Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The SENSE of Nuclear Physics: New Frontiers, Media, and Collaborations

  • J. Scott Brennen (a1)
Argument

This article describes the efforts of one fifty-year-old nuclear physics research center to stay relevant as the boundaries of nuclear physics have expanded and distributed collaborations have become increasingly common. In adapting to these shifts, SENSE, a university-based institute in the United States, has seen notable changes in power relations, forms of legitimation, and social structures. This article recognizes and investigates these changes through an interpretative investigation of four common media objects incorporated into research practice at the institute: collaboration wikis, telephones, computer simulations, and government reports. In doing so, this article adopts an approach from media studies through which hard-to-see changes in social and cultural life can be investigated by observing media objects in research practice. Ultimately, this article tells the story of a research organization and an entire discipline working to adapt to a rapidly changing scientific landscape.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abgrall, Nicolas, et al. 2014. “The Majorana Demonstrator Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Experiment.” Advances in High Energy Physics 2014:118.
Ahmed, Iftekhar. 2007. “Virtual Scientific Collaboration: The Role of Communication Technology in Teamwork and Interaction.” National Communication Association Annual Conference.
Bodnarczuk, Mark, and Hoddeson, Lillian. 2008. “Megascience in Particle Physics: The Birth of an Experiment String at Fermilab.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 38 (4):508–34.
Castells, Manuel. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Couldry, Nick. 2008. “Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling.” New Media & Society 10 (3):373–91.
Couldry, Nick, and Hepp, Andreas. 2013. “Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments.” Communication Theory 23 (3):191202.
Crombie, Alistair Cameron. 1994. Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History of Argument and Explanation Especially in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and Arts. Vol. 2. London: Duckworth.
Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation Nuclear Science Advisory Committee. 1989. Nuclei, Nucleons, Quarks Nuclear Science in the 1990’s: A Long Range Plan by the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee. https://science.energy.gov/~/media/np/nsac/pdf/docs/lrp_1989.pdf
Galison, Peter, and Hevly, Bruce William. 1992. Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hallonsten, Olof, and Heinze, Thomas. 2013. “From Particle Physics to Photon Science: Multi-Dimensional and Multi-Level Renewal at DESY and SLAC.” Science and Public Policy 40 (5):591603.
Hepp, Andreas. 2013. Cultures of Mediatization. Translated by Keith Tribe. Malden MA: Polity.
Hepp, Andreas, Hjarvard, Stig, and Lundby, Knut. 2010. “Mediatization – Empirical Perspectives: An Introduction to a Special Issue.” Communications 35 (3).
Hewlett, Richard G., and Holl, Jack M.. 1989. Atoms for Peace and War, 1953–1961: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission. Vol. 3. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Hilgartner, Stephen. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hoddeson, Lillian, Kolb, Adrienne W., and Westfall, Catherine. 2009. Fermilab: Physics, the Frontier, and Megascience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacob, Merle, and Hallonsten, Olof. 2012. “The Persistence of Big Science and Megascience in Research and Innovation Policy.” Science and Public Policy 39 (4):411–15.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 2003. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce. London: University of Wisconsin Press.
Knoblauch, Hubert. 2013. “Communicative Constructivism and Mediatization.” Communication Theory 23 (3):297315.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Krige, John. 2001. “Distrust and Discovery: The Case of the Heavy Bosons at CERN.” Isis 92 (3): 517–40.
Krotz, Friedrich. 2009. “Mediatization: A Concept with Which to Grasp Media and Societal Change.” In Mediatization: Concept, Change, Consequences, edited by Lundby, Knut, 2140. New York: Peter Lang.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
M.-R. R. 2013. “Looking Back at the First 50 Years of [SENSE].”
Magerko, Brian. 2010. “The potential for scientific collaboration in virtual ecosystems.” Learning, Media & Technology 35 (2):243248.
Manovich, Lev. 2012. “Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, by Gold, Matthew K.. City? University of Minnesota Press.
Mazur, Allan and Boyko, Elma. 1981. “Large-Scale Ocean Research Projects: What Makes Them Succeed or Fail?Social Studies of Science 11 (4):425–49.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Meyerhoff, Walter. 1967. Elements of Nuclear Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Newson, Henry, Bilpuch, Edward, Purser, Fred O, Boyce, James Reid, and Clegg, Thomas. 1974. “An Operational Review of the TUNL Cyclo-Graaff.” Nuclear Instruments and Methods 122 (November):99113.
Nuclear Science Advisory Committee. 1983, 1989, 1996, 2012. A Report by the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee.
Packer, Jeremy. 2013. “The Conditions of Media's Possibility.” The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies.
Peters, John Durham. 2015. The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SENSE. 1974, 1980, 2012. Annual Progress Report. SENSE.
Shrum, Wesley, Genuth, Joel, and Chompalov, Ivan. 2007. Structures of Scientific Collaboration. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Siegert, Bernhard. 2013. “Mineral Sound or Missing Fundamental: Cultural History as Signal Analysis.” Osiris 28 (1):105–18.
Price, Solla, de, Derek John, and Price, Derek De Solla. 1965. Little Science, Big Science. Vol. 6. Columbia University Press New York.
Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beam Times and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vertesi, J. 2014. “Seamful Spaces: Heterogeneous Infrastructures in Interaction.” Science, Technology & Human Values 39 (2):264–84.
Walsh, John P. and Maloney, Nancy G.. 2007. “Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2):712–32.
Westfall, Catherine. 2003. “Rethinking Big Science: Modest, Mezzo, Grand Science and the Development of the Bevalac, 1971–1993.” Isis 94 (1):3056.
Winsberg, Eric. 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wuchty, Stefan, Jones, Benjamin F., and Uzzi, Brian. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316 (5827):10361039.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed