No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Medical decisions influenced by eugenics: Hungarian gynecological practices during the 1910s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 March 2023
Argument
This study contributes to the discussion on the development of eugenics in Central-Eastern Europe by tracing the way that eugenic ideas entered into medical decision-making in Hungary. Through a case study that reviews the professional argumentation of the gynecological management of tuberculosis pregnancies, this paper shows that the subordination of individual reproductive rights to state interests was influenced by the ideas of eugenics, which had begun to enter into the professional public health discourse. A eugenically informed morality was envisioned, to guide decision-making in the interest of the Hungarian “race.” This biopolitically important morality can be viewed as an early influence on the formulation of biological citizenship. Leading figures were divided on how to ensure such morality: some scholars argued that education is the key, others thought that the state, and state actors, should act radically in the interest of the population and decide on behalf of the individual. Radical methods, such as the termination of pregnancies and sterilization of women, were among the practices of gynecologists. Although abortion and sterilization were not widespread and never became official therapeutic solutions for tuberculosis pregnancies, they were nonetheless part of a discourse that preceded the eugenic institutions of the interwar years.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Agar, Nicholas. 1998. “Liberal Eugenics.” Public Affairs Quarterly 12 (2): 137–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Antall, József, and Kapronczay, Károly. 1989. “A Magyar Egészségügy Az Abszolutizmus És a Dualizmus Korában [Hungarian Healthcare During the Periods of Absolutism and Dualism].” Magyar Tudomány [Hungarian Science] 34 (10–11): 903–15.Google Scholar
Apáthy, István. 1914. “Magyar Társadalomtudományi Egyesület. A Fajegészségügyi (Eugenikai) Szakosztály Megalakulása [Hungarian Social Science Assosiation. The Foundation of Race Hygiene (Eugenic) Society].” Magyar Társadalomtudományi Szemle [Hungarian Social Science Review] 7 (2): 165–72.Google Scholar
Bardeleben, Karl. 1913. “A Tüdőgümőkór És a Terhesség [Tuberculosis and Pregnancy].” Budapesti Orvosi Újság [Budapest Medical Journal] 11 (12): 149.Google Scholar
Bashford, Alison. 2010. “Epilogue: Where Did Eugenics Go?” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, edited by Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philippa, 539–58. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Egmont. 1912. “Gégetuberculosis És Művi Abortusz [Laryngeal Tuberculosis and Procured Abortion].” Budapesti Orvosi Újság [Budapest Medical Journal] 10 (1): 6–8.Google Scholar
Björkman, Maria. 2015. “The Emergence of Genetic Counseling in Sweden: Examples from Eugenics and Medical Genetics.” Science in Context 28 (3): 489–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandhorst, Henny. 2003. “From Neo-Malthusianism to Sexual Reform : The Dutch Section of the World League for Sexual Reform.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 12 (1): 38–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buklijas, Tatjana, and Lafferton, Emese. 2007. “Science, Medicine and Nationalism in the Habsburg Empire from the 1840s to 1918.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4): 679–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassels, Alan. 1964. “Fascism for Export: Italy and the United States in the Twenties.” The American Historical Review 69 (3): 707–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleminson, Richard. 2003. “‘Science and Sympathy’ or ‘Sexual Subversion on a Human Basis’? Anarchists in Spain and the World League for Sexual Reform.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 12 (1): 110–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Vilmos. 1919. “Százezrek Pusztítója: A Gümőkór [Hundred Thousands Wrecked: Tuberculosis].” Jó Egészség [Good Health] 18 (3–4): 20–22.Google Scholar
Frigyesi, József. 1914. “Terhesség És Tuberculosis I. Budapesti Orvosi Újság (Eredeti Közlemény: A Magyar Orvosok Tuberculosis-Egyesületének Munkálatai 1914. I. [Pregnancy and Tuberculosis I. Original Contribution: Procedings of Hungarian Physicians’ Tuberculosis Association 1914. I.]).” Budapesti Orvosi Újság [Budapest Medical Journal] 12 (25): 335.Google Scholar
Fülöp, Zsigmond. 1910. “Eugenika [Eugenics].” Huszadik Század [Twentieth Century] 11 (9): 161–76.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1883. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Developments. Macmillan: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerő, András. 2010. Dualizmusok. A Monarchia Magyarországa. [Dualisms. Hungary During the Monarchy] Budapest: Új Mandátum.Google Scholar
Geszti, József. 1914. “Terhesség És Tuberculosis II. [Pregnancy and Tuberculosis II.] (Eredeti Közlemény: A Magyar Orvosok Tuberculosis-Egyesületének Munkálatai 1914. I. [Original Contribution: Procedings of Hungarian Physicians’ Tuberculosis Association 1914. I.]).” Budapesti Orvosi Újság [Budapest Medical Journal] 12 (25): 335–36.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Géza. 1914. “Eugenika [Eugenics].” Magyar Társadalomtudományi Szemle [Hungarian Social Science Review] 7 (2): 91–106.Google Scholar
Kapronczay, Károly. 2007. “A Dualizmus Korának Kórházépítési Programja [The Hospital Construction Programme of the Dualist Period].” In Tanulmányok a Természettudományok, a Technika Köréből És Az Orvoslás Köréből [Studies into the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine], edited by Éva Vámos and Vigyázó Lilly Vámosné, 85–90. Budapest: Országos Műszaki Múzeum és a Műszaki és Természettudományi Egyesületek Szövetsége.Google Scholar
Kapronczay, Károly. 2010. Az Orvostörténelem Századai [Centuries of Medical History]. Budapest: Semmelweis Kiadó.Google Scholar
Karsai, László. 2005. “A Magyarországi Zsidótörvények És Rendeletek, 1920-1944 [Hungarian Jewish Laws and Statutes, 1920-1944].” In A Holokauszt Magyarországon Európai Perspektívából [The Holocaust in Hungary from a European Perspective], edited by Judit Molnár, 140–63. Budapest: Balassi Kiadó.Google Scholar
King, Desmond, and Hansen, Randall. 1999. “Experts at Work: State Autonomy, Social Learning and Eugenic Sterilization in 1930s Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 77–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Királyfi, Géza, and Frigyesi, József. 1911a. “Adatok a Tuberculosis És a Terhesség Kérdéséhez (Első Közlemény) [Data Addressing the Issue of Tuberculosis and Pregnancy (First Contribution)].” Orvosi Hetilap [Medical Weekly] 55 (40): 699–703.Google Scholar
Királyfi, Géza, and Frigyesi, József. 1911b. “Adatok a Tuberculosis És a Terhesség Kérdéséhez (Második Közlemény) [Data Addressing the Issue of Tuberculosis and Pregnancy (Second Contribution)].” Orvosi Hetilap [Medical Weekly] 55 (41): 723–26.Google Scholar
Konrád, Jenő. 1914a. “Tuberculosis És Terhesség (I) [Tuberculosis and Pregnancy (I)].” Orvosi Hetilap [Medical Weekly] 58 (34): 641–43.Google Scholar
Konrád, Jenő. 1914b. “Tuberculosis És Terhesség (II) [Tuberculosis and Pregnancy (II)].” Orvosi Hetilap [Medical Weekly] 58 (35): 661–63.Google Scholar
Kovács, M. Mária. 2012. Törvénytől Sújtva, A Numerus Clausus Magyarországon 1920-1945 [Struck by the Law, The Hungarian Numerus Clausus 1920-1945]. Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó.Google Scholar
Lafferton, Emese. 2007. “The Magyar Moustache: The Faces of Hungarian State Formation, 1867–1918.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38: 706–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafferton, Emese. 2016. “Race, Science and Medicine in Central and Eastern Europe around 1900: An Introduction.” East Central Europe 43 (1–2): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Edward. J. 2010. “Biology and the Emergence of Anglo-American Eugenics Movement.” In Biology and Ideology from Descartes to Dawkins, edited by Denis R. Alexander and Ronald L, 165–191. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Madzsar, József. 1910. “Gyakorlati Eugenika [Practical Eugenics].” Huszadik Század [Twentieth Century] 11 (1–2): 115–17.Google Scholar
Madzsar, József. 1911. “Fajromlás És Fajnemesítés [Racial Degeneration and Racial Improvement].” Huszadik Század [Twentieth Century] 12 (2): 145–60.Google Scholar
Müller, Vilmos. 1913a. “Indokolt-e a Terhesség Megszakítása Tuberculosis Eseteiben? (I) [Is it Warranted to Abort Pregnancies in Cases of Tuberculosis? (I)].” Orvosi Hetilap [Medical Weekly] 57 (7): 119–22.Google Scholar
Müller, Vilmos. 1913b. “Indokolt-e a Terhesség Megszakítása Tuberculosis Eseteiben? (II) [Is it Warranted to Abort Pregnancies in Cases of Tuberculosis? (II)].” Orvosi Hetilap [Medical Weekly] 57 (8): 143–44.Google Scholar
Nagy, Albert (ed.). 1915a. “A Tuberkulózissal Való Fertőzés Módjai [Ways of Getting Infected with Tuberculosis].” Jó Egészség [Good Health] 14 (14): 60–61.Google Scholar
Nagy, Albert (ed.). 1915b. “Fogékonyság a Tuberkulózis Iránt [Susceptibility to Tuberculosis].” Jó Egészség [Good Health] 14 (20): 81–82.Google Scholar
Nagy, Albert (ed.). 1917a. “A Tudővész Elleni Küzdelem Szervezése [Organising the Struggle Against Tuberculosis].” Jó Egészség [Good Health] 16 (23): 179–80.Google Scholar
Nagy, Albert (ed.). 1917b. “Anaphylaxia [Anaphylaxis].” Jó Egészség [Good Health] 16 (6): 43–45.Google Scholar
Novas, Carlos, and Rose, Nikolas. 2000. Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual. Economy and Society. 29 (4): 485–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pálvölgyi, Balázs. 2006. “A Magyar Közegészségügyi Közigazgatás Intézményrendszere (1867–1914) [The Hungarian Public Health Administration’s Institutional System (1867-1914).” PhD diss., Eötvös Lóránd University. https://epa.oszk.hu/02300/02363/00001/pdf/EPA02363_themis_2003_palvolgyi_phd.pdf
Google Scholar
Paul, Diane B. 1995. Controlling Human Heredity 1865 to the Present. New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2005. “Conclusion: Scandinavian Eugenics in the International Context.” In Eugenics and the Welfare State - Norway Sweeden, Denmark, and Finland, edited by Broberg, Gunnar and Roll-Hansen, Nils, 259–71. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 2006. The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton NJ, Oxfordshire UK: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rotter, H. 1912. “Eugenika És Szülészet [Eugenics and Obstetrics]. (Summary of His Lecture That Was given at the Budapest Medical Circle, Translator of the Lecture Unknown).” Budapesti Orvosi Újság [Budapest Medical Journal] 11 (7): 630–31.Google Scholar
Rudisch, Ferenc, and Tóth, Benedek. 2019. “Felvilágosodás, Biopolitika, Népesség. A Modern Közegészségügy Fogalmának 19. Századi Kontextusai [Enlightement, Biopolitics, Population. The Contexts of the Term ’Public Health’ in the 19th Century].” Kaleidoscope History 10 (19): 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, William. 1982. “Toward the Improvement of the Human Race: The History of Eugenics in France.” Journal of Modern History 54 (2): 268–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonn, Richard. 2005. “‘Your Body Is Yours’: Anarchism, Birth Control, and Eugenics in Interwar France.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 14 (4): 415–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Nancy L. 1991. The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Szűcs, Kinga. 2003. “Boundaries of Medical Ethics: German Influences in Hungarian Medical Sciences in the Early Twentieth Century.” Budapest: CEU, Budapest College.Google Scholar
Turda, Marius. 2003. “The Magyars: A Ruling Race’: The Idea of National Superiority in Fin-de-Siecle Hungary.” European Review of History 10 (1): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turda, Marius. 2006a. “‘A New Religion’? Eugenics and Racial Scientism in Pre-First World War Hungary.” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 7 (3): 303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turda, Marius. 2006b. “Heredity and Eugenic Thought in Early Twentieth Century Hungary.” Communicationes de Historia Artis Medicinae 194–195: 101–18.Google Scholar
Turda, Marius. 2007. “The First Debates on Eugenics in Hungary, 1910-1918.” In Blood and Homeland: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Turda, Marius and Weindling, Paul, 185–221. Budapest, New York: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Turda, Marius. 2013. “In Pursuit of Greater Hungary: Eugenic Ideas of Social and Biological Improvement, 1940-41.” The Journal of Modern History 85 (3): 558–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turda, Marius. 2014. Eugenics and Nation in Early 20th Century Hungary. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Georg. 1918. “A Terhesség Megszakításának Nem Jogosult Indikációiról [About the Unwarranted Indications of Abortions].” Budapesti Orvosi Újság [Budapest Medical Journal] 16 (9): 73–74.Google Scholar