Mindful Practices: On the Neurosciences in the Twentieth Century

Michael Hagner; Cornelius Borck

doi:10.1017/S0269889701000229

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Racine, Eric and Illes, Judy 2006. Neuroethical Responsibilities. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 269.

Racine, Eric and Illes, Judy 2006. Responsabilités Neuroéthiques. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 260.

Vidal, Fernando 2009. Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 5.

Pickersgill, Martyn 2010. From psyche to soma? Changing accounts of antisocial personality disorders in the American Journal of Psychiatry. History of Psychiatry, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 294.

Choudhury, Suparna and McKinney, Kelly A. 2013. Digital media, the developing brain and the interpretive plasticity of neuroplasticity. Transcultural Psychiatry, Vol. 50, Issue. 2, p. 192.

O'Connor, Cliodhna and Joffe, Helene 2013. Media representations of early human development: Protecting, feeding and loving the developing brain. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 97, Issue. , p. 297.

Pickersgill, Martyn 2013. The social life of the brain: Neuroscience in society. Current Sociology, Vol. 61, Issue. 3, p. 322.

Stahnisch, Frank 2014. The language of visual representations in the neurosciences — relating past and future. Translational Neuroscience, Vol. 5, Issue. 1,

Slaby, Jan and Gallagher, Shaun 2015. Critical Neuroscience and Socially Extended Minds. Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 33.

Rose, Nikolas 2016. Reading the Human Brain. Body & Society, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 140.

Borck, Cornelius 2016. How we may think. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 57, Issue. , p. 112.

Della Rocca, M. 2017. The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain. p. 61.

O’Connor, Cliodhna and Nagel, Saskia K. 2017. Neuro-Enhancement Practices across the Lifecourse: Exploring the Roles of Relationality and Individualism. Frontiers in Sociology, Vol. 2, Issue. ,

Stark, Laura and Campbell, Nancy D 2018. The ineffable: A framework for the study of methods through the case of mid-century mind-brain sciences. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 48, Issue. 6, p. 789.

Vidal, Fernando 2019. What makes neuroethics possible?. History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 32.

Dumonteil, Julie 2020. Autistes : entre situations de vulnérabilité et pouvoir d’agir ?. Éducation et socialisation,

Shin, Youjung 2022. The transnational move of interdisciplinarity: Ginseng and the beginning of neuroscience in South Korea, 1970–1990s. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 466.

Sysling, Fenneke 2022. The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Human Sciences. p. 1.

2022. Die Schönheit des Denkens.

Shin, Youjung 2023. For or against the molecularization of brain science?: Cybernetics, interdisciplinarity, and the unprogrammed beginning of the Neurosciences Research Program at MIT. History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 36, Issue. 1, p. 103.

Article contents

Mindful Practices: On the Neurosciences in theTwentieth Century

Abstract

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Mindful Practices: On the Neurosciences in theTwentieth Century

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests