Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Shifting Expert Configurations and the Public Credibility of Science: Boundary Work and Identity Work of Hydraulic Engineers (1980–2009)

  • Erwin van Rijswoud (a1)
Abstract
Argument

In the Netherlands, a country of water, dikes, and dams, the role of civil engineering in policy making and public debates over flood safety have changed over the last four decades. This had not just implied that new directions in flood safety policy were considered by politics, but also that engineering experts traditionally working in this area found their credibility challenged by competing expertises. I will argue that in responding to those challenges, experts combined boundary work (upholding boundaries between science and non-science, or between different fields of expertise) with identity work, in which the planning of actions and learning from experience are informed by the identity of oneself as an expert. The views of experts on the boundary zone of science, policy, and public debate, and the role and skills one attributes to oneself, are regarded as important aspects of that identity work. On the basis of biographical-narrative research, this will show that although the four experts studied here belong to a specific generation of engineers, experiencing common challenges and developments in their field of work, the combination of identity work and boundary work results in specific roles and responses for each individual expert.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Wiebe Bijker . 2002. “The Oosterschelde Storm Surge Barrier: a Test Case for Dutch Water Technology, Management, and Politics.” Technology and Culture 43 (3):569584.

Harry M. Collins , and Rob Evans . 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Art Dewulf , Barbara Gray , Linda Putnam , Roy Lewicki , Noelle Aarts , Rene Bouwen , and Cees Van Woerkum . 2009. “Disentangling Approaches to Framing in Conflict and Negotiation Research: A Meta-paradigmatic Perspective.” Human Relations 62 (2):155193.

Cornelis Disco . 2002. “Remaking ‘Nature’: The Ecological Turn in Dutch Water Management.” Science, Technology and Human Values 27 (2):206235.

Robert Hoppe . 2009. “Scientific Advice and Public Policy: Expert Advisers’ and Policymakers’ Discourses on Boundary Work.” Poiesis & Praxis 6 (3–4):235263.

Ruben B. Jongejan , Johannes K. Vrijling , Marcel J.F. Stive and Sebastian N. Jonkman . 2008. “A Comment on Changing Estuaries, Changing Views.” Hydrobiologia 605:1115.

Pavel Kabat , Wim Van Vierssen , Jeroen Veraart , Pier Vellinga , and Jeroen Aerts . 2005. “Climate Proofing the Netherlands.” Nature 438:283284.

Martin Reuss . 2002. “Learning from the Dutch: Technology, Management, and Water Resource Development.” Technology and Culture 43(3):465472.

Arie Rip . 2006. “Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists.” Science as Culture 15 (4):349365.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 119 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.