No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Protestant-Roman Catholic Encounter
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
When Hans Küng published his first major work Rechtfertigung—die Lehre Karl Barths und eine katholische Besinnung1 in 1957 great interest was aroused among Roman Catholic as well as Protestant theologians. The book represents a theological orientation which may be regarded as a new phase in the Roman Catholic encounter with Protestantism. Küng, whose orthodoxy has not been questioned by any of his Roman Catholic reviewers, argues that the Barthian and Roman doctrines of justification are in fundamental agreement. The sola fide and the simul Justus et peccator of the Reformation are, according to Küng, also Roman doctrines. Grace, he avers, is not a habitus in man but is the graciousness and favour of God. Justification is therefore primarily a matter of God ‘declaring man righteous’ and only because of this, ‘making him so’. Forgiveness and imputation of righteousness are thus given the primacy denied to them by Roman theology from the Middle Ages to the present day. Küng's Christocentrism determines his interpretation of the biblical witness: the sinner is declared and made righteous in the death and resurrection of Christ so that the sola fide is sustained in and by the sola iustitia Christi. Whether Küng's claim that the Fathers of Trent actually taught the doctrine of justification, merely shifting the emphasis from the one-sided theocentrism of the Reformation to a more biblical anthropocentrism is historically defensible, is not the point at issue in this context.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1963
References
page 21 ntoe 1 Küng, Hans, Rechtfertigung—die Lehre Karl Barths und eine katholische Besinnung. Mit einem Geleitbrief von Karl Barth, Einsiedeln, 1957.Google Scholar
page 22 note 1 pp. II-12.
page 22 note 2 Schütte, Heinz, Um die Wiedervereinigung im Glauben, third enlarged edition, Essen, 1960.Google Scholar
page 22 note 3 Bouyer, Louis, The Spirit and Forms of Protestantism, Westminster, Md., 1956.Google Scholar
page 22 note 4 Hans Küng, op. cit., p. 274.
page 22 note 5 Küng, Hans, The Council and Reunion, translated by Hastings, Cecily, London and New York, 1961.Google Scholar
page 23 note 1 The Council and Reunion, p. 3.
page 23 note 2 p. 105.
page 23 note 3 p. 145.
page 23 note 4 The Council and Reunion, p. 68.
page 23 note 5 The Council and Reunion, p. 278.
page 23 note 6 The Council and Reunion, pp. 68–69.
page 24 note 1 Küng, Hans, Konzil und Wiedervereinigung, Erneuerung als Ruf in die Einheit, 2nd edition, Wien-Freiburg-Basel, 1960, p. 66.Google Scholar
page 24 note 2 Quoted from von Loewenich, Walther, Modern Catholicism, translated by Fuller, Reginald H., London, 1959, p. 298.Google Scholar
page 25 note 1 In Christianity Divided, Protestant and Roman Catholic Theological Issues, edited by Callahan, Daniel J., Oberman, Heiko A., and O'Hanlon, Daniel J., S.J., New York, 1961, p. 323.Google Scholar
page 25 note 2 The Council and Reunion, p. 40.
page 25 note 3 The Council and Reunion, p. 50.
page 25 note 4 The Council and Reunion, p. 51.
page 26 note 1 The Council and Reunion, p. 86.
page 26 note 2 The Council and Reunion, p. 78.
page 26 note 3 The Council and Reunion, p. 78.
page 26 note 4 The Council and Reunion, p. 79.
page 26 note 5 pp. 117–118.
page 26 note 6 The Council and Reunion, p. 106.
page 27 note 1 p. 118.
page 28 note 1 Feckes, Carl, Zur Kommenden Definierung der Himmelfahrt Mariens, Leutersdorf am Rhein, 1950, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
page 29 note 1 pp. 188–9.
page 29 note 2 P. 193.
page 29 note 3 Mystici Corporis quoted from von Loewenich, Walther, op. cit., pp. 147–148.Google Scholar
page 29 note 4 Schmaus, Michael, Katholische Dogmatik I, 2nd edition, München, 1940, p. 35.Google Scholar
page 29 note 5 Christianity Divided, p. 183.
page 30 note 1 p. 184.
page 30 note 2 p. 185.
page 30 note 3 p. 185.
page 30 note 4 Schmaus, Michael, Katholische Dogmatik, III, 1, 5th edition, München, 1958, p. 488.Google Scholar
page 30 note 5 The Council and Reunion, p. 206.