Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Dredging and Projecting the Depths of Personality: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Narratives of the Unconscious

  • Jason Miller (a1)
Argument
Argument

The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) was a projective psychological test created by Harvard psychologist Henry A. Murray and his lover Christina Morgan in the 1930s. The test entered the nascent intelligence service of the United States (the OSS) during the Second World War due to its celebrated reputation for revealing the deepest aspects of an individual's unconscious. It subsequently spread as a scientifically objective research tool capable not only of dredging the unconscious depths, but also of determining the best candidate for a management position, the psychological complexes of human nature, and the unique characteristics of a culture. Two suppositions underlie the utility of the test. One is the power of narrative. The test entails a calculated abuse of the subjects tested, based on their inability to interpret their own narrative. The form of the test requires that a subject fail to decipher the coded, unconscious meaning their narrative reveals. Murray believed the interpretation of a subject's narrative and the projection contained therein depended exclusively on the psychologist. This view of interpretation stems from the seemingly more reasonable belief of nineteenth-century Romantic thinkers that a literary text serves as a proxy for an author's deepest self. The TAT also supposes that there is something beyond consciousness closely resembling a psychoanalytic unconscious, which also has clear precedents in nineteenth-century German thought. Murray's views on literary interpretation, his view of psychology as well as the continuing prevalence of the TAT, signals a nineteenth-century concept of self that insists “on relations of depth and surface, inner and outer life” (Galison 2007, 277). It is clear the hermeneutic practice of Freud's psychoanalysis, amplified in Jung, drew on literary conceptions of the unconscious wider than those of nineteenth-century psychology.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Amerikas Karl. 2000. “Introduction: Interpreting German Idealism.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, edited by Amerikas Karl, 118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson James. 1999. “Henry A. Murray and the Creation of the Thematic Apperception Test.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser Lon and Stein Morris I., 2339. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Arac Jonathan. 2000. “The Impact of Shakespeare.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 5, Romanticism, edited by Brown Marshall, 272296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Black Joel. 2000a. “Scientific Models.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 5, Romanticism, edited by Brown Marshall, 115138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Black Joel. 2000b. “Theory of the Novel.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 5, Romanticism, edited by Brown Marshall, 250272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brittain H. L. 1907. “A Study in Imagination.” Pedagogical Seminary 14:137207.
Capshew James. 1999. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eagleton Terry. 1983. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Frank Lawrence. 1939. “Projective Methods for the Study of Personality.” Journal of Psychology 8:359413.
Galison Peter. 2007. “Image of Self.” In Things That Talk, edited by Daston Lorraine, 257294. Cambridge: Zone Books.
Galton Francis. 1879. “Psychometric Experiments.” Brain 2:149162.
Gardner Sebastian. 2003. “The Unconscious Mind.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945, edited by Baldwin Thomas, 107119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gieser Lon, and Stein Morris I.. 1999. “A View of the Future.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser Lon and Stein Morris I., 215223. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Gödde Gunter. 2010. “Freud and Nineteenth-Century Philosophical Sources on the Unconscious.” In Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought, edited by Nicholls Angus and Liebscher Martin, 261287. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herman Ellen. 1995. The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Housden Martyn. 2005. “An Early Example of Personality Profiling: Henry A. Murray's Study of Adolf Hitler Written for the OSS.” Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion 8:227250.
Jameson Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Larmore Charles. 2000. “Hölderlin and Novalis.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, edited by Amerikas Karl, 141161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lashley Karl. 1939. Letter to Robert M. Yerkes. November 23. UCLA Special Collections.
Lemov Rebecca. 2009. “Towards a Data Base of Dreams: Assembling an Archive of Elusive Materials, c. 1947– 1961.” History Workshop Journal 67:4468.
Libby Walter. 1908. “The Imagination of Adolescents.” American Journal of Psychology 50:249252.
Liebscher Martin. 2010. “Friedrich Nietzsche's Perspectives on the Unconscious.” In Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought, edited by Nicholls Angus and Liebscher Martin, 241260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Margolis Joseph. 1987. “Goethe and Psychoanalysis.” In Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal, edited by Amrine Fredrick, Zucker Francis, and Wheeler Harvey, 83100. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McClelland David. 1999. “How the Test Lives On: Extensions of the Thematic Apperception Test Approach.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser Lon and Stein Morris I., 163177. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Morgan Wesley. 1999. “The 1943 Images: Their Origin and History.” In Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection, edited by Gieser Lon and Stein Morris I., 6585. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Murray Henry, with Morgan Christiana D.. [1935] 1981. “A Method for Investigating Fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test.” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman Edwin, 390408. New York: Harper & Row.
Murray Henry, and Morgan Christiana D.. [1936] 1981. “Techniques for a Systematic Investigation of Fantasy.” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman Edwin, 366389. New York: Harper & Row.
Murray Henry, et al. 1938. Explorations in Personality: A Clinical and Experimental Study of Fifty Men of College Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murray Henry. [1940] 1981. “What Should Psychologists Do about Psychoanalysis?” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman Edwin, 291311. New York: Harper & Row.
Murray Henry. 1943. “Analysis of the Personality of Adolph Hitler: With Predictions of His Future Behavior and Suggestions for Dealing with Him Now and After Germany's Surrender.” OSS Confidential. A copy in PDF is available from the Cornell Law School library.
Murray Henry, with Morgan Christiana. 1943. Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge: Harvard University Printing Office.
Murray Henry. 1949. “Introduction to Pierre.” In Pierre; or, the Ambiguities, by Melville Herman, xiii. New York: Hendricks House.
Murray Henry. 1951. “In Nomine Diaboli.” New England Quarterly 4:435452.
Murray Henry. 1960. “Introduction.” In Myth and Mythmaking, edited by Murray Henry A., 919. New York: George Braziller.
Murray Henry. [1967] 1981. “The Case of Murr.” In Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, edited by Shneidman Edwin, 5378. New York: Harper & Row.
Nicholls Angus. 2010. “The Scientific Unconscious: Goethe's Post-Kantian Epistemology.” In Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought, edited by Nicholls Angus and Liebscher Martin, 87120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oberlin Gerhard. 2007. Goethe, Schiller, und das Unbewusste: Eine literaturpsychologische Studie. Giessen: Psychosozial Verlag.
OSS Assessment Staff. 1948. Assessment of Men: Selection of Personnel for the Office of Strategic Services. New York: Rinehart & Company.
Richards Robert. 2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robinson Forrest. 1992. Love's Story Told: A Life of Henry A. Murray. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schwartz Louis. 1932. “Social Situation Pictures in the Psychiatric Interview.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2:124132.
Staff Writer. 1946. “A Good Man Is Hard to Find: The O.S.S. Learned How, with New Selection Methods that May Well Serve Industry.” Fortune 33:9295, 217–218, 220, 223.
Tallis Frank. 2002. Hidden Minds: A History of the Unconscious. New York: Arcade Publishers.
Triplet Rodney. 1992. “The Making of a Psychologist.” American Psychologist 47:299307.
Winter David. 1998. “Toward a Science of Personality Psychology: David McClelland's Development of Empirically Derived TAT Measures.” History of Psychology 1:130152.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 635 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.