Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:57:04.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citizen, Academic, Expert, or International Worker? Juggling with Identities at UNESCO's Social Science Department, 1946–1955

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Teresa Tomás Rangil
Teresa Tomás Rangil*
Affiliation:
Jesus College, University of Oxford E-mail: tomasrangil@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This paper explores the links between the competing scientific, disciplinary, and institutional identifications of social scientists working for international organizations and the nature of the work produced in these establishments. By examining the case of UNESCO's Social Science Department from 1946 to 1955, the paper shows how the initial lack of organizational identification diminished the efficiency and productivity of the Department and slowed down the creation of an international system for research in the social sciences. It then examines how the elaboration of such identification resulted from a period of trial and error during which several national, academic, and scientific models were explored. The paper concludes that only the discourse of “moral sensitivity” kept the Department together at a time when disillusions regarding internationalism, the destabilization of the meaning of nation, and suspicion towards some Western disciplines rendered unacceptable the universalization of a single international social scientific identification.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 61 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alacevich, Michele. 2009. The Political Economy of the World Bank: The Early Years. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Amrith, Sunil, and Sluga, Glenda. 2008. “New Histories of the United Nations.” Journal of World History 19 (3):251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bastide, Roger. 1952. “Sao Paulo: The Octopus Town.” Le Courrier de l'UNESCO 8 (9):9.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1942. “Some Systematic Approaches to the Study of Culture and Personality.” Character and Personality 11:76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory, and Mead, Margaret. 1941. “Principles of Moral Building.” Journal of Educational Sociology 15 (4):206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Morroe. 1954. “A Look at U.S. Race Relations. The Scoreboard for the Negro.” UNESCO Courier 7 (6):4–8.Google Scholar
Birkelund, Gunn Elisabeth. 2006. “The Genesis of Norwegian Sociology: A Story of Failures and Success.” Sociology Working Papers, Paper Number 2006-05. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bocking, Stephen. 2007. “Lier science et pratique: l'histoire du Programme de l'UNESCO sur l'homme et la biosphère.” In 60 ans d'histoire de l'UNESCO. Actes De Conference Internationale, 389–394. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Brattain, M. 2007. “Race, Racism, and Antiracism: UNESCO and the Politics of Presenting Science to the Postwar Public.” American Historical Review 112 (5):1386–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantril, H. 1948. “The Human Sciences and World Peace: A Report on the Unesco Project: ‘Tensions Affecting International Understanding’.” Public Opinion Quarterly 12 (2):236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantril, H. 1950. Tensions That Cause Wars. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Capone, Stefania. 2010. Searching for Africa in Brazil: Power and Tradition in Candomblé. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cock, A. G. 1983. “Chauvinism and Internationalism in Science: The International Research Council, 1919–1926.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 37 (2):249–288.Google ScholarPubMed
DeBenedetti, Charles. 1974. “James T. Shotwell and the Science of International Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 89 (2):379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzinga, Aant. 1996. “UNESCO and the Politics of Scientific Internationalism.” In Internationalism and Science, edited by Elzinga, Aant and Landström, C., 89–131. London: Taylor and Graham.Google Scholar
Freyre, Gilberto. 1952. “Le rôle des noirs dans la civilisation brésilienne.” Le Courrier de l'UNESCO. V (8–9):7.Google Scholar
Gastaud, Ivan. 2007. “L'UNESCO, les ≪races≫ et le racisme.” In 60 ans d'histoire de l'UNESCO. Actes De Conference Internationale, 197–210. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Gilman, Nils. 2003. Mandarins of the Future. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gitre, Edward J. K. 2010. “Importing Freud: First-Wave Psychoanalysis, Interwar Social Sciences, and the Interdisciplinary Foundations of an American Social Theory.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 46 (3):239–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gitre, Edward J. K. 2011. “The Great Escape: World War II, Neo-Freudianism, and the Origins of US Psychocultural Analysis.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 47 (1):18–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, L. C. 1954. “The International Civil Servant. His Employer and His State.” Transactions of the Grotius Society 40:147–174.Google Scholar
Greenaway, Frank. 2006. Science International: A History of the International Council of Scientific Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Ellen. 1996. The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Jane. 1989. Margaret Mead: A Life. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1946. Unesco; Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. London: Frederick Printing.Google Scholar
Janowitz, Morris, and Shils, Edward. 1948. “Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II.” Public Opinion Quarterly 12:280–315.Google Scholar
King, John E. 1990. “P.W. Martin and the Flaw in the Price System.” Discussion Paper, September 14. La Trobe University.Google Scholar
Klineberg, Otto. 1950. Tensions Affecting International Understanding, vol. 62. New York: Social Science Research Council.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavelle, Kathryn C. 2007. “Exit, Voice, and Loyalty in International Organizations: US Involvement in the League of Nations.” Review of International Organizations 2 (4):371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengyel, Péter. 1966. “Two Decades of Social Science at Unesco.” International Social Science Journal 18 (4):554–68.Google Scholar
Lengyel, Péter. 1986. International Social Science: The UNESCO Experience. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Lentin, Alana. 2005. “Replacing ‘Race’, Historicizing ‘Culture’ in Multiculturalism.” Patterns of Prejudice 39 (4):379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maio, Marcos Chor. 2007. “Un programme contre le racisme au lendemain de la Seconde Guerre mondiale.” In 60 ans d'histoire de l'UNESCO. Actes De Conference Internationale, 187–196. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Mandler, Peter. 2009. “One World, Many Cultures: Margaret Mead and the Limits to Cold War Anthropology.” History Workshop Journal 68:149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thurgood. 1954. “The Great Test of ‘Civil Rights’. A Commentary on the Legislative Attack.” UNESCO Courier 7 (6):22–23.Google Scholar
Martin, Percival W. 1947. “Unesco and Psychology.” Journal of Social Issues 3 (1):10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurel, Chloé. 2010. Histoire de l'UNESCO. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. 1961. “The Institute for Intercultural Studies and Japanese Studies.” American Anthropologist 63 (1):136–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Métraux, Alfred. 1950. “Unesco and the Racial Problem.” International Social Science Bulletin. II (3): 384–390.Google Scholar
Métraux, Alfred. 1952. “Une enquête sur les relations raciales au Brésil.” Le Courrier de l'UNESCO. V (8–9):6.Google Scholar
Murphy, Gardner. 1953. In the Minds of Men: The Study of Human Behavior and Social Tensions in India. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva. 1955. “A Scientific Approach to International Welfare.” In America's Role in International Social Welfare, edited by Myrdal, Alva, Altmeyer, Arthur J., and Rusk, Dean. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pooley, Jeffrey. 2006. “Fifteen Pages That Shook the Field: Personal Influence, Edward Shils, and the Remembered History of Mass Communication Research.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 608 (1):130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, Jeffrey. 2007. “Edward Shils’ Turn Against Karl Mannheim: The Central European Connection.” American Sociologist 38 (4):364–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, Harald, and Krebs, Edgar. 2007. “Vers un Monde sans Mal: Alfred Métraux, un anthropologue à l'Unesco (1948–1962).” In 60 ans d'histoire de l'UNESCO. Actes De Conference Internationale, 115–125. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Reid, Donald Malcolm. 1993. “The Egyptian Geographical Society: From Foreign Laymen's Society to Indigenous Professional Association.” Poetics Today 14 (3):539–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivière, Peter. 2010. “Alfred Métraux: Empiricist and Romanticist.” In Out of the Study and into the Field: Ethnographic Theory and Practice in French Anthropology, edited by Parkin, Robert and de Salles, Anne, 151–170. Vol. 22. Methodology and History in Anthropology. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2008. “The Archives of Universal History.” Journal of World History 19 (3):375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder-Gudehus, Brigitte. 1973. “Challenge to Transnational Loyalties: International Scientific Organizations after the First World War.” Science Studies 3 (2):93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen Myron. 1994. Justice in International Law: Selected Writings of Judge Stephen M. Schwebel. New York: Grotius Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selcer, Perrin. 2009. “The View from Everywhere: Disciplining Diversity in Post-World War II International Social Science.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45 (4):309–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shils, Edward. 1947. Tensions Affecting International Understanding: Preliminary Outline of (the) Project. Paris: UNESCO, May 12.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 2006. A Fragment of a Sociological Autobiography: The History of My Pursuit of a Few Ideas. Edited by Grosby, Steven Elliott. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sluga, Glenda. 2010. “UNESCO and the (One) World of Julian Huxley.” Journal of World History 21 (3):393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman, Murray. 1954. “The Decision Was Unaninous. ‘Separate but equal signifies unequal.’“ UNESCO Courier 7 (6):17.Google Scholar
Stoetzel, Jean. 1955. Without the Chrysanthemum and the Sword; a Study of the Attitudes of Youth in Post-War Japan. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Toye, John, and Toye, Richard. 2004. The UN and Global Political Economy: Trade, Finance, and Development. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Toye, Richard, and Toye, John. 2010. “One World, Two Cultures? Alfred Zimmern, Julian Huxley and the Ideological Origins of UNESCO.” History 95 (319):308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. 1946a. “Minutes of proceedings of the Committee on Social Sciences held on Thursday 13 June 1946. Session I.” In Preparatory Commission. London-Paris. 1945–1946. Vol. 5. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1946b. Minutes of proceedings of the Committee on Social Sciences held on Thursday 13 June 1946. Session II. In Preparatory Commission. London-Paris. 1945–1946. Vol. 5. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1947a. Revised Staff Regulations, Regulation I.2. (records of the) General Conference, First Session, Held at Unesco House, Paris from 20 November to 10 December 1946 (including Resolutions). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1947b. (Records of the) General Conference, first session, held at UNESCO House, Paris from 20 November to 10 December 1946 (including Resolutions). In, 287. 1C/Resolutions; UNESCO/C/30. UNESCO House Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1951. Rapport du directeur général sur l'activité de l'organisation d'avril 1950 à mars 1951. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1954. Rapport du directeur général et du conseil exécutif sur l'activité de l'organisation pendant l'année 1953. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1956. Rapport du directeur général sur l'activité de l'organisation en 1955. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1957. Rapport du directeur général sur l'activité de l'organisation en 1956. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1958. Rapport du directeur général sur l'activité de l'organisation en 1957. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul J. 2010. John W. Thompson: Psychiatrist in the Shadow of the Holocaust. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Clare. 1987. The UN, UNESCO and the Politics of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcken, Patrick. 2010. Claude Levi-Strauss: The Poet in the Laboratory. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wong, Laura Elizabeth. 2008. “Relocating East and West: UNESCO's Major Project on the Mutual Appreciation of Eastern and Western Cultural Values.” Journal of World History 19 (3):349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archives

General Records of the Department of State, Record Group 59, National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Robert Redfield Papers, University of Chicago Library, Special Collections Research Center.Google Scholar
UNESCO Archives, Paris.Google Scholar