Integration: Auditory Verbal Hallucinations as a Case Study.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5(5):603612.
Birns, Beverly. 1999. “Attachment Theory Revisited: Challenging Conceptual and Methodological Sacred Cows.” Feminism & Psychology 9(1):1021.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bromham, Lindell, Dinnage, Russell, and Hua, Xia Xiao. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Research Has Consistently Lower Funding Success.” Nature 534(7609):684687.
Callard, Felicity, and Fitzgerald, Des. 2016. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Callard, Felicity, Hayward, Rhodri, and Nicholls, Angus. 2016a. “Editorial.” History of the Human Sciences 29(3):37.
Callard, Felicity, Staines, Kimberley, and Wilkes, James, eds. 2016b. The Restless Compendium: Interdisciplinary Investigations of Rest and Its Opposites. London: Palgrave.
Chang, Hasok. 2004. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford University Press.
Chang, Hasok. 2017. “Who Cares about the History of Science?Notes and Records 71(1):91107.
Collins, Harry, Evans, Robert, and Weinel, Martin. 2016. “Expertise Revisited, Part II: Contributory Expertise.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 56:103110.
Cyr, Chantal, Euser, Eveline, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., and van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.. 2010. “Attachment Security and Disorganization in Maltreating and High-Risk Families: A Series of Meta-Analyses.” Development and Psychopathology 22:87108.
Derrida, Jacques. 1989. “Biodegradables.” Critical Inquiry 15:812873.
Duschinsky, Robbie. 2015. “The Emergence of the ‘Disorganised/Disoriented (D) Attachment’ Classification, 1979–1982.” History of Psychology 18(1):3246.
Duschinsky, Robbie, Greco, Monica, and Solomon, Judith. 2015a. “Wait Up! Attachment & Sovereign Power.” International Journal of Politics, Culture & Society 28(3):223242.
Duschinsky, Robbie, Greco, Monica, and Solomon, Judith. 2015b. “The Politics of Attachment: Lines of Flight.” Theory, Culture & Society 32(7–8):173195.
Duschinsky, Robbie, and Macnaughton, Jane. 2018. “Interview: Robbie Duschinsky, AE at MH, and Jane Macnaughton 28th March 2018.” BMJ Medical Humanities Blog, posted on September 26, 2018, https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-humanities/2018/09/26/interview-robbie-duschinsky-and-jane-macnaughton-march-2018.
Duschinsky, Robbie, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Foster, Sarah, Reijman, Sophie, and Lionetti, Francesca. Forthcoming 2019. “Attachment Histories and Futures: Reply to Vicedo’s ‘Putting Attachment in Its Place’.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology.
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
Fraley, R. Chris, and Spieker, Susan J.. 2003. “Are Infant Attachment Patterns Continuously or Categorically Distributed? A Taxometric Analysis of Strange Situation Behavior.” Developmental Psychology 39(3):387404.
Fulbrook, Mary. 2003. Historical Theory. London: Routledge.
Garforth, Lisa, and Kerr, Anne. 2011. “Interdisciplinarity and the Social Sciences: Capital, Institutions and Autonomy.” British Journal of Sociology 4(62):657676.
Garrett, Paul Michael. 2017. “Wired: Early Intervention and the ‘Neuromolecular Gaze’.” The British Journal of Social Work 48(3):656674.
Gordin, Michael. 2014. “The Tory Interpretation of History.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 44(4):413423.
Granqvist, Pehr, Hesse, Erik, Mari, Fransson, Main, Mary, Hagekull, Berit, and Bohlin, Gunilla. 2016. “Prior Participation in the Strange Situation and Overstress Jointly Facilitate Disorganized Behaviours: Implications for Theory, Research and Practice.” Attachment & Human Development 18(3):235249.
Granqvist, Pehr, Sroufe, Alan L., Dozier, Mary, Hesse, Erik, Steele, Miriam, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., and Duschinsky, Robbie. 2017. “Disorganized Attachment in Infancy: A Review of the Phenomenon and Its Implications for Clinicians and Policy-Makers.” Attachment & Human Development 19(6):534558.
Groh, Ashley M., Pasco Fearon, R., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., and Roisman, Glenn. 2017. “Attachment in the Early Life CourseChild Development Perspectives 11:7076.
Hesse, Erik, and Main, Mary. 1999. “Second-Generation Effects of Unresolved Trauma in Nonmaltreating Parents: Dissociated, Frightened, and Threatening Parental Behavior.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 19(4):481540.
Jardine, Nick. 2004. “Etics and Emics (Not to Mention Anemics and Emetics) in the History of the Sciences.” History of Science 42(3):261278.
Jones, Sophie A., and Oakley, Catherine. 2018. The Precarious Postdoc: Interdisciplinary Research and Casualised Labour in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Durham University: Working Knowledge, http://www.workingknowledgeps.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/WKPS_PrecariousPostdoc_PDF_Interactive.pdf, last accessed?
Juffer, Femmie, Struis, Estelle, Werner, Claudia, and Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.. 2017. “Effective Preventive Interventions to Support Parents of Young Children: Illustrations from the Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD).” Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community 45(3):202214.
Kalela, Jorma. 2011. Making History: The Historian and Uses of the Past. London: Palgrave.
Keddell, Emily. 2017. “Interpreting Children’s Best Interests: Needs, Attachment and Decision-Making.” Journal of Social Work 17(3):324342.
Kendler, Kenneth, Zachar, Peter, and Craver, Carl. 2011. “What Kinds of Things Are Psychiatric Disorders?Psychological Medicine 41(6):11431150.
Klein, Julie Thompson. 2010. “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by Frodeman, Robert, Thompson Klein, Julie, and Mitcham, Carl, 1530. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kontos, Pia, and Grigorovich, Alisa 2018. “‘Sleight of Hand’ or ‘Selling Our Soul’? Surviving and Thriving as Critical Qualitative Health Researchers in a Positivist World.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 19(2):25.
Kraemer, Sebastian, and Roberts, Jane. 1996. The Politics of Attachment: Towards a Secure Society. London: Free Association Books.
Lamb, Michael, Thompson, Ross A., Gardner, William, and Charnov, Eric L.. 1985. Infant-Mother Attachment: The Origins and Developmental Significance of Individual Differences in the Strange Situation. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Larregue, Julien. 2018The Long Hard Road to the Doability of Interdisciplinary Research Projects: The Case of Biosocial Criminology.” New Genetics and Society 37(1):2143.
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lenoir, Timothy, ed. 1998. Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Lindvig, Katrine. 2018. “The Implied PhD Student of Interdisciplinary Research Projects within Monodisciplinary Structures.” Higher Education Research & Development 37(6):11711185.
Loison, Laurent. 2016. “Forms of Presentism in the History of Science: Rethinking the Project of Historical Epistemology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 60:2937.
Lyons-Ruth, Karlen, and Jacobvitz, Deborah. 2016. “Attachment Disorganization from Infancy to Adulthood: Neurobiological Correlates, Parenting Contexts, and Pathways to Disorder.Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, And Clinical Applications, 3rd ed., edited by Cassidy, Jude and Shaver, Philip, 667695. NY: Guilford.
Madigan, Sheri, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Mariagn J., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Moran, Greg, Pederson, David R., and Benoit, Diane. 2006. “Unresolved States of Mind, Anomalous Parental Behavior, and Disorganized Attachment: A Review and Meta-Analysis of a Transmission Gap.” Attachment & Human Development 8(2):89111.
Main, Mary, and Stadtman, Jaclwlyn. 1981. “Infant Response to Rejection of Physical Contact by the Mother.” Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 20(2):292307.
Main, Mary and Solomon, J.. 1990. “Procedures for Identifying Infants as Disorganised/Disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation.” In Attachment in the Preschool Years, edited by Greenberg, Mark T., Cicchetti, Dante & Mark Cummings, E., 121160. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Main, Mary, and Hesse, Eric. 1990. Parents’ Unresolved Traumatic Experiences Are Related to Infant Disorganized Attachment Status. In Attachment in the Preschool Years, edited by Greenberg, Mark T., Cicchetti, Dante & Mark Cummings, E., 161181. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Main, Mary, Hesse, Eric, and Hesse, Seigfried. 2011. “Attachment Theory and Research: Overview with Suggested Applications to Child Custody.” Family Court Review 49(3):426463.
Mesman, Judy. 2007Disturbing Observations as a Basis for Collaborative Research.” Science as Culture 16(3):281295.
Midgley, Nick. 2014. “The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America.” Psychoanalysis & History 16(2):266268
Mikulincer, Mario, and Shaver, Philip R.. 2016. Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. 2nd ed. NY: Guilford Press.
Mittelstrass, Jürgen. 1993. “Unity and Transdisciplinarity.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 18:2:153157.
Mykhalovskiy, Eric, Frohlich, Katherine L., Poland, Blake, Di Ruggiero, Erica, Rock, Melanie J., and Comer, Leigha. Forthcoming 2019. “Critical Social Science with Public Health: Agonism, Critique and Engagement.” Critical Public Health, Early View.
National Institute of Mental Health 2016. “Behavioral assessment methods for RDoC constructs.” Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/rdoc_council_workgroup_report_153440.pdf.
Nissen, Morten. 2000. “Practice Research: Critical Psychology in and through Practices.” Annual Review of Critical Psychology 2:145179.
Orbach, Susie. 1999. “Why is Attachment in the Air?Psychoanalytic Dialogues 9(1):7383.
Oreskes, Naomi. 2013Why I am a Presentist.” Science in Context 26:595609.
Osbeck, Lisa, Nersessian, Nancy J.. 2017. “Epistemic Identities in Interdisciplinary Science.” Perspectives on Science 25(2):226260.
Peltola, Mikko J., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., and Yrttiaho, Santeri. 2019 Forthcoming. “Attachment Security and Cortical Responses to Fearful Faces in Infants.” Attachment & Human Development, Early View.
Pettit, Michael, and Young, Jacy L.. 2017. “Psychology and Its Publics.” History of the Human Sciences 30(4):310.
Plant, Rebecca Jo. 2015. “The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America by Marga Vicedo.” Journal of Social History 49(2):456459.
Rees, Amanda. 2016. “Stories of Stones and Bones: Disciplinarity, Narrative and Practice in British Popular Prehistory, 1911–1935.” The British Journal for the History of Science 49(3):433451.
Reijman, Sophie, Foster, Sarah, and Duschinsky, Robbie. 2018. “The Infant Disorganised Attachment Classification: ‘Patterning within the Disturbance of Coherence’.” Social Science & Medicine 200:5258.
Reisz, Samantha, Duschinsky, Robbie, and Daniel, J. Siegel. 2018. “Disorganized Attachment and Defense: Exploring John Bowlby’s Unpublished Reflections.” Attachment & Human Development 20(2):107134.
Ruck, Nora. 2014. “Review: Marga Vicedo. The Nature and Nurture of Love.Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 50(4):410411.
Rutter, Michael. 1972. Maternal Deprivation Reassessed. London: Penguin
Sedgwick, Eve K., 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Sheard, Sally, and Donaldson, Liam J.. 2006. The Nation’s Doctor: The Role of the Chief Medical Officer 1855–1998. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing.
Shemmings, David, & Shemmings, Yvonne. 2014. Assessing Disorganized Attachment Behaviour in Children: An Evidence-Based Model for Understanding and Supporting Families. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Smith, Roger. 2005. “The History of Psychological Categories.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36(1):5594.
Smith, Roger. 2013. “Why and How Do I Write the History of Science?Science in Context 26(4):611625.
Solomon, Judith, and George, Carol. 2016. “The Measurement of Attachment Security and Related Constructs in Infancy and Early Childhood.” The Handbook of Attachment, 3rd ed., edited by Cassidy, Jude and Shaver, Philip, 366398. New York: Guilford.
Solomon, Judith, Duschinsky, Robbie, Bakkum, Lianne, and Schuengel, Carlo. 2017Towards an Architecture of Attachment Disorganization: John Bowlby’s Published and Unpublished Reflections.” Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry 22(4):539560
Spieker, Susan, and Crittenden, Patricia M.. 2010. “Comparing Two Attachment Classification Methods Applied to Preschool Strange Situations.” Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry 15(1):97120.
Steedman, Carolyn. 1995. Strange Dislocations: Childhood and the Idea of Human Interiority, 1780–1930. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Stewart, John. 2009. “The Scientific Claims of British Child Guidance, 1918–45.” The British Journal for the History of Science 42(3):407432.
Summer, James. 2005. “Complementing Complementary Science.” Metascience 14(3):409413.
Thomson, Mathew. 2013. Lost Freedom: The Landscape of the Child and the British Post-War Settlement. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Turner, Lydia, Short, Nigel P., Grant, Alec, and Adams, Tony E., eds. 2018. International Perspectives on Autoethnographic Research and Practice. London: Routledge.
Vanderstraeten, Raf, and Vandermoere, Frederic. 2015. “Disciplined by the Discipline: A Social-Epistemic Fingerprint of the History of Science.” Science in Context 28(2):195214.
Viney, William, Callard, Felicity, and Woods, Angela. 2015. “Critical Medical Humanities: Embracing Entanglement, Taking Risks.Medical Humanities 41(1):27.
Van der Horst, Frank. 2011. John Bowlby – From Psychoanalysis to Ethology: Unravelling the Roots of Attachment Theory. Chichester UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Van Dijken, Suzan. 1998. John Bowlby: His Early Life: A Biographical Journey into the Roots of Attachment Theory. London: Free Association Books.
Van Rosmalen, Lenny, van der Horst, Frank, and Van der Veer, Réne. 2016. “From Secure Dependency to Attachment: Mary Ainsworth’s Integration of Blatz’s Security Theory into Bowlby’s Attachment Theory.” History of Psychology 19(1):2239.
Vicedo, Marga. 2011. “The Social Nature of the Mother’s Tie to Her Child: John Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment in Post-War America.” The British Journal for the History of Science 44(3):401426.
Vicedo, Marga. 2013. The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vicedo, Marga, 2017. “Putting Attachment in Its Place: Disciplinary and Cultural Contexts.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 14(6):684699.
Waller Niels, G., and Meehl, Paul E.. 1998. Multivariate Taxometric Procedures: Distinguishing Types from Continua. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
Wastell, David, and White, Susan. 2017. Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience. Bristol: Policy Press.
Waters, Everett, and Crowell, Judith A.. 1999. “Atypical Attachment in Atypical Circumstances.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 64(3):213220.
Waters, Everett, and Beauchaine, Theodore P.. 2003. “Are there Really Patterns of Attachment? Comment on Fraley and Spieker, 2003.” Developmental Psychology 39:417422.
Weidman, Nadine. 2016. “Overcoming Our Mutual Isolation: How Historians and Psychologists Can Work Together.History of Psychology 19(3):248253.
Whitehead, Anne, Woods, Angela, Atkinson, Sarah J., Macnaughton, Jane, and Richards, Jennifer, eds. 2016. The Edinburgh Companion to the Critical Medical Humanities. Edinburgh University Press

Keywords

Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science

  • Robbie Duschinsky (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed