Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Surgical Elimination of Violence? Conflicting Attitudes towards Technology and Science during the Psychosurgery Controversy of the 1970s

  • Brian P. Casey (a1)
Abstract
Argument

In the 1970s a public controversy erupted over the proposed use of brain operations to curtail violent behavior. Civil libertarians, civil rights and community activists, leaders of the anti-psychiatry movement, and some U.S. Congressmen charged psychosurgeons and the National Institute of Mental Health, with furthering a political project: the suppression of dissent. Several government-sponsored investigations into psychosurgery rebutted this charge and led to an official qualified endorsement of the practice while calling attention to the need for more “scientific” understanding and better ethical safeguards. This paper argues that the psychosurgery debate of the 1970s was more than a power struggle between members of the public and the psychiatric establishment. The debate represented a clash between a postmodern skepticism about science and renewed focus on ultimate ends, on the one hand, and a modern faith in standards and procedures, a preoccupation with means, on the other. These diverging commitments made the dispute ultimately irresolvable.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Garland Allen . 2001. “The Biological Basis of Crime: An Historical and Methodological Study.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31 (2):183222.

George J. Annas 1977. “Psychosurgery: Procedural Safeguards.” Hastings Center Report 7 (2):1113.

Henry Beecher , et al.1973. “Physical Manipulation of the Brain.” Hastings Center Report 3 (Special Supplement): 122.

Allan Brandt . 1978. “Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.” Hastings Center Report 8 (6):2129.

Renae N. Burchiel 1983. “Update on Psychosurgery.” Journal of Neurosurgical Nursing 15 (3):165–8.

Robert Burt . 1975. “Why We Should Keep Prisoners from the Doctors.” Hastings Center Report 5 (10):2534.

Lee Coleman . 1974. “Perspectives on the Medical Research of Violence.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 44 (5):675687.

Peter Conrad . 1975. “The Discovery of Hyperkinesis: Notes on the Medicalization of Deviant Behavior.” Social Problems 23 (1):1221.

Scott Diering , and William Bell . 1991. “Functional Neurosurgery for Psychiatric Disorders: A Historical Perspective.” Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 57:175194.

M. David Egger , and John P. Flynn . 1967. “Further Studies on the Effects of Amygdaloid Stimulation and Ablation on Hypothalamically-Elicited Attack Behavior in Cats.” Progress in Brain Research 27:165–82.

Joseph Fins . 2003. “From Psychosurgery to Neuromodulation and Palliation: History's Lessons for the Ethical Conduct and Regulation of Neuropsychiatric Research.” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 14 (2):303–19.

Joseph Fins , Ali Rezai , and Benjamin Greenberg . 2006. “Psychosurgery: Avoiding an Ethical Redux while Advancing a Therapeutic Future.” Neurosurgery 59 (4):713716.

Paul Forman . 2007. “The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology.” History and Technology 23 (1/2):1152.

Larry Gostin , and Paul Bridges . 1980. “Ethical Considerations of Psychosurgery: The Unhappy Legacy of the Pre-Frontal Lobotomy.” Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (3):149156.

Robert Heimburger , Courtney Whitlock , and John Kalsbeck . 1966. “Stereotaxic Amygdalotomy for Epilepsy with Aggressive Behavior.” Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 198 (7):741–5.

Constance Holden . 1973. “Psychosurgery: Legitimate Therapy or Laundered Lobotomy?Science New Series 179 (4078):11091112.

Morten Kringelbach , and Tipu Aziz . 2009. “Deep Brain Stimulation: Avoiding the Errors of Psychosurgery.” Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 301 (16):1705–7.

Gerald Kutcher . 2009. Contested Medicine: Cancer Research and the Military. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kenneth E. Livingston 1969. “The Frontal Lobes Revisited: The Case for a Second Look.” Archives of Neurology 20 (1):90–5.

Harry M. Marks 2000. “Trust and Mistrust in the Marketplace: Statistics and Clinical Research, 1945–1960.” History of Science 38 Part 3(121):343355.

Hirotaro Narabayashi , and Masao Uno . 1966. “Long Range Results of Stereotaxic Amygdalotomy for Behavior Disorders.” In 2nd International Symposium on Stereoencephalotomy, Vienna, 1965. Confinia neurologica 27:168171.

Alberta Nassi , and Stephen Abramowitz . 1976. “From Phrenology to Psychosurgery and Back Again: Biological Studies of Criminality.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 46 (4):591607.

Robert Neville . 1979. “On the National Commission: a Puritan Critique of Consensus Ethics.” Hastings Center Report 9 (2):22–7.

Jonathan Sadowsky . 2006. “Beyond the Metaphor of the Pendulum: Electroconvulsive Therapy, Psychoanalysis, and the Styles of American Psychiatry.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 61 (1):125.

Virginia Snodgrass . 1973. “Debate over Benefits and Ethics of Psychosurgery Involves Public.” JAMA. 225 (8):913920.

Robert Trotter . 1972. “A Clockwork Orange in a California Prison.” Science News 101 (11):174–5.

Elliot Valenstein . 1990. “The Prefrontal Area and Psychosurgery.” Progress in Brain Research 85:539554.

Luigi Valzelli . 1984. “Reflections on Experimental and Human Pathology of Aggression.” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 8:311–25.

David Wexler . 1972. “Violence and the Brain.” (Review). Harvard Law Review 85:1489–98.

Richard White , and Sid Williams . 2009. “Amygdaloid Neurosurgery for Aggressive Behavior, Sydney, 1967–1977: Societal, Scientific, Ethical and Other Factors.” Australasian Psychiatry 17 (5):410416.

Burleigh Wilkins . 1984. “Psychosurgery, the Brain and Violent Behavior.” Journal of Value Inquiry 18 (4):319–31.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 258 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 31st March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.