Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:45:50.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Godly Men and Mechanical Philosophers: Souls and Spirits in Restoration Natural Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Simon Schaffer
Simon Schaffer
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent historiography of the Scientific Revolution has challenged the assumption that the achievements of seventeenth-century natural philosophy can easily be described as the ‘mechanization of the world-picture.’ That assumption licensed a story which took mechanization as self-evidently progressive and so in no need of further historical analysis. The clock-work world was triumphant and inevitably so. However, a close examination of one key group of natural philosophers working in England during the 1670s shows that their program necessarily incorporated souls and spirits, attractions and congruities, within both their ontology and their epistemology. Any natural philosophical strategy which excluded spirits and sympathies from its world was condemned as tending to subversion and irreligion. This examination shows that the term ‘mechanical philosophy’ was a category given its meanings within local contexts and carries no universal sense separate from that accomplished by these natural philosophers. It also shows how the experimental praxis was compelled to treat souls and spirits, to produce them through experimental labor, and then to extend these experimentally developed entities throughout the cosmos, both social and natural. The development of mechanical philosophy cannot be used to explain the cognitive and social structure of this program, nor its success: instead, the historical setting of experimental work shows how a philosophy of matter and spirit was deliberately constructed by the end of the seventeenth century.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 53 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Peter, 1985. Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscules: Locke and Boyle on the External World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aubrey, John, 1972. Three Prose Works: Miscellanies, Remaines of Gentilisme and Judaisme, Observations; ed. Buchanan-Brown, J., Fontwell: Centaur Press.Google Scholar
Aylmer, G. E., 1978. “Unbelief in Seventeenth Century England,” in Puritans and Revolutionaries, ed. Pennington, D. and Thomas, K., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Bechler, Zev, 1974. “Newton's 1672 Optical Controversies: A Study in the Grammar of Scientific Dissent,” in The Interaction Between Science and Philoposophy, ed. Elkana, Y., Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, pp. 115–42.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A., 1975. “Hooke, Wren and the System of the World,” British Journal for the History of Science 8: 32–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. A., 1981. “Cosmology and the Magnetical Philosophy, 1640–1680,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 12: 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. A., 1986. “The Mechanics' Philosophy and the Mechanical Philosophy,” History of Science 24: 1–28.Google Scholar
Birch, Thomas, 1756–1757. History of the Royal Society, 4 vols.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc, 1983. Les Rois Thaumaturges, new ed., Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert, 1772. The Works, 2d ed., 6 vols.Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard, 1984. “The Fifth Monarchists and Popular Millenarianism” in Radical Religion in the English Revolution, ed. McGregor, J. F. and Reay, B., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–89.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, 1654. Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana.Google Scholar
Cohen, Edward H. and Ross, John S., 1985. “The Commonplace Book of Edmond Halley,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 40:1–40.Google Scholar
Crawfurd, R., 1911. The King's Evil, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph, 1678. The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Curry, Patrick, 1985. “Revisions of Science and Magic” History of Science 23: 299–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, A. B., 1973. Circulation Physiology and Medical Chemistry in England 1650–1680, Lawrence: Coronado Press.Google Scholar
Debus, A. G., 1977. The Chemical Philosophy, New York: Science History Publications, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Debus, A. G., 1980. “Thomas Sherley's Philosophical Essay (1672): Helmontian Mechanism as the Basis of a New Philosophy” Ambix 27:124–135.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J., 1961. The Mechanization of the World Picture, Oèford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dobbs, B. J. T., 1975. The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy: or, “The Hunting of the Greene Lyon” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbs, B. J. T., 1982. “Newton's Alchemy and his Theory of Matter,” Isis 73:511–25.Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamonn, 1981. “Valentine Greatrakes, the Irish Stroker: Miracle, Science and Orthodoxy in Restoration England,” Studies in Church History 17:251–73.Google Scholar
Easlea, Brian, 1980. Witch-hunting, Magic and the New Philosophy, Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Figala, Karin, 1977. “Newton as Alchemist,” History of Science 15: 102–37.Google Scholar
Fisch, Harold, 1953. “The Scientist as Priest: A Note on Robert Boyle's Natural Philosophy,” Isis 44:252–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. G., 1975. The Gresham Lectures of John Flamsteed, London: Mansell.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1969. “Médecins, juges et sorciers au 17e siècle” Mèdecine en France 200: 121–128.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert, 1980. Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad, 1983. “Theory of Matter and Cosmology in William Gilbert's De Magnete,” Isis 74:22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, 1982. “Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More, 1646–1671” in Problems of Cartesianism, ed. Lennon, T. M., Nicholas, J. M. and Davis, J. W., Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, 1985. “The Mechanical Philosophy and its Problems: Mechanical Explanations, Impenetrability and Perpetual Motion,” in Change and Progress in Modern Science, ed. Pitt, J. C., Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 9–84.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, John, 1985. “The Universities and the Scientific Revolution: the Case of Newton and Restoration Cambridge,” History of Science 23:391–431.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo, 1983. The Night Battles: Witchcraft and Agrarian Cults in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, 1665. Scepsis Scientifica.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, 1671. A Praefaratory Answer to Mr. Henry Stubbe.Google Scholar
Gouk, P., 1980. “The Role of Acoustics and Music Theory in the Scientific Work of Robert Hooke,” Annals of Science 37:573–605.Google Scholar
Guerlac, H., 1977. Essays and Papers in History of Modern Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, R. T., 1931. Early Science in Oxford, 14 vols., Oxford: privately printed.Google Scholar
Hale, Matthew, 1677. Observations Touching the Principles of Natural Motion.Google Scholar
Hall, M. B., 1952. “The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy,” Osiris 10:412–541.Google Scholar
Hannaway, Owen, 1975. The Chemists and the Word, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Heyd, Michael, 1981. “The Reaction to Enthusiasm in the Seventeenth Century: Towards an Integrative Approach,” Journal of Modern History 53:258–80.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, 1965. Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, 1975. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, 1984. “Irreligion in the Puritan Revolution,” in Radical Religion in the English Revolution, ed. McGregor, J. F. and Reay, B., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–211.Google Scholar
Hirst, P.Q., 1982. “Witchcraft Todayand Yesterday,” Economy and Society 11:428–48.Google Scholar
Hiscock, W. G., 1937. David Gregory, Isaac Newton and their Circle, Oxford: privately printed.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, 1651. Leviathan.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, 1662. “Considerations upon the Reputation, Loyalty, Manners and Religion of Thomas Hobbes,” in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. SirMolesworth, W., 11 vols., London 1839–1845, Vol. 4, pp. 409–40.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, 1661. An Attempt for the Explication of the Phenomena Observable in an Experiment Published by the Honourable Robert Boyle.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, 1665. Micrographia.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, 1705. Posthumous Works, ed. Waller, Richard.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, 1935. Diary, ed. Robinson, H. W. and Adams, W., London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael, 1975. John Aubrey and the Realm of Learning, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael, 1981. Science and Society in Restoration England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael and Wood, P. B., 1986. “Towards Solomon's House: Rival Strategies for Reforming the Early Royal Society,” History of Science 24:49–108.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Keith, 1982. “What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?,” Isis 73: 233–53.Google Scholar
Ihde, A. J., 1964. “Alchemy in Reverse: Boyle on the Degradation of Gold,” Chymia 9: 47–57.Google Scholar
Jacob, J. R., 1977. Robert Boyle and the English Revolution. Burt Franklin, New York.Google Scholar
Jacob, J. R., 1983. Henry Stubbe, Radical Protestantism and the Early Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, M. C., Jacob, J. R., 1980. “The Anglican Origins of Modern Science,” Isis 71: 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobe, T. H., 1981. “The Devil in Restoration Science: the Glanvill-Webster Debate,” Isis 72: 343–56.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B. B., 1982. “Greatrakes the Stroker: the Interpretations of His Contemporaries,” Isis 72: 178–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaaren, Eugene M., 1977. The Religious Origins of Modern Science, Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, 1952. “An Unpublished Letter of Robert Hooke to Isaac Newton,” Isis 43: 312–37.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, 1956. “The Origins of Modern Science,” Diogenes 16: 1–22.Google Scholar
Kubrin, D. C., 1967. “Newton and the Cyclical Cosmos,” Journal of the History of Ideas 28: 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, William, 1969. Godly Rule: Politics and Religion 1603–1660. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Larner, Christina, 1984. Witchcraft and Religion: the Politics of Popular Belief. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. von, 1956. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, ed. Alexander, H., Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lennard, R. V., 1932–1934. “English Agriculture under Charles II: Evidence of the Royal Society Enquiries,” Economic History Review 4:23–45.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Michael, 1982. “Religion, Social Change, and Psychological Healing in England,” Studies in Church History 19: 101–26.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, Alan, 1977. “Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart Essex,” in Crime in England, 1550–1800, ed. Cockburn, J. S., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McGee, J. S., 1976. The Godly Man in Stuart England, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E., 1968. “Force, Active Principles and Newton's Invisible Realm,” Ambix 15: 154–208.Google Scholar
McKeon, Michael, 1975. Politics and Poetry in Restoration England, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McKie, Douglas, 1953. “Fire and the Flamma Vitalis: Boyle, Hooke and Mayow,” in Science, Medicine and History, ed. Underwood, E. Ashworth, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 469–88.Google Scholar
Maddison, R. E. W., 1969. The Life of the Honourable Robert Boyle, London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Mayow, John, 1964. Tractatus quinque. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mayow, John, 1957. Medico-physical Works, ed. Brown, A. Crum and Dobbin, L., Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Millen, Ron, 1985. “The Manifestation of Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution,” in Religion, Science and World-View: Essays in Honor of Richard S. Westfall, ed. Osier, M. J. and Farber, P. L., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–216.Google Scholar
More, Henry, 1962. A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, 1687. Principia mathematica.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, 1934. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, ed. Cajori, F., Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, 1958. Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy, ed. Cohen, I. B. and Schofield, R. E., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, 1959–1977. Correspondence, ed. Turnbull, H. W., Scott, J. D., Hall, A. R., and Tilling, L., 7 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, 1962. Unpublished Scientific Papers, ed. Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolson, M. H., 1930. The Conway Letters, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pagel, W., 1982. Joan Baptista van Helmont, Reformer of Science and Medicine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petty, William, 1674. Discourse Concerning the Use of Duplicate Proportion.Google Scholar
Porter, R. S., 1983. “The Rage of Party: a Glorious Revolution in English Psychiatry?,” Medical History 27: 35–50.Google Scholar
Power, Henry, 1664. Experimental Philosophy.Google Scholar
Ruffner, J., 1966. The Background and Early Development of Newton's Theory of Comets, Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, 1987. “Newton's Comets and the Transformation of Astrology,” in Astrology, Science and Society: Historical Essays, ed. Curry, P., London: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar
Schechner Genuth, S., 1985. “Comets, Teleology and the Relationship of Chemistry to Cosmology in Newton's Thought,” Annali dell'Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze 10: 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuler, Robert, 1980. “Some Spiritual Alchemies of Seventeenth Century England,” Journal of the History of Ideas 41: 293–318.Google Scholar
Schuster, J. A., 1984. “Methodologies as Mythic Structures,” Metascience 1: 15–36.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Hillel, 1980. The French Prophets, Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, 1984. “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology,” Social Studies of Science 14: 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S., 1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyleandthe Experimental Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, B. R., 1976. “Robert Hooke on Memory, Association, and Time Perception,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 31: 115–31.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas, 1667. History of the Royal Society.Google Scholar
Staudenbauer, C., 1974. “Platonism, Theosophy and Immaterialism: Recent Views of the Cambridge Platonists,” Journal of the History of Ideas 35: 157–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steneck, N. H., 1982. “Greatrakes the Stroker: the Interpretations of Historians,” Isis 73: 161–77.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan, 1975. A Tale of a Tub and Other Satires, ed. Williams, Kathleen, London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Tamny, M., 1978. “Newton, Creation and Perception,” Isis 70: 48–58.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. Sherwood, 1949. “Alchemical Papers of Dr. Robert Plot,” Ambix 4: 67–76.Google Scholar
Thomas, K., 1973. Religion and the Decline of Magic, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tourney, G., 1972. “The Physician and Witchcraft in Restoration England,” Medical History 14: 143–55.Google Scholar
Wagstaffe, John, 1671. The Question of Witchcraft Debated, 2d edn.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P., 1958. Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella, London: Warburg Institute Studies.Google Scholar
Webster, C., 1967. “The Experimental Philosophy of Henry Power,” Ambix 14: 150–78.Google Scholar
Webster, C., 1982. From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making of Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., 1971. Force in Newton's Physics, London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., 1972. “Newton and the Hermetic Tradition,” in Science, Medecine and Society in the Renaissance, ed. Debus, A. G., New York: Science History Publications, pp. 183–93.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., 1973. Science and Religion in Seventeenth Century England, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., 1977. The Construction of Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., 1984. “Newton and Alchemy,” in Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance, ed. Vickers, Brian, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Thomas, 1663. An Exclusion of Scepticks from All Title to Dispute.Google Scholar
Whiteside, D. T., 1970. “Before the Principia: the Maturing of Newton's Thoughts on Dynamical Astronomy,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 1: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wren, C, 1750. Parentalia, or Memoirs of the Family of Wrens.Google Scholar
Wrightson, Keith, 1982. English Society, 1580–1680. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P., ed., 1982. Scienze, Credenze Occulte, Livelli di Cultura, Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar