Skip to main content
×
Home

Models at Work—Models in Decision Making

  • Ekaterina Svetlova (a1) and Vanessa Dirksen (a2)
Abstract

In recent years, research on modeling in both the philosophy of science and the social studies of science and technology has undergone an acute transformation. Philosophers and social scientists have begun to realize that science, in the words of Carrier and Nordmann, has increasingly shifted its focus from “epistemic or truth-oriented” research to “application-dominated” research. “Science is viewed today as an essentially practical endeavor” (Carrier and Nordmann 2011, 1) and should be considered in the context of its application. In accordance with this re-orienting of science, research on modeling has also changed. Still considering models as genuinely scientific tools, philosophers and social scientists promoted the “practice turn” that suggests a sharper focus on pragmatic issues and the performative and productive role of modeling. Application of models for the resolution of practice-related problems is viewed as an extension of science.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alexandrova Anna. 2008. “Making Models Count.” Philosophy of Science 75:383404.
Appadurai Arjun. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Public Culture 2 (2):124.
Beunza Daniel, and Stark David. 2010. “Models, Reflexivity and Systemic Risk: A Critique of Behavioral Finance” Working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1285054 (last accessed May 5, 2011).
Beunza Daniel, and Stark David. 2012. “From Dissonance to Resonance: Cognitive Interdependence in Quantitative Finance.” Economy and Society 41 (3):383417.
Callender Graig, and Cohen Jonathan. 2006. “There Is No Special Problem about Scientific Representation.” Theoria 55:6785.
Callon Michel. 1998. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics.” In The Laws of the Market, edited by Callon Michel, 157. Oxford and Madlen MA: Blackwell.
Carrier Martin, and Nordmann Alfred. 2011. “Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Re-Orientation.” In Science in the Context of Application, edited by Carrier Martin and Nordmann Alfred, 17. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cartwright Nancy. 1989. Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daston Lorraine, ed. 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
De Certeau Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley/London: University of California Press.
Den Butter Frank, and Morgan Mary. 2000. Empirical Models and Policy Making: Interaction and Institutions. London: Routledge.
Derrida Jacques. 2001. Limited Inc. Wien: Passagen.
Dewey John. 1915. “The Logic of Judgments of Practice.” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12 (19):505523.
Egmond Stans van, and Zeiss Ragna. 2010. “Modeling for Policy: Science-Based Models as Performative Boundary Objects for Dutch Policy Making. Science Studies 23 (1):5878.
Evans Robert. 1999. Macroeconomic Forecasting: A Sociological Appraisal. Routledge Studies in the Modern World Economy. London: Routledge.
Evans Robert. 2000. “Economic Models and Economic Policy: What Economic Forecasters Can Do for Government.” In Empirical Models and Policy-Making, edited by den Butter Frank and Morgan Mary S., 206228. London: Routledge.
von Foerster Heinz. 2003. Understanding Understanding: Essay On Cybernetics and Cognition. New York: Springer.
Giere Ronald N. 2004. “How Models Are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science (Symposia) 71:742752.
Gigerenzer Gerd. 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconcious. London: Penguin Books.
Gigerenzer Gerd, and Todd Peter M.. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goffman Erving. 1969. “Where the Action Is.” In Where the Action Is: Three Essays, edited by Goffman Erving, 107206. London: Penguin Press.
Goffman Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Gramelsberger Gabriele. 2011. “Generation of Evidence in Simulation Runs: Interlinking With Models for Predicting Weather and Climate Change.” Simulation & Gaming 42 (2):212224.
Gramelsberger Gabriele, and Feichter Johann, eds. 2011. Climate Change and Policy: The Calculability of Climate Change and the Challenge of Uncertainty. Heidelberg/Berlin/New York: Springer.
Greenberger Martin, Crensson Mathew, and Crissey Brian. 1976. Models in the Policy Process. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Hausman Daniel. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howlett Peter, and Morgan Mary S., eds. 2011. How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jasanoff Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizens Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3):223244.
Jasanoff Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Joas Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. London: Polity Press.
Keynes John M. [1936] 2012. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Reprinted in Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, edited by Johnson Elizabeth and Moggridge Donald, vol. 7. London: Macmillan.
Keynes John M. 1973. Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. 14: The General Theory and After: Part II. Defence and Development. London: Macmillan.
Knorr Cetina Karin. 1997. “Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Post-Social Knowledge Societies.” Theory, Culture & Society 14:130.
Knorr Cetina Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Knorr Cetina Karin. 2001. “Objectual Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki Theodore R., Cetina Karin Knorr, and von Savigny Eike, 175188. London/New York: Routledge.
Knorr Cetina Karin. 2007. “Culture in Global Knowledge Societies: Knowledge Cultures and Epistemic Cultures.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32 (4):361375.
Knorr Cetina Karin. 2009. “The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World.” Symbolic Interaction 32 (1):6187.
Knuuttila Tarja. 2005. “Models, Representation, and Mediation.” Philosophy of Science 72:12601271.
Knuuttila Tarja. 2011. “Modeling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42:262271.
Knuuttila Tarja, Merz Martina, and Mattila Erika. 2006. “Computer Models and Simulations in Scientific Practice.” Science Studies 19 (1):311.
Knuuttila Tarja, and Merz Martina. 2009. “Understanding by Modeling: An Objectual Approach.” In Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by de Regt Henk W., Leonelli Sabina, and Eigner Kai, 146168. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Lane Stuart N., Landström Catharina, and Whatmore Sarah J.. 2011. “Imagining Flood Futures: Risk Assessment and Management in Practice.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369:17841806.
Lengwiler Martin. 2008. “Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective.” Science, Technology and Human Values 33:186200.
Lindblom Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’.” Public Administration Review 19 (2):7988.
MacKenzie Donald. 2003. “An Equation and Its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics.” Social Studies of Science 33:831868.
MacKenzie Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge: MIT Press.
MacKenzie Donald. 2007. “Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by MacKenzie Donald, Muniesa Fabian, and Siu Lucia, 5486. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mackett Roger L. 1998. “Role of Travel Demand Models in Appraisal and Policy-Making.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16 (2):9199.
Mäki Uskali. 2009. “MISSing the World: Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems.” Erkenntnis 70 (1):2943.
Mansnerus Erika. 2012. “Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser Sabine, Hillerbrand Rafaela, Sandin Per and Peterson Martin, 213237. London, New York, Heidelberg: Springer.
McMullin Ernan. 1985. “Galilean Idealization.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16:247273.
Mikes Anette. 2009. “Risk Management and Calculative Cultures.” Management Accounting Research 20:1840.
Mikes Anette. 2011. “From Counting Risk to Making Risk Count: Boundary-Work in Risk Management.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 36 (4–5):226245.
Morgan Mary S., and Morrison Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nowak Leszek. 1980. The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel.
Nowak Leszek. 1989. “On the (Idealizational) Structure of Economic Theories.” Erkenntnis 30:225246.
Petersen Arthur C. 2008. “The Practice of Climate Simulation and Its Social and Political Context.” Netherlands Journal of Geoscience 87 (3):219229.
Pickering Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rheinberger Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Shackley Simon. 1998. “Introduction to Special Section on the Use of Models in Appraisal and Policy-Making. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16 (2):8189.
Shackley Simon. 2001. “Epistemic Lifestyles in Climate Change Modeling.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by Miller Clark A. and Edwards Paul N., 107133. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Shackley Simon, Risbey James, Stone Peter, and Wynne Brian. 1999. “Adjusting to Policy Expectations in Climate Change Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Study of Flux Adjustments in Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models.” Climatic Change 43:413454.
Smith Ron. 1998. “Use of Quantitative Models in UK Economic Appraisal and Policy-Making.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16 (2):105114.
Smith Charles W. 2011. “Coping with Contingencies in Equity Option Markets: The ‘Rationality’ of Pricing.” In The Worth of Goods: Valuation & Pricing in the Economy, edited by Beckert Jens and Aspers Patrik, 272294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Star Susan L., and Griesemer James R.. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19:387420.
Suárez Mauricio. 2003. “Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17:225244.
Suárez Mauricio. 2004. “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation.” Philosophy of Science (Symposia) 71:767779.
Svetlova Ekaterina. 2008. “Framing Complexity in Financial Markets: An Example of Portfolio Management.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 4 (2):115130.
Svetlova Ekaterina. 2012. “On the Performative Power of Financial Models.” Economy and Society 41 (3):418434.
Svetlova Ekaterina. 2013. “De-idealization by Commentary: The Case of Financial Valuation Models.” Synthese 190 (2):321337.
Van den Bogaard Adrienne. 1999. “Past Measurement and Future Prediction.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Morgan Mary S. and Morrison Margaret, 282325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weick Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organisations. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage Publications.
Weick Karl E. 2001. Making Sense of the Organization. Malden/Oxford/Victoria MA: Blackwell.
Weick Karl E., and Sutcliffe Kathleen M.. 2001. Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 54 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 260 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.