Skip to main content
×
Home

Dissolving Decision Making? Models and Their Roles in Decision-Making Processes and Policy at Large

  • Ragna Zeiss (a1) and Stans van Egmond (a2)
Argument
Argument

This article studies the roles three science-based models play in Dutch policy and decision making processes. Key is the interaction between model construction and environment. Their political and scientific environments form contexts that shape the roles of models in policy decision making. Attention is paid to three aspects of the wider context of the models: a) the history of the construction process; b) (changes in) the political and scientific environments; and c) the use in policy processes over longer periods of time. Models are more successfully used when they are constructed in a stable political and scientific environment. Stability and certainty within a scientific field seems to be a key predictor for the usefulness of models for policy making. The economic model is more disputed than the ecology-based model and the model that has its theoretical foundation in physics and chemistry. The roles models play in policy processes are too complex to be considered as straightforward technocratic powers.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alterra. 2007. Is Your Landscape Climate Proof? Biodiversity Analyses with Larch. Wageningen: Alterra.
Ashmore Malcolm, Mulkay Mike, and Pinch Trevor. 1989. Health and Efficiency: A Sociology of Health Economics. Milton Keynes IL: Open University Press.
Bekebrede Geertje, and van Bilsen Arthur. 2009. “Spelen met Complexiteit: Serious Gaming voor Besluitvorming over Ruimtelijke Infrastructuren” [Playing with Complexity: Serious Gaming for Decision-Making about Spatial Infrastructures]. Bestuurskunde 3:2435.
Bijker Wiebe, Bal Roland, and Hendriks Ruud. 2009. The Paradox of Scientific Authority. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boesten Jos, and van derLinden Ton. 1991. “Modeling the Influence of Sorption and Transformation on Pesticide Leaching and Persistence.” Journal of Environmental Quality 20:425435.
Bogaard Adrienne van den. 1998. Configuring the Economy: The Emergence of a Modelling Practice in the Netherlands, 1920–1955. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
Bogaard Adrienne van den. 1999. “Past Measurement and Future Prediction.” In Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Morgan Mary S. and Morrison Margaret, 282325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brouwer Floor. 2001. “Policy-Technology Interactions for Intensive Farming Systems: Some Experiences from the Netherlands.” In Adoption of Technologies for Sustainable Farming Systems, Wageningen Workshop Proceedings, 108119. Paris: OECD Publications.
Callon Michel. 1998. The Laws of the Market, the Sociological Review. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
CPB, RIVM, SCP. 1994. “Pre-Study: naar een Ramingsmodel voor de Zorgsector” [Pre-Study: Towards an Assessment Model for the Health Care Sector]. Den Haag: CPB, RIVM, SCP.
CPB SCP. 1995. “Ramingsmodel Zorgsector. Organisatie en Planning” [Assessment Model Health Care Sector: Organization and Planning]. Den Haag: CPB and SCP.
Daalen Els van, Dresen Leen, and Janssen Marco. 2002. “The Roles of Computer Models in the Environmental Policy Life Cycle.” Environmental Science and Policy 5:221–31.
Den Butter Frank. 2003. “The Dutch Miracle: Institutions, Networks, and Trust.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 159 (2):362–91.
Edwards Paul. 1999. “Global Climate Science, Uncertainty and Politics: Data-Laden Models, Model-Filtered Data.” Science as Culture 8 (4):437–72.
Eggink Gert, and Wiertz Jaap. 2003. Natuurverkenning 2: Evaluatie van Inhoud, Vorm en Proces [Nature Exploration 2: Evaluation of Content, Form and Process]. Bilthoven: RIVM.
Evans Robert. 2000. “Economic Models and Economic Policy: What Economic Forecasters Can Do for Government.” In Empirical Models and Policy-Making, edited by den Butter Frank and Morgan Mary S., 206–28. London, New York: Routledge.
Fischer Frank, and Forrester John. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Fischer Frank, Miller Gerald, and Sidney Mara. 2007. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. Boca Raton, London, and New York: CRC Press.
Galison Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grin John, and Felix Francisca. 2004. “The Praxis of Reflexive Design: Lessons from a Dutch Programme on Sustainable Live-Stock Systems.” Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 13 (4):99107.
Hajer Maarten, and Wagenaar Hendrik. 2003. Deliberate Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halffman Willem. 2003. Boundaries of Regulatory Science: Eco/Toxicology and Aquatic Hazards of Chemicals in the US, England and the Netherlands, 1970–1995. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Halffman Willem. 2009. “Measuring the Stakes: The Dutch Planning Bureaus.” In Scientific Advice to Policy Making: International Comparison, edited by Lentsch Justus and Weingart Peter, 4167. Leverkusen Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Halffman Willem, and Hoppe Rob. 2005. “Science/Policy Boundaries: A Changing Division of Labour in Dutch Expert Policy Advice.” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, edited by Maasen Sabine and Weingart Peter, 135152. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Helderman Jan-Kees, Schut Frederik, van derGrinten Tom, and van de Ven Wynand. 2005. “Market-Oriented Health Care Reforms and Policy Learning in the Netherlands.” Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law 30 (1–2):189209.
Hilgartner Stephen. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Huitema Dave, and Turnhout Esther. 2009. “Working at the Science–Policy Interface: A Discursive Analysis of Boundary Work at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.” Environmental Politics 18 (4):576594.
Hunter David. 1997. Desperately Seeking Solutions: Rationing Health Care. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Jansen Jacques, Halbertsma Junt, Heesterbeek Hans, Houweling Harm, and Jansen Michiel. 2004. Kwaliteitsborging Databestanden en Modellen. Balanceren tussen Chaotische Dynamiek en Geordende Stilstand [Quality Assurance Databanks and Models. Balancing Chaotic Dynamics and Ordered Stagnation]. Wageningen: Alterra.
Jasanoff Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keuzenkamp Hugo A. 2003. “A Day of Reckoning for Politicians – or Economists?” In Economic Assessment of Election Programmes: Does It Make Sense? edited by Graafland John F. and Ros Arie P., 37. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Leistra Minze, van derLinden Ton, Boesten Jos, Tiktak Aaldrik, and van denBerg Erik. 2001. PEARL Model for Pesticide Behaviour and Emissions in Soil-plant System; Description of the Processes in FOCUS PEARL v 1.1.1. Alterra-rapport 013 / RIVM Rep. 711401009. Bilthoven: Alterra, RIVM.
Linden Ton van der, and Boesten Jos. 1989. Berekening van de Mate van Uitspoeling en Accumulatie van Bestrijdingsmiddelen als Functie van hun Sorptiecoefficient en Omzettingssnelheid in Bouwvoormateriaal [Calculation of the Degree of the Washing Out and Accumulation of Pesticides as Function of Their Sorption Coefficient and Rate of Turnover in Upper Layer of Soil]. RIVM rapport 728800003. Bilthoven: RIVM.
Linden Ton van der, Tiktak Aaldrik, Heuvelink Gerard, and Leijnse Toon. 2006. “Spatial Uncertainty Analysis of Pesticide Leaching Using a Metamodel of PEARL.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 5 – 7 July 2006, edited by Mario Caetano and Marco Painho, 359–366. Lisbon: Instituto Geográfico Português.
Maasen Sabine, and Weingart Peter. 2005. Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Dordrecht: Springer.
Morgan Mary, and den Butter Frank. 2000. Empirical Models and Policy-Making: Interaction and Institutions. London and New York: Routledge.
Morgan Mary, and Morrison Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Opdam Paul, Verboom Jana, and Pouwels Rogier. 2003. “Landscape Cohesion: An Index for the Conservation of Landscapes for Biodiversity.” Landscape Ecology 18 (2):113–26.
Reijnen Rien, Harms Bert, Foppen Ruud, de Visser R., and Wolfert Henk. 1995. Rhine-Econet. Ecological Networks in River Rehabilitation Scenario's: A Case Study for the Lower Rhine. Lelystad: RIZA, Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Shackley Simon, Risbey James, Stone Peter, and Wynne Brian. 1999. “Adjusting to Policy Expectations in Climate Change Modeling.” Climatic Change 43 (2):413454.
Shackley Simon, and Wynne Brian. 1995. “Global Climate Change: The Mutual Construction of an Emergent Science-Policy Domain.” Science and Public Policy 22 (4):218–30.
Shackley Simon, Young Peter, Parkinson Stuart, and Wynne Brian. 1998. “Uncertainty, Complexity and Concepts of Good Science in Climate Change Modelling: Are GCMs the Best Tools?Climatic Change 38:155201.
Sluis Theo van der, and Bunce Robert. 2003. Corridors for Life: Ecological Network Analysis for Cheshire County UK. Wageningen: Alterra.
Stone Diane. 2007. “Recycle Bins, Garbage Cans or Think Tanks? Three Myths Regarding Policy Analysis Institutes.” Public Administration 85 (2):259–78.
Sundberg Mikaela. 2007. “Credulous Modellers and Suspicious Experimentalists? Comparison of Model Output and Data in Meteorological Simulation Modelling.” Science Studies 19 (1):5268.
Tiktak Aaldrik, van denBerg Erik, Boesten Jos, van Kraalingen Daniel, Leistra Minze, and van derLinden Ton. 2002. Manual of FOCUS PEARL Version 1.1.1. RIVM report 711401008/2000. Bilthoven: RIVM.
Tiktak Aaldrik, van derLinden Ton, and Boesten Jos. 2003. The GeoPEARL Model – Description, Applications and Manual. RIVM report 716601007/2003. Bilthoven: RIVM.
Trommel Willem. 2003. “De Onderzoeksmethode van het Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau” [The Research Method of the Netherlands Institute for Social Research]. Beleid en Maatschappij 30 (1):4254.
Turnhout Esther. 2009. “The Rise and Fall of a Policy: Policy Succession and the Attempted Termination of Ecological Corridors Policy in the Netherlands.” Policy Sciences 42 (1):5772.
Van Egmond Stans. 2010. “Science and Policy in Interaction. On Practices of Science Policy Interactions for Policy-Making in Health Care.” Ph.D. diss., Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Van Egmond Stans, and Zeiss Ragna. 2010. “Modeling for Policy – Science-Based Models as Performative Boundary Objects for Dutch Policy Making.” Science Studies 23 (1):5878.
Van Egmond Stans, and Bal Roland. 2011. “Boundary Configurations in Science Policy, Modeling Practices in Health Care.” Science, Technology and Human Values 36 (1):108130.
Van Rooij Sabine van, van der Sluis Theo, Steingrover Eveline G., and Clarke Steve. 2004. “Applying Landscape Ecological Methods to Analyse and Design Ecological Networks.” In Landscape Ecology of Trees and Forests. Proceedings of the Woodland Trust and International Association of Landscape Ecology (IALE), 208215. Gloucestershire: IALE.
Verboom Jana, Foppen Ruud, Chardon Paul, Opdam Paul, and Luttikhuizen Pieternella. 2001. “Introducing the Key Patch Approach for Habitat Networks with Persistent Populations: An Example for Marchland Birds.” Biological Conservation 100:89101.
Verboom Jana, and Pouwels Rogier. 2006. Strategisch Plan Larch: Van Strategische Visie naar Plan van Aanpak [Strategic Plan Larch: From Strategic Vision to Action Plan]. Wageningen: Alterra.
Vries Annick de. 2008. “Uncertainty in Scientific Policy Advice and Decision Making, 2004–2008.” Ph.D. diss., Twente University.
Vries Annick de., Halffman Willem, and Hoppe Rob. 2010. “Policy Workers Tinkering with Uncertainty: Dutch Econometric Policy Advice in Action.” In Working for Policy, edited by Colebatch Hal, Hoppe Robert, and Noordegraaf Mirko, 91115. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
WVC, Ministry of Welfare, Health and Culture. 1994. “Brief betreffende Toekomstverkenning Volume en Kosten van de Gezondheidszorg. 2” [Archival Letter Concerning Future Predictions of Volume and Costs of Health Care]. Rijswijk: Ministerie WVC, January 1994.
Weiss Carol H. 1991. “Policy Research: Data, Ideas, or Arguments?” In Social Sciences and Modern States, edited by Wagner Peter, 307–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yearley Steve. 1999. “Computer Models and the Public's Understanding of Science.” Social Studies of Science 29 (6):845–66.
Yearley Steve, Cinderby Steve, Forrester John, Bailey Peter, and Rosen Paul. 2003. “Participatory Modelling and the Local Governance of the Politics and UK Air Pollution: A Three-City Case Study.” Environmental Values 12:247–62.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 242 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.