Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T11:32:03.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Struggling with Causality: Einstein's Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Yemima Ben-Menahem
Yemima Ben-Menahem
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Einstein's concept of causality as analyzed in this paper is a thick concept comprised of: (a) regularity; (b) locality; (c) symmetry considerations leading to conservation laws; (d) mutuality of causal interaction. The main theses are: 1. Since (b)–(d) are not elements of Hume's concept of causality, Einstein's concept, the concept embedded in the theory of relativity, is manifestly non–Humean. 2. On a Humean conception, Newtonian mechanics is a paradigmatically causal theory. Einstein, however, regarded this theory as causally deficient, for it fails to comply with both (b) and (d). Special relativity was (partly) motivated by the wish to correct the first of these failures; general relativity the second. 3. Ironically, general relativity, based on the thick concept of causality, opens the way for a conventionalist understanding of that concept. 4. With regard to human freedom, Einstein professed to be a Spinozist. However, he suggested a version of soft determinism, not found in Spinoza.

Information

Type
The Philosophical Context
Information
Science in Context , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993 , pp. 291 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Balibar, F. 1990. “Einstein–Ehrenfest, a Scientific Friendship.” Paper delivered at the International Workshop on Einstein in Context, 23–26 April 1990, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. 1989. The Speakable and the Unspeakable in Quantum Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ben–Menahem, Y. 1989. “Struggling with Causality: Schrödinger's Case.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 20: 307–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. 1985. Collected Works, edited by Rudinger, E. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Born, M. 1962. Einstein's Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Cramer, J. G. 1986. “The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.”Review of Modern Physics. 58: 647–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. 1989. World Enough and Space–Time. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. [1916] 1923. “The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity.”In The Principle of Relativity, edited by Perrett, W. and Jeffry, G. B. New York: Dover. (Originally published as “Die Grundlagen die allgemeinen Relativitötstheorie,” Annalen der Physik 49.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. 1951. The Meaning of Relativity. 5 th ed. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fine, A. 1986. The Shaky Game. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1983. Foundations of Space–Time Theories. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., and Weber, M. 1986. “Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and MacRoscopic Systems.” Physical Review D 34: 470–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, D. 1985. “Einstein on Locality and Separability.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 16: 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. 1990. “Einstein and Duhem”. Paper delivered at the International Workshop on Einstein in Context, April 23–26, 1990, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Jarrett, J. P. 1984. “On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments”. Nous 18: 569–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, R. 1946. Spinoza: Portrait of a Spiritual Hero. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Meyerson, E. 1930. Identity and Reality, translated by K. Loewenberg. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. 1970. Gravitation. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. [1905]1952. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. [1923] 1959. “The Principle of Causality and the Possibility of Its Empirical Confirmation.” In Modern Philosophy of Science, edited by Reichenbach, M., 109–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.ed. 1956. The Direction of Time. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. 1958. The Philosophy of Space and Time. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Russell, B. [1912] 1963. “On the Notion of Cause.” In Mysticism and Logic, London: Unwin Books.Google Scholar
Schlick, M. [1920] 1979. “Philosophical Reflections on the Causal Principle.” In Moritz Schlick: Philosophical Papers, edited by Mulder, H. L. and van de Velde Schlick, B. F. B., 1:295–321. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Originally published as “Naturphilosophische Betrachtungen Uber das Kausalprinzip,” Die Naturwis senschaften 8:461–74.)Google Scholar
Schlick, M. [1931] 1979. “Causality in Contemporary Physics.” In Moritz Schlick:Philosophical Papers, 2: 176–209. (Originally published as “Die Kausalitát in der gegenwartigen Physik,” Die Naturwissenschaften 19:145–62.)Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. [1929] 1957. “The Law of Chance.” In E. Schrodinger, Science, Theory, and Man. New York: Dover. (Originally published as “Das Gesetz der Zufall.” In Schrodinger 1984, 4:316–17.)Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. 1984. Collected Papers, 4 vols., edited by Dick, G. and Kerber, W. Vienna: Verlag der Östreicher Akademie des Wissenschaften and Friedrich Vieweg Sohn.Google Scholar
Sklar, L. 1974.Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. 1970. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 1972. Gravitation and Cosmology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar