Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-tlg78 Total loading time: 5.033 Render date: 2021-05-13T07:42:47.631Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Beyond Virtual Inclusion – Communications Inclusion and Digital Divisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2010

Stephen Sinclair
Affiliation:
Glasgow Caledonian University, W502a, Hamish Wood Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK E-mail: stephen.sinclair@gcu.ac.uk
Glen Bramley
Affiliation:
Glasgow Caledonian University, W502a, Hamish Wood Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK E-mail: stephen.sinclair@gcu.ac.uk
Corresponding

Abstract

Access to and engagement with information and communications technologies (ICTs) are increasingly important aspects of social inclusion. This paper draws upon analyses of UK survey data and a review of research on communications and social exclusion published in the UK between 2001 and 2006 to examine the social distribution of access to and uptake of ICTs and to explore key factors restricting the digital engagement of young people from lower income households and communities. It argues that effective strategies to bridge digital divisions in the UK must pay more attention to the social rather than technological barriers which inhibit communications inclusion.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Avery, V., Chamberlain, E., Summerfield, C. and Zealey, L. (eds.) (2007), Focus on the Digital Age, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan/Office of Public Sector Information.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1998), Social Exclusion, Social Isolation and the Distribution of Income, CASEpaper 12, London: LSE.Google Scholar
Bartley, M. (2006), Capability and Resilience: Beating the Odds, London: UCL Dept of Epidemiology and Public Health/ESRC.Google Scholar
Becker, H. (2000), ‘Who's wired and who's not: children's use of computer technology: the future of children’, Children and Technology, 10, 2, 4475.Google ScholarPubMed
BECTA (2005), A Good Start: Using ICT to Enable Social Inclusion in Primary Schools, Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.Google Scholar
BECTA (2009), The Impact of Digital Technology: A Review of the Evidence of the Impact of Digital Technologies on Formal Education, Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.Google Scholar
Calvert, K. (2007), ‘Community planning: double vision’, New Start, 13 April, 16.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2005), ‘Geographies of welfare and exclusion: initial report’, Progress in Human Geography, 29, 2, 194203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citizens Online/National Centre for Social Research (2008), Digital Exclusion Profiling of Vulnerable Groups: Young People not in Education, Employment or Training – a Profile, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Condie, R. and Munro, B. (2007), The Impact of ICT in Schools: A Landscape Review, Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.Google Scholar
Cringely, R. X. (1996), Accidental Empires: How the Boys of Silicon Valley Make their Millions, Battle Foreign Competition, and Still Can't Get a Date, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills (2005), Fulfulling the Potential: Transforming Teaching and Learning Through ICT in Schools, London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Department of Communities and Local Government (2008a), Delivering Digital Inclusion: An Action Plan for Consultation, London: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Department of Communities and Local Government (2008b), Communities in Control: Real People, Real Power, London: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Department of Trade and Industry (2005), Connecting the UK: The Digital Strategy, London: Department of Trade and Industry/Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Digital Inclusion Panel (2004), Enabling a Digitally United Kingdom: A Framework for Action, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Dutton, W., Helsper, E. and Gerber, M. (2009), The Internet in Britain in 2009, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.Google Scholar
Empirica, and Work Research Centre (2006), Thematic Study to Analyse Policy Measures to Promote Access to Information Technologies as a Means of Combating Social Exclusion, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.Google Scholar
Facer, K. and Furlong, R. (2001), ‘Beyond the myth of the “cyberkid”: young people at the margins of the information revolution’, Journal of Youth Studies, 4, 4, 451–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facer, K., Sutherland, R., Furlong, R. and Furlong, J. (2001), ‘What's the point of using computers? The development of young people's computer expertise in the home’, New Media Society, 3, 2, 199219.Google Scholar
Financial Inclusion Taskforce (2010), Mainstreaming Financial Inclusion: Managing Money and Access to Banking, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Foley, P. (2004), ‘Does the internet help to overcome social exclusion?’, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2, 2, 139–45.Google Scholar
Fox, K. (2001), Evolution, Alienation and Gossip: The Role of Mobile Telecommunications in the 21st Century, Oxford: Social Issues Research Centre.Google Scholar
Furlong, J., Furlong, R., Facer, K. and Sutherland, R. (2000), ‘The National Grid for learning: a curriculum without walls?’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, 1, 91111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Future Foundation (2004), The Digital Divide in 2025, London: British Telecom.Google Scholar
Gochenour, P. H. (2006), ‘Distributed communities and nodal subjects’, New Media & Society, 8, 1, 3351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, J., Whitworth, A., Walker, R., McLennan, D. and Noble, M. (2008), Person or Place-Based Policies to Tackle Disadvantage? Not Knowing What Works, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, Aitken (2003), Evaluation of CMF Funded UK Online Centres, final report, Glasgow: Hall Aitken.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. (2006), ‘Inequality and the knowledge economy: running to stand still?’, Social Policy and Society, 5, 2, 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, R. (1996), ‘The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony’, Critical Social Policy, 16, 46, 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S. and Bober, M. (2004), ‘Taking up online opportunities? Children's uses of the internet for education, communication and participation’, E-Learning and Digital Media, 1, 3, 395419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S. and Bober, M. (2005), UK Children Go Online: A Final Report of Key Project Findings, London: London School of Economics Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
Loader, B. D. and Keeble, L. (2004), Challenging the Digital Divide? A Literature Review of Community Informatics Initiatives, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Ofcom (2009a), ‘Media literacy tracker 2009, wave 1 tables – children and parents’, http://ww2.elitetele.com/p/ofcom-office-official-statistics/7395 (accessed 19 April 2010).Google Scholar
Ofcom (2009b), ‘Ofcom technology tracker Q1, 2009’, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/stats/Q1_Tech_Tracker_2009.pdf (accessed 19 April 2010).Google Scholar
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2009), ‘Internet access households and individuals 2009’, Statistical Bulletin, http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/iahi0809.pdf (accessed 19 April 2010).Google Scholar
Page, R. (2006), Respect and Renewal: A Study of Neighbourhood Social Regeneration, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Schmitt, J. and Wadsworth, J. (2004), Is There an Impact of Household Computer Ownership on Children's Educational Attainment in Britain? Discussion Paper No. 625, London: Centre for Economic Performance.Google Scholar
Scottish Executive (2006), Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006: General Report, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
Scottish Government (2009), Scottish Household Survey: Annual Report 2007–08, web tables, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/16002/WebTablesAnnual2008 (accessed 19 April 2010).Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2002), ‘“E-stablishing” an inclusive society? Technology, social exclusion and UK government policy making’, Journal of Social Policy, 31, 1, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2004), ‘Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide’, New Media & Society, 6, 3, 341–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, S., Bramley, G., Dobbie, L. and Gillespie, M. (2007), Social Inclusion and Communications: A Review of the Literature, London: Ofcom Consumer Panel.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. and Crush, D. (2005), Inclusion through Innovation: Tackling Social Exclusion through New Technologies – Qualitative Research Report, London: Social Exclusion Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1976), Sociology and Social Policy, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vaitilingam, R. and Woolgar, S. (2000), ‘@Ccess for all won't close the digital divide’, The Edge, 3, 1213.Google Scholar
Van Winden, W. (2001), ‘The end of social exclusion? On information technology policy as a key to social inclusion in large European cities’, Regional Studies, 35, 9, 861–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, J. (2005), ‘Reaching out to digital refuseniks’, BBC News Online, 19 June, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4092750.stm (accessed 19 September 2008).Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2004), Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2006), ‘Can ICT reduce social exclusion? The case of an adults’ English language learning programme’, British Educational Research Journal, 32, 3, 481507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Beyond Virtual Inclusion – Communications Inclusion and Digital Divisions
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Beyond Virtual Inclusion – Communications Inclusion and Digital Divisions
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Beyond Virtual Inclusion – Communications Inclusion and Digital Divisions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *