Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Voorhoeve, Alex 2016. Why One Should Count Only Claims with which One Can Sympathize. Public Health Ethics, p. phw006.


    Cowell, Frank A. Fleurbaey, Marc and Tungodden, Bertil 2015. The tyranny puzzle in social preferences: an empirical investigation. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 765.


    Voorhoeve, Alex 2013. VAULTING INTUITION: TEMKIN'S CRITIQUE OF TRANSITIVITY. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 29, Issue. 03, p. 409.


    Cendales, Andrés 2012. Vote buying, political patronage and selective plunder. Latin American Journal of Economics, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 237.


    ×

ON THE POSSIBILITY OF NONAGGREGATIVE PRIORITY FOR THE WORST OFF

  • Marc Fleurbaey (a1), Bertil Tungodden (a2) and Peter Vallentyne (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509090116
  • Published online: 24 November 2008
Abstract
Abstract

We address the question of whether there is a prioritarian moral theory that both (1) avoids giving absolute priority to the worst off (as leximin does) but (2) does not allow arbitrarily small benefits to enough extremely affluent people to take priority over a significant benefit to a worst off person in abject poverty. We argue that this is possible only if one rejects some seemingly plausible conditions.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

David Brink , “The Separateness of Persons, Distributive Norms, and Moral Theory,” in R. G. Frey and C. W. Morris , eds., Value, Welfare, and Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 252–89

Rahul Kumar , “Contractualism on Saving the Many,” Analysis 61 (2001): 165–70

Alastair Norcross , “Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1997): 135–67

Michael Otsuka , “Scanlon and the Claims of the Many Versus the One,” Analysis 60 (2000): 288–93

Michael Otsuka , “Skepticism about Saving the Greater Number,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (2004): 413–26

Michael Otsuka , “Saving Lives, Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2006): 109–35

Derek Parfit , “Justifiability to Each Person,” Ratio 16 (2003): 368–90

T. M. Scanlon , “Replies,” Ratio 16 (2003): 424–39

Amartya Sen , “Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination,” Econometrica 45 (1977): 5389

Peter Vallentyne , “Two Types of Moral Dilemmas,” Erkenntnis 30 (1989): 301–18

Bertil Tungodden and Peter Vallentyne , “On the Possibility of Paretian Egalitarianism,” Journal of Philosophy 102 (2005): 126–54

Graham Loomes and Robert Sugden , “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty,” Economic Journal 92 (1982): 805–24

Robert Sugden , “Why Be Consistent? A Critical Analysis of Consistency Requirements in Choice Theory,” Economica, new series, vol. 52 (1985): 167–83

Amartya Sen , “Internal Consistency of Choice,” Econometrica 61 (1993): 495521

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Philosophy and Policy
  • ISSN: 0265-0525
  • EISSN: 1471-6437
  • URL: /core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×