Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Introduction: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation

  • Jeremy Vetter (a1)
Abstract

Why and how have lay people participated in scientific observation? And on what terms have they collaborated with experts and professionals? We have become accustomed to the involvement of lay observers in the practice of many branches of science, including both the natural and human sciences, usually as subordinates to experts. The current surge of interest in this phenomenon, as well as in the closely related topic of how expertise has been constructed, suggests that historians of science can offer a valuable contribution to these vital questions. A historical approach to lay participation allows us to better understand the making of expert-lay relations in science, and it offers a broader, long-term perspective on contemporary debates about that boundary.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Introduction: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Introduction: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Introduction: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Arun Agrawal . 1995. “Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge.” Development and Change 26:413–39.

Samuel J. M. M. Alberti 2001. “Amateurs and Professionals in One County: Biology and Natural History in Late Victorian Yorkshire.” Journal of the History of Biology 34:115–47.

Phil Brown . 1992. “Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 33:267–81.

Daniel Carey . 1997. “Compiling Nature's History: Travellers and Travel Narratives in the Early Royal Society.” Annals of Science 54:269–92.

H. M. Collins , and Robert Evans . 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32:235296.

Harold J. Cook 2007. Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Lorraine Daston . 2008. “On Scientific Observation.” Isis 99:97110.

Rebecca Ellis , and Claire Waterton . 2004. “Environmental Citizenship in the Making: The Participation of Volunteer Naturalists in UK Biological Recording and Biodiversity Policy.” Science and Public Policy 31:95105.

Rebecca Ellis , and Claire Waterton . 2005. “Caught between the Cartographic and the Ethnographic Imagination: The Whereabouts of Amateurs, Professionals, and Nature in Knowing Biodiversity.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23:673–93.

Jim Endersby . 2001. “‘the Realm of Hard Evidence’: Novelty, Persuasion and Collaboration in Botanical Cladistics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32:343–60.

Steven Epstein . 1995. “The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 20:408–37.

Steven Epstein . 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Robert Evans , and Alexandra Plows . 2007. “Listening without Prejudice? Re-Discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen.” Social Studies of Science 37:827–53.

Fa-ti Fan . 2003. “Science in a Chinese Entrepot: British Naturalists and Their Chinese Associates in Old Canton.” Osiris 18:6078.

Frank Fischer . 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

Daniel Goldstein . 1994. “‘Yours for Science’: The Smithsonian Institution's Correspondents and the Shape of Scientific Community in Nineteenth-Century America.” Isis 85:573–99.

Graeme Gooday . 2008. “Liars, Experts and Authorities.” History of Science 46:431–56.

Elizabeth Green Musselman . 2003. “Plant Knowledge at the Cape: A Study in African and European Collaboration.” International Journal of African Historical Studies 36:367–92.

Steven J. Harris 1998. “Long-Distance Corporations, Big Sciences, and the Geography of Knowledge.” Configurations 6:269304.

Michael K. Heiman 1997. “Science by the People: Grassroots Environmental Monitoring and the Debate over Scientific Expertise.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 16:291–99.

Alan Irwin . 2001. “Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences.” Public Understanding of Science 10:118.

Dewi Jones . 2002. “‘Nature-Formed Botanists’: Notes on Some Nineteenth Century Botanical Guides of Snowdonia.” Archives of Natural History 29:3150.

Robert E. Kohler 2007. “Finders, Keepers: Collecting Sciences and Collecting Practice.” History of Science 45:428–54.

Robert E. Kohler 2008. “From Farm and Family to Career Naturalist: The Apprenticeship of Vernon Bailey.” Isis 99:2856.

Melissa Leach , and James Fairhead . 2002. “Manners of Contestation: ‘Citizen Science’ and ‘Indigenous Knowledge’ in West Africa and the Caribbean.” International Social Science Journal 54:299311.

Andrew J. Lewis 2005. “A Democracy of Facts, an Empire of Reason: Swallow Submersion and Natural History in the Early American Republic.” William and Mary Quarterly 62:663–96.

Christopher H. Low 2007. “Different Histories of Buchu: Euro-American Appropriation of San and Khoekhoe Knowledge of Buchu Plants.” Environment and History 13:333–61.

Helen Macdonald . 2002. “‘What Makes You a Scientist Is the Way You Look at Things’: Ornithology and the Observer 1930–1955.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33:5377.

Stuart McCook . 1996. “‘It May Be Truth, but It Is Not Evidence’: Paul Du Chaillu and the Legitimation of Evidence in the Field Sciences.” Osiris 11 (2):177–97.

Gregg Mitman . 2005. “In Search of Health: Landscape and Disease in American Environmental History.” Environmental History 10:184210.

Michelle Murphy . 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

Gwen Ottinger . 2010. “Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 35:244–70.

Michael Reidy . 2008. Tides of History: Ocean Science and Her Majesty's Navy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Marc Rothenberg . 1981. “Organization and Control: Professionals and Amateurs in American Astronomy, 1899–1918.” Social Studies of Science 11:305–25.

Martin J. S. Rudwick 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Daniel W. Schneider 2000. “Local Knowledge, Environmental Politics, and the Founding of Ecology in the United States: Stephen Forbes and ‘The Lake as Microcosm’ (1887).” Isis 91:681705.

Lyn Schumaker . 2001. Africanizing Anthropology: Fieldwork, Networks, and the Making of Cultural Knowledge in Central Africa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Anne Secord . 1994b. “Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-Century Lancashire.” History of Science 32:269315.

Pamela H. Smith 2004. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Robert A. Stebbins 1980. “Avocational Science: The Amateur Routine in Archaeology and Astronomy.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 21:3448.

David Turnbull . 1997. “Reframing Science and Other Local Knowledge Traditions.” Futures 29:551–62.

Jeremy Vetter . 2008. “Cowboys, Scientists, and Fossils: The Field Site and Local Collaboration in the American West.” Isis 99:273303.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 144 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 209 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.