Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:35:13.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Definitional Argument in Evolutionary Psychology and Cultural Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2010

John P. Jackson Jr.
John P. Jackson Jr.*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Evolutionary psychologists argue that because humans are biological creatures, cultural explanations must include biology. They thus offer to unify the natural and social sciences. Evolutionary psychologists rely on a specific history of cultural anthropology, particularly the work of Alfred Kroeber to make this point. A close examination of the history of cultural anthropology reveals that Kroeber acknowledged that humans were biological and culture had a biological foundation; however, he argued that we should treat culture as autonomous because that would bring benefits to the biological sciences as well as the human sciences. Hence, the historical caricature of his work by evolutionary psychology fails. The paper concludes that cultural anthropologists were successful in creating their discipline, at least in part, because they argued by pragmatic definition. Evolutionary psychology, on the other hand, offers an essentialist definition of “culture” and thus offers a much less promising vision of interdisciplinary collaboration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 121 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1914. “Eugenics called snare and joke.” New York Tribune 27 February 1914.Google Scholar
Ash, Mitchell G. 1983. “The Self-presentation of a Discipline: History of Psychology in the United States between Pedagogy and Scholarship.” In Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories, edited by Graham, Loren L., Lepenies, Wolf, and Weingart, Peter, 143–149. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lee D. 1998. From Savage to Negro: Anthropology and the Construction of Race, 1896–1954. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, Elazar. 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, Jerome H. 2006a. “Introduction: Sometimes the bus does wait.” In Missing the Revolution: Darwinism for Social Scientists, edited by Barkow, Jerome H., 3–59. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, Jerome H. 2006b. “Vertical/compatible Integration versus Analogizing with Biology.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:348–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, John. 1997. “Why Do Biologists Argue like They Do?” Philosophy of Science 64:432–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Ruth. 1934. Patterns of Culture. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, Bruce. 2003. Psychology and Evolution: The Origins of Mind. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles, and Bauman, Richard. 1999. “The Foundation of All Future Researches: Franz Boas, George Hunt, Native American Texts, and the Construction of Modernity.” American Quarterly 51:479–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Thomas. 1989. “Suffering in the Cultural Construction of Others: Robert Spott and A. L. Kroeber.” American Indian Quarterly 13:437–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Thomas. 1996. “The Little History of Pitiful Events: The Epistemological and Moral Contexts of Kroeber's Californian Ethnology.” In Volkgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, edited by Stocking, George W., 257–297. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Buller, David J. 2005. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Question for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bunzl, Matti. 1996. “Franz Boas and the Humboltian Tradition: From Volkgeist and Nationalcharakter to an anthropological concept of culture.” In Volkgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, edited by Stocking, George W., 17–78. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Buss, David M. 1995. “Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science.” Psychological Inquiry 6:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporael, Linda R. 2001. “Evolutionary Psychology: Toward a Unifying Theory and a Hybrid Science.” Annual Review of Psychology 52:607–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, Leah. 2001. Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 1978. The Triumph of Evolution: American Scientists and the Heredity-environment Controversy, 1900–1941. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 1996. Scientific Racism in Modern America, 1870s-1990s. Prospects 26:471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna. 1990. “Franz Boas, Edward Sapir, and the Americanist Text Tradition.” Hisoriagraphia Linguistica 17:129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degler, Carl N. 1991. In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Derksen, Maarten. 2005. “Against Integration: Why Evolution Cannot Unify the Social Sciences.” Theory and Psychology 15:139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, Maarten. 2007. “Cultivating Human Nature.” New Ideas in Psychology 25:189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikötter, Frank. 1998. “Race Culture: Recent Perspectives on the History of Eugenics.” American Historical Review 103:467–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, Robin I. M. 2007. “Evolution and the Social Sciences.” History of the Human Sciences 20:29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. 1996. “Metaphysical Disorder and Scientific Disunity.” In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Galison, Peter Louis and Stump, David J., 101–117. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. 2001. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford and New York: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter Louis. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gandolfi, Arthur E., Barash, David P., and Gandolfi, Anna S.. 2002. Economics as an Evolutionary Science: From Utility to Fitness. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Geher, Glenn. 2006. “Evolutionary Psychology Is not Evil! (. . . and Here's why. . .).” Psychological Topics 15:181–202.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilkerson, John. 1986. “The Domestication of ‘culture’ in interwar America.” In The Estate of Social Knowledge, edited by Brown, JoAnne and van Keurin, David K.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert. 2004. “Towards the Unity of the Human Behavioral Sciences.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert. 2007. “A Framework for the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30:1–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golla, Victor. 1984. The Sapir-Kroeber Correspondence: Letters between Edward Sapir and A. L. Kroeber, 1905–15. Berkeley: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gossett, Thomas F. 1963. Race: The History of an Idea in America. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Madison. 1916. The Passing of the Great Race or the Racial Basis of European History. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Green, Christopher D. 2009. “Darwinian Theory, Functionalism, and the First American Psychological Revolution.” American Psychologist 64 (2):75–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosvenor, Peter C. 2002. “Evolutionary Psychology and the Intellectual Left.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45:433–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, Anil. 2009. “Definitions.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/definitions/>. Retrieved 3 November 2009.+Retrieved+3+November+2009>Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1996. The Disunities of the Sciences. In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Galison, Peter Louis and Stump, David J., 37–74. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Richard. 2008. “The Darwinian Cage: Evolutionary Psychology as a Moral Science.” Theory, Culture and Society 25:105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Simon J. 2004. “The Instinct Debate and the Standard Social Science Model.” Sexualities, Evolution and Gender 6:15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Simon J. 2006. “Can Evolutionary Psychology Learn from the Instinct Debate?” History of the Human Sciences 19:57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Richard. 1990. “Boasian Anthropology and the Critique of American Culture.” American Quarterly 42:252–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbring, Mark. 1994. “Feeling Universality and Thinking Particularistically: Alain Locke, Franz Boas, Melville Herskovits, and the Harlem Renaissance.” Prospects 19:289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Lawrence J. 1913. The Fitness of the Environment: An Inquiry into the Biological Significance of the Properties of Matter. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoover, Dwight W. 1981. “A Paradigm Shift: The Concept of Race in the 10s and 1930s. Conspectus of History 1:82–100.Google Scholar
Jacknis, Ira. 1993. “Alfred Kroeber as Museum Anthropologist.” Museum Anthropology 17:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacknis, Ira. 1996. “Alfred Kroeber and the Photographic Representation of California Indians. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 20 (3):15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacknis, Ira. 2002. “The First Boasian: Alfred Kroeber and Franz Boas, 1896–1905.” American Anthropologist 104:520–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John P. Jr., and Weidman, Nadine M.. 2004. Race, Racism, and Science: Social Impact and Interaction. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George Alexander. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1985. Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1999. “Unification as a Regulative Ideal.” Perspectives on Science 7:337–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1901. “Decorative Symbolism of the Arapaho.” American Anthropologist 3:308–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1915. “Eighteen Professions.” American Anthropologist 17:283–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1916a. “Inheritance by Magic.” American Anthropologist 18:19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1916b. “Heredity without Magic.” American Anthropologist 18:294–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1917. “The Superorganic.” American Anthropologist 19:163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1918. “The Possibility of a Social Psychology.” American Journal of Sociology 23:633–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1923. Anthropology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1952. The Nature of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kronfeldner, Maria E. 2009. “If There Is Nothing Beyond the Organic: Heredity and Culture at the Boundaries of Anthropology in the Work of Alfred L. Kroeber.” NTM- Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine 17 (2):107–134.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Largent, Mark A. 2008. Breeding Contempt: The History of Coerced Sterilization in the United States. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Le Bon, Gustave. 1912. The Psychology of Peoples. New York: G. E. Stechert.Google Scholar
Leahey, Thomas H. 1992. “The Mythical Revolutions of American Psychology.” American Psychologist 47:308–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian R. and Weisberg, Michael. 2007. “Why Evolutionary Biology is (so Far) Irrelevant to Law.” Law and Philosophy DOI -10.1007/s10982–009-9049-y. <http://www.springerlink.com/content/9346hq6788710×50>. Retrieved 3 November 2009.Google Scholar
Littlefield, Alice, Lieberman, Leonard, and Reynolds, Larry T.. 1982. “Redefining Race: The Potential Demise of a Concept in Physical Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 23:641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1894. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Valentine Seaman.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. Lee, and O'Brien, Michael J.. 2004. “Nomothetic Science and Ideographic History in Twentieth-Century Americanist Anthropology.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 40:77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1961. “Cause and Effect in Biology: Kinds of Causes, Predictability, and Teleology Are Viewed by a Practicing Biologist.” Science 134 (3489):1501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex, Whiten, Andrew, and Laland, Kevin N.. 2006. “Towards a Unified Science of Cultural Evolution.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:329–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morning, Ann. 2008. “Reconstructing Race in Science and Society: Biology Textbooks, 1952–2002.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (11/01):S106–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, Nigel. 2005. “Objections to Evolutionary Psychology: Reflections, Implications and the Leadership Exemplar.” Human Relations 58:393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Robert A. 1993. “The Rise and Fall of the Eugenics Empire: Recent Perspectives on the Impact of Biomedical Thought in Modern Society.” Historical Journal 36:687–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Diane B. 1998. The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine, and the Nature/Nurture Debate. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Richardson, Robert C. 2007. Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risjord, Mark. 2000. “Politics of Explanation and the Origins of Ethnography.” Perspectives on Science 8:29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samelson, Franz. 1997. “On the Uses of History: The Case of the Bell Curve.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 33:129–33.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samelson, Franz. 2000. “Whig and Anti-Whig Histories, and Other Curiosities of Social Psychology.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 36:499–506.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapir, E. 1917. “Do We Need a “Superorganic”? American Anthropologist 19:441–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiappa, Edward A. 2003. Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Irwin. 2007. “Why Evolutionary Psychology?” Acta Psychologica Sinica 39:541–5.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A., Mulder, M. B., and Hill, K.. 2001. “Controversies in the Evolutionary Social Sciences: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:128–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somit, Albert, and Peterson, Steven A.. 2003. “From Human Nature to Public Policy: Evolutionary Theory Challenges the ‘Standard Model’.” In Human Nature and Public Policy an Evolutionary Approach, edited by Somit, Albert and Peterson, Steven A., 3–18. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocking, George W. 1968. Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. 2001. Delimiting Anthropology: Occasional Essays and Reflections. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles Alan. 1996. Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, John, and Cosmides, Leda. 1992. “The Psychological Foundations of Culture.” In Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by Barkow, Jerome H., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John, 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, John, and Cosmides, Leda. 2005. “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology.” In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by Buss, David M., 5–67. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 2005. “Deceptive Arguments Containing Persuasive Language and Persuasive Definitions.” Argumentation 19 (2):159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank. 1891a. Neo-Darwinism and neo-Lamarckism. Washington: Press of Gedney and Roberts.Google Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank. 1891b. “Transmission of Culture.” The Forum 11:312–9.Google Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank. 1903. Pure Sociology: A Treatise on the Origins of Spontaneous Development of Society. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank. 1907. “Social and Biological Struggle.” American Journal of Sociology 13:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Vernon J. 1996. Rethinking Race: Franz Boas and His Contemporaries. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Winston, Andrew S. 2006. “Mythologized History of Psychology as Social Practice: The Uses of ‘Environmentalist Hegemony’ Narratives.” In History of Psychology and Social Practice. Special Issue of Social Practice/Psychological Theorizing, edited by Brock, A. C. and Louw, J., 82–95. Retrieved 3 November 2009 from http://sppt-gulerce.boun.edu.tr.html.Google Scholar
Winston, Andrew S., Butzer, Bethany, and Ferris, Mark D.. 2004. “Constructing Difference: Heredity, Intelligence, and Race in Textbooks, 1930–1970.” In Defining Difference: Race and Racism in the History of Psychology, edited by Winston, Andrew S., 199–229. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, Lance, and Reader, Will. 2004. Evolutionary Psychology: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarefsky, David. 1997. “Definitions.” In Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques, edited by Klumpp, James F., 1–11. Annandale VA: National Communication Association.Google Scholar