Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:01:01.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negative and Positive Genetic Interventions: Is There a Moral Boundary?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Norman Daniels
Norman Daniels
Affiliation:
Department of PhilosophyTufts UniversityMedford, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some have claimed that negative genetic interventions are morally permissible while positive ones are not, but the distinction cannot be used to draw this moral boundary. Underlying the negative/positive distinction is a distinction between treatment and enhancement. The treatment/enhancement distinction at best provides an imperfect guide to which health care services we are obliged to provide and which we are not. It offers only some “warning flags” to help us think about what is permissible or not.

Type
Genetic Services Eugenic Practices?
Information
Science in Context , Volume 11 , Issue 3-4 , Autumn-Winter 1998 , pp. 439 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This article is drawn from a much longer chapter by the same name (see Buchanan, Brock, Daniels, and Wikler 1998, chap. 4). I thank my coauthors of the book for their support and criticism throughout the drafting of the chapter, for which I had primary responsibility, and for permission to use this material here. I also draw on arguments from Daniels 1996, chaps. 10 and 11.

References

Allen, D. B. and Fost, N. C.. 1990. “Growth Hormone Therapy for Short Stature: Panacea or Pandora's Box?” Journal of Pediatrics 117:16–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, F. 1980. “Gene Therapy in Human Beings: When Is It Ethical to Begin?” New England Journal of Medicine 303(22):1293–1297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, F. 1985. “Human Gene Therapy: Scientific and Ethical Considerations.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10(3-4):275–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, F. 1989. “Human Gene Therapy: Why Draw a Line?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14(1):681–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayer, R. 1981. Homosexuality and American Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. 1975. “On the Distinction between Disease and Illness.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 5(1):49–68.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. 1976. “Wright on Functions.” Philosophical Review 85(1):70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. 1977. “Health as a Theoretical Concept.” Philosophy of Science 44:542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N., and Wikler, D.. 1998. From Chance to Choice: Genes and Social Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1995. “Amartya Sen: Inequality Reexamined.” Journal of Philosophy 92(5):275–288.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. 1985. Just Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, N. 1986 “Why Saying No to Patients in the United States Is So Hard: Cost-Containment, Justice, and Provider Autonomy.” New England Journal of Medicine 314:1380–1383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, N. 1990. “Equality of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50(Supplement):273–296. Reprinted in Daniels 1996, 208–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, N. 1992. “Growth Hormone Therapy for Short Stature: Can We Support the Treatment/Enhancement Distinction?” Growth Genetics & Hormones 8(Supplement 1)(May 1992):46–48.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. 1996. Justice and Justfication: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, N. and Sabin, J.. 1997. “Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers.” Philosophy and Public Policy 26 (4, Fall): 303–350.Google ScholarPubMed
Engelhardt, H. T. 1974. “Disease of Masturbation: Values and the Concept of Disease.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48(2): 234–248.Google ScholarPubMed
Finkeistein, B. S., Silvers, J. B., Marrero, U., Neuhauser, D., and Cuttler, L.. 1998.“ Insurance Coverage, Physician Recommendations, and Access to Emerging Treatment: Growth Hormone Therapy for Childhood Short Stature,” Journal of American Medical Association 279(9):663–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, J. 1988. “Mapping the Human Genome: Some I.” In Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1988. Mapping our Genes: Federal Genome Projects: How Vast, How Fast: Contractor Reports, Volume 1, 105–156. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Phillip. 1996. Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Morreim, E. H. 1991. “Gaming the System: Dodging the Rules, Ruling the Dodgers.” Archives of Internal Medicine 151:443–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novack, D. H., Detering, B. J., Arnold, R., Forrow, L., Kadubsjtm, M., Pezzullo, J. C.. 1989. “Physicians' Attitudes towards Using Deception to Resolve Difficult Ethical Problems.” Journal of the American Medical Association 261:2980–2985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sabin, J. E., and Daniels, N.. 1994. “Determining ‘Medical Necessity’ in Mental Health Practice: A Study of Clinical Reasoning and a Proposal for Insurance Policy,” Hastings Center Report 24(6):5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabin, J. E. 1998. “Making Insurance Coverage for New Technologies Reasonable and Accountable,” Journal of the American Medical Association 279(9):703–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, A. 1980. “Equality of What?” In Tanner Lectures on Human Values;, Volume 1, edited by McMurrin, S., 195–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Sen, A. Choice, Welfare, and Measurement, 353–369. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1990. “Justice: Means versus Freedoms.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19: 1111–1121.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar