Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Why I Am a Presentist

  • Naomi Oreskes (a1)

Extract

Both geologists and historians study the past, but they have divergent views of the present. Geologists are unambiguously presentist. They believe that the observable present is a crucial resource in understanding the past, because in the observable present we can see and study the processes that have occurred in the unobservable past. For geologists, it is largely uncontroversial that the past not only can but should be interpreted with reference to the present.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Alvarez, W. 1986. “Toward a Theory of Impact Crises.” Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 67 (35):649658.
Boorstein, Daniel. 1989. Hidden History. New York: Vintage Press.
Brandt, Allan. 2004. “From Analysis to Advocacy: Crossing Boundaries as a Historian of Health Policy.” In Locating Medical History: The Stories and Their Meanings, edited by Huisman, Frank and Harley Warner, John, 460484. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Brysse, Keynyn, Oreskes, Naomi, O'Reilly, Jessica and Oppenheimer, Michael. 2012. “Climate Change Prediction: Erring on the Side of Least Drama?Global Environmental Change 23:327337. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378012001215 (last accessed August 15, 2013).
Butterfield, Herbert. 1965. The Whig Interpretation of History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cockell, Charles, Koeberl, Christian, and Gilmour, Iain, eds. 2010. Biological Studies Associated with Impact Events. New York and Heidelberg: Springer.
Culver, Stephen J. 2003. “Benthic foraminifera across the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary: A Review.” Marine Micropaleontology 47:177226.
Fine, Arthur. 1996. The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gavroglu, Kostas, and Renn, Jürgen, eds. 2010. Positioning the History of Science. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Glantz, Stanton A., Slade, John, Bero, Lisa A., and Hanauer, Peter. 1998. The Cigarette Papers. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Golan, Tal. 2004. Laws of Men and Laws of Nature: The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in England and America. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1965. “Is uniformitarianism necessary?American Journal of Science 263: 223228, http://www.ajsonline.org/content/263/3/223.abstract (last accessed June 28, 2013).
Le Goff, Jacques. 1996. History and Memory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Haraway, Donna J. 1990. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hindle, Brooke. 1984. “A Retrospective View of Science, Technology, and Material Culture in Early American History.” William and Mary Quarterly 41 (3):422435. http://xroads.virginia.edu/~DRBR/hindle.html (last accessed June 18, 2013).
Hookyaas, Reijer. 1963. Natural Law and Divine Miracle: The Principle of Uniformity in Geology, Biology and Theology. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Hubbert, M. King. 1967. “Critique of the principle of uniformity.” In Uniformity and Simplicity, edited by Albritton, Claude C., Geological Society of America, Special Paper 89:333.
Hut, Piet, et al. 1987. “Comet Showers as a Cause of Mass Extinction.” Nature 329:118126.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1984. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Keller, Evelyn Fox, and Longino, Helen, eds. 1996. Feminism and Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koeberl, Christian. 1996. “Chicxulub-the KT boundary impact crater: A review of the evidence and an introduction to impact crater studies.” Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt 53:2350.
Koeberl, Christian, and Reimold, Wolf Uwe. 2012. Meteorite Impact Structures: An Introduction to Impact Crater Studies. New York and Heidelberg: Springer.
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Newcomb, Sally. 1990. “Contributions of British Experimentalists to the Discipline of Geology 1780–1820.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 134 (2):161225.
Oldroyd, David. 1990. The Highlands Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Oreskes, Naomi. 1999. The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oreskes, Naomi. 2004. “The scientific consensus on climate change.” Science 306:1686.
Oreskes, Naomi. 2007, “From scaling to simulation: Changing meanings and ambitions of models in the Earth sciences.” In Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, and Exemplary Narratives, edited by Angela, N. H. Creager, Lunbeck, Elizabeth, and Norton Wise, M., 93124. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Oreskes, Naomi. 2013. “On the ‘reality’ and reality of anthropogenic climate change.” Climatic Change 119:559560, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-013-0779-3 (last accessed June 30, 2013).
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik M.. 2012. “Perspectives on global warming: A Book Symposium with Steven Yearley, David Mercer, and Andy Pitman.” Metascience 21:531559, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11016–011–9639–9 (last accessed July 17, 2013).
Oreskes, Naomi, and Doel, Ronald E.. 2002. “Physics and chemistry of the earth.” In The Cambridge History of Science, Volume V: Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences, edited by Mary, Jo Nye, 538552. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rampino, Michael, and Self, Stephen. 1993. “Bottleneck in human evolution and the Toba eruption (Letter).” Science 262:1955.
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 2010. Worlds Before Adam: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Secord, James. 1990. Controversy in Victorian Geology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shea, James H. 1982. “Twelve fallacies of uniformitarianism.” Geology 10:455460, http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/10/9/455.abstract (last accessed June 8, 2013).
Smit, J. 2002. “The Fate of Planktonic Foraminifers Crossing the KT Boundary (Or Not): A Review.” In Catastrophic Events and Mass Extinctions – Impacts and Beyond, edited by Christian, Koeberl and Macleod, Kenneth G., 204205. Boulder CO: Geological Society of America.
Solomon, Miriam. 2001. Social Empiricism. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Toon, Owen B., et al. 1997. “Environmental Perturbations Caused by the Impacts of Asteroids and Comets.” Reviews of Geophysics 35 (1):4178.
White, Richard. 2011. Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America. New York: W.W. Norton.
Wylie, Alison. 2002. Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed