Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Virtually Expert: Modes of Environmental Computer Simulation Modeling

  • Catharina Landström (a1) and Sarah J. Whatmore (a2)
Argument

This paper challenges three assumptions common in the literature on expertise: that expertise is linearly derived from scientific knowledge; that experts always align with the established institutional order; and that expertise is a property acquired by individuals. We criticize these ideas by juxtaposing three distinct expert practices involved with flood risk management in England. Virtual engineering is associated with commercial consultancy and relies on standardized software packages to assess local flood inundation. Mathematical experimentation refers to academic scientists creating new digital renderings of the physical dynamics of flooding. Participatory modeling denotes research projects that aim to transform the relationships between experts and local communities. Focusing on different modes of modeling we contribute an analysis of how particular models articulate with specific politics of knowledge as experts form relationships with flood risk management actors. Our empirical study also shows how models can contribute to re-distribution of expertise in local flood risk management.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Barretau, Olivier, Bousquet, Francois, Millier, C., and Weber, J.. 2004. “Suitability of Multi-Agent Simulations to Study Irrigated System Viability: Application to Case Studies in the Senegal River Valley.” Agricultural Systems 80:255275.
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bocking, Stephen. 2004. Nature's Experts: Science, Politics and the Environment. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Collins, Harry M., and Evans, Robert. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32:235296.
Defra (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2009. “Appraisal of Flood and Coastal Erosion Management: A Defra Policy Statement.” London: Crown Copyright.
Defra and EA (Environmental Agency for England and Wales). 2004. “Reducing Uncertainty in River Flood Conveyance. Phase 2, Conveyance Manual.” Flood and Coastal Defence Research and Development Programme, Project Record W5A-057/PR/1. Bristol: Environment Agency.
Du, Jinkang, Qian, Li, Rui, Hanyi, Zuo, Tianhui, Zheng, Dapeng, Xu, Youpeng, and Xu, C.-Y.. 2012. “Assessing the Effects of Urbanization on Annual Runoff and Flood Events Using an Integrated Hydrological Modeling System for Qinhuai River Basin, China.” Journal of Hydrology 464–465:127139.
EA. 2005. “Benchmarking of Hydraulic River Modelling Software Packages Project Overview.” R&D Technical Report: W5-105/TR0 Defra/Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Defence R&D Programme. Bristol: Environment Agency.
EA. 2009. “Desktop Review of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages.” Science Report: SC080035 Defra/Environment Agency, Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D Programme. Bristol: Environment Agency.
EA and Defra. 2011. “Understanding the Risks, Empowering Communities, Building Resilience: The National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy for England.” London: The Stationary Office.
Fischer, Frank. 2009. Democracy and Expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haase, Dagmar. 2013. “Participatory Modelling of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in Flood Risk Management.” Natural Hazards 67:7797.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41:223244.
van Kouwen, Frank, Dieperink, Carel, Schot, Paul P., Wassen, Martin J.. 2009. “Computer-Supported Cognitive Mapping for Participatory Problem Structuring.” Environment and Planning A 41:6381.
Knuutilla, Tarja. 2011. “Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-Based Representation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):262271.
Lane, Stuart N., Odoni, Nicholas A., Landström, Catharina, Whatmore, Sarah J., Ward, Neil, and Bradley, Susan. 2011. “Doing Flood Risk Science Differently: An Experiment in Radical Scientific Method.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36:1536.
Landström, Catharina, Whatmore, Sarah J., Lane, Stuart N.. 2011. “Virtual Engineering: Computer Simulation Modelling for Flood Risk Management in England.” Science Studies 24:322.
Landström, Catharina, Whatmore, Sarah J., Lane, Stuart N., Odoni, Nicholas A., Ward, Neil, and Bradley, Susan. 2011. “Co-producing Flood Risk Knowledge: Redistributing Expertise in ‘Participatory Modelling.’Environment and Planning A 43:16171633.
Morrison, Margaret, and Morgan, Mary. 1999. “Models as Mediating Instruments.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Morgan, Mary and Morrison, Margaret, 1037. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nowotny, Helga. 2000. “Transgressive Competence: The Narrative of Expertise.” European Journal of Social Theory 3:521.
Odoni, Nicholas, and Lane, Stuart N.. 2010. “Knowledge-Theoretic Models in Hydrology.” Progress in Physical Geography 34:151171.
Rip, Arie. 2003. “Constructing Expertise: In a Third Wave of Science Studies?Social Studies of Science 33:419434.
Sarhadi, Ali, Soltani, Saeed, Modarres, Reza. 2012. “Probabilistic Flood Inundation Mapping of Ungauged Rivers: Linking GIS Techniques and Frequency Analysis.” Journal of Hydrology 458–459:6886.
Souchère, Véronique, Millair, Lauerent, Echeverie, Javier, Bousquet, François, Le Page, Christophe, and Etienne, Michel. 2010. “Co-Constructing with Stakeholders a Role-Playing Game to Initiate Collective Management of Erosive Runoff Risks at the Watershed Scale.” Environmental Modelling & Software 25:13591370.
Stengers, Isabelle. 2010. “Including Nonhumans in Political Theory: Opening Pandora's Box?” In Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, edited by Braun, Bruce and Whatmore, Sarah J., 334. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Sundberg, Mikaela. 2006. “Credulous Modellers and Suspicious Experimentalists? Comparison of Model Output and Data in Meteorological Simulation Modelling.” Science Studies 19:5268.
Sundberg, Mikaela. 2009. “The Everyday World of Simulation Modeling: The Development of Parameterizations in Meteorology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 34:162181.
Turner, Stephen. 2001. “What Is the Problem with Experts?Social Studies of Science 31:123149.
Videira, Nuno, Antunes, Paula, Santos, Rui. 2009. “Scoping River Basin Management Issues with Participatory Modelling: The Baixo Guadiana Experience.” Ecological Economics 68:965978.
Voinov, Alexey, and Bousquet, Francois. 2010. “Modelling with Stakeholders.” Environmental Modelling & Software 25 (11):12671281.
Voinov, Alexey, and Gaddis, Erica J. Brown. 2008. “Lessons for Successful Participatory Watershed Modeling: A Perspective from Modeling Practitioners.” Ecological Modelling 216:197207.
Whatmore, Sarah J., and Landström, Catharina. 2010. “Manning's n: Putting Roughness to Work.” In How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, edited by Howlett, Peter and Morgan, Mary, 111135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whatmore, Sarah J., and Landström, Catharina. 2011. “Flood-Apprentices: An Exercise in Making Things Public.” Economy and Society 40:582610.
Winsberg, Eric. 2003. “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World.” Philosophy of Science 70:105125.
Wynne, Brian. 2003. “Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002),” Social Studies of Science 33:401417.
Wynne, Brian. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science: Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?Community Genetics 9:211220.
Wynne, Brian. [1982] 2011. Rationality and Ritual. Participation and Exclusion in Nuclear Decision-Making. Updated edition. London: Earthscan.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed