Skip to main content Accessibility help

Why Is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Sciences? Some Preliminary Theses

  • Gyorgy Markus (a1)
Hide All
Ackerman, J. S., 1961. “Science and the Visual Arts,” in Seventeenth Century Science and the Arts, ed. Rhys, H. H., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Apel, K. O., 1983. “Comments on J. Farr, 1983,” Philosophy of Social Sciences 13.
Arendt, H., 1958. The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bachelard, G., 1938. La formation de I'esprit scientifique, Paris: Vrin.
Barnes, B., 1972. “On the Reception of Scientific Beliefs,” in Sociology of Science, ed. Barnes, B., Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bazerman, C., 1981. “What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse,” Phil. Soc. Sci. 11.
Bellone, E., 1980. A World on Paper, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ben-David, J., 1965. “The Scientific Role: The Conditions of Its Establishment in Europe,” Minerva 4.
Blumenberg, H., 1981. Die Lesbarkeit der Welt, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Bourdieu, P., 1975. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason,” Social Science Information 14.
Broadus, R. N., 1971. “The Literature of the Social Sciences,” International Social Science Journal 23.
Bush, D., 1950. Science and English Poetry, New York: Oxford University Press.
Callon, M., 1980. “Struggles and Negotiations to Define What Is Problematic and What Is Not,” in The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, ed. Knorr, K. D. et al. , Dordrecht: Reidel.
Cannon, S. F., 1978. Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period, New York: Dawson.
Collins, H. M., 1974. “The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks,” Science Studies 4.
Collins, H. M., 1975. “The Seven Sexes: A Study in the Sociology of a Phenomenon, or the Replication of Experiments in Physics,” Sociology 9.
Collins, H. M., 1981. “Son of Seven Sexes: The Social Destruction of a Physical Phenomenon,” Social Studies of Science 11.
Crombie, A. C., 1981. “Philosophical Presuppositions and Shifting Interpretations of Galileo,” in Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatic and Galileo's Methodology, ed. Hintikka, J. and Gruender, D., Dordrecht: Reidel, 1.
Curtius, E., 1948. Europaische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter, Bern: Francke.
Diemer, A., ed., 1978. Konzeption und Begriffder Forschung in den Wissenschaften des 19. Jahrhunderts, Meisenheim: Hain.
Dolby, R. G. A., 1971. “Sociology of Knowledge in Natural Sciences,” Sci. Stud. 1.
Dolby, R. G. A., 1982. “On the Anatomy of Pure Science,” in Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, ed. Elias, N. et al. , Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dosch, H. G., 1982. “Geschichtsbewusstsein in der Naturwissenschaft,” in Geschichtsbewusstsein und Rationalität, ed. Rudolph, E. and Stöve, E., Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Edge, D., 1979. “Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review,” History of Science 17.
Eisenstein, E. L., 1980. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elkana, Y., 1971. “Newtonianism in the Eighteenth Century,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22.
Elkana, Y., 1974. The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, London: Hutchinson.
Elkana, Y., 1981. “A Programmatic Attempt at an Anthropology of Knowledge,” in Sciences and Cultures, ed. Mendelsohn, E., and Elkana, Y., Dordrecht: Reidel.
Farr, J., 1983. “Popper's Hermeneutics,” Phil. Soc. Sci. 13.
Farrall, L. A., 1975. “Controversy and Conflict in Science: A Case Study,” Soc. Stud. Sci. 5.
Fontenelle, B. L. de, 1790. “Préface sur l'utilité des mathématiques et de la physique,” in Oeuvres, Paris: Bastien, 6.
Gadamer, H. G., 1975. Wahrheit und Methode, 4th ed., Tübingen: Mohr.
Gadamer, H. G., 1976. Vernunft im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Gage, J., 1983. “Newton and Painting,” in Common Denominators in Art and Science, ed. Pollock, M., Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Gilbert, N., 1976. “The Transformation of Research Findings into Scientific Knowledge,” Soc. Stud. Sci. 6.
Gilbert, N., 1977. “Referencing as Persuasion,” Soc. Stud. Sci. 7.
Gilbert, N., and Mulkay, M., 1980. “Contexts of Scientific Discourse: Social Accounting in Experimental Papers,” in The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, ed. Knorr, K. D. et al. , Dordrecht: Reidel.
Gilbert, N., and Mulkay, M., 1984. Opening Pandora's Box, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gillispie, C. C., 1959. “The Encyclopedic and Jacobin Philosophy of Science,” in Critical Problems in the History of Science, ed. Clagett, M., Madison: Wisconsin University Press.
Gopnik, M., 1972. Linguistic Structures in Scientific Texts, The Hague: Mouton.
Gouk, P. M., 1983. “The Union of Art and Science in the Eighteenth Century: L. Spengler, Artist, Turner and Natural Scientist,” Annals Sci. 40.
Guerlac, H., 1977. “Newton's Changing Reputation in the Eighteenth Century,” in Essays and Papers in the History of Modern Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gusfield, L. J., 1976. “The Literary Rhetorics of Science,” American Sociological Review 41.
Gutting, G., ed., 1980. Paradigms and Revolutions, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Habermas, J., 1971. “Die Universälitatsanspruch der Hermeneutik,” in Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hagstrom, W. O., 1965. The Scientific Community, New York: Basic Books.
Halliday, M. A. K., 1978. Language as Social Semiotics, London: Arnold.
Harvey, B., 1980. “The Effects of Social Context on the Process of Scientific Investigation,” in The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, ed. Knorr, K. D. et al. , Dordrecht: Reidel.
Healan, P. A., 1972. “Hermeneutics of Experimental Science in the Context of the Life-World,” Philosophia Mathematica 9.
Heimann, P. M., 1978. “Science and the English Enlightenment,” Hist. Sci. 16.
Henrichs, N., 1968. Bibliographic der Hermeneutik, München: Saur.
Hofstadter, A., 1955. “The Scientific and Literary Uses of Language,” in Symbols and Society, ed. Bryson, L., New York: Harper.
Holton, G., 1978. “Can Science Be Measured?” in Toward a Metric of Science, ed. Elkana, Y. et al. , New York: Wiley.
Holton, G. and Blanpied, G. A., eds., 1976. Science and Its Public: The Changing Relationship, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hume, D., 1748. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.
Jacob, J. R., 1978. “Boyle's Atomism and the Restoration Assault on Pagan Naturalism,” Soc. Stud. Sci. 8.
Jacob, J. R. and Jacob, M. C., 1976. “Seventeenth Century Science and Religion: The State of the Argument,” Hist. Sci. 14.
Jacob, M. C., 1971. “The Church and the Formulation of the Newtonian World-View,” Journal of European Studies 1.
Jacob, M. C., 1976. The Newtonians and the English Revolution, Hassocks: Harvester Press.
Jardine, N. A., 1981. “Philosophy of Science and the Art of Historical Interpretation,” in Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatic and Galileo's Methodology, ed. Hintikka, J., and Gruender, D., Dordrecht: Reidel, Vol. 1.
Jauss, H. R., 1970. Literaturgeschichte als Provokation, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Kant, I., 1790. Kritik der Urteilskraft.
Kisiel, T., 1974. “Comments on Healan, 1972,” Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4.
Kisiel, T., 1976. “Hermeneutic Models for the Natural Sciences,” in Phänomenologische Forschungen, ed. Orth, E. W., Freiburg: Alber, 2.
Kisiel, T., 1978. “Heidegger and the New Images of Science,” in Radical Phenomenology, ed. Sallis, J., Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
Knorr, K. D., 1975. “The Nature of Scientific Consensus and the Case of Social Sciences,” in Determinants and Controls of Scientific Development, ed. Knorr, K. D. et al. , Dordrecht: Reidel.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D., 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon.
Kuhn, T., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2d ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T., 1977. The Essential Tension, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakatoss, I., 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lammers, C. J., 1974. “Mono- and Poly-Paradigmatic Developments in Natural and Social Sciences,” in Social Process of Scientific Development, ed. Whitley, R., London: Routledge.
Latour, B. and Fabri, P., 1977. “La rhétoriquedela science,” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 13.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Fact, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lawrence, C., 1979. “The Nervous System and Society in the Scottish Enlightenment,” in Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, ed. Barnes, B. and Shapin, S., Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lepenies, W., 1979. “Der Wissenschaftler als Autor,” Akzente 25.
Leonardo da Vinci, , 1980. Notebooks, selected and edited by Richter, I. A., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGuire, J. E. and McEvoy, J. G., 1975. “God and Nature: Priestley's Way of Rational Dissent,” Historical Studies in Physical Science 6.
Markus, G., 1984. “Interpretations of, and Interpretation in Philosophy,” Critical Philosophy (Sydney) 1.
Marx, K., [1844] 1968. “Okonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte,” reprinted in Marx-Engels-Werke, Berlin: Dietz, 1.
Mendelsohn, E., 1964. “The Emergence of Science as a Profession in Nineteenth Century Europe,” in The Management of Scientists, ed. Hill, K., Boston: Beacon.
Mulkay, M., 1981. “Action and Belief or Scientific Discourse?Phil. Soc. Sci. 11.
Nelson, B., 1975. “Certitude and the Book of Scripture, Nature, and Conscience,” in The Nature of Scientific Discovery, ed. Gingerich, O., Washington: Smithsonian Institute.
Nicolson, M. H., 1946. Newton Demands the Muse, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Olschki, L., 1922. Geschichte der neusprachlichen wissenschaftlichen Literatur, Leipzig: Olschki, 2.
Oromaner, M., 1977. “The Career of Sociological Literature: A Diachronous Study,” Soc. Stud. Sci. 1.
Pickering, A., 1981. “The Hunting of the Quark,” Isis 72.
Polanyi, M., 1964. Personal Knowledge, New York: Harper.
Porter, R., 1978. “Gentlemen and Geology: The Emergence of a Scientific Career,” The Historical Journal 21.
Porter, R., 1980. “Science, Provincial Culture and Public Opinion in Enlightenment England,” British Journal of Eighteenth Century Studies 3.
Ricken, U., 1978. “Le champ lexical ‘science-litérature’ en Français et en Alle-mand,” Dix-Huitième Siècle 10.
Riedel, M., 1979. “Die Universalität der europäischen Wissenschaft als begriffs- und wissenschaftsgeschichtliches Problem, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschafts-theorie 10.
Riffaterre, M., 1983. Text Production, New York: Columbia University Press.
Ross, S., 1962. “Scientist: The Story of a Word,” Annals Sci. 18.
Rothacker, E., 1979. Das ‘Buch der Natur,’ Bonn: Bouvier.
Santillana, G. de, 1959. “The Role of Art in the Scientific Renaissance,” in Critical Problems in the History of Science, ed. Clagett, M., Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Schaffer, S., 1980. “Natural Philosophy,” in The Ferment of Knowledge, ed. Rousseau, G. S. and Porter, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schaffer, S., 1983. “Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century,” Hist. Sci. 21.
Schofield, R.E., 1978. “An Evolutionary Taxonomy of Eighteenth- Century Newtonianisms,” in Studies in the Eighteenth Century Culture, ed. Runte, R., Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 7.
Shapin, S., 1974. “The Audience for Science in Eighteenth Century Edinburgh,” Hist. Sci. 12.
Shapin, S., 1982. “History of Science and its Sociological Reconstruction,” Hist. Sci. 20.
Shapin, S., and Thackray, A., 1974. “Prosopography as a Research Tool in the History of Science,” Hist. Sci. 12.
Shils, E., 1981. Tradition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Silliman, R. H., 1973. “Fresnel and the Emergence of Physics as a Discipline,” Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 4.
Smith, C. W., 1978. “A New Chart for British Natural Philosophy,” Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 9.
Solla Price, D. J. de, 1970. “Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology and Nonscience,” in Communication among Scientists and Engineers, ed. Nelson, C. E., and Pollock, D. K., Lexington: Heath.
Stanzel, F. K., 1982. Theorie des Erzählens, 2d ed., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.
Tenbruck, F. H., 1975. “Fortschritt der Wissenschaft als Trivialisierungsprozess,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Sociologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 18.
Warning, R., ed., 1975. Rezeptionsästhetik: Theorie und Praxis, München: Fink.
Warning, R., 1983. “Der inszenierte Diskurs,” in Funktionen des Fiktiven, ed. Henrich, D. and Iser, W., München: Fink.
Whitley, R., 1977. “Changes in the Social and Intellectual Organisation of Sciences,” in The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, ed. Mendelsohn, E. et al. , Dordrecht: Reidel.
Woolgar, S., 1980. “Discovery: Logic and Sequence in a Scientific Text,” in The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, ed. Knorr, K. D. et al. , Dordrecht: Reidel.
Zons, R. S., 1983. “Über den Ursprung des literarischen Werks aus dem Geist der Autorschaft,” in Kolloquium Kunst und Philosophic, ed. Oelmüller, W., München: Schöningh, 3.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed