Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T10:42:42.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to Webster and Lauber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Alyssa Lyra Pitstick*
Affiliation:
Hope College, PO Box 9000, Holland, MI 49422-9000, USApitstick@hope.edu

Extract

Given the extent of agreement between Dr Webster and myself, his article suggests how this topic may promote ecumenical reappropriation of our common Christian heritage. Now if we can only get the Catholics to agree among themselves. . . Seriously, however, he has identified the fundamental questions of my book: what are our doctrinal commitments as Christians, and do we take them seriously enough to accept that not all positions are compatible with them? Are we consequently willing to set aside some propositions, or even adopt others?

Type
Response
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Paul J. Griffiths, ‘Is There a Doctrine of the Descent into Hell?’, in Pro Ecclesia, 17/3 (Summer 2008), pp. 257–68, and presented in an earlier version at the Barth Society in San Diego, 2007, in conjunction with papers from Webster and Lauber. This article responds to all three papers.