Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Nicolaus Taurellus on Forms and Elements

  • Andreas Blank (a1)
Argument

This article examines the conception of elements in the natural philosophy of Nicolaus Taurellus (1547–1606) and explores the theological motivation that stands behind this conception. By some of his early modern readers, Taurellus may have been understood as a proponent of material atoms. By contrast, I argue that considerations concerning the substantiality of the ultimate constituents of composites led Taurellus to an immaterialist ontology, according to which elements are immaterial forms that possess active and passive potencies as well as motion and extension. In Taurellus's view, immaterialism about elements provides support for the theological doctrine of creation ex nihilo. As he argues, the ontology of immaterial forms helps to explicate a sense in which creatures are substances, not accidents of the divine substance. In particular, he maintains that immaterial forms stand in suitable relations of ontological dependence to God: creation dependence (since forms would not exist without the divine act of creation), but neither subsistence dependence (since forms continue to exist without continued divine agency) nor activity dependence (since forms are active without requiring divine concurrence).

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anon. 1611. Bedenckingen. Over de Beroepinghe D.D. Conradi Vorstii Bedenckingen. Over de Beroepinghe D.D. Conradi Vorstii tot de Professie der H. Theologie in de Universiteyt tot Leyden, By tenighe Dienaren des Godlicken Woorts Opt begeern/ ende uptlast ban de E. Mog. Heeren Staaten/ von Hollandt/ ende West = Fieslandt/ voorghestelt/ ende hare E. Mog. overghelevert op den 29. Aprilis Anno 1611.
Alexander of Aphrodisias. [1495] 1559. De anima liber primus. Translated by Girolamo Donato. In Alexander of Aphrodisias. Quaestiones naturales et morales . . . De anima liber primus . . . De anima liber secundus, 71102. Venice: Octavianus Scotus.
Alexander of Aphrodisias. 2008. De l’âme. Edited and translated by Bergeron, M. and Dufour, R.. Paris: Vrin.
Arnaldus of Villanova. 1585. Opera Omnia. Cum Nicolai Taurelli Medici & Philosophi in quosdam libros annotationes. Basel: Conrad Waldkirch.
Baier, Johann Jacob. 1728. Biographiae professorum medicinae qui in Academia Altorfiana unquam vixerunt. Nürnberg and Altdorf: Tauber.
Bayle, Pierre. 1730. Dictionnaire historique et critique. Amsterdam: Brunel.
Bernhard, Reinhard. 2008. Was heißt ‘Handeln Gottes’? Eine Rekonstruktion der Lehre von der Vorsehung. Zürich and Berlin: Lit.
Blank, Andreas. 2009. “Existential Dependence and the Question of Emanative Causation in Protestant Metaphysics, 1570–1620.” Intellectual History Review 19:113.
Bovillus, Carolus. [1509] 1510. “Libellus de Nihilo.” In Bovillus, Carolus, Liber de intellectu. Liber de sensu. Liber de nichilo . . ., fol. 63v-74r. Paris: Stephanus.
Cassirer, Ernst. [1927] 2013. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Caston, Victor. 1997. “Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern.” Philosophical Review 106:309363.
Cunningham, Andrew. 2001. “Protestant Anatomy.” In Religious Confessions and the Sciences in the Sixteenth Century. Edited by Helm, J. and Winkelmann, A., 4450. Leiden, Boston and Köln: E. J. Brill.
De Haas, Frans A. J. 1997. John Philoponus’ New Definition of Prime Matter. Aspects of its Background in Neoplatonism and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. Leiden, New York and Cologne: E. J. Brill.
Emerton, Norma. 1984. The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Feuerlein, Jacob Wilhelm. 1734. Taurellus Defensus. Nürnberg: Adam Schmid.
Frank, Günter. 2003. Die Vernunft des Gottesgedankens. Religionsphilosophische Studien zur frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Galenus, Claudius. 1553. In Hippocratis De natura hominis commentarius. Translated by Andernacus, I. G.. Lyon: Guilielmus Rovillus.
Gorlaeus, David. 1620. Exercitationes philosophicae. [no place]: Comelinus.
Gregory, Tullio. 1966. “Studi sull’atomismo del seicento.” Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 45:4463.
Harrison, Peter. 1998. The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hattab, Helen. 2009. Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirai, Hiro. 2007. “The Invisible Hand of God in Seeds: Jacob Schegk's Theory of Plastic Faculty.” Early Science and Medicine 12:377404.
Kusukawa, Sachiko. 1995. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kusukawa, Sachiko. 1997. “Vinculum concordiae: Lutheran Method by Philip Melanchthon.” In Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, edited by Di Liscia, D. A., Kessler, E., and Methuen, C., 337354. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kusukawa, Sachiko. 1999. “Lutheran Uses of Aristotle: A Comparison between Jacob Schegk and Philip Melanchthon.” In Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, edited by Blackwell, C. and Kusukawa, S., 169188. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lasswitz, Kurd. 1890. Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton. 2 vols. Hamburg and Leipzig: Voss.
Leinsle, Ulrich Gottfried. 1985. Das Ding und die Methode. Methodische Konstitution und Gegenstand der frühen protestantischen Metaphysik. 2 vols. Augsburg: Maro Verlag.
Lüthy, Christoph. 2001. “David Gorlaeus’ Atomism, or: The Marriage of Protestant Metaphysics with Italian Natural Philosophy.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, edited by Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. R., 245290. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: E. J. Brill.
Lüthy, Christoph. 2012. David Gorlaeus (1591–1612): An Enigmatic Figure in the History of Philosophy and Science. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Margolin, Jean-Claude. 1986. “La function de modèle dans la pensée créatrice de Bovelles.” In Le modèle à la Renaissance, edited by Balavoine, C., Lafond, J. and Laurens, P., 5175. Paris: Vrin.
Mayer, H. C. 1959. Nikolaus Taurellus, der erste Philosoph im Luthertum. Ein Beitrag zum Problem von Vernunft und Offenbarung. Dissertation, University of Göttingen.
Mayer, H. C. 1960. “Ein Altdorfer Philosophenporträt.” Zeitschrift für Bayerische Kirchengeschichte 29:75190.
Melanchthon, Philip. [1549] 1555. Initia Doctrinae Physicae. Wittenberg: Johannes Lufft.
Methuen, Charlotte. 1998. Kepler's Tübingen. Stimulus to a Theological Mathematics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Methuen, Charlotte. 2008. “On the Problem of Defining Lutheran Natural Philosophy.” In Science and Theology in the Reformation. Studies in Theological Interpretation and Astronomical Observation in Sixteenth-Century Germany, edited by Methuen, Charlotte, 94111. Aldershot: T & T Clark.
Newman, William Royal. 2006. Atoms and Alchemy. Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Nutton, Vivian. 1993. “Wittenberg Anatomy.” In Medicine and the Reformation. Edited by Grell, O. P. and Cunningham, A., 1132. London and New York: Routledge.
Pico della Mirandola, Gianfranceso. [1520] 1573. Examen vanitatis doctrinae Gentium, & veritatis Christianae disciplinae. In Opera Omnia, vol. 2, edited by Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni and Pico della Mirandola, Gianfrancesco, 7101264. Basel: Henricpetri.
Petersen, Peter. 1921. Geschichte der aristotelischen Philosophie im protestantischen Deutschland. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
Philoponus, Johannes. 1554. Physicorum, hoc est, De naturali auscultatione primi quatuor Aristotelis libri, cum Ioannis Grammatici cognomento Philoponi eruditissimis commentariis. Translated by Dorotheus, Guilelmus. Venice: Octavianus Scotus.
Philoponus, Johannes. 1888. In Aristotelis Physicorum libri quinque posteriores commentaria, edited by Vitelli, H.. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
Schegk, Jacob. 1540. De causa continente. Eodem interprete Alexandri Aphrodisaei De mixtione libellus. Tübingen: Ulrich Morhard.
Schegk, Jacob. 1570. Jacobi Schegkii Schorndorffensis Hyperaspistes Responsi, ad quatuor epistolas Petri Rami contra se aeditas. Tübingen [no publisher].
Schegk, Jacob. 1580. De plastica seminis facultate. Augsburg: Bernardus Iobinus.
Schegk, Jacob. 1585. Tractationum physicarum et medicarum tomus unus. Frankfurt: Johannes Wechel.
Schmid, Xaver. 1860. Nikolaus Taurellus, der erste deutsche Philosoph. Erlangen: Bläsing.
Schmitt, Charles B. 1967. Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and his Critique of Aristotle. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Shriver, Frederick. 1970. “Orthodoxy and Diplomacy: James I and the Vorstius Affair.” English Historical Review 336:449474.
Taurellus, Nicolaus. [1573] 2012. Philosophiae triumphus, hoc est, Metaphysica philosophandi methodus [cited as PT]. Edited and translated by Wels, Henrik. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Taurellus, Nicolaus. 1597. Alpes caesae, Hoc est, Andreae Caesalpini Itali, monstrosa & superba dogmata, discussa & excussa. Frankfurt: Palthenius.
Taurellus, Nicolaus. 1603. Kosmologia, hoc est physicarum et metaphysicarum discussionum de mundo. Amberg: Clain.
Taurellus, Nicolaus. 1604. De rerum aeternitate. Marburg: Egenolph.
Todd, Robert B. 1976. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. A Study of the De Mixtione with preliminary essays, text, translation, and commentary. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Voetius, Gisbert. 1643. Testimonium Academiae Ultrajectinae et narratio historica quae defensae, quae exterminatae novae philosophiae. Utrecht: Strickius.
Vorstius, Conrad. 1610. Tractatus theologicus de Deo, sive de natura & attributa Dei. Steinfurt: Theophilus Caesar.
Vorstius, Conrad. 1611. Christiana & modesta responsio ad articulos quosdam, nuper ex Anglia transmissos. Leiden: Thomas Basson.
White Beck, Louis. 1969. Early German Philosophy. Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Wollgast, Siegfried. 1988. Philosophie in Deutschland zwischen Reformation und Aufklärung, 1550–1650. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Zedler, H. H. 1732–1754. Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschaften und Künste, 68 vols. Leipzig and Halle: Zedler.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed