Skip to main content Accessibility help

Criticism and Revolutions*

  • Mara Beller (a1)
Hide All
AHQP — Archive for the History of Quantum Physics, assembled by Kuhn, T. S., Heilbron, J. L., Forman, Paul, and Allen, Lini. In Sources for History of Quantum Physics: An Inventory and Report. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Batens, D., and van Bendegem, J. P., eds. 1988 Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bell, J. S. 1966. “On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 38:447–52.
Bell, J. S.. 1987. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beller, M. 1983. “Matrix Theory before Schrödinger: Philosophy, Problems, Consequences.” ISIS 74:469–91.
Beller, M.. 1990. “Born Probabilistic Interpretation — A Case Study of‘Concepts in Flux’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.
Beller, M.. 1992. “The Birth of Bohr's Complementarity: The Context and the Dialogues.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23(1): 147–80.
Beller, M.. 1996. “Bohm and ‘Inevitability’ of Acausality.” In Cushing et al. eds. 1996, 211–30.
Beller, M.. Forthcoming. “Kant Impact on Einstein Thought.” In The Young Einstein: Einsteinian Studies, edited by Howard, D. H. and Stachel, J..
Ben-Menahem, Y. 1992. “Struggling with Realism — Schrödinger's Case.” In Erwin Schrödinger's Philosophy and the Birth of Quantum Mechanics, edited by Bitbol, M. and Darrigol, O.. Paris: Editions Frontières.
Biagioli, M. 1990. “Galileo's System of Patronage.” History of Science 28:162.
Bohm, D. 1952. “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden Variables,’ I and II.” Physical Review 85:166–93.
Bohm, D.. 1964: “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by T. Kuhn.” Philosophical Quarterly 14:377–79.
Bohm, D., and Peat, F. D.. 1987. Science, Order and Creativity. New York: Bantam.
Born, M., Heisenberg, W., and Jordan, P.. 1925. “Zur Quantenmechanik TT.” Zeitschrift für Physik 35:557615.
Born, M., and Jordan, P.. 1925. “Zur Quantenmechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik 34:858–88.
Chevalley, C. 1988. “Physical Reality and Closed Theories in Werner Heisenberg's Early Papers.” In Batens, and van Bendegem, 1988, 159–76.
Coffa, J. A. 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Stations. Edited by Wessels, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, I. B. 1987. “Scientific Revolutions, Revolutions in Science, and a Probabilistic Revolution 1800–1930.” In Krüger et al. 1987, 2344.
Cushing, J. T. 1994. Quantum Mechanics, Historical Contingency and the “Copenhagen” Hegemony. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cushing, J. T., and McMullin, E., eds. 1989. Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem., Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Cushing, J. T., Fine, A., and Goldstein, S., eds. 1996. Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Darrigol, O. 1992. From c-Numbers to q-Numbers: The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Earman, J. 1986. A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Earman, J. 1993. “Carnap, Kuhn and the Philosophy of Scientific Methodology.” In Horwich 1993, 9–36.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.. 1935. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Physical Review 47:777–80.
Feyerabend, P. K. 1970. “Consolation for the Specialist.” In Lakatosh and Mus- grave 1970, 197230.
Feyerabend, P. K. 1975. Against Method. New Left Books.
Feyerabend, P. K.. 1981. Problems of Empiricism. Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fine, A. 1986. The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Finkelstein, D. 1987. “All Is Flux,” In Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm, edited by Hiley, B. T. and Peat, F. D.. New York: Routledge.
Friedman, M. 1983. “Carnap's Aufbau Reconsidered.” Nous 21:521–45.
Fuller, S. 1994. “Teaching Thomas Kuhn to Teach the Cold War Vision of Science.” Contention 4(1):81105.
Ghirardi, G. C., A, Rimini, and Weber, T.. 1986. Physical Review D34:470–91.
Gillies, D. 1992. “Are There Revolutions in Mathematics?” In Gillies, 1992.
Gillies, D. 1992. Revolutions in Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon.
Gutting, G. 1980. Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn's Philosophy of Science., London: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hacking, I. 1992. “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences.” In Pickering 1992.
Hanson, R. N. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, R. N.. 1959. “Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory.” American Journal of Physics 27(1): 115. Revised version of paper delivered at the 1958 meeting of the American Philosophical Association.
Heilbron, L., and Kuhn, T. S.. 1969. “The Genesis of the Bohr Atom.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 1:211–90.
Heisenberg, W. 1925. “Quantentheoretische Umdeutung Kinematischer und Mechanischer Beziehungen.” Zeitschrift für Physik 33:879–93.
Heisenberg, W.. 1948. “Der Begriff ‘Abgeschlossene Theorie’ in der modernen Naturwissenschaft.” Dialectica 2:331–36.
Heisenberg, W.. [1952] 1979. Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press. Originally published as Philosophical Problems of Nuclear Science, Pantheon Books (a collection of Heisenberg's essays 1934–48).
Heisenberg, W.. 1958. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper and Row.
Horgan, J. 1991. “Profile — Reluctant Revolutionary.” Scientific American, May: 1415.
Horwich, P. 1993. World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Howard, D. A. 1990. “Einstein and Duhem.” In Pierre Duhem: Historian and Philosopher of Science, edited by Ariev, R. and Barker, P.. Synthèse 83:363–84.
Howard, D. A.. 1993. “Was Einstein Really A Realist?Perspectives on Science 1:204–51.
Kellert, S. M. 1993. In the Wake of Chaos. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Klein, M. 1977. “The Beginnings of Quantum Theory.” In History of Twentieth-Century Physics, edited by Weiner, C.. New York: Academic Press.
Koyré, A. [1968] 1943. “Galileo and Plato.” In idem, Metaphysics and Measurement. London: Originally published in Journal for the History of ideas 4:400–47.
Koyré, A.. 1957. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Krüger, L., Daston, L. J., and Heidelberger, M.. 1987. The Probabilistic Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kuhn, T. S. 1957. “The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy.” In The Development of Western Thought., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T. S.. [1959] 1977. “The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research.” In Proceedings of the Third University of Utah Research Conference on the Identification of Scientific Talent, edited by Taylor, C. W.. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Kuhn, T. S.. 1963. “The Function of Dogma'in Scientific Research.”In Scientific Change, edited by Crombie, A. C., 347–69, 386–95. New York: Basic Books.
Kuhn, T. S.. [1964] 1977. “A Function for Thought Experiments.” In idem, Melangés Alexandre Koyré, 1:307–34. Paris: Hermann. Reprinted in Kuhn 1977, 240–65.
Kuhn, T. S.. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., enl. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S.. [1971] 1977. “The Relations between History and the History of Science.” Daedalus 100:271304. Reprinted in Kuhn 1977, 127–61.
Kuhn, T. S.. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S.. 1978. Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 18941912. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S.. 1987. “What Are Scientific Revolutions?” In Krcger et al. 1987, 7–22.
Kuhn, T. S.. 1991. “?The Road Since Structure.” In, Vol. 2, 3–13. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
Kuhn, T. S.. 1993. “Afterwords.” In Horwich 1993, 311–41.
Lakatosh, I., and Musgrave, A., eds. 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Masterman, M. 1970. “The Nature of a Paradigm.” In Lakatosh and Musgrave 1970, 59–90.
Maudlin, T. 1996. “Kuhn Defanged: Incommensurability and Theory Choice.” In Revue Philosophique de Louvain.
Mauskopf, S.M. Forthcoming. Overview of the Chemical Revolution.
Pickering, A., ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ryckman, T. A. 1991. “Condition sine qua non? Zuordnung in the Early Epistemologies of Cassirer and Schlick.” Synthese 88:5795.
Schmitt, C. 1983. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Schrödinger, E. 1935. “Die Gegenwärtinge Situation in der Quantenmechanik.” Naturwissenschaften 23:807–28,844–49.
von Weizsäcker, C. F. 1987. “Heisenberg's Philosophy.” In Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, edited by Lahti, P. and Mittelstaedt, P., 277293. Singapore: World Scientific.
Wessels, L. 1989. “The Way the World Isn't: What the Bell Theorems Force Us to Give Up.” In Cushing and McMullin 1989, 80–96.
Wessels, L. 1983. “Erwin Schrodinger and the Descriptive Tradition,” in Aris, R. et al. (ed.), The Springs of Scientific Creativity, pp. 254278.
Westfall, R. S. 1985. “Science and Patronage: Galileo and the Telescope.” ISIS 76:1130.
Westman, R. S. 1994. “Two Cultures or One? A Second Look at Kuhn's The Copernican Revolution.” ISIS 85:79115.
Yzzik, G., and Grcnberg, T.. 1995. “Carnap and Kuhn: Arch Enemies or Close Allies.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed