Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Why and How Do I Write the History of Science?

  • Roger Smith (a1)
Extract

I make a large claim for the intellectual and institutional centrality of the history of science as critical reason. The reality on the ground, of course, does not always exhibit this. I trace the vicissitudes of my own way of thought in relation to developments in the field, leading to an interest, first, in relating intellectual history (with its philosophical orientation) to mainstream (evidence based) history, and second, to finding a place for the human sciences in the history of science. The latter area, which involves questioning the nature of science as knowledge, leads to an engagement with notions of being human. It is an interest which potentially makes the history of science a boundless field, and it is necessary to comment on the questions, both intellectual and practical, that this raises. I welcome a notion of the history of science as a family of activities, and I relate this to practices which seek models of good history rather than explicit methods.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Brentano, Franz. [1874] 1973. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Translated by Rancurello, Antos C., Terrell, D. B., and McAlister, Linda L.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Buchanan, Roderick D. 2010. Playing with Fire: The Controversial Career of Hans J. Eysenck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butterfield, Herbert. [1931] 1973. The Whig Interpretation of History. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1973.
Butterfield, Herbert. [1949] 1962. The Origins of Modern Science 1300–1800. Revised edition. London: Bell.
Cohen, H. Floris. 2010. How Modern Science Came into the World: Four Civilizations, One 17th-Century Breakthrough. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Danziger, Kurt. 1997. Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found Its Language. London: Sage.
Danziger, Kurt. 2008. Marking the Mind: A History of Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daston, Lorraine, ed. 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dijksterhuis, Eduard Jan. [1950] 1969. The Mechanization of the World Picture. Translated by Dijkshoorn, C.. London: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, John. 1968. “The Identity of the History of Ideas.” Philosophy 43:85104.
Forman, Paul. 1971. “Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918–1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3:1115.
Gillispie, Charles C. 1960. The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Graham, Loren R. 1987. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1995a. Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1995b. “The Looping Effects of Human Kinds.” In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, edited by Sperber, Dan, Premack, David, and Premack, Ann James, 351394. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hacking, Ian. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Jacyna, L. Stephen. 2008. Medicine and Modernism: A Biography of Sir Henry Head. London: Pickering & Chatto.
Jahoda, Gustav. 2007. A History of Social Psychology: From the Eighteenth-Century Enlightenment to the Second World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joas, Hans. [1980] 1997. G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-Examination of His Thought. Translated by Meyer, Raymond. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2009. Disciplines in the Making: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Elites, Learning, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mongili, Allesandro. 1998. La chute de l’ U.R.S.S. et la recherche scientifique. Une science fantôme et de vrais scientifiques. Paris: L'Harmattan.
Needham, Joseph. 1969. The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Pagel, Walter. 1958. Paracelsus: An Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of the Renaissance. Basel and New York: S. Karger.
Pagel, Walter. 1967. William Harvey's Biological Ideas: Selected Aspects and Historical Background. New York: Hafner.
Shamdasani, Sonu. 2003. Jung and the Making of Modern Psychology: The Dream of a Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shamdasani, Sonu. 2005. Jung Stripped Bare by His Biographers, Even. London: Karnac.
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8:353.
Smith, Roger. 1981. Trial by Medicine: Insanity and Responsibility in Victorian Trials. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Smith, Roger. 1992. Inhibition: History and Meaning in the Sciences of Mind and Brain. London: Free Association Books; Berkeley: University of California Press.
Smith, Roger. 1997. The Fontana History of the Human Sciences. London: Fontana. Also published as The Norton History of the Human Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.
Roger, Smith, ed. 2005. Special issue, “Reflexivity.” History of the Human Sciences 18 (4).
Smith, Roger. 2007. Being Human: Historical Knowledge and the Creation of Human Nature. Manchester: Manchester University Press; New York: Columbia University Press.
Smith, Roger. 2013a. Free Will and the Human Sciences in Britain, 1870–1910. London: Pickering & Chatto.
Smith, Roger. 2013b. Between Mind and Nature: A History of Psychology. London: Reaktion Books.
Tauber, Alfred I. 1997. Science and the Quest for Reality. New York: New York University Press.
Thomson, Mathew. 2006. Psychological Subjects: Identity, Culture, and Health in Twentieth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Todes, Daniel P. 2002. Pavlov's Physiology Factory: Experiment, Interpretation, Laboratory Enterprise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Todes, Daniel P. Forthcoming. Ivan Pavlov: A Russian Life in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ward, James. 1886. “Psychology.” In Encyclopædia Britannica. 9th edition, vol. 20, 3785. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.
Young, Robert M. 1966. “Scholarship and the History of the Behavioural Sciences.” History of Science 5:151.
Young, Robert M. 1969. “Malthus and the Evolutionists: The Common Context of Biological and Social Theory.” Past & Present 43:109145.
Young, Robert M. 1973. “The Historiographic and Ideological Contexts of the Nineteenth-Century Debate on Man's Place in Nature.” In Changing Perspectives in the History of Science: Essays in Honour of Joseph Needham, edited by Teich, Mikuláš and Young, Robert M., 344438. London: Heinemann.
Young, Robert M. 2000. “Science and the Humanities in the Understanding of Human Nature.” Inaugural Lecture, University of Sheffield <http:/www.human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers> (last accessed August 15, 2013).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed