Skip to main content
×
Home

Nicolaus Taurellus on Forms and Elements

  • Andreas Blank (a1)
Argument
Argument

This article examines the conception of elements in the natural philosophy of Nicolaus Taurellus (1547–1606) and explores the theological motivation that stands behind this conception. By some of his early modern readers, Taurellus may have been understood as a proponent of material atoms. By contrast, I argue that considerations concerning the substantiality of the ultimate constituents of composites led Taurellus to an immaterialist ontology, according to which elements are immaterial forms that possess active and passive potencies as well as motion and extension. In Taurellus's view, immaterialism about elements provides support for the theological doctrine of creation ex nihilo. As he argues, the ontology of immaterial forms helps to explicate a sense in which creatures are substances, not accidents of the divine substance. In particular, he maintains that immaterial forms stand in suitable relations of ontological dependence to God: creation dependence (since forms would not exist without the divine act of creation), but neither subsistence dependence (since forms continue to exist without continued divine agency) nor activity dependence (since forms are active without requiring divine concurrence).

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anon. 1611. Bedenckingen. Over de Beroepinghe D.D. Conradi Vorstii Bedenckingen. Over de Beroepinghe D.D. Conradi Vorstii tot de Professie der H. Theologie in de Universiteyt tot Leyden, By tenighe Dienaren des Godlicken Woorts Opt begeern/ ende uptlast ban de E. Mog. Heeren Staaten/ von Hollandt/ ende West = Fieslandt/ voorghestelt/ ende hare E. Mog. overghelevert op den 29. Aprilis Anno 1611.
Alexander of Aphrodisias. [1495] 1559. De anima liber primus. Translated by Girolamo Donato. In Alexander of Aphrodisias. Quaestiones naturales et morales . . . De anima liber primus . . . De anima liber secundus, 71102. Venice: Octavianus Scotus.
Alexander of Aphrodisias. 2008. De l’âme. Edited and translated by Bergeron M. and Dufour R.. Paris: Vrin.
Arnaldus of Villanova. 1585. Opera Omnia. Cum Nicolai Taurelli Medici & Philosophi in quosdam libros annotationes. Basel: Conrad Waldkirch.
Baier Johann Jacob. 1728. Biographiae professorum medicinae qui in Academia Altorfiana unquam vixerunt. Nürnberg and Altdorf: Tauber.
Bayle Pierre. 1730. Dictionnaire historique et critique. Amsterdam: Brunel.
Bernhard Reinhard. 2008. Was heißt ‘Handeln Gottes’? Eine Rekonstruktion der Lehre von der Vorsehung. Zürich and Berlin: Lit.
Blank Andreas. 2009. “Existential Dependence and the Question of Emanative Causation in Protestant Metaphysics, 1570–1620.” Intellectual History Review 19:113.
Bovillus Carolus. [1509] 1510. “Libellus de Nihilo.” In Bovillus Carolus, Liber de intellectu. Liber de sensu. Liber de nichilo . . ., fol. 63v-74r. Paris: Stephanus.
Cassirer Ernst. [1927] 2013. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Caston Victor. 1997. “Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern.” Philosophical Review 106:309363.
Cunningham Andrew. 2001. “Protestant Anatomy.” In Religious Confessions and the Sciences in the Sixteenth Century. Edited by Helm J. and Winkelmann A., 4450. Leiden, Boston and Köln: E. J. Brill.
De Haas Frans A. J. 1997. John Philoponus’ New Definition of Prime Matter. Aspects of its Background in Neoplatonism and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. Leiden, New York and Cologne: E. J. Brill.
Emerton Norma. 1984. The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Feuerlein Jacob Wilhelm. 1734. Taurellus Defensus. Nürnberg: Adam Schmid.
Frank Günter. 2003. Die Vernunft des Gottesgedankens. Religionsphilosophische Studien zur frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Galenus Claudius. 1553. In Hippocratis De natura hominis commentarius. Translated by Andernacus I. G.. Lyon: Guilielmus Rovillus.
Gorlaeus David. 1620. Exercitationes philosophicae. [no place]: Comelinus.
Gregory Tullio. 1966. “Studi sull’atomismo del seicento.” Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 45:4463.
Harrison Peter. 1998. The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hattab Helen. 2009. Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirai Hiro. 2007. “The Invisible Hand of God in Seeds: Jacob Schegk's Theory of Plastic Faculty.” Early Science and Medicine 12:377404.
Kusukawa Sachiko. 1995. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kusukawa Sachiko. 1997. “Vinculum concordiae: Lutheran Method by Philip Melanchthon.” In Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, edited by Di Liscia D. A., Kessler E., and Methuen C., 337354. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kusukawa Sachiko. 1999. “Lutheran Uses of Aristotle: A Comparison between Jacob Schegk and Philip Melanchthon.” In Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, edited by Blackwell C. and Kusukawa S., 169188. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lasswitz Kurd. 1890. Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton. 2 vols. Hamburg and Leipzig: Voss.
Leinsle Ulrich Gottfried. 1985. Das Ding und die Methode. Methodische Konstitution und Gegenstand der frühen protestantischen Metaphysik. 2 vols. Augsburg: Maro Verlag.
Lüthy Christoph. 2001. “David Gorlaeus’ Atomism, or: The Marriage of Protestant Metaphysics with Italian Natural Philosophy.” In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, edited by Lüthy C., Murdoch J. E., and Newman W. R., 245290. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: E. J. Brill.
Lüthy Christoph. 2012. David Gorlaeus (1591–1612): An Enigmatic Figure in the History of Philosophy and Science. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Margolin Jean-Claude. 1986. “La function de modèle dans la pensée créatrice de Bovelles.” In Le modèle à la Renaissance, edited by Balavoine C., Lafond J. and Laurens P., 5175. Paris: Vrin.
Mayer H. C. 1959. Nikolaus Taurellus, der erste Philosoph im Luthertum. Ein Beitrag zum Problem von Vernunft und Offenbarung. Dissertation, University of Göttingen.
Mayer H. C. 1960. “Ein Altdorfer Philosophenporträt.” Zeitschrift für Bayerische Kirchengeschichte 29:75190.
Melanchthon Philip. [1549] 1555. Initia Doctrinae Physicae. Wittenberg: Johannes Lufft.
Methuen Charlotte. 1998. Kepler's Tübingen. Stimulus to a Theological Mathematics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Methuen Charlotte. 2008. “On the Problem of Defining Lutheran Natural Philosophy.” In Science and Theology in the Reformation. Studies in Theological Interpretation and Astronomical Observation in Sixteenth-Century Germany, edited by Methuen Charlotte, 94111. Aldershot: T & T Clark.
Newman William Royal. 2006. Atoms and Alchemy. Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Nutton Vivian. 1993. “Wittenberg Anatomy.” In Medicine and the Reformation. Edited by Grell O. P. and Cunningham A., 1132. London and New York: Routledge.
Pico della Mirandola Gianfranceso. [1520] 1573. Examen vanitatis doctrinae Gentium, & veritatis Christianae disciplinae. In Opera Omnia, vol. 2, edited by Pico della Mirandola Giovanni and Pico della Mirandola Gianfrancesco, 7101264. Basel: Henricpetri.
Petersen Peter. 1921. Geschichte der aristotelischen Philosophie im protestantischen Deutschland. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
Philoponus Johannes. 1554. Physicorum, hoc est, De naturali auscultatione primi quatuor Aristotelis libri, cum Ioannis Grammatici cognomento Philoponi eruditissimis commentariis. Translated by Dorotheus Guilelmus. Venice: Octavianus Scotus.
Philoponus Johannes. 1888. In Aristotelis Physicorum libri quinque posteriores commentaria, edited by Vitelli H.. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
Schegk Jacob. 1540. De causa continente. Eodem interprete Alexandri Aphrodisaei De mixtione libellus. Tübingen: Ulrich Morhard.
Schegk Jacob. 1570. Jacobi Schegkii Schorndorffensis Hyperaspistes Responsi, ad quatuor epistolas Petri Rami contra se aeditas. Tübingen [no publisher].
Schegk Jacob. 1580. De plastica seminis facultate. Augsburg: Bernardus Iobinus.
Schegk Jacob. 1585. Tractationum physicarum et medicarum tomus unus. Frankfurt: Johannes Wechel.
Schmid Xaver. 1860. Nikolaus Taurellus, der erste deutsche Philosoph. Erlangen: Bläsing.
Schmitt Charles B. 1967. Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and his Critique of Aristotle. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Shriver Frederick. 1970. “Orthodoxy and Diplomacy: James I and the Vorstius Affair.” English Historical Review 336:449474.
Taurellus Nicolaus. [1573] 2012. Philosophiae triumphus, hoc est, Metaphysica philosophandi methodus [cited as PT]. Edited and translated by Wels Henrik. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Taurellus Nicolaus. 1597. Alpes caesae, Hoc est, Andreae Caesalpini Itali, monstrosa & superba dogmata, discussa & excussa. Frankfurt: Palthenius.
Taurellus Nicolaus. 1603. Kosmologia, hoc est physicarum et metaphysicarum discussionum de mundo. Amberg: Clain.
Taurellus Nicolaus. 1604. De rerum aeternitate. Marburg: Egenolph.
Todd Robert B. 1976. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. A Study of the De Mixtione with preliminary essays, text, translation, and commentary. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Voetius Gisbert. 1643. Testimonium Academiae Ultrajectinae et narratio historica quae defensae, quae exterminatae novae philosophiae. Utrecht: Strickius.
Vorstius Conrad. 1610. Tractatus theologicus de Deo, sive de natura & attributa Dei. Steinfurt: Theophilus Caesar.
Vorstius Conrad. 1611. Christiana & modesta responsio ad articulos quosdam, nuper ex Anglia transmissos. Leiden: Thomas Basson.
White Beck Louis. 1969. Early German Philosophy. Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Wollgast Siegfried. 1988. Philosophie in Deutschland zwischen Reformation und Aufklärung, 1550–1650. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Zedler H. H. 1732–1754. Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschaften und Künste, 68 vols. Leipzig and Halle: Zedler.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 133 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.