Skip to main content Accessibility help

Models at Work—Models in Decision Making

  • Ekaterina Svetlova (a1) and Vanessa Dirksen (a2)

In recent years, research on modeling in both the philosophy of science and the social studies of science and technology has undergone an acute transformation. Philosophers and social scientists have begun to realize that science, in the words of Carrier and Nordmann, has increasingly shifted its focus from “epistemic or truth-oriented” research to “application-dominated” research. “Science is viewed today as an essentially practical endeavor” (Carrier and Nordmann 2011, 1) and should be considered in the context of its application. In accordance with this re-orienting of science, research on modeling has also changed. Still considering models as genuinely scientific tools, philosophers and social scientists promoted the “practice turn” that suggests a sharper focus on pragmatic issues and the performative and productive role of modeling. Application of models for the resolution of practice-related problems is viewed as an extension of science.

Hide All
Alexandrova, Anna. 2008. “Making Models Count.” Philosophy of Science 75:383404.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Public Culture 2 (2):124.
Beunza, Daniel, and Stark, David. 2010. “Models, Reflexivity and Systemic Risk: A Critique of Behavioral Finance” Working paper, (last accessed May 5, 2011).
Beunza, Daniel, and Stark, David. 2012. “From Dissonance to Resonance: Cognitive Interdependence in Quantitative Finance.” Economy and Society 41 (3):383417.
Callender, Graig, and Cohen, Jonathan. 2006. “There Is No Special Problem about Scientific Representation.” Theoria 55:6785.
Callon, Michel. 1998. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics.” In The Laws of the Market, edited by Callon, Michel, 157. Oxford and Madlen MA: Blackwell.
Carrier, Martin, and Nordmann, Alfred. 2011. “Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Re-Orientation.” In Science in the Context of Application, edited by Carrier, Martin and Nordmann, Alfred, 17. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cartwright, Nancy. 1989. Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daston, Lorraine, ed. 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley/London: University of California Press.
Den Butter, Frank, and Morgan, Mary. 2000. Empirical Models and Policy Making: Interaction and Institutions. London: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 2001. Limited Inc. Wien: Passagen.
Dewey, John. 1915. “The Logic of Judgments of Practice.” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12 (19):505523.
Egmond, Stans van, and Zeiss, Ragna. 2010. “Modeling for Policy: Science-Based Models as Performative Boundary Objects for Dutch Policy Making. Science Studies 23 (1):5878.
Evans, Robert. 1999. Macroeconomic Forecasting: A Sociological Appraisal. Routledge Studies in the Modern World Economy. London: Routledge.
Evans, Robert. 2000. “Economic Models and Economic Policy: What Economic Forecasters Can Do for Government.” In Empirical Models and Policy-Making, edited by den Butter, Frank and Morgan, Mary S., 206228. London: Routledge.
von Foerster, Heinz. 2003. Understanding Understanding: Essay On Cybernetics and Cognition. New York: Springer.
Giere, Ronald N. 2004. “How Models Are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science (Symposia) 71:742752.
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconcious. London: Penguin Books.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Todd, Peter M.. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1969. “Where the Action Is.” In Where the Action Is: Three Essays, edited by Goffman, Erving, 107206. London: Penguin Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Gramelsberger, Gabriele. 2011. “Generation of Evidence in Simulation Runs: Interlinking With Models for Predicting Weather and Climate Change.” Simulation & Gaming 42 (2):212224.
Gramelsberger, Gabriele, and Feichter, Johann, eds. 2011. Climate Change and Policy: The Calculability of Climate Change and the Challenge of Uncertainty. Heidelberg/Berlin/New York: Springer.
Greenberger, Martin, Crensson, Mathew, and Crissey, Brian. 1976. Models in the Policy Process. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Hausman, Daniel. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howlett, Peter, and Morgan, Mary S., eds. 2011. How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizens Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3):223244.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. London: Polity Press.
Keynes, John M. [1936] 2012. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Reprinted in Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, edited by Johnson, Elizabeth and Moggridge, Donald, vol. 7. London: Macmillan.
Keynes, John M. 1973. Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. 14: The General Theory and After: Part II. Defence and Development. London: Macmillan.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1997. “Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Post-Social Knowledge Societies.” Theory, Culture & Society 14:130.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2001. “Objectual Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and von Savigny, Eike, 175188. London/New York: Routledge.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2007. “Culture in Global Knowledge Societies: Knowledge Cultures and Epistemic Cultures.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32 (4):361375.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2009. “The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World.” Symbolic Interaction 32 (1):6187.
Knuuttila, Tarja. 2005. “Models, Representation, and Mediation.” Philosophy of Science 72:12601271.
Knuuttila, Tarja. 2011. “Modeling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42:262271.
Knuuttila, Tarja, Merz, Martina, and Mattila, Erika. 2006. “Computer Models and Simulations in Scientific Practice.” Science Studies 19 (1):311.
Knuuttila, Tarja, and Merz, Martina. 2009. “Understanding by Modeling: An Objectual Approach.” In Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by de Regt, Henk W., Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai, 146168. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Lane, Stuart N., Landström, Catharina, and Whatmore, Sarah J.. 2011. “Imagining Flood Futures: Risk Assessment and Management in Practice.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369:17841806.
Lengwiler, Martin. 2008. “Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective.” Science, Technology and Human Values 33:186200.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’.” Public Administration Review 19 (2):7988.
MacKenzie, Donald. 2003. “An Equation and Its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics.” Social Studies of Science 33:831868.
MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge: MIT Press.
MacKenzie, Donald. 2007. “Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by MacKenzie, Donald, Muniesa, Fabian, and Siu, Lucia, 5486. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mackett, Roger L. 1998. “Role of Travel Demand Models in Appraisal and Policy-Making.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16 (2):9199.
Mäki, Uskali. 2009. “MISSing the World: Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems.” Erkenntnis 70 (1):2943.
Mansnerus, Erika. 2012. “Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, Sabine, Hillerbrand, Rafaela, Sandin, Per and Peterson, Martin, 213237. London, New York, Heidelberg: Springer.
McMullin, Ernan. 1985. “Galilean Idealization.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16:247273.
Mikes, Anette. 2009. “Risk Management and Calculative Cultures.” Management Accounting Research 20:1840.
Mikes, Anette. 2011. “From Counting Risk to Making Risk Count: Boundary-Work in Risk Management.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 36 (4–5):226245.
Morgan, Mary S., and Morrison, Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nowak, Leszek. 1980. The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel.
Nowak, Leszek. 1989. “On the (Idealizational) Structure of Economic Theories.” Erkenntnis 30:225246.
Petersen, Arthur C. 2008. “The Practice of Climate Simulation and Its Social and Political Context.” Netherlands Journal of Geoscience 87 (3):219229.
Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Shackley, Simon. 1998. “Introduction to Special Section on the Use of Models in Appraisal and Policy-Making. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16 (2):8189.
Shackley, Simon. 2001. “Epistemic Lifestyles in Climate Change Modeling.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by Miller, Clark A. and Edwards, Paul N., 107133. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Shackley, Simon, Risbey, James, Stone, Peter, and Wynne, Brian. 1999. “Adjusting to Policy Expectations in Climate Change Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Study of Flux Adjustments in Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models.” Climatic Change 43:413454.
Smith, Ron. 1998. “Use of Quantitative Models in UK Economic Appraisal and Policy-Making.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16 (2):105114.
Smith, Charles W. 2011. “Coping with Contingencies in Equity Option Markets: The ‘Rationality’ of Pricing.” In The Worth of Goods: Valuation & Pricing in the Economy, edited by Beckert, Jens and Aspers, Patrik, 272294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Star, Susan L., and Griesemer, James R.. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19:387420.
Suárez, Mauricio. 2003. “Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17:225244.
Suárez, Mauricio. 2004. “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation.” Philosophy of Science (Symposia) 71:767779.
Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2008. “Framing Complexity in Financial Markets: An Example of Portfolio Management.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 4 (2):115130.
Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2012. “On the Performative Power of Financial Models.” Economy and Society 41 (3):418434.
Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2013. “De-idealization by Commentary: The Case of Financial Valuation Models.” Synthese 190 (2):321337.
Van den Bogaard, Adrienne. 1999. “Past Measurement and Future Prediction.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Morgan, Mary S. and Morrison, Margaret, 282325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organisations. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage Publications.
Weick, Karl E. 2001. Making Sense of the Organization. Malden/Oxford/Victoria MA: Blackwell.
Weick, Karl E., and Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.. 2001. Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed